Evolving Characteristics of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents for MR Imaging: A Systematic Review of the Importance of Relaxivity.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are widely and routinely used to enhance the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography examinations. T1 relaxivity (r1) is the measure of their ability to increase signal intensity in tissues and blood on T1-weighted images at a given dose. Pharmaceutical companies have invested in the design and development of GBCAs with higher and higher T1 relaxivity values, and "high relaxivity" is a claim frequently used to promote GBCAs, with no clear definition of what "high relaxivity" means, or general concurrence about its clinical benefit. To understand whether higher relaxivity values translate into a material clinical benefit, well-designed, and properly powered clinical studies are necessary, while mere in vitro measurements may be misleading. This systematic review of relevant peer-reviewed literature provides high-quality clinical evidence showing that a difference in relaxivity of at least 40% between two GBCAs results in superior diagnostic efficacy for the higher-relaxivity agent when this is used at the same equimolar gadolinium dose as the lower-relaxivity agent, or similar imaging performance when used at a lower dose. Either outcome clearly implies a relevant clinical benefit. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Standardized Approaches to MR Safety Assessment of Patients with Implanted Devices.

Three dimensionally mapping the relative spatial distributions and magnitudes of the various energy sources used in the MR imaging process for a given MR scanner potentiates an understanding of the relative spatial distributions of the potential risks associated with each of these energies or fields. By systematically analyzing the data for each energy source relative to the location and type of implants, devices, and/or foreign bodies within a specific patient, one can prospectively assess and even begin to quantify the risks of exposing that patient to selected MR scanner hardware for a requested diagnostic study.

Dentate Nucleus Signal Intensity Increases Following Repeated Gadobenate Dimeglumine Administrations: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background Increased cerebral signal intensity (SI) has been reported in patients undergoing MRI with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Published data on gadobenate dimeglumine have been somewhat contradictory. Purpose To evaluate the relationship between dosage of gadobenate dimeglumine and SI change at MRI following multiple gadobenate dimeglumine administrations. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients referred for clinically indicated brain MRI from January 2006 through May 2016 were evaluated for inclusion. Eligible patients were between 18 and 90 years old at their baseline brain MRI and had never received a GBCA, had undergone three or more MRI examinations with gadobenate dimeglumine, and had the baseline scan and another brain MRI scan available for comparison. The primary group consisted of patients with four or fewer supratentorial lesions smaller than 3 cm who underwent axial T1-weighted MRI at 1.5 T. One patient had also undergone prior radiation therapy. The secondary group consisted of patients with a history of brain radiation therapy or craniotomy who underwent 1.5-T and 3-T same-plane T1-weighted MRI (in any order). The SI for up to eight brain MRI examinations per patient was measured, and relative SI changes from baseline to interval scans were calculated. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the gadobenate dimeglumine washout since the last gadolinium exposure. All patients had normal renal and liver functions. Linear mixed regression analyses were performed for variables with P < .05. Results In 43 patients (14 men, 29 women; median age, 49 years; age range, 25-73 years), the dentate nucleus (DN)-to-middle cerebral peduncle (MCP) SI ratio showed a mean increase of 6.7% ± 3.9 in the primary group and 4.0% ± 2.7 in the secondary group (both P < .001) following the administration of 134 mL ± 141 gadobenate dimeglumine over 55 months ± 35.2. The DN/MCP SI ratio increased linearly with the amount of gadobenate dimeglumine, with a mean increase of 0.015% ± 0.004 per 1 mL of gadobenate dimeglumine (R2 = 0.3, P < .001). Conclusion In patients receiving multiple doses of gadobenate dimeglumine, a linear relationship existed between gadobenate dimeglumine administrations and an increase in the dentate nucleus-to-middle cerebral peduncle signal intensity ratio at MRI. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by McDonald and Kallmes in this issue.

ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: Updates and critical information 2019.

The need for a guidance document on MR safe practices arose from a growing awareness of the MR environment's potential risks and adverse event reports involving patients, equipment, and personnel. Initially published in 2002, the American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety established de facto industry standards for safe and responsible practices in clinical and research MR environments. The most recent version addresses new sources of risk of adverse events, increases awareness of dynamic MR environments, and recommends that those responsible for MR medical director safety undergo annual MR safety training. With regular updates to these guidelines, the latest MR safety concerns can be accounted for to ensure a safer MR environment where dangers are minimized. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:331-338.

Safety Considerations of 7-T MRI in Clinical Practice.

Although 7-T MRI has recently received approval for use in clinical patient care, there are distinct safety issues associated with this relatively high magnetic field. Forces on metallic implants and radiofrequency power deposition and heating are safety considerations at 7 T. Patient bioeffects such as vertigo, dizziness, false feelings of motion, nausea, nystagmus, magnetophosphenes, and electrogustatory effects are more common and potentially more pronounced at 7 T than at lower field strengths. Herein the authors review safety issues associated with 7-T MRI. The rationale for safety concerns at this field strength are discussed as well as potential approaches to mitigate risk to patients and health care professionals.

The Impact of Gadolinium Deposition on Radiology Practice: An International Survey of Radiologists.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Brain deposition of gadolinium following the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) was initially reported in 2014. Gadolinium deposition is now recognized as a dose-dependent consequence of exposure. The potential clinical implications are not yet understood. The purpose of this study was to determine radiologists' reporting practices in response to gadolinium deposition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey querying radiologists' practices regarding gadolinium deposition was distributed by Radiopaedia.org from November-December 2015. RESULTS: Our study sample included 94 total respondents (50% academic; 27% private practice; 23% hybrid) from 30 different countries (USA 18%). Fifty-seven (62%) radiologists had observed brain gadolinium deposition on MRI brain studies howerver more than half of these (30 of 57) reported detecting dentate T1 shortening only rarely (<1/month). Among respondents, 58% (52 of 89) do not or would not include the finding in the radiology report; only 12 (13%) report the finding in the impression of their reports. The most common reason for not reporting gadolinium deposition was the risk of provoking unnecessary patient anxiety (29%, 20 of 70). Recent data on gadolinium deposition has led to a reported practice change in 24 of 87 (28%) of respondents. CONCLUSION: Recognition of, and attitudes toward, brain gadolinium deposition were inconsistent in this worldwide sample. Most surveyed radiologists do not routinely report dentate T1shortening as a marker of gadolinium deposition. Fear of provoking patient/clinician anxiety and an incomplete understanding of the implications of gadolinium deposition contribute to inconsistencies in reporting.

Gadolinium Retention: A Research Roadmap from the 2018 NIH/ACR/RSNA Workshop on Gadolinium Chelates.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have revolutionized MRI, enabling physicians to obtain crucial life-saving medical information that often cannot be obtained with other imaging modalities. Since initial approval in 1988, over 450 million intravenous GBCA doses have been administered worldwide, with an extremely favorable pharmacologic safety profile; however, recent information has raised new concerns over the safety of GBCAs. Mounting evidence has shown there is long-term retention of gadolinium in human tissues. Further, a small subset of patients have attributed a constellation of symptoms to GBCA exposure, although the association of these symptoms with GBCA administration or gadolinium retention has not been proven by scientific investigation. Despite evidence that macrocyclic GBCAs show less gadolinium retention than linear GBCAs, the safety implications of gadolinium retention are unknown. The mechanism and chemical forms of gadolinium retention, as well as the biologic activity and clinical importance of these retained gadolinium species, remain poorly understood and underscore the need for additional research. In February 2018, an international meeting was held in Bethesda, Md, at the National Institutes of Health to discuss the current literature and knowledge gaps about gadolinium retention, to prioritize future research initiatives to better understand this phenomenon, and to foster collaborative standardized studies. The greatest priorities are to determine (a) if gadolinium retention adversely affects the function of human tissues, (b) if retention is causally associated with short- or long-term clinical manifestations of disease, and (c) if vulnerable populations, such as children, are at greater risk for experiencing clinical disease. The purpose of the research roadmap is to highlight important information that is not known and to identify and prioritize needed research. ©RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article .

Frequency of acute longus colli tendinitis on CT examinations.

PURPOSE: We attempted to determine the frequency of acute longus colli tendinitis on diagnostic CT imaging performed at a large multicenter health care system. By correlating with the pre-imaging clinical information, we investigated which patient presentations should lead the radiologist to increased suspicion for this condition. METHODS: Images from a total of 8101 adult CT examinations of the neck and cervical spine performed over a 3-month period were evaluated by researchers independent of the original clinical report. Clinical information available at the time of imaging was reviewed and assigned to one of five categories. Frequency of the condition was calculated by sex and clinical presentation. This retrospective study with waiver of consent and waiver of HIPPA was approved by our IRB. RESULTS: Nine positive scans were found for an overall frequency of 1.1 per 1000 examinations. The frequency was significantly higher (11.4 per thousand) on scans performed of patients presenting without history of recent trauma, concern for tumor, suspected postoperative complication, or clinical signs of infection localized to the neck. Although frequency in males was higher than in females, this did not reach statistical significance. In no positive or negative case was longus colli tendinitis considered in the pre-imaging documentation. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of acute longus colli tendinitis on CT examination generally occur in the absence of prior mention of this condition in the medical record. The radiologist should be particularly alert for this diagnosis when a patient presents with rapid-onset neck pain without a clear history of recent trauma or other etiologies.

Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations.

Emerging evidence has linked MRI signal changes in deep nuclei of the brain with repeated administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Gadolinium deposits have been confirmed in brain tissue, most notably in the dentate nuclei and globus pallidus. Although some linear contrast agents appear to cause greater MRI signal changes than some macrocyclic agents, deposition of gadolinium has also been observed with macrocyclic agents. However, the extent of gadolinium deposition varies between agents. Furthermore, the clinical significance of the retained gadolinium in the brain, if any, remains unknown. No data are available in human beings or animals to show adverse clinical effects due to the gadolinium deposition in the brain. On behalf of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, we present recommendations for the clinical and research use of gadolinium-based contrast agents. These recommendations might evolve as new evidence becomes available.

Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA): Safety overview after 3 decades of clinical experience.

In the past three decades, we have learned much about the potential short-term and long-term safety issues associated with the intravenous administration of gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCAs). Yet, surprisingly, the past few years and even months have been accompanied by new discoveries in this field. This manuscript focuses predominantly on what we have learned - and are continuing to learn - about the long-term potential MR safety issues associated with the administration of the various GBCAs available today and will highlight areas in which they appear to differ from each other at least in a quantitative fashion, if not qualitatively.