Concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors is not associated with major adverse cardiovascular events following coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Cytochrome P450 inhibition by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may attenuate the effectiveness of clopidogrel. AIM: To examine whether PPI use modifies the association between clopidogrel use and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation, using time-varying drug exposure ascertainment. METHODS: We conducted this population-based cohort study in Western Denmark (population 3 million) using medical databases. We identified all 13,001 patients with coronary stent implantation between 2002 and 2005 and ascertained their reported comorbidities. During the recommended 12-month postintervention treatment period, we tracked use of clopidogrel and PPI and the rate of MACE. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs), controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: During follow-up, one or more prescriptions were redeemed by 91% of patients for clopidogrel and by 21% of patients for PPIs. Of the patients, 15% experienced a MACE. The adjusted HR for MACE comparing clopidogrel use with non-use was 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.74] among PPI users and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.42-0.53) among PPI non-users, yielding an interaction effect (i.e. relative rate increase) of 1.20 (95% CI: 0.91-1.58). PPI users treated from before PCI had a 25% increased rate of MACE compared to PPI non-users, independent of clopidogrel use [adjusted HR = 1.24 (95% CI: 0.97-1.58) for clopidogrel users and 1.26 (95% CI: 0.97-1.63) for clopidogrel non-users]. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PPIs as a class did not modify the protective effect of clopidogrel, but its use was associated with major adverse cardiovascular events itself, particularly among patients having used PPIs before percutaneous coronary intervention.

Left ventricular contractile function after distal protection in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the Drug Elution and Distal Protection in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronary intervention (PCI) may result in an increased infarct size. We evaluated the effect of distal protection during PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on myocardial function. METHODS: Patients with STEMI were randomly referred within 12 h for PCI with (N = 312) or without distal protection (N = 314). Left ventricular (LV) contractile function was assessed with echocardiography 8 months after PCI. Global LV myocardial wall motion index (WMI) was calculated as the average wall motion score of all myocardial segments. The occurrence of death, nonfatal re-infarction, and stroke 8 months after PCI were also recorded. RESULTS: The occurrence of death, nonfatal re-infarction, and stroke 8 months after PCI was 7.1% after distal protection and 5.7% after conventional treatment (p = 0.17). WMI improved by 4.1% at 8 months in patients treated with distal protection compared to patients receiving conventional PCI (p < 0.01). In myocardium supplied by a culprit artery treated by distal protection regional LV function was 9-11% higher than myocardial regions treated conventionally ( p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of distal protection during primary PCI is associated with a significant improvement in LV contractile function, with no detectable impact on intermediate term clinical outcome.

99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT is a useful technique for viability detection: results of a comparison with NH3/FDG PET.

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of myocardial viability by 99mTc-Sestamibi Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography (SPECT) has been suggested as a more readily available and cheaper alternative to Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with 13N-ammonia (NH3) and 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG). We hypothesized that a semi-quantitative evaluation by SPECT could delineate myocardial viability with an acceptable concordance to PET. DESIGN: Fifty patients (age 57+/-7 years; ejection fraction 28 +/- 8%), with ischemic cardiomyopathy, underwent SPECT and PET imaging in random order. Viability by SPECT was defined as a defect size <50% of the segment area, or a defect representing > or =50% of the segment but with a mean activity > or =50% of peak activity. PET viability was defined as a perfusion score >2 and FDG score < or =2 (five-point scale, 0 = normal, 4 = absent activity). RESULTS: By segmental comparison to PET. SPECT yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 82% for detection of viable myocardium. The positive and negative predictive values were 96% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with severe ischemic cardiomyopathy 99mTc-Sestamibi SPECT can delineate viable myocardium with an acceptable segmental concordance to NH3/FDG PET.