In vitro activity of apramycin (EBL-1003) in combination with colistin, meropenem, minocycline or sulbactam against XDR/PDR Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from Greece.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the in vitro activity of the combination of apramycin with colistin, meropenem, minocycline or sulbactam, against some well-characterized XDR Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolates from Greece, to understand how apramycin can be best incorporated into clinical practice and optimize effectiveness. METHODS: In vitro interactions of apramycin (0.5×, 1× and 2× the MIC value) with colistin (2 mg/L), meropenem (30 mg/L), minocycline (3.5 mg/L) or sulbactam (24 mg/L) were tested using time-kill methodology. Twenty-one clinical A. baumannii isolates were chosen, exhibiting apramycin MICs of 4-16 mg/L, which were at or below the apramycin preliminary epidemiological cut-off value of 16 mg/L. These isolates were selected for a range of colistin (4-32 mg/L), meropenem (16-256 mg/L), minocycline (8-32 mg/L) and sulbactam (8-32 mg/L) MICs across the resistant range. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active agent. RESULTS: The combination of apramycin with colistin, meropenem, minocycline or sulbactam was synergistic, at least at one of the concentrations of apramycin (0.5×, 1× or 2× MIC), against 83.3%, 90.5%, 90.9% or 92.3% of the tested isolates, respectively. Apramycin alone was bactericidal at 24 h against 9.5% and 33.3% of the tested isolates at concentrations equal to 1× and 2× MIC, while the combination of apramycin at 2× MIC with colistin, meropenem or sulbactam was bactericidal against all isolates tested (100%). The apramycin 2× MIC/minocycline combination had bactericidal activity against 90.9% of the tested isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Apramycin combinations may have potential as a treatment option for XDR/pandrug-resistant (PDR) A. baumannii infections and warrant validation in the clinical setting, when this new aminoglycoside is available for clinical use.

Ceftazidime/avibactam in the era of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: experience from a national registry study.

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) are associated with high mortality. Therefore, new treatment options are urgently required. OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcomes and predictors of mortality in patients with KPC- or OXA-48-Kp infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam with an emphasis on KPC-Kp bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: A multicentre prospective observational study was conducted between January 2018 and March 2019. Patients with KPC- or OXA-48-Kp infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam were included in the analysis. The subgroup of patients with KPC-Kp BSIs treated with ceftazidime/avibactam was matched by propensity score with a cohort of patients whose KPC-Kp BSIs had been treated with agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam with in vitro activity. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven patients were identified; 140 were infected with KPC producers and 7 with OXA-48 producers. For targeted therapy, 68 (46.3%) patients received monotherapy with ceftazidime/avibactam and 79 (53.7%) patients received ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with at least another active agent. The 14 and 28 day mortality rates were 9% and 20%, respectively. The 28 day mortality among the 71 patients with KPC-Kp BSIs treated with ceftazidime/avibactam was significantly lower than that observed in the 71 matched patients, whose KPC-Kp BSIs had been treated with agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam (18.3% versus 40.8%; P = 0.005). In the Cox proportional hazards model, ultimately fatal disease, rapidly fatal disease and Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 were independent predictors of death, whereas treatment with ceftazidime/avibactam-containing regimens was the only independent predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime/avibactam appears to be an effective treatment against serious infections caused by KPC-Kp.

Topical use of tranexamic acid in primary total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study.

INTRODUCTION: Perioperative blood management represents a major issue in knee arthroplasty. The aim of the present observational study is to compare two different methods of topical tranexamic acid (TXA) administration (periarticular and intraarticular) in primary knee arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present is an observational comparative study. A total of 66 consecutive patients receiving topical injection of TXA after unilateral primary knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1; periarticular injection of TXA and group 2; intraarticular injection. RESULTS: Transfusion rate in group 1 was found to be 15%, compared to 44% in group 2 (p-value= 0.015). In transfused patients the mean received blood units were 1.2 (SD=0.44) in group 1, compared to 1.06 (SD=0.24; p-value=0.34) in group 2. The mean hospital stay of group 1 patients was 7.94 days (SD=2.79), compared to 9.58 days (SD=3.26; p-value=0.03) in group 2. DISCUSSION: The main findings of the study are that statically significant higher transfusion rates, as well as longer in-hospital stay were found in the intraarticular group, when compared to the periarticular group. According to these two parameters the present study has shown that the topical periarticular TXA injection is superior to the intraarticular one. Further research is of utmost importance in order to conclude to the optimum combination of knee arthroplasty perioperative blood management.

Genomic characterization of a KPC-23-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258 clinical isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam.

OBJECTIVES: We characterized the first ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-producing-Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate detected in Greece, before the introduction of ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical practice. METHODS: K. pneumoniae KP-90 was isolated from a hospitalized patient in Thessaloniki during a nationwide surveillance study conducted between 2014 and 2016. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested against a panel of agents. Whole-genome sequencing (Ion Torrent TM platform) of the isolate was carried out to identify the acquired resistance genes and mutations that were associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. RESULTS: The K. pneumoniae isolate belonged to multilocus sequence type ST258 and harboured blaKPC-23 as the only carbapenemase gene. The isolate had a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 16 mg/L to ceftazidime-avibactam and was highly resistant to imipenem, meropenem (MICs, 512 mg/L) and ceftazidime (MIC, >1024 mg/L). blaKPC-23 was detected on a Tn4401a transposon, located on a pKPQIL-type plasmid. A non-functional outer membrane protein OmpK35 and an OmpK36 variant that had been previously associated with K. pneumoniae isolates of ST258 were detected. Transformation studies with Escherichia coli TOP10 showed that KPC-23 offered similar carbapenem MICs as KPC-2 and KPC-3. However, KPC-23 conferred a four-fold higher ceftazidime MIC (>1024 mg/L), which in the presence of avibactam was reduced (>7-fold) to 8 mg/L, which is just within the limit of the susceptibility breakpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a KPC-23- producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolate was due to increased ceftazidime hydrolysis and was likely enhanced by OmpK35 porin deficiency.

Predictors of outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

PURPOSE: There are few data in the literature regarding sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (E). The aim of this study was to assess predictors of outcome in septic patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by ESBL-E. METHODS: Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and BSI due to ESBL-E were selected from the INCREMENT database. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of predictors of outcome after 30 days from development of severe sepsis or septic shock due to ESBL-E infection. Three cohorts were created for analysis: global, empirical-therapy and targeted-therapy cohorts. RESULTS: 367 septic patients were analysed. Overall mortality was 43.9% at 30 days. Escherichia coli (62.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.2%) were the most frequent isolates. ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combinations were the most empirically used drug (43.6%), followed by carbapenems (29.4%). Empirical therapy was active in vitro in 249 (67.8%) patients, and escalation of antibiotic therapy was reported in 287 (78.2%) patients. Cox regression analysis showed that age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, McCabe classification, Pitt bacteremia score, abdominal source of infection and escalation of antibiotic therapy were independently associated with 30-day mortality. No differences in survival were reported in patients treated with BLBLI combinations or carbapenems in empirical or definitive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: BSI due to ESBL-E in patients who developed severe sepsis or septic shock was associated with high 30-day mortality. Comorbidities, severity scores, source of infection and antibiotic therapy escalation were important determinants of unfavorable outcome.

Management of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections.

BACKGROUND: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) has become one of the most important contemporary pathogens, especially in endemic areas. AIMS: To provide practical suggestion for physicians dealing with the management of KPC-KP infections in critically ill patients, based on expert opinions. SOURCES: PubMed search for relevant publications related to the management of KPC-KP infections. CONTENTS: A panel of experts developed a list of 12 questions to be addressed. In view of the current lack of high-level evidence, they were asked to provide answers on the bases of their knowledge and experience in the field. The panel identified several key aspects to be addressed when dealing with KPC-KP in critically ill patients (preventing colonization in the patient, preventing infection in the colonized patient and colonization of his or her contacts, reducing mortality in the infected patient by rapidly diagnosing the causative agent and promptly adopting the best therapeutic strategy) and provided related suggestions that were based on the available observational literature and the experience of panel members. IMPLICATIONS: Diagnostic technologies could speed up the diagnosis of KPC-KP infections. Combination treatment should be preferred to monotherapy in cases of severe infections. For non-critically ill patients without severe infections, results from randomized clinical trials are needed for ultimately weighing benefits and costs of using combinations rather than monotherapy. Multifaceted infection control interventions are needed to decrease the rates of colonization and cross-transmission of KPC-KP.

Double-carbapenem combination as salvage therapy for untreatable infections by KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

We report our experience using the double-carbapenem combination as salvage therapy for patients with untreatable infections caused by KPC-2- producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. A total of 27 patients in two institutions in Athens, Greece suffering from complicated urinary tract infections (16) with or without secondary bacteraemia (four and 12 respectively), primary (six) or catheter-related bloodstream infections (two), HAP or VAP (two) and external ventricular drainage infection (one) were treated exclusively with ertapenem and high-dose prolonged infusion meropenem because in-vitro active antimicrobials were unavailable (19) or failed (four) or were contraindicated (six). Most patients presented with severe infections with median APACHE II score of 17 and 11 of those patients (40.7%) had severe sepsis (five) or septic shock (six). The clinical and microbiological success was 77.8 and 74.1% respectively. Crude mortality was 29.6% with attributable mortality of 11.1%. Adverse events, none of them severe, were reported in four patients (14.8%). The double-carbapenem combination as an exclusive regimen represents a safe and valid salvage therapy for untreatable infections by extensively- or pandrug-resistant KPC-producing K.pneumoniae.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of colistin methanesulfonate and colistin after intravenous administration in critically ill patients with infections caused by gram-negative bacteria.

Colistin is used to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). It is administered intravenously in the form of colistin methanesulfonate (CMS), which is hydrolyzed in vivo to the active drug. However, pharmacokinetic data are limited. The aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of CMS and colistin in a population of critically ill patients. Patients receiving colistin for the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB were enrolled in the study; however, patients receiving a renal replacement therapy were excluded. CMS was administered at a dose of 3 million units (240 mg) every 8 h. Venous blood was collected immediately before and at multiple occasions after the first and the fourth infusions. Plasma CMS and colistin concentrations were determined by a novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method after a rapid precipitation step that avoids the significant degradation of CMS and colistin. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed with the NONMEM program. Eighteen patients (6 females; mean age, 63.6 years; mean creatinine clearance, 82.3 ml/min) were included in the study. For CMS, a two-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics, and the half-lives of the two phases were estimated to be 0.046 h and 2.3 h, respectively. The clearance of CMS was 13.7 liters/h. For colistin, a one-compartment model was sufficient to describe the data, and the estimated half-life was 14.4 h. The predicted maximum concentrations of drug in plasma were 0.60 mg/liter and 2.3 mg/liter for the first dose and at steady state, respectively. Colistin displayed a half-life that was significantly long in relation to the dosing interval. The implications of these findings are that the plasma colistin concentrations are insufficient before steady state and raise the question of whether the administration of a loading dose would benefit critically ill patients.