The Association between Glycosylated Hemoglobin Level and Platelets Reactivity in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients tend to have increased platelet reactivity after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to determine the association between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values and platelet reactivity and to evaluate the consequent impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CABG. METHODS: This prospective observational trial consecutively enrolled 225 diabetic patients undergoing CABG, between February 2014 and October 2018. HbA1c levels and platelet function (multiple electrode aggregometry [MEA]) were analyzed the day before surgery and on postoperative day 4 (POD 4). Patients were divided into two groups according to the HbA1c value: HBA1c < 7% and HbA1c ≥ 7%. RESULTS: Significantly higher postoperative ASPI (platelet function test based on arachidonic acid) and ADP (platelet function test based on adenosine diphosphate) test values were observed at POD 4 compared with preoperative values (ASPI test: p < 0.001; ADP test: p < 0.001). The prevalence of preoperative aspirin resistance (AR) was 46.4% relative to 57.2% after surgery showing consistent increase in postoperative AR by approximately 10%. In addition, the prevalence of AR in the HbA1c < 7% group was higher by 10% compared with the HbA1c ≥ 7% group, both before and after surgery. We did not demonstrate differences in clinical outcomes between the HbA1c groups. CONCLUSION: Perioperative assessment of platelet reactivity in diabetic patients detects those with AR who may be at increased risk of adverse ischemic events. A personalized approach guided by MEA and administration of early and more potent antiaggregation therapy after CABG can be beneficial in this group of patients.

Cost Analysis of Transfusion Therapy in Coronary Artery Surgery.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), wide variability in transfusion rate (7.8% to 92.8%) raises the question of the amount of unnecessary transfusions. The aim of the study was (1) to identify CABG patients at low risk of bleeding to whom transfusion treatment should be avoided and (2) to calculate the amount of possible cost savings that would be achieved by avoiding transfusion in low bleeding risk patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients undergoing isolated elective CABG from January 2010 to January 2018. Patients were divided with respect to the presence of excessive bleeding and transfusion costs were compared between the two groups. Predictors for postoperative excessive bleeding were defined and multivariable logistic regression analysis and risk modeling were performed. The use of a model to predict patients at low risk of bleeding allowed for the estimation of transfusion cost savings assuming the patients who were found to be at low risk of bleeding should not be transfused. RESULTS: A total of 1,426 patients were enrolled in the analysis. Of those, 28.3% had excessive postoperative bleeding. The multivariate logistic regression analysis model was developed to identify/predict patients without excessive bleeding (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, area under the curve 72.3%, p < 0.001). When applied to the existing database, the use of the developed model identifying patients at low risk of bleeding may result in a 39.1% reduction of transfusions. Specifically, cost savings would be 48.2% for packed red blood cells, 38.9% for fresh frozen plasma, 10.9% for platelets concentrate, and 17.9% for fibrinogen concentrate. CONCLUSION: The clinical and economic burdens associated with unnecessary transfusions are significant. Avoiding transfusion in CABG patients found to be at low risk of bleeding may result in significant reduction of transfusion rate and transfusion-associated costs.