RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of anemia is a significant public health challenge. Approximately half of all pregnant women in India experience anemia during pregnancy. This study aims to determine the prevalence of anemia and perinatal outcomes among anemic and nonanemic pregnant mothers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The quantitative research approach was adopted using a descriptive comparative design. The study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatric departments of a tertiary care hospital. Hemoglobin (Hb) was recorded using antenatal records of pregnant mothers in their III trimester. Based on their Hb level, subjects were divided into two groups, anemic and nonanemic as per World Health Organization criteria. The subjects were followed up until the first week after birth. RESULTS: The prevalence of anemia was 48% [N = 410]; 70.6% had mild, 13.7% had moderate, and 15.7% had severe. The anemic group had a significantly higher incidence of low birthweight (30.9% vs 10.3%, P = 0.001) and preterm births (24.2% vs 3.2%, P = 0.001) compared to the nonanemic group. Additionally, there were significant differences in various quantitative perinatal parameters such as weight (P = 0.001), length (P = 0.001), head circumference (P = 0.001), chest circumference (P = 0.034), APGAR score at one minute (P = 0.022), and APGAR score at five minutes (P = 0.001) between the anemic and nonanemic. CONCLUSION: The maternal anemia is associated with increased risk of unfavorable perinatal outcomes. Identifying and managing anemia among pregnant women is critical to minimize adverse outcomes. Adequate antenatal care can play a significant role in preventing avoidable complications associated with anemia during the third trimester.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To compare vaccine related reactogenicity during primary immunization in healthy infants using 23 vs. 25 gauge needles. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted in Vaccination Room of the Advanced Pediatrics Center. 155 participants for primary immunization were assigned to two intervention groups (23 vs. 25 gauge). Parent-reported local and systemic reactions were recorded daily for three days after the immunization. RESULTS: Swelling (24%) and tenderness (21%) were the two most common parent-reported local symptoms followed by restriction of movements (18%) and redness (10%) on day 1. Any local reaction on day 1 was statistically similar in 25 gauge vs. 23 gauge group (RR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.32 to 1.82) (P = 0.54), but fever (day 1) showed higher trend in 23 gauge needle group (RR 2.24; 95% CI: 0.92-5.47) (P = 0.07). Furthermore, on analysis of serially reported local and systemic reactions for 3 consecutive days by generalized estimating equations, odds of redness, swelling, tenderness, restricted movement and fever were statistically similar between two needle groups. On the other hand, median (± SE) crying time (in seconds) was significantly prolonged in the 25 gauge needle (39 ± 2) as compared to 23 gauge group (30 ± 1.3) (log rank test, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of same length needles with narrower (25) or wider (23) gauge did not show significant differences in local reactogenicity during primary immunization. Fever, however, was reduced marginally in 25 gauge group whereas crying duration was significantly shorter with 23 gauge needle. Finally, larger studies are needed to further evaluate objectively the outcome of reactogenicity.
