Pediatric Colorectal Surgery: A Collaborative Approach From a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease encompasses relapsing gastrointestinal disorders commonly presenting in pediatric patients, with 25% of diagnoses made before age 20 and 4% before age 5. Considering the need for life-long surgical follow-up, a collaborative system involving both pediatric and colorectal surgeons could improve overall patient experiences. We hypothesized that cases performed in collaboration with both pediatric and adult colorectal surgeons may lead to better outcomes. METHODS: Data were gathered retrospectively for 116 patients 18 y old or younger who underwent colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease between 2010 and 2017 at our institution. Data included patient demographics, type of procedure, surgical approach, specimen extraction site, surgeon involvement (pediatric, colorectal, or collaborative), operative time, and estimated blood loss. We analyzed days until passage of flatus and bowel movement, length of stay, type of surgical procedure, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Our data showed that days until flatus (2.27 ± 0.47, P = 0.049), first bowel movement (2.64 ± 0.67, P = 0.006), and length of stay (4.45 ± 1.51, P = 0.006) were the shortest in the collaborative group. We also found that single-incision laparoscopic surgery was significantly more common in the collaborative group (77.8%, P = 0.002). We did not see a difference in surgical complication rates among any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed short-term beneficial outcomes in a single institution associated with the collaboration of pediatric surgeons and colorectal surgeons on pediatric colorectal cases in comparison to those performed by pediatric surgeons or adult colorectal surgeons alone.

Comparison of Transumbilical Laparoscopically Assisted Appendectomy to Conventional Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children.

PURPOSE: To compare surgical outcomes of children with appendicitis treated with the transumbilical laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (TULAA) versus the conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TPLA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of pediatric patients with appendicitis treated with TULAA or TPLA between January 2010 and December 2015. Operative time (OT), length of stay, cost, and surgical site infection rate were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Six hundred twenty-five appendectomies were performed [263 TULAA, 362 TPLA: acute (457), gangrenous (39), and perforated (129)]. TULAA had a shorter OT (median, 40 vs. 67 min; P<0.001), a shorter length of stay (median, 20 vs. 23 h; P<0.001), and a lesser cost (median $6266 vs. $8927; P<0.001). Surgical site infection rate was slightly higher in the TULAA group (6% vs. 4%; P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: TULAA had a shorter OT and was less costly than conventional TPLA. TULAA should be considered as the first surgical approach at treating appendicitis in children.

Transumbilical laparoscopically assisted extracorporeal appendectomy in children and young adults: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To compare surgical outcomes of pediatric patients aged 0-15 with acute appendicitis treated with single-port, transumbilical, extracorporeal laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (SP) with young adult patients aged 16-21. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single center retrospective chart review in patients 21 years and younger with a pre-operative diagnosis of appendicitis who underwent SP between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients were divided into two groups based on age. Operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), cost, rates of conversion to standard three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TP), and rates of infection were compared between the groups. RESULTS: SP was performed in a total of 263 patients: 211 in pediatric patients aged 0-15 and 52 in patients aged 16-21. Age groups did not differ significantly on cost, LOS, operative time, rates of conversion to TP, or rates of infection. CONCLUSIONS: SP has comparable surgical outcomes in adolescent, adult, and pediatric patients.

Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Appendectomy in Overweight and Obese Children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare surgical outcomes of overweight and obese patients with acute appendicitis who have undergone single-port extracorporeal laparoscopically assisted appendectomy (SP) with those who have had conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TP). METHODS: This single-center retrospective chart review included patients 21 years of age and younger with a preoperative diagnosis of appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy from January 2010 through December 2015. Cases of gangrenous and perforated appendicitis were excluded. Subgroup analyses of patients with acute appendicitis were performed. Operative time (OT), length of stay (LOS), and cost were compared between groups stratified by body mass index (BMI) and operative technique. RESULTS: A total of 625 appendectomies were performed-457 for acute appendicitis. Sixty-eight patients were overweight. The SP technique (n = 30) had shorter OT (median minutes, 41 vs 68; P < .001), lower cost (median , $5741 vs $8530; P < .001), and shorter LOS (median hours, 16 vs 19; P = .045) than the TP technique had (n = 38). Seventy patients were obese: 19 were treated with SP and 51 with TP. LOS did not differ significantly between the SP and TP groups, but subjects treated with SP had shorter OT (median minutes, 39 vs 63; P < .001) and lower cost (median, $6401 vs $8205; P = .043). CONCLUSIONS: The SP technique for acute appendicitis was found to have a significantly shorter OT and lower cost in all weight groups. There were minimal differences in LOS. SP should be considered in patients with acute appendicitis, regardless of their weight.