In Utero Exposure to Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Offspring Neurodevelopment at 12 and 18 Months.

Importance: Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines among pregnant individuals was hampered by safety concerns around potential risks to unborn children. Data clarifying early neurodevelopmental outcomes of offspring exposed to COVID-19 vaccination in utero are lacking. Objective: To determine whether in utero exposure to maternal COVID-19 vaccination was associated with differences in scores on the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, third edition (ASQ-3), at 12 and 18 months of age. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study, Assessing the Safety of Pregnancy During the Coronavirus Pandemic (ASPIRE), enrolled pregnant participants from May 2020 to August 2021; follow-up of children from these pregnancies is ongoing. Participants, which included pregnant individuals and their offspring from all 50 states, self-enrolled online. Study activities were performed remotely. Exposure: In utero exposure of the fetus to maternal COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was compared with those unexposed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Neurodevelopmental scores on validated ASQ-3, completed by birth mothers at 12 and 18 months. A score below the established cutoff in any of 5 subdomains (communication, gross motor, fine motor, problem solving, social skills) constituted an abnormal screen for developmental delay. Results: A total of 2487 pregnant individuals (mean [SD] age, 33.3 [4.2] years) enrolled at less than 10 weeks' gestation and completed research activities, yielding a total of 2261 and 1940 infants aged 12 and 18 months, respectively, with neurodevelopmental assessments. In crude analyses, 471 of 1541 exposed infants (30.6%) screened abnormally for developmental delay at 12 months vs 203 of 720 unexposed infants (28.2%; χ2 = 1.32; P = .25); the corresponding prevalences at 18 months were 262 of 1301 (20.1%) vs 148 of 639 (23.2%), respectively (χ2 = 2.35; P = .13). In multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusting for maternal age, race, ethnicity, education, income, maternal depression, and anxiety, no difference in risk for abnormal ASQ-3 screens was observed at either time point (12 months: adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.97-1.33; 18 months: aRR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07). Further adjustment for preterm birth and infant sex did not affect results (12 months: aRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.98-1.36; 18 months: aRR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.07). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that COVID-19 vaccination was safe during pregnancy from the perspective of infant neurodevelopment to 18 months of age. Additional longer-term research should be conducted to corroborate these findings and buttress clinical guidance with a strong evidence base.

Exploratory cohort study into underlying mechanism of differences in estrogen metabolism between Asian and Caucasian women during assisted reproductive technology treatment.

Objective: Explore whether racial differences in prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism underlies estrogen metabolism differences among Asians and Caucasians. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: University-based fertility practice. Patients: Asian or Caucasian patients who underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) or programmed cycle frozen embryo transfer (FET) between October 2019 and April 2021. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Trigger-day serum E2 per oocyte retrieved in OS cycles, and E2 on day of lining check in FET cycles. Results: Seventy-one participants were enrolled, 55 in OS group (29 Caucasian and 26 Asian) and 16 in FET group (10 Caucasian and 6 Asian). Peak E2 per oocyte retrieved in the OS group (n = 48) differed by race, with significantly lower levels in Caucasians compared with Asians (177.5 ± 64.2 vs. 261.1 ± 139.5 pg/mL). Prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism did not significantly differ by race. Compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, peak E2 per oocyte retrieved did not differ by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. In multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for body mass index, caffeine intake, and self-reported race, there remained no significant correlation. In FET group, serum E2 on day of lining check was also not significantly different by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. Conclusions: Although a consistent difference in serum E2 between Asians and Caucasians undergoing OS was noted, the CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism is unlikely the primary driver of this difference.

Early pregnancy anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: preliminary findings from the UCSF ASPIRE study.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal anxiety has been linked to adverse obstetric outcomes, including miscarriage and preterm birth. However, most studies investigating anxiety during pregnancy, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, have focused on symptoms during the second and third trimester. This study aims to describe the prevalence of anxiety symptoms early in pregnancy and identify predictors of early pregnancy anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We assessed baseline moderate-to-severe anxiety symptoms after enrollment in the UCSF ASPIRE (Assessing the Safety of Pregnancy in the Coronavirus Pandemic) Prospective Cohort from May 2020 through February 2021. Pregnant persons < 10 weeks' gestation completed questions regarding sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric/medical history, and pandemic-related experiences. Univariate and multivariate hierarchical logistic regression analyses determined predictors of moderate or severe anxiety symptoms (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 questionnaire score ≥ 10). All analyses performed with Statistical Analysis Software (SAS®) version 9.4. RESULTS: A total of 4,303 persons completed the questionnaire. The mean age of this nationwide sample was 33 years of age and 25.7% of participants received care through a fertility clinic. Over twelve percent of pregnant persons reported moderate-to-severe anxiety symptoms. In univariate analysis, less than a college education (p < 0.0001), a pre-existing history of anxiety (p < 0.0001), and a history of prior miscarriage (p = 0.0143) were strong predictors of moderate-to-severe anxiety symptoms. Conversely, having received care at a fertility center was protective (26.6% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.0009). COVID-19 related stressors including job loss, reduced work hours during the pandemic, inability to pay rent, very or extreme worry about COVID-19, and perceived stress were strongly predictive of anxiety in pregnancy (p < 0.0001). In the hierarchical logistic regression model, pre-existing history of anxiety remained associated with anxiety during pregnancy, while the significance of the effect of education was attenuated. CONCLUSION(S): Pre-existing history of anxiety and socioeconomic factors likely exacerbated the impact of pandemic-related stressors on early pregnancy anxiety symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite on-going limitations for in-person prenatal care administration, continued emotional health support should remain an important focus for providers, particularly when caring for less privileged pregnant persons or those with a pre-existing history of anxiety.

Is Preimplantation Genetic Testing Associated with Increased Risk of Abnormal Placentation After Frozen Embryo Transfer?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with abnormal placentation among a cohort of pregnancies conceived after frozen embryo transfer (FET). STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of women who conceived via FET at the University of California, San Francisco from 2012 to 2016 with resultant delivery at the same institution. The primary outcome was abnormal placentation, including placenta accreta, retained placenta, abruption, placenta previa, vasa previa, marginal or velamentous cord insertion, circumvallate placenta, circummarginate placenta, placenta membranacea, bipartite placenta, and placenta succenturiata. Diagnosis was confirmed by reviewing imaging, delivery, and pathology reports. Our secondary outcome was hypertensive disease of pregnancy. RESULTS: A total of 311 pregnancies were included in analysis; 158 (50.8%) underwent PGT. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between groups except for age at conception and infertility diagnosis. Women with PGT were more likely to undergo single embryo transfer (82.3 vs. 64.1%, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of the primary outcome (26.6 vs. 27.4%, p = 0.86) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (33.5 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.97), which remained true after multivariate analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: Among pregnancies conceived after FET, PGT is not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of abnormal placentation or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. KEY POINTS: · In pregnancies conceived by FET, PGT is not associated with increased risk of abnormal placentation.. · In pregnancies conceived by FET, PGT is not associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders.. · Differences in outcomes of PGT pregnancies may be related to FET rather than trophectoderm biopsy..

Highly elevated level of antimüllerian hormone associated with preterm delivery in polycystic ovary syndrome patients who underwent ovulation induction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between high antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels and increased preterm delivery risk in populations of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or unexplained infertility undergoing ovulation induction. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from two multicenter randomized clinical trials: Pregnancy in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome II (PPCOS II); and Assessment of Multiple Intrauterine Gestations from Ovarian Stimulation (AMIGOS). SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENTS: Live births at ≥24 weeks' gestation from both the PPCOS II (n = 172) and AMIGOS (n = 222) cohorts were evaluated, and those at risk for iatrogenic preterm delivery including placental conditions, fetal growth restriction, multiple gestations, hypertensive diseases of pregnancy, and pre-gestational diabetes were excluded. The final analysis included 118 women with PCOS from the PPCOS II cohort and 146 women with unexplained infertility from the AMIGOS cohort. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Spontaneous preterm delivery. RESULTS: In the PCOS population, median AMH overall was 5.5 ng/dL (interquartile range 2.9-9.3 ng/dL). In all, 62% of participants who delivered preterm had AMH levels above the 75th percentile. When comparing clinical covariates between the preterm and term deliveries, women with PCOS who delivered preterm had notably higher AMH than their term counterparts (11.1 vs. 5.4 ng/mL). In the univariate logistic regression analysis, each unit increase in AMH raised the odds of preterm delivery by 14% (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.26). The effect was magnified only after adjusting for age, race, body mass index, smoking status, testosterone, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance, and treatment randomization group (adjusted odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.49). Unlike in the PCOS population, the unexplained infertility cohort had no significant difference in AMH levels between those with or without preterm delivery (2.3 vs. 2.6 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that women with PCOS and high AMH who conceived after ovulation induction represent a high-risk group for preterm delivery. These data indicate that closer monitoring in the third trimester of pregnancies in PCOS patients with early first trimester AMH levels above 9.3 ng/mL may be warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01044862.

Perceptions, motivations and decision regret surrounding preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a difference in level of decision regret following IVF treatment between those who choose to complete or not complete preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy [PGT-A]? SUMMARY ANSWER: Approximately one-third of the participants expressed moderate to severe regret (MSR) following their decision to either complete or not complete PGT-A; notably, decision regret was higher in those who chose not to complete PGT-A, primarily driven by significantly higher regret scores in those that experienced a miscarriage after not testing. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Previous research has found that 39% of participants who completed PGT-A expressed some degree of decision regret and that negative clinical outcomes, such as lack of euploid embryos, negative pregnancy test or miscarriage, were associated with a higher level of decision regret. To date, there are no published studies assessing the possible disparity in decision regret surrounding PGT-A in a population of IVF patients that either chose to pursue PGT-A or not. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: An anonymous online survey was distributed to 1583 patients who underwent IVF with or without PGT-A at a single university institution between January 2016 and December 2017. In total, 335 women accessed the survey, 220 met eligibility criteria and 130 completed the full study survey. Six participants were excluded due to refusal of medical record review, and nine participants were excluded after record review due to not meeting eligibility based on cycle start date or completing only embryo banking without attempting transfer. One hundred and fifteen participants were included in the final analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Of the 115 participants included, 55 (48%) completed PGT-A and 60 (52%) did not complete PGT-A. The online survey included four sections: Demographics; Perceptions about PGT-A risks and benefits [scale from 0 (absolutely not true) to 100 (absolutely true)]; Decision-making factors [scale from 0 (not important) to 100 (very important)]; and Brehaut Decision Regret Scale [DRS] [range 0-100, with >25 indicating MSR]. A retrospective chart review was conducted to confirm study eligibility and collect cumulative clinical outcomes of consenting participants who completed the survey. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Demographics of the PGT-A and no PGT-A cohorts were similar, with the majority of respondents being Caucasian or Asian, unaffiliated with any religion and with a graduate or professional degree. The two groups differed significantly in mean age, with the PGT-A group being slightly older (mean ± SD: 37 ± 3.7 versus 36 ± 3.4; P = 0.048), and in rate of miscarriages, with fewer participants in the PGT-A cohort experiencing a miscarriage (5% versus 22%; P = 0.012). The majority of participants in both PGT-A and no PGT-A cohorts strongly believed in the purported benefits of PGT-A, including that it decreases the risk of birth defects (median 82 versus 77; P = 0.046), improves the chances of having a healthy baby (median 89 versus 74; P = 0.002) and selects the best embryo for transfer (median 85 versus 80; P = 0.049). When asked to report their motivating factors for decision-making, both groups cited physician counseling as important (median 70 versus 71; P = 0.671); however, the PGT-A cohort was more strongly motivated by a desire to not transfer abnormal embryos (median 84 versus 53; P = 0.0001). Comparison of DRS score between those who did or did not undergo PGT-A showed significantly higher median DRS score after not completing PGT-A (median 15 versus 0; P = 0.013). There was a significantly higher proportion of participants who did not complete PGT-A that expressed mild (36% versus 16%) and MSR (32% versus 24%) compared to those who completed PGT-A (χ2 = 9.03, df = 2; P = 0.011). Sub-group analyses of DRS scores by outcomes of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth revealed that the higher DRS score in those not completing PGT-A was driven by a large increase in regret noted by those with history of a miscarriage (median 45 versus 0; P = 0.018). Multivariate logistic regression modeling found no evidence that any specific demographic factor, clinical outcome or perception/motivation surrounding PGT-A was independently predictive of increased risk for MSR. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of data collection incurs the possibility of sampling and recall bias. As only 59% of eligible respondents completed the full survey, it is possible that mainly those with very positive or negative sentiments following treatment felt compelled to complete their response. This bias, however, would apply to the whole of the population, and not simply to those who did or did not complete PGT-A. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The proportion of participants expressing any degree of decision regret in this PGT-A cohort was 40%, which is comparable to that shown in prior research. This study adds to prior data by also assessing decision regret experienced by those who went through IVF without PGT-A, and showed that 68% expressed some level of regret with their decision-making. These results should not be interpreted to mean that all patients should opt for PGT-A to pre-emptively mitigate their risk of regret. Instead, it suggests that drivers of decision regret are likely multifactorial and unique to the experience of one's personal expectations regarding PGT-A, motivations for pursuing or not pursuing it and resultant clinical outcome. Highlighting the complex nature of regret, these data should encourage physicians to more carefully consider individual patient values toward risk-taking or risk-averse behavior, as well as their own positions regarding PGT-A. Until there are clear recommendations regarding utilization of PGT-A, a strong collaboration between physicians and genetic counselors is recommended to educate patients on the risks and potential benefits of PGT-A in a balanced and individualized manner. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was utilized for study completion and the authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Earlier day of blastocyst development is predictive of embryonic euploidy across all ages: essential data for physician decision-making and counseling patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether day of blastocyst development is associated with embryo chromosomal status as determined by high-density oligonucleotide microarray comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis, including women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) with trophectoderm biopsy at a single private fertility center from January 2014 to December 2014. Repeat cycles were excluded. Cycles were assessed for percentage of blastocysts biopsied on days 5, 6, or 7 and rate of euploid embryos per cycle. Cycles were stratified by Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) age groups (< 35, 35-37, 38-40, 41-42, > 42) and by donor status. RESULTS: A total of 388 IVF cycles and 2132 biopsied blastocysts were evaluated. The percentages of blastocysts biopsied on days 5, 6, and 7 were 62.5, 35.8, and 1.7%, respectively. Blastocyst euploid rates on days 5, 6, and 7 were 49.5, 36.5, and 32.9%, respectively. Earlier blastocyst development was associated with a significantly increased euploid rate (p < 0.0001). Younger maternal age (p < 0.0001) and higher number of blastocysts biopsied per patient (p = 0.0063) were both independently associated with greater percentage of euploidy. CONCLUSIONS: Earlier blastocyst development is independently associated with a higher likelihood of embryonic euploidy in both autologous and donor embryos. In non-biopsied embryos, these data support selection of day 5 blastocysts for transfer over later-developing embryos. These results can assist with patient counseling regarding expectations and outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine embryonic euploidy as stratified by both day of blastocyst development and SART age group.

Attributes That Fellowship Directors Value in the Selection of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Fellows.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate which attributes of reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) fellowship applicants are most valued by fellowship program directors during the match process. STUDY DESIGN: An electronic survey was administered to determine characteristics most favored by program directors in the selection of REI fellows. A 5-point Likert scale was utilized to rank characteristics, with 1 being "most important" and 5 being" least important." The main outcome measures were factors desired by REI fellowship directors. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 61%. Objective factors that ranked highly were training at a competitive obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) residency program, and clinical or basic science research experience. First authorship research ranked favorably regardless of whether it was in the form of a peer-reviewed paper, oral presentation, or poster abstract. Personal interview and perceived ability to work well with others were subjective factors considered favorably by REI fellowship directors. CONCLUSION: When selecting REI fellows for interviews, fellowship directors value candidates who have trained at competitive OB/GYN residency programs, who have clinical or basic science research experience, and who have contributed to scientific literature as first author. When subsequently ranking fellowship applicants, however, the most important factors are those found in the interview process, such as identification as a "team player".

Incidence of patent foramen ovale and migraine headache in adults with congenital heart disease with no known cardiac shunts.

The purpose of this study was to understand why patients with adult congenital heart disease (CHD) but no obvious shunt have an increased frequency of migraine headaches (MH). CHD patients with no known cardiac shunts (CHD-NKS), based on their echocardiographic or angiographic procedures, were tested for a right-to-left shunt using agitated saline contrast transcranial Doppler (TCD). Medical records of 2,920 patients from the UCLA Adult CHD Center were screened to participate in a study to evaluate the prevalence of MH in adults with CHD; 182 patients (6.23%) had CHD-NKS; of these, 60 (30%) underwent a TCD; 23 (38%) tested positive and 37 (62%) tested negative for a right-to-left shunt (P = 0.01 compared with controls). The frequency of MH was 43% in CHD-NKS compared with 11% in controls (P < 0.0001). TCD demonstrated right-to-left shunting in approximately 2/3 of patients with pulmonary stenosis, the Marfan syndrome and congenitally corrected transposition of great vessels, 1/4 of patients with bicuspid aortic valve, 1/5 of patients with mitral valve prolapse and all patients with Ebstein's anomaly. Approximately half of these experienced MH. Patients who had MH did not show a higher frequency of right-to-left shunt when compared with patients without MH (P = 0.57). In conclusion, CHD patients with conditions usually not associated with a shunt have a higher than expected prevalence of PFO which permits intermittent right-to-left shunting undetected by standard non-contrast TTE and TEE; the increased prevalence of right-to-left shunting may partially explain the higher than expected frequency of migraines.