Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arthroscopy ; 40(3): 879-886, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37543148

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To confirm whether posterior displacement of the detached meniscocapsular structure in ramp lesions could be observed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the flexed knee position and to clarify whether this displacement on MRI is related to greater anterior knee laxity. METHODS: This retrospective comparative trial study included 50 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries in whom attendant ramp lesions were observed on preoperative MRI. All patients underwent 3-T MRI at 120° of knee flexion preoperatively. The gap distance of the ramp lesion on sagittal slices was measured, and a distance greater than 1 mm was classified as gap positive. Additionally, joint effusion in the posteromedial recess was quantitatively evaluated by measuring the surface area of joint fluid. Prior to surgery, the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation (ATT) on stress radiographs at 20° of knee flexion was measured to evaluate anterior knee laxity. During anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the length of the ramp lesion was measured by a scale from the posteromedial portal. RESULTS: Of the 50 knees, 29 had ramp lesion gaps greater than 1 mm on MRI at knee flexion. The gap-positive group had a significantly greater side-to-side difference in ATT (9.6 ± 3.6 mm vs 5.0 ± 2.7 mm, P < .001) and significantly larger ramp lesion length (15.7 ± 4.9 mm vs 11.7 ± 3.9 mm, P = .002) than the gap-negative group. The gap-positive group also had a significantly greater amount of joint effusion than the gap-negative group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior displacement of the detached meniscocapsular structure in ramp lesions can be observed on MRI at knee flexion and is related to greater anterior knee laxity, lesion size, and joint effusion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative trial.


Assuntos
Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior , Humanos , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/diagnóstico por imagem , Lesões do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior/cirurgia , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Meniscos Tibiais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 120, 2022 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123474

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative periarticular injection of corticosteroid effectively reduces perioperative pain in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, which corticosteroid is most effective for intraoperative periarticular injection remains controversial. We compared the effects of corticosteroids between dexamethasone and triamcinolone acetonide periarticular administration for reducing pain and postoperative nausea and increasing fasting blood glucose concentrations during the perioperative period following TKA. METHODS: One hundred and two patients who underwent TKA from August 2018 to September 2020 were divided into two groups: one received 10 mg dexamethasone for intraoperative periarticular injection and another receiving 40 mg triamcinolone acetonide. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during walking and nausea scores were recorded using a 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale. C-reactive protein (CRP) and fasting blood glucose levels were measured pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Pain scores in the triamcinolone group were significantly lower than in the dexamethasone group at rest 7 days postoperatively (1.5 vs. 2.0; p = 0.046) and while walking at both 72 h (3.9 vs. 4.8; p = 0.008) and 7 days postoperatively (3.2 vs. 4.0; p = 0.03). The CRP levels in the triamcinolone group were significantly lower than in the dexamethasone group at 7 days postoperatively (1.6 mg/dl vs. 3.0 mg/dl: p < 0.001). The fasting blood glucose levels at 1 day postoperatively were increased in both groups but not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences in the nausea score were noted between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Triamcinolone acetonide periarticular administration provided greater pain relief by reducing inflammation to a greater degree than dexamethasone.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho , Artroplastia do Joelho/efeitos adversos , Dexametasona , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Triancinolona Acetonida/uso terapêutico
3.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 103(4): 319-325, 2021 Feb 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33497075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are widely used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to relieve postoperative pain and prevent postoperative nausea. The aim of this prospective, randomized controlled study was to compare the effects of intravenous and periarticular administration of corticosteroids on pain control, prevention of postoperative nausea, and inflammation and thromboembolism markers following TKA. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing TKA were randomly allocated to either the intravenous administration or periarticular injection group. The intravenous administration group received 10 mg dexamethasone 1 hour before and 24 hours after the surgical procedure, as well as a periarticular injection placebo during the procedure. The periarticular injection group received a 40-mg injection of triamcinolone acetonide during the surgical procedure, as well as an intravenous administration placebo 1 hour before and 24 hours after the procedure. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during walking and nausea scores were recorded according to the 0-to-10 Numerical Rating Scale. Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (PF1.2) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest and during walking 24 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the periarticular injection group than in the intravenous administration group. Nausea scores showed no significant difference between groups. IL-6 at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively also showed no significant difference between groups. CRP at 24 and 48 hours postoperatively was significantly lower in the intravenous administration group than in the periarticular injection group. In contrast, CRP at 1 week postoperatively was significantly higher in the intravenous administration group than in the periarticular injection group. The mean PF1.2 was significantly lower in the intravenous administration group than in the periarticular injection group at 4 hours postoperatively. Two cases of deep venous thrombosis in each group were detected with use of ultrasonographic examination. CONCLUSIONS: Periarticular injection of corticosteroids showed a better pain-control effect at 24 hours postoperatively than did intravenous administration, whereas the antiemetic effect was similar between treatments. Although intravenous administration had a better anti-thromboembolic effect than periarticular injection, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis was low in both groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Triancinolona Acetonida/administração & dosagem , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...