Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Infect Dis Ther ; 12(6): 1725-1737, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37243912

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Infectious diseases (ID) consultations have been demonstrated to improve patient outcomes in the treatment of severe infections. However, ID consultation is often unavailable to patients that live in rural communities. Little is known regarding the treatment of infections in rural hospitals with no coverage from an ID specialist. We characterized the outcomes of patients cared for in hospitals without coverage from an ID physician. METHODS: Patients aged 18 years or older admitted to eight community hospitals without access to ID consultation during a 6.5-month period were assessed. All patients had received at least three days of continuous antimicrobial therapy. The primary outcome was the need for transfer to a tertiary facility for ID services. The secondary outcome was the characterization of antimicrobials received. Antimicrobial courses were evaluated independently by two board-certified ID physicians. RESULTS: 3706 encounters were evaluated. Transfers for ID consultation occurred in 0.01% of patients. The ID physician would have made modifications in 68.5% of patients. Areas for improvement included treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, broad-spectrum treatment of skin and soft tissue infection, long courses of azithromycin, and management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, including choice and length of therapy, as well as obtaining echocardiography. Patients evaluated received 22,807 days of antimicrobial therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized in community hospitals are rarely transferred for ID consultation. Our work demonstrates a need for ID consultation in community hospitals, identifying opportunities to enhance patient care by modifying antimicrobial regimens to improve antimicrobial stewardship and avoid inappropriate antimicrobials. Efforts to expand the ID workforce to include coverage at rural hospitals will likely improve antibiotic utilization.

3.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(1): 101396, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36126764

RESUMO

In the COVID-19 pandemic, to minimize aerosol-generating procedures, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was utilized at our institution as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for diagnosing infective endocarditis (IE). This retrospective study evaluated the clinical utility of CMR for detecting IE among 14 patients growing typical microorganisms on blood cultures or meeting modified Duke Criteria. Seven cases were treated for IE. In 2 cases, CMR results were notable for possible leaflet vegetations and were clinically meaningful in guiding antibiotic therapy, obtaining further imaging, and/or pursuing surgical intervention. In 2 cases, vegetations were missed on CMR but detected on TEE. In 3 cases, CMR was non-diagnostic, but patients were treated empirically. There was no difference in antibiotic duration or outcomes over 1 year. CMR demonstrated mixed results in diagnosing valvular vegetations and guiding clinical decision-making. Further prospective controlled trials of CMR Vs TEE are warranted.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Humanos , COVID-19/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , Endocardite/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite/terapia , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/patologia , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética
4.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 89(11): 640-642, 2022 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36319051

RESUMO

Recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in adults have been updated in the hopes not only of preventing more cases of invasive pneumococcal disease but also of making the recommendations simpler and easier to follow.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas , Vacinação , Adulto , Humanos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle
5.
Case Rep Neurol ; 14(2): 286-290, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35949205

RESUMO

Fingolimod is a disease-modifying treatment utilized in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Fingolimod has been associated with an increased risk in herpes simplex and varicella infection in clinical trials. We report a case of cerebral venous thrombosis secondary to cryptococcus in a patient receiving fingolimod. A 61-year-old male with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod presented with a 2-week history of headache, chills, and night sweats. An MRI of the brain revealed a left transverse and sigmoid sinus thrombosis. Two blood cultures revealed Cryptococcus neoformans; a serum cryptococcal antigen was also positive. HIV testing was negative. A lumbar puncture was deferred as the patient was placed on heparin and, subsequently, warfarin for the cerebral venous thrombosis. The patient received antifungal therapy for 14 days with liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine, followed by oral fluconazole for 8 weeks. He was subsequently readmitted 60 days later with bilateral papilledema; his anticoagulation was reversed, and a lumbar puncture revealed a negative cryptococcal antigen and an intracranial pressure of 20. A repeat MRI revealed worsening superior sagittal sinus thrombosis, thought to be the cause of the papilledema; his anticoagulation was reinitiated. He received a brief course of intravenous methylprednisolone, but as his multiple sclerosis was well-controlled, further therapy was deferred. His symptoms had resolved at a 3-month follow-up appointment. This is the first report of a multiple sclerosis patient treated with fingolimod to develop cerebral venous thrombosis secondary to cryptococcal fungemia. The risks of opportunistic infections should be considered in patients managed with fingolimod.

7.
J Med Virol ; 93(3): 1620-1630, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918755

RESUMO

The efficacy of tocilizumab (TOC), monoclonal antibody against interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor, in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients has led to conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of addition of TOC to standard of care (SOC) versus SOC in patients with COVID-19. We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, WHO COVID, LitCOVID, and Cochrane databases. Pooled outcomes (overall mortality, need for mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and secondary infections) were compared using DerSimonian-Laird/Random-effects approach. Risk difference (RD), confidence interval (CI), and p values were generated. A total of 23 studies with 6279 patients (1897 in TOC and 4382 in SOC group, respectively) were included. The overall mortality was lower in TOC group compared to SOC group (RD: -0.06; CI: -0.12 to -0.01; p = .03). Subgroup analysis including studies with only severe cases revealed lower mortality (RD: -0.12; CI: -0.18 to -0.06; p < .01) and need for mechanical ventilation (RD: -0.11; CI: -0.19 to -0.02; p = .01) in TOC group compared to SOC group. The addition of TOC to SOC has the potential to reduce mortality and need for mechanical ventilation in patients with severe COVID-19. Randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19/mortalidade , Hospitalização , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Receptores de Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inibidores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...