Follistatin Forms a Stable Complex With Inhibin A That Does Not Interfere With Activin A Antagonism.

Inhibins are transforming growth factor-ß family heterodimers that suppress follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion by antagonizing activin class ligands. Inhibins share a common ß chain with activin ligands. Follistatin is another activin antagonist, known to bind the common ß chain of both activins and inhibins. In this study, we characterized the antagonist-antagonist complex of inhibin A and follistatin to determine if their interaction impacted activin A antagonism. We isolated the inhibin A:follistatin 288 complex, showing that it forms in a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio, different from previously reported homodimeric ligand:follistatin complexes, which bind in a 1:2 ratio. Small angle X-ray scattering coupled with modeling provided a low-resolution structure of inhibin A in complex with follistatin 288. Inhibin binds follistatin via the shared activin ß chain, leaving the α chain free and flexible. The inhibin A:follistatin 288 complex was also shown to bind heparin with lower affinity than follistatin 288 alone or in complex with activin A. Characterizing the inhibin A:follistatin 288 complex in an activin-responsive luciferase assay and by surface plasmon resonance indicated that the inhibitor complex readily dissociated upon binding type II receptor activin receptor type IIb, allowing both antagonists to inhibit activin signaling. Additionally, injection of the complex in ovariectomized female mice did not alter inhibin A suppression of FSH. Taken together, this study shows that while follistatin binds to inhibin A with a substochiometric ratio relative to the activin homodimer, the complex can dissociate readily, allowing both proteins to effectively antagonize activin signaling.

The orphan ligand, activin C, signals through activin receptor-like kinase 7.

Activin ligands are formed from two disulfide-linked inhibin ß (Inhß) subunit chains. They exist as homodimeric proteins, as in the case of activin A (ActA; InhßA/InhßA) or activin C (ActC; InhßC/InhßC), or as heterodimers, as with activin AC (ActAC; InhßA:InhßC). While the biological functions of ActA and activin B (ActB) have been well characterized, little is known about the biological functions of ActC or ActAC. One thought is that the InhßC chain functions to interfere with ActA production by forming less active ActAC heterodimers. Here, we assessed and characterized the signaling capacity of ligands containing the InhßC chain. ActC and ActAC activated SMAD2/3-dependent signaling via the type I receptor, activin receptor-like kinase 7 (ALK7). Relative to ActA and ActB, ActC exhibited lower affinity for the cognate activin type II receptors and was resistant to neutralization by the extracellular antagonist, follistatin. In mature murine adipocytes, which exhibit high ALK7 expression, ActC elicited a SMAD2/3 response similar to ActB, which can also signal via ALK7. Collectively, these results establish that ActC and ActAC are active ligands that exhibit a distinct signaling receptor and antagonist profile compared to other activins.

Structural perspective of BMP ligands and signaling.

The Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are the largest class signaling molecules within the greater Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFß) family, and are responsible for a wide array of biological functions, including dorsal-ventral patterning, skeletal development and maintenance, as well as cell homeostasis. As such, dysregulation of BMPs results in a number of diseases, including fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Therefore, understanding BMP signaling and regulation at the molecular level is essential for targeted therapeutic intervention. This review discusses the recent advances in the structural and biochemical characterization of BMPs, from canonical ligand-receptor interactions to co-receptors and antagonists. This work aims to highlight how BMPs differ from other members of the TGFß family, and how that information can be used to further advance the field. Lastly, this review discusses several gaps in the current understanding of BMP structures, with the aim that discussion of these gaps will lead to advancements in the field.