The quantitative impact of joint peer review with a specialist radiologist in head and neck cancer radiotherapy planning.

OBJECTIVES: Radiologist input in peer review of head and neck radiotherapy has been introduced as a routine departmental approach. The aim was to evaluate this practice and to quantitatively analyse the changes made. METHODS: Patients treated with radical-dose radiotherapy between August and November 2020 were reviewed. The incidence of major and minor changes, as defined by The Royal College of Radiologists guidance, was prospectively recorded. The amended radiotherapy volumes were compared with the original volumes using Jaccard Index (JI) to assess conformity; Geographical Miss Index (GMI) for undercontouring; and Hausdorff Distance (HD) between the volumes. RESULTS: In total, 73 out of 87 (84%) patients were discussed. Changes were recommended in 38 (52%) patients: 30 had ≥1 major change, eight had minor changes only. There were 99 amended volumes: The overall median JI, GMI and HD was 0.91 (interquartile range [IQR]=0.80-0.97), 0.06 (IQR = 0.02-0.18) and 0.42 cm (IQR = 0.20-1.17 cm), respectively. The nodal gross-tumour-volume (GTVn) and therapeutic high-dose nodal clinical-target-volume (CTVn) had the biggest magnitude of changes: The median JI, GMI and HD of GTVn was 0.89 (IQR = 0.44-0.95), 0.11 (IQR = 0.05-0.51), 3.71 cm (IQR = 0.31-6.93 cm); high-dose CTVn was 0.78 (IQR = 0.59-0.90), 0.20 (IQR = 0.07-0.31) and 3.28 cm (IQR = 1.22-6.18 cm), respectively. There was no observed difference in the quantitative indices of the 85 'major' and 14 'minor' volumes (p = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Routine head and neck radiologist input in radiotherapy peer review is feasible and can help avoid gross error in contouring. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The major and minor classifications may benefit from differentiation with quantitative indices but requires correlation from clinical outcomes.

Evaluation of rejection, infection, and malignancy outcomes in elderly liver transplant recipients receiving a similar level of immunosuppression compared to a younger group.

Elderly liver transplant (LTx) recipients at a lower risk of acute rejection compared to younger recipients due to immunosenescence. As such, they may benefit from reduced immunosuppression (IS) to minimize infectious and malignant complications. We aimed to evaluate outcomes in LTx recipients ≥60 years compared to a younger group of LTx recipients aged 18-59 years maintained on a similar level of IS. This was a single-center retrospective evaluation of adult LTx recipients from 2013 to 2018 who received methylprednisolone induction and were maintained on tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and a prednisone taper. A total of 143 LTx recipients were evaluated. Mean age in the older group was 65 ± 3.8 compared to 49 ± 10.4 years in the younger group (p < 0.0001). Mean tacrolimus levels and the duration of MMF and steroids were comparable. Both groups had a similar incidence of first rejection within 1 year (19.2% in the elderly group vs. 23.1% in the younger group, p = 0.57). There were no statistical difference in terms of infection, malignancy, or patient survival. In conclusion, our data suggests that elderly LTx recipients, when treated with a similar level of IS, had similar 1 year incidence of rejection, infection, malignancy, and patient survival as younger LTx recipients.

Avatrombopag Use in Patient With Thromboembolic Risks Listed for Combined Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Liver Transplant: A Case Report.

Thrombocytopenia commonly occurs in patients with advanced liver disease and can be a contraindication in patients needing combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and liver transplant (LT). Thrombopoietin receptor agonists, including avatrombopag, are part of a novel drug class and stimulate platelet production. Avatrombopag is indicated in the perioperative setting to avoid platelet transfusions, which carry several disadvantages. Avatrombopag was shown to be safe and effective in patients with chronic liver disease. This study describes the successful use of avatrombopag in a patient with thromboembolic risks in preparation for a combined CABG and LT. Larger clinical trials are necessary to validate our results.

Management of hyperkalemia: A focus on kidney transplant recipients.

Hyperkalemia is a frequent complication among kidney transplant recipients that can lead to fatal arrhythmias. The causes of hyperkalemia post kidney transplant are multifactorial and often are drug-induced, and include decreased glomerular filtration rate, tubular dysfunction, and impaired sodium delivery in the distal nephron. This review will discuss pathophysiology and recent updates in the management of both acute and chronic hyperkalemia with a focus on kidney transplant recipients.

Should we favour the use of 5 × 5 preoperative radiation in rectal cancer.

The management of patients with "locally advanced rectal cancer" (LARC) is evolving from the original aim of reducing local recurrence. Current practice recognises the importance of surgical technique, high-quality preoperative imaging, and integration of neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Contemporary protocols focus on improving survival and avoiding radical surgery with organ preservation strategies. Both short course preoperative radiotherapy (SCPRT) with immediate surgery and long-course chemoradiation (LCCRT) are standard neoadjuvant strategies, both demonstrating similar efficacy in preventing local recurrence, distant metastases and improving disease-free survival (DFS). SCPRT is highly cost-effective with high compliance rates, hence is gaining traction in Europe and East Asia, partly because of inherent flexibility in timing and the ability to add neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy as there is a delay to surgery. SCPRT is currently not being exploited to its full extent - particularly in the USA where uptake is approximately 1% of neoadjuvant treatments for rectal cancer. We analyse the use of induction, concurrent and consolidation chemotherapy with SCPRT in a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach.

The Southeast Scotland Foundation Doctor Teaching Programme--is "near-peer" teaching feasible, efficacious and sustainable on a regional scale?

BACKGROUND: Peer-assisted learning has advantages for students and tutors. AIMS: We aimed to establish a novel 'near-peer' teaching scheme delivered by junior doctors for final-year medical students in Southeast Scotland. We report feedback from students regarding the perceived utility of this scheme, the results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of its impact, and mechanisms for quality assurance and sustainability. METHODS: The scheme was devised by newly qualified doctors. Following open recruitment and tutor training, junior doctor-led sessions were provided on clinical examination and practical prescribing in 2006-2008. Feedback was sought using anonymized questionnaires. An RCT was performed to assess the effect of attendance at a prescribing tutorial on performance in a mock assessment. RESULTS: Of 271 students in 2006-2007, 234 (86%) completed voluntary feedback and 233 (99%) expressed interest in attending more tutorials. In the RCT, students who received a tutorial made fewer dosing errors (9 vs. 22, p = 0.049). The majority of tutors attending the training symposium felt the experience was useful and helped prepare them for teaching. CONCLUSION: 'Near-peer' teaching is a popular adjunct to the undergraduate programme and may promote junior doctors' professional development. Such schemes can be devised and delivered by juniors in conjunction with university staff.