Experience With Establishing a Robotic Donor Hepatectomy Program for Pediatric Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of minimal invasive donor hepatectomy, especially for left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) have been unequivocally demonstrated. Moreover, donors in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) are usually parents who need to recover quickly to take care of the child. There are inherent limitations to conventional laparoscopic surgery including surgeon's experience with advanced laparoscopic surgery and steep learning curve which limits the wide application of minimal invasive donor hepatectomy. We share our experience of establishing a program of robotic donor hepatectomy (RDH) and achieving proficiency in performing RDH for pediatric LT. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected of consecutive LLS RDH based on a structured learning algorithm. Donor and recipient outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-five consecutive cases of LLS RDH were performed. The median primary warm ischemia time was 6 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-7 min). No major complications (grade ≥IIIb Clavien-Dindo) were noted in the cohort. There were no emergency conversion to open surgery and neither were there postoperative explorations through a laparotomy. Seven grafts were hyper-reduced and 5 required venoplasty. Two recipients died because of severe sepsis and multiorgan failure. Major complications occurred in 15 children (20%), none of which were attributable to RDH. Median hospital stay of the donors and recipients was 5 d (IQR: 5-6) and 12 d (IQR: 10-18) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We share our experience of starting a RDH program for pediatric LT. We highlight the challenges and our learning algorithm to spur teams on the cusp of starting robotic transplant programs.

Anatomical variations of left hepatic vein and outflow reconstruction techniques in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.

Anatomical variations of left hepatic vein are observed in nearly a third of left lateral segment (LLS) donors in living donor liver transplantation. However, there is a paucity of studies and no structured algorithm for customized outflow reconstruction in LLS grafts with variant anatomy. Analysis of a prospectively collected database of 296 LLS pediatric living donor liver transplantation was done to identify different venous drainage patterns of segments 2 (V2) and 3 (V3). Left hepatic vein anatomy was classified into 3 types: type 1 (n = 270, 91.2%): V2 and V3 joined to form a common trunk which drains into the middle hepatic vein/inferior vena cava (IVC), subtype 1a length of trunk ≥9 mm and subtype 1b length of trunk <9 mm; type 2(n = 6, 2%): V2 and V3 drain independently into IVC; type 3 (n = 20, 6.8%): V2 and V3 drain into IVC and middle hepatic vein respectively. Analysis of postoperative outcomes between LLS grafts with single and reconstructed multiple outflows showed no difference in the occurrence of hepatic vein thrombosis/stenosis, major morbidity (P = .91), and 5-year survival (log-rank P = .562). This classification is a simple yet effective tool for preoperative donor assessment, and we propose a schema for the customized reconstruction of LLS grafts with excellent and consistently reproducible outcomes.

Liver Transplantation for Rapidly Progressive Giant Hepatic Hemangioma With Diffuse Hemangiomatosis.

Cavernous hemangiomas are the most common benign tumors of the liver and are usually asymptomatic. On the other hand, giant hemangioma and diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis may become symptomatic by causing compression on adjacent structures, rupture, or consumptive coagulopathy. The coexistence of these 2 entities in an adult is extremely rare, and the literature, especially on their management, is sparse. We report the case of a young woman who developed a rapidly growing recurrent giant hemangioma and diffuse hepatic hemangiomatosis with significant pressure effects, raising the suspicion of a malignant tumor. She had previously undergone a liver resection and an aborted attempt at liver transplant elsewhere. As a preoperative measure, with an aim to shrink the tumor, she underwent arterial embolization and chemotherapy. After this procedure, she underwent deceased donor liver transplant. Her postoperative period was uneventful, and she was well at her 6-month follow-up. We highlight the challenges involved and the need for a multidisciplinary approach in managing these lesions. Liver transplant is an excellent option for patients who develop life-threatening complications or poor quality of life due to these benign liver tumors.

Live Liver Donors: Is Right Still Right?

BACKGROUND: Conventional wisdom dictates that a larger hepatectomy is more prone to complications. Consequently, with the donor safety as paramount, the transplant community has intuitively been proponents of left lobe donation in live donor liver transplantation (LDLT), thereby satisfying the tenet of double equipoise. More recently some data suggest that this may not always be the case, especially in established centres. Our aim was to compare right and left lobe donor outcomes in LDLT from a centre with cumulative experience. METHODS: Review of a prospectively collected database of right and left lobe liver donors operated between August 2009 and July 2017 was performed. Their preoperative demographics, operative and post-operative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Of 904 liver transplantations, 458 were right lobe donors [379 without middle hepatic vein (MHV), 79 with MHV] and 58 left lobe donors. There was a significant difference in GRWR and functional liver remnant between the right and left lobe donors (1.27 ± 0.45 vs. 1.03 ± 0.28 p = 0.004, and 63.2 ± 7.9 vs. 37.7 ± 16.3, respectively, p value). The end portal pressure (7 vs. 8 mmHg p = <0.001), peak bilirubin (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5 p = <0.001) and day 5 bilirubin (0.8 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.9 p = <0.001) were significantly higher in right lobe donors. There was no difference in blood loss, duration of surgery or peak lactate between the groups. Complications (20.7% vs. 25.9% p = 0.48), including serious complications (Clavien-Dindo > III) (6.9% vs. 8.1% p = 0.95), duration of ICU and hospital stay, were comparable between the groups. Subgroup analysis between left lobe and right lobe with and without MHV donor was also comparable. CONCLUSION: Though biochemical differences exist between the groups, no difference in outcomes was noted. Despite larger liver mass loss in right lobe donors, a strict protocol-based approach to donor selection leads to comparable outcomes between left lobe and right lobe donations.

Living donor liver transplantation in Alagille syndrome-Single center experience from south Asia.

To analyze the clinical characteristics and the outcomes of living donor liver transplantation in children with Alagille syndrome (AGS). Clinical data of children with AGS who underwent liver transplantation between July 2009 and May 2019 in our unit were retrospectively analyzed. Primary end-points were patient and graft survival. Ten children with AGS underwent living donor liver transplantation at a median age of 28 months (range, 12-84 months). Jaundice was the most common initial symptom and was noted after a median duration of 20 days after birth (range, 7-60 days). Two patients had undergone Kasai porto-enterostomy for misdiagnosis of biliary atresia. The most common indication for transplantation was severe pruritus with poor quality of life. Explant livers in three children showed cirrhosis with early well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. We have 100% patient and graft survival at a mean follow-up of 32 months (range 3-72 months). The median z-score for weight and height at liver transplantation was -2.66 (range: -6.44 to -0.9) and -3.6 (range: -7.96 to -0.93) while at follow-up was -1.7 (range: -3.4 to -0.35) and -2.1 (range: -3.9 to -1.4), respectively. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was normal pretransplant and follow-up. This is the first series of LDLT for Alagille syndrome in the Indian sub-continent. We report excellent post-transplant outcomes in contrast to outcomes reported from Western literature.

Liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma - why left is sometimes right.

INTRODUCTION: Left-sided liver resection (LLR) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) may require right hepatic artery (RHA) resection and reconstruction because of its intimate relationship with the biliary confluence. Consequently right-sided resections (RLR) are preferred for Bismuth-Corlette IIIb tumours, and resections avoided in Bismuth-Corlette IV tumours with left lobar atrophy when the RHA is involved by tumour. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients with PHC who presented between December 2009 and June 2015. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent resection for PHC (23 LLR, 13 RLR). The number of Bismuth-Corlette IV patients undergoing LLR was significantly greater than those undergoing RLR (8/23 vs 0/13, p = 0.032). The need for arterial reconstruction (AR) was significantly greater during LLR than RLR (10/23 vs 0/13, p = 0.006). Postoperative liver dysfunction was greater after RLR (5/13 vs 0/23, p = 0.003), and hospital stay was shorter after LLR (10 vs 15 days, p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Safe AR increases the ability to perform potentially curative LLR for PHC. This improves the resectability rate for PHC, particularly for Bismuth-Corlette Type IV tumours. The larger liver remnant after LLR results in less postoperative liver dysfunction and shorter hospital stay without increased operating time, blood loss or morbidity.

Donor Outcomes in Living Donor Liver Transplantation-Analysis of 275 Donors From a Single Centre in India.

BACKGROUND: Live donor liver transplantation is the predominant form of liver transplantation in India and in most Asian countries. Donor outcome reports are an important source of information to be shared with prospective donors at the time of informed consent. This is the first donor outcome series from India. METHODS: Analysis of donor characteristics and morbidity of 275 live donors from a single large volume center is documented. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five patients donated from November 2009 to October 2014, 144 were women and 131 were men, 180 donated to adults and 95 donated to children. Right lobe donors were majority at 62.2% followed by left lateral segment 28%. Two thirds of the live donors did not have any morbidity; 114 complications were encountered in 85 patients. The complications were graded as per Clavien 5 tier grading and major morbidity (grade III b, grade IV grade V) was 4.36%. Postoperative biliary complication was seen in 3 donors. CONCLUSIONS: This large single-center study is the first donor outcome report from India, and the results are comparable to other published donor series. Documentation and regular audit of donor outcomes is important to help improve the safety of donor hepatectomy and to provide a database for informed consent of prospective donors.