Open reduction after failed closed reduction following failed Pavlik harness treatment in developmental dysplasia of the hip: One- or two-stage?

INTRODUCTION: The current published evidence for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with failed closed reduction (CR) following failed Pavlik harness (PH) treatment is still limited. This study aimed to determine whether an one-stage open reduction (OR) would lead to a similar outcome to a two-stage OR in these patients. Meanwhile, the occurrence of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) and further surgery (pelvic osteotomy, PO) within the follow-up period was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of DDH patients who failed CR following failed PH treatment and received OR finally between January 2008 and December 2020 were studied. The patients were divided into two groups. One group of which received OR immediately after failed CR (one-stage OR group, Group A), and the other received a delayed OR (two-stage OR group, Group B). The McKay's criteria, acetabular index (AI) and the degree of dislocation of the hips were evaluated for the final outcomes. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, 54 (84.4%) of the 64 hips in Group A and 26 (83.9%) of 31 hips in Group B were in excellent or good condition. Comparison between the two groups revealed that there were no differences in terms of McKay grading (P = 0.950), AI (P = 0.783), incidence of AVN (P = 0.745), and also incidence of PO (P = 1.000). However, a significant lower mean AI was found in Group A, when the OR was performed in Group B (31.06 ± 4.45° vs. 33.87 ± 4.12°, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Both of the one- and two-stage OR may acheive favorable outcomes. Moreover, one-stage OR is of without the general anesthesia risk associated with two-stage OR. We therefore advocate that an OR should be performed in appropriate DDH patients during the same session once a failed CR is detected.

Correction of Pediatric Cubitus Varus by Centralization of the Distal Humeral Fragment: A Surgical Technique to Avoid Lateral Condylar Prominence.

BACKGROUND: Cubitus varus is a well-recognized late complication of supracondylar humerus fractures in children. Various osteotomies have been described to correct this deformity, but each has disadvantages. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of a surgical technique, lateral closing wedge osteotomy combined with centralization of the distal humeral fragment, in cubitus varus. Meanwhile, the occurrence of postoperative lateral condylar prominence was observed. METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2019, 36 pediatric cubitus varus deformity patients who were treated with lateral closing wedge osteotomy combined with centralization of the distal fragment in our institution were included. The corrective osteotomies were performed through a standard lateral approach and fixed with crossed Kirschner wires. The preoperative and postoperative full-length anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of bilateral upper limbs were assessed. At the same time, clinical and radiologic parameters were reviewed. Lateral condylar prominence index (LCPI) and any other complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean preoperative humerus-elbow-wrist angle (HEWA) on the affected side was 20.9 degrees of varus, which was significantly improved to 9.2 degrees of valgus postoperatively. The mean postoperative value of LCPI was -0.047. Postoperative LCPI and HEWA was compared with the normal side, and there was no significant difference. All of the patients had excellent clinical and radiographic alignment. No surgical complications and limitation of range of motion were noted. No patient complained of lateral bony prominence. CONCLUSION: Lateral closing wedge osteotomy by centralization of distal fragment is a safe and highly effective method and prevents lateral prominence with a minimal complication rate. We recommend this technique for the treatment of cubitus varus in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Case series.

Impact of Failed Pavlik Harness Treatment on the Outcomes Following Closed or Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Purpose: To investigate the impact of failed Pavlik harness (PH) treatment on the outcomes following closed reduction (CR) or open reduction (OR) in developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Methods: Ninety-three DDH patients treated with CR or OR were enrolled. One group of which received previous PH treatment (F group) and the other (L group) not. The clinical outcomes were evaluated according to McKay's criteria. Radiographs were evaluated for acetabular index (AI) and the degree of dislocation of the hips. Results: A higher rate of CR was found in F group (P = 0.034). Before CR/OR, the mean AI in F group was significantly lower than that in L group (P = 0.000), while at the last follow-up, the AIs in both groups were all improved. In F group, there were 7 (16.67%), 18 (42.86%) and 17 (40.48%) hips were classified as Graf type II, III and IV pathologic changes, respectively, when PH treatment started, while the corresponding data were 17 (40.48%), 17 (40.48%) and 8 (19.05%) after PH treatment (P = 0.024). At the last follow-up, no significant difference was found concerning the complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: PH treatment, even if failed, may have the ability of accelerating the development of the acetabulum and increasing the rate of successful CR. Thus we advocate a trial of PH treatment for all DDH patients less than 6 months of age. Meanwhile, a close monitoring by dynamic ultrasonography is required due to the risk of AVN.

Clinical and radiological results of two hybrid reconstructive techniques in noncontiguous 3-level cervical spondylosis.

OBJECT: To date, formulation of the optimal surgical protocol for noncontiguous multilevel cervical spondylosis remains controversial, and the corresponding clinical data continue to be limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two hybrid reconstructive techniques in noncontiguous 3-level cervical spondylosis (2 contiguous disc levels and 1 "skip" disc level [nonoperated level between 2 operated levels]). The incidence of adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD) was also evaluated. METHODS: Sixty-three consecutive patients with noncontiguous 3-level cervical spondylosis who underwent two different hybrid methods of treatment were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the fusion group and the arthroplasty group. A titanium mesh cage and an anterior cervical plate were used after the anterior cervical corpectomy, and then a stand-alone cage (the fusion group) or an artificial cervical disc (the arthroplasty group) was used after the discectomy. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score and the JOA scale score improvement rate preoperatively and during follow-up. Radiological results were assessed using global angle and global range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine. The ASD was also evaluated. RESULTS: The JOA scores of the patients significantly improved postoperatively and were well maintained within the follow-up period, as did the JOA scale score improvement rate. The mean global angle of the cervical spine of the patients significantly increased postoperatively. At the last follow-up evaluation, the mean global ROM was retained by patients in the arthroplasty group (p > 0.05) but not by patients in the fusion group (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference in the incidence of ASD between the 2 groups (p = 0.114). However, at the skip levels, patients in the fusion group had a higher incidence of ASD than patients in the arthroplasty group (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Both of the hybrid procedures (anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion [ACCF] + anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and ACCF + cervical disc arthroplasty [CDA]) yielded favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of noncontiguous 3-level cervical spondylosis. Moreover, the ACCF + CDA procedure may have the ability to decrease the likelihood of ASD in appropriate patients.

[Strengthened respiratory management for lower tracheostomy risks in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury].

OBJECTIVE: To access the feasibility of reducing tracheostomy rates in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury through a systemic respiratory management mode. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for 239 patients on a systemic respiratory management mode after complete cervical spinal cord injury in Shanghai Changzheng Hospital from 2006 to 2012. Their demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, cause of injury, level of cervical spinal cord injuries, surgical approaches, tracheostomy rates and mortality rates, were collected and analyzed. Tracheostomy rates were compared with those of patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury. Tracheostomy rates were compared with those patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury from 1991 to 2005. The new respiratory management mode for patients with severe cervical spinal cord injury included maintaining adequate energy and water for patients, relieving bronchospasm, loosening phlegm, strengthening body-turning and backslapping, sputum aspiration with suction tube through nasal cavity or bronchofibroscope, strengthening deep breath and cough training, strict control of tracheostomy indications and short-term postoperative intubation reserving if necessary. RESULTS: 32 patients were implemented tracheostomy. The tracheostomy rate was 13.4%. 10 patients died, the mortality rate was 4.18%. However, the tracheostomy rate was 19.1% and mortality rate 21.4% from 1991 to 2005. The tracheostomy rate was significantly lower than before and survival rate improved significantly. CONCLUSION: The systemic respiratory management mode can effectively reduce tracheostomy rate of patients with complete cervical spinal cord injury and improve their survival rate.