The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab are commonly used in the second-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, these have only been compared in observational studies, not in controlled trials, with limited and inconclusive results being reported. A comparison of their effect on relapse and disability in a real-world setting is therefore needed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in reducing disease activity in RRMS. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective observational study was carried out with prospectively collected data from 16 centers. All consecutive RRMS patients treated with fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab were included. Data for relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were collected. Patients were matched using propensity scores. Annualized relapse rates (ARR), time to first relapse, and disability accumulation were compared. RESULTS: Propensity score matching retained 736 patients in the fingolimod versus 370 in the natalizumab groups, 762 in the fingolimod versus 434 in the ocrelizumab groups, and 310 in the natalizumab versus 310 in the ocrelizumab groups for final analyses. Mean ARR decreased markedly from baseline after treatment in all three treatment groups. Mean on-treatment ARR was lower in natalizumab-treated patients (0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.07-0.12) than in those treated with fingolimod (0.17, 0.15-0.19, p<0.001), ocrelizumab (0.08, 0.06-0.11), and fingolimod (0.14, 0.12-0.16, p=0.001). No significant difference was observed in mean on-treatment ARR between patients treated with natalizumab (0.08, 0.06-0.11) and ocrelizumab (0.09, 0.07-0.12, p=0.54). Compared to fingolimod, the natalizumab and ocrelizumab groups exhibited a higher percentage of relapse-free patients and a lower percentage of MRI-active patients at year 1. No significance differences in disability accumulation were determined between the therapies. CONCLUSION: Natalizumab and ocrelizumab exhibited similar effects on relapse control, and both were associated with better relapse control than fingolimod. The effects of the three therapies on disability outcomes were similar.

The Role of Thrombo-inflammatory Biomarkers in the Prognosis of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: The role of inflammation in the prognosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) has been demonstrated in a small number of studies. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) have been studied as prognostic inflammatory biomarkers in numerous thrombo-embolic diseases. However, the number of studies evaluating the relationship between these parameters and CVST is very low. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the relationship between PLR, NLR, and SII values on admission and long-term prognosis in patients with CVST in the acute-subacute period. METHODS: Fifty-one patients diagnosed with CVST and 51 healthy controls were included in the study. The patient and control groups were compared in terms of NLR, PLR, and SII values. Patients were classified into good and poor prognosis groups based on sixth-month modified Rankin scale scores (mRS) (0-2: good prognosis, 3-6: poor prognosis). Clinical and radiological features and PLR, NLR, and SII values were compared between the good and poor prognosis groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors for poor prognosis. The Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) was used to demonstrate the predictive power of PLR, NLR, and SII. RESULTS: Higher NLR and SII emerged as independent factors for poor prognosis in patients with CVST. NLR was the strongest parameter in predicting poor prognosis in CVST (AUC: 0.817, 95% CI: 0.63-1.00, sensitivity 70%, specificity 92.7%, p:0.002). CONCLUSION: Higher NLR and SII on admission may be a predictor of long-term poor prognosis in patients with acute-subacute CVST.

Comparative analysis of fingolimod versus teriflunomide in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Fingolimod and teriflunomide are commonly used in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). These have not been compared in controlled trials, but only in observational studies, with inconclusive results. Comparison of their effect on relapse and disability in a real-world setting is therefore needed. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of fingolimod and teriflunomide in reducing disease activity in RRMS. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective observational study was carried out with prospectively collected data from 15 centers. All consecutive RRMS patients treated with teriflunomide or fingolimod were included. Data for relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were collected. Patients were matched using propensity scores. Annualized relapse rates (ARR), disability accumulation, percentage of patients with active MRI and treatment discontinuation over a median 2.5-year follow-up period were compared. RESULTS: Propensity score matching retained 349 out of 1388 patients in the fingolimod group and 349 out 678 in the teriflunomide group for final analyses. Mean ARR decreased markedly from baseline after 1 and 2 years of treatment in both the fingolimod (0.58-0.17 after 1 year and 0.11 after 2 years, p < 0.001) and teriflunomide (0.56-0.29 after 1 year and 0.31 after 2 years, p < 0.001) groups. Mean ARR was lower in fingolimod-treated patients than in those treated with teriflunomide at years 1 (p = 0.02) and 2 (p = 0.004). Compared to teriflunomide, the fingolimod group exhibited a higher percentage of relapse-free patients and a lower percentage of MRI-active patients after 2.5-year follow-up. Disability worsening was similar between the two groups. Patients were less likely to discontinue fingolimod than teriflunomide (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fingolimod was associated with a better relapse control and lower discontinuation rate than teriflunomide. The two oral therapies exhibited similar effects on disability outcomes.