Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Infect Dis Clin Microbiol ; 5(2): 94-105, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38633015

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to define the predictors of critical illness development within 28 days postadmission during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study including 477 PCR-positive COVID-19 patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Istanbul from March 12 to May 12, 2020. Results: The most common presenting symptoms were cough, dyspnea, and fatigue. Critical illness developed in 45 (9.4%; 95% CI=7.0%-12.4%) patients. In the multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR)=1.05, p<0.001), number of comorbidities (HR=1.33, p=0.02), procalcitonin ≥0.25 µg/L (HR=2.12, p=0.03) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ≥350 U/L (HR=2.04, p=0.03) were independently associated with critical illness development. The World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale for clinical improvement on admission was the strongest predictor of critical illness (HR=4.15, p<0.001). The patients hospitalized at the end of the study period had a much better prognosis compared to the patients hospitalized at the beginning (HR=0.14; p=0.02). The C-index of the model was 0.92. Conclusion: Age, comorbidity number, the WHO scale, LDH, and procalcitonin were independently associated with critical illness development. Mortality from COVID-19 seemed to be decreasing as the first wave of the pandemic advanced. Graphic Abstract: Graphic Abstract.

2.
Vaccine ; 40(18): 2619-2625, 2022 04 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35339303

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the antibody response, natural killer cell response and B cell phenotypes in healthcare workers (HCW) who are vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac with or without documented SARS-CoV-2 infection and unvaccinated HCWs with SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: HCWs were divided into four groups: vaccine only (VO), vaccine after SARS-CoV-2 infection (VAI), SARS-CoV-2 infection only (IO), and SARS-CoV-2 infection after vaccine (IAV). Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (Anti-S) antibodies were measured by Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S ELISA kit. Memory B cells (CD19+CD27+), plasmablast B cells (CD19+CD138+) and long-lived plasma cells (LLPC; CD138+CD19-) were measured by flow cytometry in 74 patients. Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) release by natural killer (NK) cells were measured by NKVue Test (NKMAX, Republic of Korea) in 76 patients. RT-PCR was performed with Bio-speedy® COVID-19 qPCR detection kit, Version 2 (Bioexen LTD, Istanbul, Turkey). RESULTS: The Anti-S antibodies were detectable in all HCWs (n: 224). The median Anti-S titers (BAU/mL) was significantly higher in VAI (620 25-75% 373-1341) compared to VO (136, 25-75% 85-283) and IO (111, 25-75% 54-413, p < 0.01). VAI group had significantly lower percentage of plasmablasts (2.9; 0-8.7) compared to VO (6.8; 3.5-12.0) and IO (9.9; 4.7-47.5, p < 0.01) (n:74). Percentage of LLPCs in groups VO, VAI and IO was similar. There was no difference of IFN-γ levels between the study groups (n: 76). CONCLUSION: The antibody response was similar between uninfected vaccinated HCWs and unvaccinated HCWs who had natural infection. HCWs who had two doses of CoronaVac either before or after the natural SARS-CoV-2 infection elicited significantly higher antibody responses compared to uninfected vaccinated HCWs. The lower percentages of plasmablasts in the VAI group may indicate their migration to lymph nodes and initiation of the germinal center reaction phase. IFN-γ response did not differ among the groups.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Interferon gama , Células Matadoras Naturais , Plasmócitos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
3.
Tuberk Toraks ; 69(3): 314-320, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Turco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34581152

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tuberculosis, one of the most common and deadly infectious diseases, mainly affects the lungs, but can involve all tissues and organs. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis may be more challenging than pulmonary tuberculosis, which may lead to delay in starting treatment. In our study, it was aimed to determine the diagnostic value of FluoroType MTB, GeneXpert MTB/RIF, GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra molecular tests in extrapulmonary specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Extrapulmonary clinical materials were subjected to Kinyoun staining for acid fast bacilli and cultivation was done on Lowenstein Jensen media and BACTEC MGIT 960 automated culture system (BD). Results were compared with FluoroType MTB and GeneXpert MTB/RIF test results (2018) and with FluoroType MTB and GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra tests results (2019). RESULT: A total number of 892 extrapulmonary specimens were enrolled in the study. In 2018, positivity was detected in 16 (3.4%) of 467 specimens by molecular methods. Compared with culture; the sensitivity and specifity of the FluoroType MTB were 76.92%, 98.88% respectively; the sensitivity and specifity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF were 100%, 98.96% respectively. In 2019, positivity was detected in 15 (3.5%) of 425 specimens by molecular methods. The sensitivity and specifity of the FluoroType MTB was 62.5%, 98.05% respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra was 100%, 99.36% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although culture is the gold standard method in the diagnosis of tuberculosis, the patients were diagnosed only with polymerase chain reaction positivity, supported by the patient's clinical, radiology and pathology results in seven cases. The diagnosis of tuberculosis in extrapulmonary specimens is more challenging than in pulmonary specimens due to low bacillary burden and requiring invasive procedures for sampling. It should be considered that molecular methods have a critical role in diagnosis.


Assuntos
Mycobacterium tuberculosis , Tuberculose Pulmonar , Tuberculose , Humanos , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genética , Rifampina , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Tuberculose Pulmonar/diagnóstico
4.
Int J Endocrinol ; 2021: 2395212, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34422043

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 infection may have multiorgan effects in addition to effects on the lungs and immune system. Recently, studies have found thyroid function abnormalities in COVID-19 cases which were interpreted as euthyroid sick syndrome (ESS) or destructive thyroiditis. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the thyroid function status and thyroid autoimmunity in COVID-19 patients. Material and Method. 205 patients were included. The medical history and laboratory parameters at admission were collected from medical records. Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), thyroid peroxidase antibody, and thyroglobulin antibody were measured, and patients were classified according to thyroid function status. RESULTS: 34.1% of the patients were euthyroid. Length of hospitalization (p < 0.001), rate of oxygen demand (p < 0.001), and intensive care unit (ICU) admission (p=0.022) were lower, and none of the euthyroid patients died. 108 (52.6%) patients were classified to have ESS, 57 were classified as mild, and 51 were moderate. The inflammatory parameters were higher in patients with moderate ESS. In cluster analysis, a high-risk group with a lower median FT3 value (median = 2.34 ng/L; IQR = 0.86), a higher median FT4 value (median = 1.04 ng/dL; IQR = 0.33), and a lower median TSH value (median = 0.62 mIU/L; IQR = 0.59) included 8 of 9 died patients and 25 of the 31 patients that were admitted to ICU. Discussion. Length of hospitalization, oxygen demand, ICU admission, and mortality were lower in euthyroid patients. Moreover, none of the euthyroid patients died. In conclusion, evaluation of thyroid function tests during COVID-19 infection may give information about the prognosis of disease.

5.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(12): 3745-3751, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34436829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic pulmonary infection is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The most common pathogens isolated in CF are Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). Chronic infection of PA and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are associated with worse survival and antibiotic eradication treatment is recommended for both. This study compared the outcomes between intravenous (IV) and non-IV antibiotics in eradication of PA and MRSA. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. All respiratory specimen cultures of 309 CF patients and eradication regimens between 2015 and 2019 were reviewed. Patients received eradication treatment in case of first ever isolation or new isolation after being infection-free ≥1 year. The primary analysis was the comparison of the percentage of successful eradication after receiving IV and non-IV eradication regimens. Demographic and clinical risk factors for eradication failure were also analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with PA isolations and 48 patients with MRSA were analyzed. At 1 year, 21.6% in PA group and 35.4% in MRSA group were successfully eradicated. There was not any statistically significant difference between IV versus non-IV antibiotic regimens on eradication in either group. Additionally, none of the clinical risk factors was significantly associated with eradication failure in PA and MRSA groups. CONCLUSION: In the eradication of PA and MRSA, IV and non-IV treatment regimens did not show any superiority to one another. Non-parenteral eradication could be a better option considering the cost-effectiveness and the treatment burden of IV treatments due to hospitalization and the need for IV access.


Assuntos
Fibrose Cística , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fibrose Cística/complicações , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Infecção Persistente , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Int J Infect Dis ; 101: 160-166, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992013

RESUMO

AIM: Studies analyzing viral load in COVID-19 patients and any data that compare viral load with chest computerized tomography (CT) severity are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the severity of chest CT in reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive patients and factors associated with it. METHODOLOGY: SARS-CoV-2 RNA was extracted from nasopharyngeal swab samples by using Bio-speedy viral nucleic acid buffer. The RT-PCR tests were performed with primers and probes targeting the RdRp gene (Bioexen LTD, Turkey) and results were quantified as cycle threshold (Ct) values. Chest CT of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-positive patients (n = 730) in a period from 22 March to 20 May 2020 were evaluated. The total severity score (TSS) of chest CT ranged 0-20 and was calculated by summing up the degree of acute lung inflammation lesion involvement of each of the five lung lobes. RESULTS: Of the 284 patients who were hospitalized, 27 (9.5%) of them died. Of 236 (32.3%) patients, there were no findings on CT and 216 (91.5%) of them were outpatients (median age 35 years). TSS was significantly higher in hospitalized patients; 5.3% had severe changes. Ct values were lower among outpatients, indicating higher viral load. An inverse relation between viral load and TSS was detected in both groups. CT severity was related to age, and older patients had higher TSS (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Viral load was not a critical factor for hospitalization and mortality. Outpatients had considerable amounts of virus in their nasopharynx, which made them contagious to their contacts. Viral load is important in detecting early stages of COVID-19, to minimize potential spread, whereas chest CT can help identify cases requiring extensive medical care.


Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/virologia , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Pulmão/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nasofaringe/diagnóstico por imagem , Nasofaringe/virologia , Pandemias , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Carga Viral
7.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 14(7): 721-725, 2020 Jul 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32794460

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). First COVID-19 case was detected in March, 10, 2020 in Turkey and as of May, 18, 2020 148,067 cases have been identified and 4096 citizens have died. Tuberculosis (TB) is a worldwide public health concern, incidence of tuberculosis (per 100,000 people) in Turkey was reported at 14, 1 in 2018. During pandemic COVID-19 was the main concern in every clinic and as we discuss here overlapping respiratory diseases may result in delaying of the diagnosis and treatment. METHODOLOGY: There were 4605 respiratory samples examined between March 23 and May 18 for COVID-19 and 185 samples for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in our laboratory. The Xpert Ultra assay was performed for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis; SARS-CoV-2 RNA was determined by real-time PCR (RT-PCR) analysis in combined nasopharyngeal and deep oropharyngeal swabs of suspected cases of COVID-19. RESULTS: Both of SARS-CoV-2 and M. tuberculosis tests were requested on the clinical and radiological grounds in 30 patients. Here we discussed 2 patients who were both COVID-19 and TB positive. One patient already diagnosed with tuberculosis become COVID-19 positive during hospitalization and another patient suspected and treated for COVID-19 received the final diagnosis of pulmonary TB and Human Immunodeficiency Virus infection. CONCLUSIONS: We want to emphasize that while considering COVID-19 primarily during these pandemic days, we should not forget one of the "great imitators", tuberculosis within differential diagnoses.


Assuntos
Betacoronavirus , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Tuberculose/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus/genética , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Coinfecção , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Tuberculose/complicações , Tuberculose/diagnóstico por imagem
8.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 7(11): 888-91, 2013 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24240049

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus aureus is one of the first bacteria colonizing in cystic fibrosis (CF) respiratory tract and different virulence factors are responsible for disease progression. It is not clear if CF S. aureus strains are more virulent than strains isolated from non-CF patients. METHODOLOGY: Biofilm production was detected by a modified tissue culture plate method, presence of genes encoding for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) was investigated by a signal amplified sandwich hybridization assay and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were detected by disk diffusion method. RESULTS: Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates (n = 88) recovered from respiratory tract specimens in which 31 of them were from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients were analysed. Biofilm production was detected in 96.8% of CF isolates in which 32.3% exhibited strong positive phenotype and in 47.4% of non-CF isolates in which strong positive phenotype was not observed (p <0.05). All CF isolates were methicillin susceptible, whereas 53.4% of non-CF isolates (n = 31) were methicillin resistant. No resistance was observed for vancomycin, chloramphenicol and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in any of the isolates. PVL genes were detected only in two isolates (2.3%), one from each group, CF and non-CF, which both were methicillin susceptible. CONCLUSION: Biofilm rather than PVL production appears to be an important virulence factor in CF patients.


Assuntos
Toxinas Bacterianas/genética , Biofilmes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Exotoxinas/genética , Leucocidinas/genética , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiologia , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...