RESUMO
We recently reported on the Multi Wave Animator (MWA), a novel open-source tool with capability of recreating continuous physiologic signals from archived numerical data and presenting them as they appeared on the patient monitor. In this report, we demonstrate for the first time the power of this technology in a real clinical case, an intraoperative cardiopulmonary arrest following reperfusion of a liver transplant graft. Using the MWA, we animated hemodynamic and ventilator data acquired before, during, and after cardiac arrest and resuscitation. This report is accompanied by an online video that shows the most critical phases of the cardiac arrest and resuscitation and provides a basis for analysis and discussion. This video is extracted from a 33-min, uninterrupted video of cardiac arrest and resuscitation, which is available online. The unique strength of MWA, its capability to accurately present discrete and continuous data in a format familiar to clinicians, allowed us this rare glimpse into events leading to an intraoperative cardiac arrest. Because of the ability to recreate and replay clinical events, this tool should be of great interest to medical educators, researchers, and clinicians involved in quality assurance and patient safety.
Assuntos
Parada Cardíaca Induzida , Transplante de Fígado , Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Reperfusão , Ressuscitação , Feminino , Humanos , Fígado/irrigação sanguínea , Fígado/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Transplante HomólogoAssuntos
Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana/métodos , Transplante de Fígado/diagnóstico por imagem , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Derivação Portossistêmica Transjugular Intra-Hepática , Trombose Venosa/cirurgia , Síndrome Hepatorrenal/complicações , Síndrome Hepatorrenal/cirurgia , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Trombose Venosa/complicações , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagemAssuntos
Neoplasias Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Humanos , Inflamação/diagnóstico por imagem , Inflamação/cirurgia , Masculino , Miofibroblastos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ultrassonografia Doppler em Cores , Neoplasias Vasculares/cirurgia , Veia Cava Inferior/cirurgia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors (APCOs) are increasingly used as alternatives to thermodilution. Validation of these evolving technologies in high-risk surgery is still ongoing. In liver transplantation, FloTrac-Vigileo (Edwards Lifesciences) has limited correlation with thermodilution, whereas LiDCO Plus (LiDCO Ltd.) has not been tested intraoperatively. Our goal was to directly compare the 2 proprietary APCO algorithms as alternatives to pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The cardiac index (CI) was measured simultaneously in 20 OLT patients at prospectively defined surgical landmarks with the LiDCO Plus monitor (CI(L)) and the FloTrac-Vigileo monitor (CI(V)). LiDCO Plus was calibrated according to the manufacturer's instructions. FloTrac-Vigileo did not require calibration. The reference CI was derived from pulmonary artery catheter intermittent thermodilution (CI(TD)). CI(V)-CI(TD) bias ranged from -1.38 (95% confidence interval = -2.02 to -0.75 L/minute/m(2), P = 0.02) to -2.51 L/minute/m(2) (95% confidence interval = -3.36 to -1.65 L/minute/m(2), P < 0.001), and CI(L)-CI(TD) bias ranged from -0.65 (95% confidence interval = -1.29 to -0.01 L/minute/m(2), P = 0.047) to -1.48 L/minute/m(2) (95% confidence interval = -2.37 to -0.60 L/minute/m(2), P < 0.01). For both APCOs, bias to CI(TD) was correlated with the systemic vascular resistance index, with a stronger dependence for FloTrac-Vigileo. The capability of the APCOs for tracking changes in CI(TD) was assessed with a 4-quadrant plot for directional changes and with receiver operating characteristic curves for specificity and sensitivity. The performance of both APCOs was poor in detecting increases and fair in detecting decreases in CI(TD). In conclusion, the calibrated and uncalibrated APCOs perform differently during OLT. Although the calibrated APCO is less influenced by changes in the systemic vascular resistance, neither device can be used interchangeably with thermodilution to monitor cardiac output during liver transplantation.