Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuroimage ; 212: 116686, 2020 05 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32119981

RESUMO

Source modelling in magnetoencephalography (MEG) requires precise co-registration of the sensor array and the anatomical structure of the measured individual's head. In conventional MEG, the positions and orientations of the sensors relative to each other are fixed and known beforehand, requiring only localization of the head relative to the sensor array. Since the sensors in on-scalp MEG are positioned on the scalp, locations of the individual sensors depend on the subject's head shape and size. The positions and orientations of on-scalp sensors must therefore be measured at every recording. This can be achieved by inverting conventional head localization, localizing the sensors relative to the head - rather than the other way around. In this study we present a practical method for localizing sensors using magnetic dipole-like coils attached to the subject's head. We implement and evaluate the method in a set of on-scalp MEG recordings using a 7-channel on-scalp MEG system based on high critical temperature superconducting quantum interference devices (high-Tc SQUIDs). The method allows individually localizing the sensor positions, orientations, and responsivities with high accuracy using only a short averaging time (≤ 2 â€‹mm, < 3° and < 3%, respectively, with 1-s averaging), enabling continuous sensor localization. Calibrating and jointly localizing the sensor array can further improve the accuracy of position and orientation (< 1 â€‹mm and < 1°, respectively, with 1-s coil recordings). We demonstrate source localization of on-scalp recorded somatosensory evoked activity based on co-registration with our method. Equivalent current dipole fits of the evoked responses corresponded well (within 4.2 â€‹mm) with those based on a commercial, whole-head MEG system.


Assuntos
Mapeamento Encefálico/instrumentação , Mapeamento Encefálico/métodos , Magnetoencefalografia/instrumentação , Magnetoencefalografia/métodos , Couro Cabeludo , Adulto , Encéfalo/fisiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 64(6): 1270-1276, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28541190

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We present a benchmarking protocol for quantitatively comparing emerging on-scalp magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensor technologies to their counterparts in state-of-the-art MEG systems. METHODS: As a means of validation, we compare a high-critical-temperature superconducting quantum interference device (high Tc SQUID) with the low- Tc SQUIDs of an Elekta Neuromag TRIUX system in MEG recordings of auditory and somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) on one human subject. RESULTS: We measure the expected signal gain for the auditory-evoked fields (deeper sources) and notice some unfamiliar features in the on-scalp sensor-based recordings of SEFs (shallower sources). CONCLUSION: The experimental results serve as a proof of principle for the benchmarking protocol. This approach is straightforward, general to various on-scalp MEG sensors, and convenient to use on human subjects. The unexpected features in the SEFs suggest on-scalp MEG sensors may reveal information about neuromagnetic sources that is otherwise difficult to extract from state-of-the-art MEG recordings. SIGNIFICANCE: As the first systematically established on-scalp MEG benchmarking protocol, magnetic sensor developers can employ this method to prove the utility of their technology in MEG recordings. Further exploration of the SEFs with on-scalp MEG sensors may reveal unique information about their sources.


Assuntos
Benchmarking/normas , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Eletrodos/normas , Magnetoencefalografia/instrumentação , Magnetoencefalografia/normas , Couro Cabeludo/fisiologia , Desenho de Equipamento/normas , Análise de Falha de Equipamento/normas , Humanos , Magnetoencefalografia/métodos , Valores de Referência , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...