Safety of a New Subcutaneous Testosterone Enanthate Auto-Injector: Results of a 26-Week Study.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with testosterone deficiency (TD) can be treated with exogenous testosterone (T) to achieve and maintain physiologic T levels and prevent negative clinical symptoms; with many testosterone replacement therapies currently available, this registration safety study was conducted to further characterize the clinical profile of chronically administered, concentration-guided subcutaneous testosterone enanthate (TE) dosing. AIM: The purpose of this study was to confirm the safety and characterize the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the subcutaneous TE auto-injector (SCTE-AI) in adult men with TD. METHODS: In this phase III, 26-week study, 133 men 18-75 years of age with symptomatic TD self-administered SCTE-AI 75 mg once weekly for 6 weeks from July 2015 to June 2016. Dosing was adjusted when indicated to 50 mg or 100 mg to maintain T trough levels between 350 and 650 ng/dL (12.1-22.5 nmol/L). PK data were collected from a subgroup of patients receiving 75 mg SCTE-AI through week 12. Safety, including ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), lipid levels, and adverse drug reactions, and PK were assessed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes were the documentation of the reproducibility of trough concentration-guided exposure to SCTE, 6-month safety profile, and PK data for the 75 mg dose SCTE. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients (25.6%) experienced adverse drug reactions; the most frequently reported were increased hematocrit (≥52%) in 10 patients (7.5%), injection-site hemorrhage in 6 patients (4.5%), injection-site bruising in 4 patients (3.0%), and increased prostate-specific antigen in 4 patients (3.0%). By week 26, mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) measured in the clinic increased by 3.4 mmHg (125.6-129.0 mmHg) and 1.8 mmHg (78.2-80.0 mmHg), respectively, from baseline. At week 12, ABPM showed 24-hour mean systolic and diastolic BP increases of 3.7 mmHg and 1.3 mmHg, respectively. All measured lipid fractions were below baseline levels at week 26. T, TE, dihydrotestosterone, and estradiol increased from weeks 1-12. T trough levels ranged from 300-650 ng/dL (10.4-22.5 nmol/L) in 82.4% and 83.2% of patients at weeks 12 and 26, respectively. Of the 965 assessed injections, mild pain was reported by 1 patient. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dosing with SCTE is well-tolerated overall, yet associated with a numerically small mean systolic BP increase. STRENGTHS & IMPLICATIONS: This study used a standardized ABPM protocol, confirming a numerically small systolic BP increase may be associated with reintroducing therapeutic T exposure in hypogonadal men. It is unknown at this time whether this applies with all routes of T supplementation. CONCLUSION: SCTE-AI has a favorable safety profile and is well-tolerated, with a stable PK profile. Gittelman M, Jaffe JS, Kaminetsky JC. Safety of a New Subcutaneous Testosterone Enanthate Auto-Injector: Results of a 26-Week Study. J Sex Med 2019;16:1741-1748. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02504541.

A 52-Week Study of Dose Adjusted Subcutaneous Testosterone Enanthate in Oil Self-Administered via Disposable Auto-Injector.

PURPOSE: In this open label, single arm, dose blinded, 52-week registration phase study we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a subcutaneous testosterone enanthate auto-injector administered weekly to men with hypogonadism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 150 patients were initiated on a 75 mg subcutaneous testosterone enanthate auto-injector self-administered weekly. Dose adjustments were made at week 7 to 50, 75 or 100 mg testosterone enanthate based on the week 6 total testosterone trough concentration. If required, dose adjustments continued through the extended treatment phase. Pharmacokinetic and clinical laboratory parameters, treatment emergent adverse events and injection site reactions were captured. RESULTS: The primary end point was met since 92.7% of patients achieved an average total testosterone concentration of 300 to 1,100 ng/dl (mean ± SD 553.3 ± 127.29) at week 12. A maximum concentration of less than 1,500 ng/dl was achieved by 91.3% of patients and no patient had a level greater than 1,800 ng/dl at week 12. The mean total testosterone trough concentration was 487.2 ± 153.33 ng/dl at week 52. Of the patients more than 95% reported no injection related pain. The most frequently reported treatment emergent adverse events were increased hematocrit, hypertension and increased prostate specific antigen, which led to discontinuation in 30 men. There were no study drug related serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The dose adjusted subcutaneous testosterone enanthate auto-injector demonstrated a steady serum total testosterone pharmacokinetic profile with small peak and trough fluctuations. The device was safe, well tolerated and virtually painless, indicating that this subcutaneous testosterone enanthate auto-injector offers a testosterone delivery system that is a convenient weekly option to treat testosterone deficiency.

Summative Usability Evaluation of the SCTE-AI Device: A Novel Prefilled Autoinjector for Subcutaneous Testosterone Administration.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous testosterone enanthate (TE) autoinjector (SCTE-AI) is a single-use, pre-filled, disposable autoinjector intended for testosterone (T) self-administration in adult males with T deficiency. AIM: To evaluate the usability of the market configuration of the SCTE-AI, including packaging and instructions for use (IFU), in order to identify and mitigate any preventable patterns of use errors that could result in harm. METHODS: 4 groups of participants (injection-naïve or injection-experienced patients or caregivers) were randomized to 1 of 3 doses (50, 75, and 100 mg) of TE and either trained (ie, reviewed the IFU and shown how to properly inject) or not trained (only given the IFU). After simulated at-home use, participants were asked questions regarding the comprehensibility of the IFU and the intuitiveness/usability of the device. All tasks were measured as success, use error, or close call (participant initiated an error but recovered in time). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Usability (success rates, errors, and close calls) of the drug/device combination by adult males with T deficiency or their caregivers. RESULTS: 65 patients received 1 dose of TE, and 59 patients received 2 doses. Overall, 99 of 123 (80.5%) attempted injections resulted in administration of 1 full dose. Injection success rates were high and comparable among the various user groups. The most common use error (21 of 24) was due to not holding the autoinjector on the abdomen long enough (at least 8 seconds). Few critical drug delivery and safety errors or close calls were observed. No unmitigated use errors by patients or caregivers were apparent that could result in harm or have a negative impact on treatment. SCTE-AI was well tolerated. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The SCTE-AI development process resulted in a subcutaneous, TE autoinjection device that is intuitive to use, with clear labeling and packaging and an easy-to-understand IFU, providing an option for T-deficient adult males to self-inject subcutaneously at home. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The strengths of the study include use of a patient-ready drug/device combination for self-administration and inclusion of both injection-naïve and injection-experienced patients and caregivers. The main limitation of the study is the presence of observers/cameras that may have distracted or created performance anxiety, potentially contributing to errors. CONCLUSION: Results of this usability validation study indicate that the SCTE-AI device is safe and intuitive to use, with a low potential for harm and is associated with a high rate of injection success, regardless of prior training or experience. Arora S, Moclair B, Murphy K, et al. Summative Usability Evaluation of the SCTE-AI Device: A Novel Prefilled Autoinjector for Subcutaneous Testosterone Administration. J Sex Med 2018;15:1707-1715.

Quality of erections by age group in men with erectile dysfunction.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess erection quality with sildenafil vs placebo and adverse events (AEs) according to age (≤45, 46-55 and ≥56 years) in 997 men with erectile dysfunction (ED) using pooled data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose trials. METHODS: The trials included 6- to 10-week treatment periods. The starting sildenafil dose was 50 mg, taken ~1 hour before sexual activity but not more than once daily, with subsequent adjustment to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and safety. Exclusion criteria included blood pressure <90/50 or >170/110 mmHg, taking nitrate therapy or nitric oxide donors, severe cardiac failure/unstable angina or recent stroke or myocardial infarction. Changes from baseline in Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) scores were analysed. RESULTS: Improvements in QEQ scores with sildenafil vs placebo were significant (P<.0001) for the overall sample (33.7 sildenafil; 8.1 placebo) and each age group (≤45 years: 38.5 sildenafil, 13.9 placebo; 46-55 years: 34.9 sildenafil, 5.8 placebo; ≥56 years: 26.9 sildenafil, 4.9 placebo). IIEF Erectile Function domain (P<.0001), question 3 (achieving erection; P<.003), and question 4 (maintaining erection; P<.001) scores also improved significantly for the overall sample and each age group. Treatment satisfaction was significantly greater (P<.0001) with sildenafil vs placebo for the overall sample and each age group. The most common AEs with sildenafil were headache, flushing and nasal congestion in all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil significantly improved erection quality across all age groups of men with ED. Efficacy improvements with sildenafil were consistent with the QEQ, IIEF, and EDITS. AEs were comparable across age groups. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00159900, NCT00147628, NCT00301262, NCT00343200.

Efficacy and Safety of Sildenafil by Age in Men With Erectile Dysfunction.

INTRODUCTION: Sildenafil, an oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, has been extensively investigated for the treatment of erectile dysfunction in randomized controlled trials. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of sildenafil vs placebo according to age subgroups (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years) in 11,364 men with erectile dysfunction using pooled data from 48 randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, flexible-dose trials. METHODS: Most trials had a 12-week treatment duration. The starting sildenafil dose was 50 mg, taken 1 hour before sexual activity, with subsequent adjustment to 100 or 25 mg based on efficacy and safety. Men taking nitrate therapy or nitric oxide donors and men with severe cardiac failure, unstable angina, or recent stroke or myocardial infarction were excluded. Efficacy analyses included all subjects with baseline and at least one postrandomization evaluation. Safety analyses included subjects who received study medication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The International Index of Erectile Function and a global assessment question ("Did the treatment improve your erections?"). RESULTS: Mean International Index of Erectile Function scores for question 3 (frequency of penetration), question 4 (maintenance of erections after penetration), and the erectile function domain were statistically significantly improved with sildenafil vs placebo for each age subgroup; orgasmic function, intercourse satisfaction, sexual desire, and overall satisfaction domain scores also were statistically significantly improved with sildenafil vs placebo. The percentage of men reporting improved erections on the global assessment question was statistically significantly higher with sildenafil vs placebo for all age subgroups; the percentage with sildenafil tended to decrease with increasing age (<65 years, 80%; 65-74 years, 69%; ≥75 years, 59%). The most common adverse events with sildenafil were headache and flushing in each age subgroup. CONCLUSION: Sildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for erectile dysfunction regardless of patient age, including men at least 75 years old.

Adulteration of purported herbal and natural sexual performance enhancement dietary supplements with synthetic phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Many products labeled "herbal" or "all natural" (herbal/natural) that claim to enhance sexual performance and imply use for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) are marketed as over-the-counter (OTC) dietary supplements. However, adulteration with undeclared phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors appears widespread. AIM: To assess the availability, cost, origin, categorical content, and adulteration with PDE5 inhibitors of purported herbal/natural OTC dietary supplements claiming to naturally enhance sexual performance. METHODS: Pfizer Global Security coordinated sample collection (all from convenience stores and filling stations in two U.S. metropolitan areas except for seven from U.S. Customs seizures) and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adulteration with synthetic PDE5 inhibitors. RESULTS: Ninety-one samples labeled as 58 distinct products and priced from $2.99 to $17.99 were evaluated. Origin/manufacture was claimed as United States (n = 62), apparently Asian (n = 15), and not clearly identified (n = 14). Although no sample claimed to include synthetic substances, 74 (81%) contained PDE5-inhibitor pharmaceutical ingredients, including tadalafil and/or sildenafil (n = 40, of which 18 contained >110% of the highest approved drug product strength) or PDE5-inhibitor analogs (n = 34). Pronounced heterogeneity of contents between samples within individual products indicated minimal quality control during manufacture. Labeling was inadequate (e.g., lacking lot number and/or expiry date) for 17 products (23 samples) and inconsistent between samples within a given product (e.g., in manufacturer, lot number, and/or expiry date) for seven of 17 products having multiple samples. Only 14 samples warned against concomitant nitrate use. CONCLUSIONS: Ethical pharmaceutical companies are concerned for an unsuspecting public when their products are counterfeited, mislabeled, and illegally offered for sale in an unsafe manner. Because of the dangers of adulteration with synthetic PDE5 inhibitors, absent safety warnings, and lack of quality or consistent manufacture, men with ED unknowingly risk their health by using OTC herbal/natural products that claim to enhance sexual performance.

Diagnostic performance of PCA3 to detect prostate cancer in men with increased prostate specific antigen: a prospective study of 1,962 cases.

PURPOSE: The detection of prostate cancer relies primarily on abnormal digital rectal examination or increased serum prostate specific antigen concentration. However, low positive predictive values result in many men with increased prostate specific antigen and/or suspicious digital rectal examination having a negative biopsy. We investigated the value of the PCA3 (prostate cancer gene 3) urine test in predicting the likelihood of diagnosis of cancer before biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, community based clinical trial to evaluate PCA3 score before any biopsy. This trial was conducted at 50 urology practices in the United States. Samples were obtained from 1,962 men with increased serum prostate specific antigen (greater than 2.5 ng/ml) and/or abnormal digital rectal examination before transrectal prostate needle biopsy. Study samples (urinary PCA3 and biopsies) were processed and analyzed by a central laboratory. Sensitivity-specificity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 1,913 urine samples (97.5%) were adequate for PCA3 testing. Of 802 cases diagnosed with prostate cancer 222 had high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation and were suspicious for cancer, whereas 889 cases were benign. The traditional PCA3 cutoff of 35 reduced the number of false-positives from 1,089 to 249, a 77.1% reduction. However, false-negatives (missed cancers) increased significantly from 17 to 413, an increase of more than 2,300%. Lowering the PCA3 cutoff to 10 reduced the number of false-positives 35.4% and false-negatives only increased 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary PCA3 testing in conjunction with prostate specific antigen has the potential to significantly decrease the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Correlations with satisfaction measures in men treated with phosphodiesterase inhibitors for erectile dysfunction.

This literature review examined the relationship of erectile function to patient satisfaction. Published correlation coefficients (r values) were sought between patient-reported outcomes (PROs; i.e., instruments/questionnaires) assessing erection or erectile function and PROs assessing individual sexual satisfaction, satisfaction in the context of the couple or relationship, or satisfaction with erection. The U.S. National Library of Medicine's PubMed database was searched for English-language, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of treatment with a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor in men with erectile dysfunction (ED) who were not selected for any concomitant disease. Trials that reported correlations between an ED-specific and psychometrically validated PRO for an erection/erectile function concept and for a selected satisfaction concept were included. All correlations were positive, with almost all r values >.50. The positive relationship between results on erection/erectile function PROs and results on satisfaction PROs is probably reinforced bidirectionally such that improved erection/erectile function improves satisfaction, which further improves erection and/or erectile function.

A phase IV prospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of extended release testosterone pellets for the treatment of male hypogonadism.

INTRODUCTION: Men with hypogonadism exhibit decreased serum testosterone levels and may experience a constellation of clinical symptoms, including decrease in muscle mass, loss of sexual desire, impotence, and infertility. While previous studies have shown that implantation of extended release testosterone pellets can provide therapeutic levels of testosterone over several months, additional data are needed to establish this approach as the standard of care for male hypogonadism. AIM: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of testosterone pellets over 6 months as a treatment for male hypogonadism in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: A phase IV, single center, open-label study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous insertion of 8 to 12 testosterone 75 mg pellets (450 mg to 900 mg), during a single implantation procedure in hypogonadal men. Subjects who successfully completed the protocol were allowed to enroll in an extension study that included another implantation and 6 months of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety was determined by investigator-reported adverse events, changes in vital signs, physical exam findings, and laboratory tests. Efficacy was based on serum laboratory tests, physical exams, implantation site evaluations, and vital signs. Secondary objectives were to assess patient preference for testosterone pellets and to maintain optimal total testosterone. RESULTS: Mean testosterone significantly increased and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels significantly decreased from pre-implantation values at weeks 1, 4, and 12, and had returned to pre-implantation levels by week 24. Prostate-specific antigen levels remained unchanged for the duration of the study. Improvements in several symptoms of hypogonadism were determined with multiple questionnaires. Implanted testosterone pellets were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Implanted testosterone pellets can normalize testosterone and LH levels and improve symptoms for at least 3 months and up to 6 months in men with hypogonadism, and should be considered as a therapeutic option for hypogonadal men.

Changes in peak urinary flow and voiding efficiency in men with signs and symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia during once daily tadalafil treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To determine, by post hoc analysis, the effects of tadalafil (a long-acting phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor) on peak urinary flow (Q(max)), bladder capacity, voiding efficiency and the obstructive symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH (BPH-LUTS), compared with placebo. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 1058 men with BPH-LUTS were randomly allocated to receive once daily treatment with placebo or tadalafil (2.5, 5, 10, or 20 mg) for 12 weeks. Uroflowmetry, postvoid residual volume (PVR), and BPH symptom score measurements were assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS: Increases in Q(max) were numerically greater for tadalafil (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 mg with percentage changes of 15%, 16%, 17%, 22%, respectively) vs placebo (12%), but did not reach statistical significance. Age, baseline Q(max), erectile dysfunction history, sexual activity, and previous alpha-blocker therapy significantly influenced the Q(max) response. Tadalafil was not associated with significant changes in PVR. Tadalafil had its greatest effects on bladder capacity and voiding efficiency in men with a Q(max) of <10 mL/s at baseline, but these changes were not significantly different from placebo responses. Tadalafil treatment significantly improved the IPSS obstructive subscores (tadalafil 2.5, 5, 10, 20 mg with percentage changes of 24%, 31%, 33%, 33%, respectively) vs placebo (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Once daily tadalafil did not significantly change Q(max) or voiding efficiency compared with placebo in men with BPH-LUTS, although there were dose-dependent improvements. No subgroups were identified where tadalafil or placebo treatment had a deleterious effect on Q(max). Despite these minimal changes in uroflowmetric measures, tadalafil was associated with clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in the obstructive symptoms of BPH.

In men with erectile dysfunction, satisfaction with quality of erections correlates with erection hardness, treatment satisfaction, and emotional well-being.

INTRODUCTION: The validated Quality of Erection Questionnaire (QEQ) evaluates satisfaction with erection quality. AIM: To collate QEQ data, including correlations between QEQ outcomes and outcomes assessing emotional well-being, treatment satisfaction, and erection hardness after sildenafil citrate treatment. METHODS: In four trials, men older than 18 years and with erectile dysfunction, a stable sexual partner, and no recent phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor use were randomized to double-blind flexible-dose sildenafil or placebo (1:1 ratio) for 6 or 10 weeks (two trials), fixed-dose 50 mg, 100 mg, and placebo (1:1:1 ratio) for 8 weeks (one trial), and 50 mg and 100 mg (1:1 ratio) for 4 weeks after 4 weeks of single-blind sildenafil 50 mg. Exclusion criteria included recent significant cardiovascular disease, use of nitrates, nitric oxide donors, cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors, or other erectile dysfunction treatment, and sildenafil hypersensitivity or previous severe or serious treatment-related adverse event. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Scores on the QEQ, QEQ Question 5 (satisfaction with erection hardness), the Self-Esteem and Relationship Questionnaire, and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction; the percentage of occasions with Erection Hardness Score 3 (EHS 3, hard enough for penetration but not completely hard) and/or EHS 4 (completely hard and fully rigid); and Pearson correlation coefficients. RESULTS: 1,296 men (18-80 years) were randomized. Except for the percentage of occasions with EHS 3, all outcomes improved in men treated with sildenafil and correlated positively with the change in QEQ scores in all trials. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction with the quality of erections, which is easily monitored with the QEQ, correlated positively with measures of emotional well-being and treatment satisfaction and with the change in percentage of erections that were completely hard and fully rigid, but not with the change in percentage of erections that were hard enough for penetration but not completely hard.

Tadalafil relieves lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy and safety of tadalafil dosed once daily for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in 281 men were randomly assigned (1:1) to 5 mg tadalafil for 6 weeks, followed by dose escalation to 20 mg for 6 weeks or 12 weeks of placebo. RESULTS: Tadalafil significantly improved the mean change from baseline in International Prostate Symptom Score at 6 weeks (5 mg tadalafil -2.8 vs placebo -1.2) and at 12 weeks (5/20 mg tadalafil -3.8 vs placebo -1.7). Larger changes were observed with inclusion of the placebo run-in at 12 weeks (5/20 mg tadalafil -7.1 vs placebo -4.5). Significant improvements were also seen in the International Prostate Symptom Score irritative and obstructive domains, the International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life index, a question about urinary symptom improvement and the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (significant at 12 weeks) vs placebo. International Prostate Symptom Score and International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain scores significantly improved in the 56% of men with lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia who were sexually active and had erectile dysfunction. Changes in uroflowmetry parameters were similar in the placebo and tadalafil groups. Commonly reported (2% or greater) treatment emergent adverse events were "erection increased," dyspepsia, back pain, headache, nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection (each 5.1% or less). No change in post-void residual volume was seen with tadalafil treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil once daily was well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant symptomatic improvement for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia. Tadalafil also improved erectile function in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction.

Benefits of a new testosterone gel formulation for hypogonadal men.

Hypogonadism is a common problem in men. It affects 2% to 30% of men aged 40 to 59 years, 20% to 45% aged 60 to 69 years, 34% to 70% aged 70 to 79 years, and most men aged >80 years. Hypogonadism is also highly prevalent in men with chronic illnesses, such as HIV infection. The low testosterone (T) levels associated with hypogonadism impair sexual function and many other aspects of health and well-being. In aging men and in those who are chronically ill, impaired gonadal function is characterized by subtle changes at many stages of T regulation. T therapy reverses the effects of hypogonadism, improving sexual function, body composition, mood, and well-being. Although many forms of T therapy are available, some therapies have limitations that render them ineffective or inconvenient. A new type of T gel has improved pharmacokinetic and clinical profiles compared with other forms of T therapy. This T gel has been shown to be effective in older men and in men with HIV infection, despite unsatisfactory response to earlier T-gel therapy.