RESUMO
Objective:To investigate the anatomic classification and reconstruction of right intrahepatic bile duct in the donor liver of split liver transplantation (SLT).Methods:The retrospective and descriptive study was constructed. The clinical data of 85 patients who underwent SLT in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from July 2014 to January 2022 were collected. There were 65 males and 20 females, aged 45(range, 1-82)years. Observation indicators: (1) surgical conditions; (2) anatomy of right intrahepatic bile duct; (3) bile duct reconstruction; (4) postoperative biliary complications; (5) follow-up. Measurement data with normal distribution were represented as Mean± SD, and measurement data with skewed distribution were represented as M(range) or M( Q1, Q3).Count data were described as absolute numbers or percentages, and comparison between groups was conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher exact probability. Results:(1) Surgical conditions. Of the 85 donor livers, 11 donor livers were split between the left and right hemilivers, and 74 donor livers were split between the classic right trilobe and left lateral lobe. The cold ischemia time of 85 donor livers was 291(273, 354)minutes, and the operation time, anhepatic phase time and volume of intraoperative blood transfusion of 85 recipients were (497±97)minutes, 51(40, 80)minutes and 8(7, 12)U. (2) Anatomy of right intrahepatic bile duct. Of the 85 donor livers, there were 47 donor livers with classic bile duct anatomical model (type 1), of the ratio as 55.3%(47/85), and 38 donor livers with anatomical variants, of the ratio as 44.7%(38/85). Of the 38 donor livers with anatomical variants, 7 donor livers were type 2, 16 donor livers were type 3a, 2 donor livers were type 3b, 2 donor livers were type 3c, 1 donor liver was type 4, 3 donor livers were type 5a, 4 donor livers were type 5b, 3 donor livers were type 6. For bile duct splitting patterns of the 85 donor livers, 84 donor livers were split with the main trunk of common hepatic duct preserving in the right hemiliver or right trilobe, and 1 donor liver were treated with complete left and right hemiliver splitting to preserve the main trunk of the common hepatic duct in the left hemiliver and the right hemiliver in the right hepatic duct (type 1 bile duct anatomical model). There were 84 donor livers with only one bile duct opening, and 1 donor liver with two bile duct openings (type 3c bile duct anatomical model). (3) Bile duct reconstruction. Of the 85 recipients, there were 69 recipients with common bile duct end-to-end anastomosis to common bile duct of donor liver (38 donor livers with type 1 bile duct anatomical model, 5 donor livers with type 2 bile duct anatomical model, 14 donor livers with type 3a bile duct anatomical model, 2 donor livers with type 3b bile duct anatomical model, 1 donor liver with type 4 bile duct anatomical model, 3 donor livers with type 5a bile duct anatomical model, 4 donor livers with type 5b bile duct anatomical model, 2 donor livers with type 6 bile duct anatomical model), 11 recipients with jejunum anastomosis to common bile duct of donor liver (7 donor livers with type 1 bile duct anatomical model, 2 donor livers with type 2 bile duct anatomical model, 1 donor liver with type 3c bile duct anatomical model, 1 donor liver with type 6 bile duct anatomical model), 3 recipients with jejunum anastomosis to common hepatic duct of donor liver (1 donor liver with type 1 bile duct anatomical model, 2 donor livers with type 3a bile duct anatomical model), 1 recipient with jejunum anastomosis to right hepatic duct of donor liver (type 1 bile duct anatomical model), 1 recipient with common hepatic duct end-to-end anastomosis to right posterior branch of donor liver combined with jejunum of the recipient Roux-en-y anastomosis to common hepatic duct of donor liver (type 3c bile duct anatomical model). (4) Postoperative biliary complications. Of the 85 recipients, 6 cases had postoperative biliary complications, with an incidence of 7.1% (6/85). Of the 6 recipients with postoperative biliary complications, there were 5 recipients with donor liver with type 1 bile duct anatomical model, including 3 cases undergoing postoperative biliary stricture with biliary leakage and 2 cases undergoing postoperative biliary anastomotic stricture, 1 recipient with donor liver with type 3b bile duct anatomical model and undergoing postoperative biliary anastomotic stricture and bile leakage in the liver section. Cases with biliary complications were 5 in the 47 recipients with donor liver with classic bile duct anatomical model and 1 in the 38 recipients with donor liver with anato-mical variants, showing no significant difference between them ( P>0.05). (5) Follow-up. There were 83 recipients receiving followed up for 52(12,96)months. During the follow-up period, 2 recipients died due to non-biliary complication factors (1 donor liver with type 1 bile duct anatomical model and 1 donor liver with 3a bile duct anatomical model). Conclusion:The anatomical classification of right intrahepatic bile duct of donor liver in SLT is mainly classical bile duct anatomical model, and the bile duct reconstruction scheme is mainly common bile duct of donor liver end-to-end anasto-mosis to common bile duct of recipient.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment strategy of the portal vein complications in children undergoing split liver transplantation. Methods The clinical data of 88 pediatric recipients who underwent split liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative anastomosis at the bifurcating site of the portal vein or donor iliac vein bypass anastomosis was performed depending on the internal diameter and development of the recipient's portal vein. A normalized portal venous blood stream monitoring was performed during the perioperative stage. After operation, heparin sodium was used to bridge warfarin for anticoagulation therapy. After portal vein stenosis or thrombosis was identified with enhanced CT or portography, managements including embolectomy, systemic anticoagulation, interventional thrombus removal, balloon dilatation and/or stenting were performed. Results Among the 88 recipients, a total of 10 children were diagnosed with portal vein complications, of which 4 cases were diagnosed with portal vein stenosis at 1 d, 2 months, 8 months, and 11 months after surgery, and 6 cases were diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis at intraoperative, 2 d, 3 d (n=2), 6 d, and 11 months after surgery, respectively. One patient with portal vein stenosis and one patient with portal vein thrombosis died perioperatively. The fatality related to portal vein complications was 2% (2/88). Of the remaining 8 patients, 1 underwent systemic anticoagulation, 2 underwent portal venous embolectomy, 1 underwent interventional balloon dilatation, and 4 underwent interventional balloon dilatation plus stenting. No portal venous related symptoms were detected during postoperative long term follow up, and the retested portal venous blood stream parameters were normal. Conclusions The normalized intra- and post-operative portal venous blood stream monitoring is a useful tool for the early detection of portal vein complications, the early utilization of useful managements such as intraoperative portal venous embolectomy, interventional balloon dilatation and stenting may effectively treat the portal vein complications, thus minimizing the portal vein complication related graft loss and recipient death.
RESUMO
The American Transplant Congress (ATC) is an influential academic congress in the field of organ transplantation. In this article, the hotspots of liver transplantation in 2020 ATC were summarized, including the latest research progress in donor liver procurement and quality assessment, donor liver preservation and ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and other hepatic malignancies, complications after liver transplantation, transplantation immunology, perioperative management and donor-derived infection, pediatric liver transplantation and cell therapy, etc.
RESUMO
Objective To evaluate the effect of microvascular invasion (MVI) on prognosis of recipients after liver transplantation for primary liver cancer (liver cancer). Methods Clinical data of 177 recipients after liver transplantation for liver cancer were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into the MVI-positive group (n=64) and MVI-negative group (n=113) according to postoperative pathological examination results. Clinical data were statistically compared of all recipients between the negative and positive MVI groups. The prognosis and risk factors of liver transplantation recipients for liver cancer were analyzed. Results Among 177 recipients, 64 cases (36.2%) were positive for MVI and 113 (63.8%) negative for MVI. Compared with the MVI-negative recipients, MVI-positive recipients had significantly lower degree of tumor differentiation, higher preoperative alpha-fetaprotein (AFP) level, larger maximal tumor diameter, a larger quantity of tumors, more satellite lesions and more recipients who did not meet the Milan criteria (all P < 0.05). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of recipients after liver transplantation for liver cancer were 80.2%, 62.1%, 58.5% and 66.3%, 57.5%, 51.2%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS of MVI-positive recipients were 70%, 39%, 35% and 53%, 39%, 33%, significantly lower than 86%, 75%, 72% and 73%, 68%, 63% of their counterparts negative for MVI (all P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis showed that the maximal tumor diameter >8 cm, preoperative AFP level ≥20 ng/mL, low degree of tumor differentiation and positive MVI were the independent risk factors for OS of recipients after liver transplantation for liver cancer (all P < 0.05). Positive MVI, low degree of tumor differentiation and preoperative down-staging failure were the independent risk factors for RFS of recipients after liver transplantation for liver cancer (all P < 0.05). Conclusions MVI is of significant clinical value in predicting clinical prognosis of recipients after liver transplantation for liver cancer.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the relationship between the expression level of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) and clinical prognosis of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods The clinical data of 94 recipients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. The expression of 15-PGDH in the pathological tissues of all recipients was detected by immunohistochemical staining. The relationship between the expression level of 15-PGDH protein and clinical parameters of hepatocellular carcinoma patients was analyzed. The 5-year tumor-free survival and overall survival rates of liver transplant recipients were calculated. The possible independent risk factors of the clinical prognosis of liver transplant recipients were analyzed. Results The expression level of 15-PGDH was significantly correlated with age, Child-Pugh grade and preoperative level of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) of the recipients (all P < 0.05). The tumor-free survival and overall survival rates of the recipients with low expression of 15-PGDH were significantly lower than those in their counterparts with high expression of 15-PGDH (both P < 0.05). The expression level of 15-PGDH, degree of tumor differentiation and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging were the independent risk factors of clinical prognosis of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (all P < 0.05). Conclusions The expression level of 15-PGDH is an independent risk factor of clinical prognosis of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.
RESUMO
Objective To investigate the influence of preoperative splenectomy on the prognosis after liver transplantation.Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted.The clinical data of 95 patients who underwent liver transplantation in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2004 and January 2014 were collected.Thirty-five patients undergoing preoperative splenectomy and pericardial devascularization and 60 undergoing spleen-preserving liver transplantation were allocated into the study group and control group,respectively.All patients received modified piggyback liver transplantation by the same team.Observation indicators:(1) intra-and post-operative situations;(2) follow-up and survival.The follow-up using telephone interview and outpatient examination was performed once every a week within 3 months postoperatively,once every one month within 6 months postoperatively and once every 3 months after 1 year postoperatively up to January 2016,including routine blood test,plasma-drug concentration of immunosuppressive agent and function of liver and kidney.Ultrasound and abdominal CT were used to monitor the long-term complication and survival.The measurement data with normal distribution were represented as (x)±s,and comparison between groups was done by the t test.Comparison of count data was done by the chi-square test.Results (1) Intra-and post-operative situations:all patients underwent successful liver transplantation.The operation time,volumes of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion were (483 ± 136) minutes,(5 683±2 950) mL,(4 887±3 682) mL in the study group and (392± 103)minutes,(3 522± 1 885)mL,(3 455±2 630)mL in the control group,respectively,with statistically significant differences between groups (t=3.683,4.358,2.202,P＜0.05).Six patients in the study group had intraoperative portal vein thrombosis (PVT),including 4 in level 1,1 in level 2 and 1 in level 3,and no patients in the control group,showing a statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =1.979,P＜0.05).Five patients with PVT in level 1 or 2 underwent thrombectomy and then end-to-end anastomosis of PV.One patient with PVT in level 1 had PVT recurrence and was cured by postoperative thrombolytic therapy.One patient with PVT in level 3 received PV reconstruction using artificial blood vessels,and had PVT recurrence and then was cured.There was no PV stenosis between groups.The levels of platelet at 1,3 and 7 days postoperatively were (75±60)× 109/L,(71± 45)×109/L,(111±73)×109/L in the study group and (57±32) ×109/L,(52±46) ×109/L,(87±53)×109/L in the control group,respectively,with statistically significant difference between groups (t =1.909,1.957,1.848,P＜ 0.05).The levels of platelet at 14 and 30 days postoperatively were respectively (230± 152)× 109/L,(310± 140)× 109/L in the study group and (193± 125)× 109/L,(286±62)× 109/L in the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (t=1.284,1.199,P＞0.05).The cases with postoperative infection,acute rejection,new-onset PVT in level 1-2 and 3-4 and PV stenosis were respectively 23,0,2,0,2 in the study group and 35,1,2,0,1 in the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =1.171,0.590,0.547,1.184,P＞0.05).Patients with postoperative infection and acute rejection were improved by symptomatic treatment.Two patients in the study group with PVT underwent anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy,including 1 receiving interventional thrombectomy therapy.Two patients in the control group with new-onset PVT were cured by anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy.Three patients with PV stenosis underwent percutaneous transhepatic portography (PTA) for balloon dilation,including 1 in the study group with good improvement after stent implantation.(2) Follow-up and survival:95 patients were followed up for 3-24 months,with an average time of 18 months.During the follow-up,the rate of chronic rejection in study and control groups was 5.7％(2/35) and 5.0％(3/60),showing no statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =0.023,P＞0.05).The 1-and 2-year accumulative survival rates were respectively 91.4％ (32/35),82.9％ (29/35) in the study group and 93.3％ (56/60),76.7％(46/60) in the control group,with no statistically significant difference between groups (x2 =0.780,P＞0.05).Conclusion The splenectomy before liver transplantation is easy to form PVT,increase time and difficulty of transplantation surgery,however,it doesn't increase complication risk after transplantation and affect postoperative survival.