Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With Metastatic NSCLC Previously Treated With Programmed Cell Death Protein-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are standard-of-care treatment for metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC). Intolerance to treatment/disease progression warrants additional lines of therapy. Real-world treatment patterns and efficacy outcomes after PD-1/PD-L1 use are insufficiently characterized to inform treatment decisions. METHODS: Electronic health records of adults with stage IV NSCLC initiating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line monotherapy (cohort 1), first-line combination therapy (cohort 2), or second-line monotherapy (cohort 3) who received a subsequent line of therapy (i.e., index therapy) in the Flatiron NSCLC Core Registry Dataset were identified. Patient characteristics, types of index treatments/therapies, and associated index treatment outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: A total of 1061 patients with mNSCLC were included in this analysis. In cohort 1 (n = 242), median real-world overall survival (mrwOS) with index therapies for the overall population was 9.18 months (95% confidence interval: 7.54-12.13); platinum-based chemotherapy was the most common index therapy (39.3%) with mrwOS of 12.52 months (8.39-not applicable). In cohort 2 (n = 145), mrwOS for the overall population was 6.43 months (5.34-7.61); vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor plus chemotherapy was the most common index therapy (32.4%) with mrwOS of 5.97 months (4.95-7.34). In cohort 3 (n = 647), mrwOS for the overall population was 7.21 months (6.39-7.80); single-agent chemotherapy was the most common index therapy (45.4%) with mrwOS of 6.59 months (5.64-7.61). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes of index therapies in mNSCLC after PD-1/PD-L1 use are variable. These analyses provide insights to optimize post-PD-1/PD-L1 treatments and inform standards of care.

Factors Associated with Failure to Achieve SVR in Hepatitis C Genotype 3 Patients Within an Integrated Care Delivery System.

BACKGROUND: Achievement of sustained virologic response (SVR) and factors associated with treatment failure in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 have been described in tertiary and referral care settings, with rates of SVR reported to range between 72% and 89%. Fewer data exist on SVR outside of these settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe rates of SVR and characterize factors associated with achievement of SVR within an integrated health care delivery system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of genotype 3 HCV patients treated with dual therapy (pegylated interferon-alpha plus ribavirin) was conducted at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Adult patients diagnosed with HCV and testing positive for HCV-RNA genotype 3 were identified from electronic medical records. Data were collected on patient demographics, baseline health status, and comorbid conditions. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the association between baseline patient factors and SVR. RESULTS: A total of 484 HCV genotype 3 patients met the eligibility criteria. The median age was 49 years, and 65.7% were male. Overall, 252 (52.1%) achieved SVR. Aged ≥ 45 years and male gender were associated with lower rates of SVR; cirrhosis and chronic diseases (diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) were also associated with lower rates of SVR. CONCLUSIONS: SVR was lower in patients within an integrated care delivery system than in those in tertiary and referral centers. Males and older patients had lower rates of SVR, as well as patients with cirrhosis, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The implications of acute rejection for allograft survival in contemporary U.S. kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We examined the frequency and clinical impact of acute rejection (AR) in contemporary U.S. kidney transplantation. METHODS: Data for Medicare-insured kidney transplant recipients in 2000 to 2007 (n=48,179) were drawn from the United States Renal Data System. AR events were ascertained from Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network reports. AR was subclassified as antibody (Ab)-treated AR or other management (non-Ab-treated AR). Associations of AR with subsequent all-cause graft loss were estimated with time-varying Cox regression. Covariates included recipient, donor, and transplant factors in the United Network for Organ Sharing Kidney Allocation Review Committee survival model. RESULTS: The frequencies of non-Ab-treated AR per 100 graft-years at risk among standard criteria donor recipients over the first 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after transplantation were 9.93, 8.43, 5.71, and 4.70, respectively. Non-Ab-treated AR was consistently more than twice as common as Ab-treated AR by risk period and donor type. Development of Ab-treated AR predicted a greater risk of graft loss than non-Ab-treated AR. The relative risk for graft loss from Ab-treated AR continuously increased with later timing of AR after transplantation, whereas risk associated with non-Ab-treated AR peaked for events reported in months 13 to 24 after kidney transplantation. Regardless of the diagnosis time, the relative risk of graft loss was higher in the first 89 days after a given AR report compared with 90 days and beyond. CONCLUSIONS: AR events recognized later after transplantation have more serious graft loss implications, especially within the first 89 days after AR reporting. This observation may reflect reduced intensity of monitoring, delays in diagnosis, or clinicopathologic features of late AR.