Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage in Anterior Shoulder Instability Results in Fewer Redislocations Than Bankart Repair Alone at Medium-term Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: A multicenter, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) to Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) reported benefits of remplissage in reducing recurrent instability at 2 years postoperative. The ongoing benefits beyond this time point are yet to be explored. PURPOSE: To (1) compare medium-term (3 to 9 years) outcomes of these previously randomized patients undergoing isolated Bankart repair (NO REMP) or Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) to manage recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability; (2) examine the failure rate, overall recurrent instability, and reoperation rate. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Recruitment and randomization for the original randomized trial occurred between 2011 and 2017. Patients ≥14 years diagnosed with recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability with an engaging Hill-Sachs defect of any size were included. Those with a glenoid defect >15% were excluded. In 2020, participants were contacted by telephone and asked standardized questions regarding ensuing instances of subluxation, dislocation, or reoperation on their study shoulder. "Failure" was defined as a redislocation, and "overall recurrent instability" was described as a redislocation or ≥2 subluxations. Descriptive statistics, relative risk, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 108 participants were randomized, of whom 50 in the NO REMP group and 52 in the REMP group were included in the analyses in the original study. The mean number of months from surgery to the final follow-up was 49.3 and 53.8 months for the NO REMP and REMP groups, respectively. Failure rates were 22% (11/50) in the NO REMP group versus 8% (4/52) in the REMP group. Rates of overall recurrent instability were 30% (15/50) in the NO REMP group versus 10% (5/52) in the REMP group. Survival curves were significantly different, favoring REMP in both scenarios. CONCLUSION: For the treatment of traumatic recurrent anterior shoulder instability with a Hill-Sachs lesion and subcritical glenoid bone loss (<15%), a significantly lower rate of overall postoperative recurrent instability was observed with arthroscopic Bankart repair and remplissage than with isolated Bankart repair at a medium-term follow-up (mean of 4 years). Patients who did not receive a remplissage experienced a failure (redislocated) earlier and had a higher rate of revision/reoperation than those who received a concomitant remplissage. REGISTRATION: NCT01324531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

The Clinical Outcome of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty vs Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 55 Years.

BACKGROUND: Patellofemoral osteoarthritis affects 10% of patients older than 40 years and is commonly treated by patellofemoral joint arthroplasty (PFA) or a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PFA is a more conservative approach with documented faster recovery. No study to date has compared both approaches with respect to patient-reported outcome measures in patients younger than 60 years. METHODS: A retrospective case-matched cohort based on age, sex, body mass index, and side of 23 PFAs (in 19 patients) operated on by 2 surgeons and of 23 TKAs (23 patients) operated on by 6 surgeons was included in the study. All patients were younger than 55 years and operated on between March 2010 and September 2015. The Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritic Index, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome scores, Tegner, and University of California, Los Angeles activity scores were compared between preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative timepoints between groups. RESULTS: TKA and PFA were comparable on all patient-reported outcome measures at minimum 2-year follow-up; however, PFA patients exhibited statistically significantly larger improvement between 1 year postoperative and 2 years postoperative timepoints (P < .05). All patients improved between preoperative and postoperative timepoints (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Although TKA performed better with respect to functional outcomes at the 1-year mark, at 2-year follow-up, PFA and TKA performed equally well. Our results allow us to conclude that in younger patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis who desire a more conservative, kinematic-preserving approach, PFA continues to be a practical treatment option yielding early outcomes that compare favorably with TKA.