Effect of prophylactic corticosteroids on postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction in the adult population: An updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Background and Aims: Postoperative neurocognitive dysfunction (PNCD) commonly occurs after surgery and prolongs hospital stays. Both direct noxious stimuli to the central nervous system and systemic inflammation have been implicated. Due to their potent anti-inflammatory effects, corticosteroids have been utilised to attenuate the incidence and severity of PNCD. This systematic review and meta-analysis strived to evaluate the prophylactic role of perioperative corticosteroids for PNCD. Methods: A search was run in pre-defined databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the role of corticosteroids in preventing PNCD. The incidence of PNCD within 1 month was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the use of antipsychotic medications for the treatment, postoperative infection, and hospital length of stay. The results are exhibited as odds ratio (OR) and the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Fifteen RCTs comprising 15,398 patients were included. The incidence of PNCD was significantly lower in the corticosteroid group than in the control group, with a pooled OR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.58, 0.96; P = 0.02; I2 = 66%). Trial sequential analysis showed the clinical benefit of corticosteroids in preventing PNCD; however, the requisite information size is still inadequate. The sub-group analysis supported the prophylactic effect of corticosteroids on delirium prevention but not on delayed neurocognitive recovery. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis revealed statistically significant protective effects of corticosteroids on the incidence of PNCD. However, further studies are still needed to confirm the protective role of this commonly used and relatively safe strategy for preventing PNCD.

Estimates of 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications after gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A retrospective cohort analysis of a health system population.

The incidence of 30-day postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures (GIEP) are not well characterized in the literature. The primary aim of this study was to identify the incidence of 30-day PPC after GIEP within a large healthcare system. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 5377 patients presenting for GIEP between January 2013 and January 2022. Our primary outcome was the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality PPC composite (AHRQ-PPC). Secondary outcomes were sub-composites derived from the AHRQ-PPC; including pneumonia (AHRQ-PNA), respiratory failure (AHRQ-RF), aspiration pneumonia/ pneumonitis (AHRQ-ASP) and pulmonary emboli (AHRQ-PE). We performed propensity score matching (PSM) followed by multivariable logistic regression to analyze primary and secondary outcomes. Inpatients had higher 30-day AHRQ-PPC (6.0 vs. 1.2%, p<0.001), as well as sub-composite AHRQ-PNA (3.2 vs. 0.7%, p<0.001), AHRQ-RF (2.4 vs. 0.5%, p<0.001), and AHRQ-ASP (1.9 vs. 0.4%, p<0.001). After PSM adjustment, pre-procedural comorbidities of electrolyte disorder [57.9 vs. 31.1%, ORadj: 2.26, 95%CI (1.48, 3.45), p<0.001], alcohol abuse disorder [16.7 vs. 6.8%, ORadj: 2.66 95%CI (1.29, 5.49), p = 0.01], congestive heart failure (CHF) [22.3 vs. 8.7%, ORadj: 2.2 95%CI (1.17, 4.15), p = 0.02] and pulmonary circulatory disorders [21 vs. 16.9%, ORadj: 2.95, 95%CI (1.36, 6.39), p = 0.01] were associated with 30-day AHRQ-PPC. After covariate adjustment, AHRQ-PPC was associated with upper endoscopy more than lower endoscopy [5.9 vs. 1.0%, ORadj: 3.76, 95%CI (1.85, 7.66), p<0.001]. When compared to gastroenterologist-guided conscious sedation, anesthesia care team presence was protective against AHRQ-PPC [3.7 vs. 8.4%, ORadj: 0.032, 95%CI (0.01, 0.22), p<0.001] and AHRQ-ASP [1.0 vs. 3.37%, ORadj: 0.002, 95%CI (0.00, 0.55), p<0.001]. In conclusion, we report estimates of 30-day PPC after GIEP across inpatient and outpatient settings. Upper endoscopic procedures confer a higher risk, while the presence of an anesthesia care team may be protective against 30-day PPC.

Pro-Con Debate: Should Critically Ill Patients Undergo Procedures at Bedside or in the Operating Room?

Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) is a fast-growing field in anesthesiology, wherein anesthesia care is provided for surgical procedures performed outside the main operating room (OR) pavilion. Advances in medical science and technology have led to an increasing number of procedures being moved out of the operating room to procedural suites. One such NORA location is the intensive care unit (ICU), where a growing number of urgent and emergent procedures are being performed on medically unstable patients. ICU-NORA allows medical care to be provided to patients who are too sick to tolerate transport between the ICU and the OR. However, offering the same, high-quality, and safe care in this setting may be challenging. It requires special planning and a thorough consideration of the presence of life-threatening comorbidities and location-specific and ergonomic barriers. In this Pro-Con commentary article, we discuss these special considerations and argue in favor of and against routinely performing procedures at the bedside in the ICU versus in the OR.

Identifying, Understanding, and Minimizing Unconscious Cognitive Biases in Perioperative Crisis Management: A Narrative Review.

Rapid clinical decision-making behavior is often based on pattern recognition and other mental shortcuts. Although such behavior is often faster than deliberative thinking, it can also lead to errors due to unconscious cognitive biases (UCBs). UCBs may contribute to inaccurate diagnoses, hamper interpersonal communication, trigger inappropriate clinical interventions, or result in management delays. The authors review the literature on UCBs and discuss their potential impact on perioperative crisis management. Using the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA), publications with the most relevance to UCBs in perioperative crisis management were selected for inclusion. Of the 19 UCBs that have been most investigated in the medical literature, the authors identified 9 that were judged to be clinically relevant or most frequently occurring during perioperative crisis management. Formal didactic training on concepts of deliberative thinking has had limited success in reducing the presence of UCBs during clinical decision-making. The evolution of clinical decision support tools (CDSTs) has demonstrated efficacy in improving deliberative clinical decision-making, possibly by reducing the intrusion of maladaptive UCBs and forcing reflective thinking. Anesthesiology remains a leader in perioperative crisis simulation and CDST implementation, but spearheading innovations to reduce the adverse impact of UCBs will further improve diagnostic precision and patient safety during perioperative crisis management.

Long-term clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with sepsis and pre-existing low muscle mass: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Critically ill patients with sepsis account for significant disease morbidity and healthcare costs. Low muscle mass has been proposed as an independent risk factor for poor short-term outcomes, although its effect on long-term outcomes remains unclear. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated at a quaternary care medical center over 6 years (09/2014 - 12/2020). Critically ill patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria were included, with low muscle mass defined by [Formula: see text] 5th percentile skeletal muscle index, measured at the L3 lumbar level (L3SMI) on Computed-Tomography (CT) scan ([Formula: see text] 41.6 cm2/m2 for males and [Formula: see text] 32.0 cm2/m2 for females). L3SMI was calculated by normalizing the CT-measured skeletal muscle area to the square of the patient's height (in meters). Measurements were taken from abdominal/pelvic CT scan obtained within 7 days of sepsis onset. The prevalence of low muscle mass and its association with clinical outcomes, including in-hospital and one-year mortality, and post-hospitalization discharge disposition in survivors, was analyzed. Unfavorable post-hospitalization disposition was defined as discharge to a location other than the patient's home. RESULTS: Low muscle mass was present in 34 (23%) of 150 patients, with mean skeletal muscle indices of 28.0 ± 2.9 cm2/m2 and 36.8 ± 3.3 cm2/m2 in females and males, respectively. While low muscle mass was not a significant risk factor for in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio 1.33; 95% CI 0.64 - 2.76; p = 0.437), it significantly increased one-year mortality after adjusting for age and illness severity using Cox multivariate regression (hazard ratio 1.9; 95% CI 1.1 - 3.2; p = 0.014). Unfavorable post-hospitalization discharge disposition was not associated with low muscle mass, after adjusting for age and illness severity in a single, multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Low muscle mass independently predicts one-year mortality but is not associated with in-hospital mortality or unfavorable hospital discharge disposition in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Emergency use of sugammadex after failure of standard reversal drugs and postoperative pulmonary complications: A retrospective cohort study.

Background and Aims: The use of sugammadex instead of neostigmine for the reversal of neuromuscular blockade may decrease postoperative pulmonary complications. It is unclear if this finding is applicable to situations where sugammadex is administered after the administration of neostigmine. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of a composite outcome measure of major postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who received sugammadex as a rescue agent after neostigmine versus those who received sugammadex alone for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the medical records of adult patients who underwent elective inpatient noncardiac surgery under general anesthesia and received sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade, at a tertiary care academic hospital between August 2016 and November 2018. Results: A total of 1,672 patients were included, of whom 1,452 underwent reversal with sugammadex alone and 220 received sugammadex following reversal with neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. The composite primary outcome was diagnosed in 60 (3.6%) patients. Comparing these two groups, and after adjusting for confounding factors, patients who received sugammadex after reversal with neostigmine had more postoperative pulmonary complications than those reversed with sugammadex alone (6.8% vs. 3.1%, odds ratio, 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25 to 4.18; P = 0.006). Conclusion: The use of sugammadex following reversal with neostigmine was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as compared to the use of sugammadex alone. The implications of using sugammadex after the failure of standard reversal drugs should be investigated in prospective studies.

Intraoperative arterial pressure management: knowns and unknowns.

Preventing postoperative organ dysfunction is integral to the practice of anaesthesia. Although intraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative end organ dysfunction, there remains ambiguity with regards to its definition, targets, thresholds for initiating treatment, and ideal treatment modalities.

Oral versus intravenous acetaminophen for perioperative pain management in adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A quantile segmented regression analysis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Determine whether preferential use of perioperative enteral acetaminophen is associated with changes in perioperative pain, narcotic administration, or time to meeting criteria for post anesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge, compared to preferential parenteral administration. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort with quantile segmented regression analysis. Groups determined by date of surgery, one year pre-initiative and one year post-initiative. SETTING: Operating room and PACU of a tertiary academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adult (age > 18 years), ASA status 1-5, non-pregnant patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery of less than six hours duration admitted to the PACU postoperatively. INTERVENTIONS: A multidisciplinary initiative to preferentially utilize enteral over parenteral acetaminophen. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was narcotic consumption in the PACU. Secondary outcomes were intraoperative narcotic administration, pain score on PACU admission and discharge, and time to meeting criteria for PACU discharge. RESULTS: 24,701 patients were included in the analysis; 12,379 had surgery prior to the initiative and 12,322 after. Enteral acetaminophen administration increased preoperatively from 13.49% to 26.84%, and postoperatively from 43.16% to 51.45%, while intraoperative parenteral APAP use dropped from 43.23% to 6.81%. Quantile Segmented regression analysis after adjusting for period (pre versus postintervention), day, age, gender, inpatient status, and ASA class demonstrated a decrease in adjusted median perioperative acetaminophen dose (-175 mg P < 0.001), with no significant difference in level change of intraoperative or PACU narcotic administration. There was no significant difference in median time to meet criteria for PACU discharge, though there was a significant change in the slope, (-0.36, p = 0.007.) Median pain scores measured on a standard 0-10 numeric rating scale at PACU admission did not change, while median pain scores at PACU discharge decreased slightly (-0.24 p < 0.001). There was no change in the probability of PONV. CONCLUSION: In adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery of <6 h duration, preferential use of enteral rather than parenteral acetaminophen is associated with non-inferior outcomes in narcotic requirements, pain scores, time to PACU discharge, and probability of PONV when compared with routine parenteral administration. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.

Management of anesthetic complications outside the operating room.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) procedures have seen a significant growth over the years along with an increase in the complexity and severity of cases. Providing anesthesia care in these often-unfamiliar locations is risky, and complications are common. This review aims to report the most recent updates regarding managing anesthesia-related complications in patients undergoing procedures in non-operating room locations. RECENT FINDINGS: Surgical innovations, advent of new technology, and the economics of a healthcare environment that strives to improve value by decreasing costs, has expanded the indications for and complexity of NORA cases. In addition, an aging population with increasing comorbidity burden, requirements for deeper levels of sedation have all increased the risk of complications in NORA environments. In such a situation, improvement in monitoring and oxygen delivery techniques, better ergonomics of NORA sites and development of multidisciplinary contingency plans are likely to improve our management of anesthesia-related complications. SUMMARY: Delivery of anesthesia care in out-of-operating room locations is associated with significant challenges. Meticulous planning, close communication with the procedural team, establishing protocols and pathways for help, along with interdisciplinary teamwork can facilitate safe, efficient, and cost-effective procedural care in the NORA suite.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis and Pre-existing Sarcopenia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Critically ill patients with sepsis account for significant disease morbidity and healthcare costs. Sarcopenia has been proposed as an independent risk factor for poor short-term outcomes, although its effect on long-term outcomes remains unclear. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated at a tertiary care medical center over 6 years (09/2014 - 12/2020). Critically ill patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria were included, with sarcopenia defined by skeletal muscle index at the L3 lumbar area on abdominal Computed-Tomography scan. The prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with clinical outcomes was analyzed. Results: Sarcopenia was present in 34 (23%) of 150 patients, with median skeletal muscle indices of 28.1 cm 2 /m 2 and 37.3 cm 2 /m 2 in sarcopenic females and males, respectively. In-hospital mortality was not associated with sarcopenia when adjusted for age and illness severity. One year mortality was increased in sarcopenic patients, after adjustment for illness severity (HR 1.9, p = 0.02) and age (HR 2.4, p = 0.001). However, it was not associated with increased likelihood for discharge to long-term rehabilitation or hospice care in adjusted analyses. Conclusion: Sarcopenia independently predicts one year mortality but is not associated with unfavorable hospital discharge disposition in critically ill patients with sepsis.

Perioperative Fluid Management and Volume Assessment.

Fluid therapy is an integral component of perioperative care and helps maintain or restore effective circulating blood volume. The principal goal of fluid management is to optimize cardiac preload, maximize stroke volume, and maintain adequate organ perfusion. Accurate assessment of volume status and volume responsiveness is necessary for appropriate and judicious utilization of fluid therapy. To accomplish this, static and dynamic indicators of fluid responsiveness have been widely studied. This review discusses the overarching goals of perioperative fluid management, reviews the physiology and parameters used to assess fluid responsiveness, and provides evidence-based recommendations on intraoperative fluid management.

Role of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Emergency Airway Management Outside the Operating Room.

Tracheal intubation is one of the most frequently performed procedures in critically ill patients, and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hemodynamic instability and cardiovascular collapse are common complications associated with the procedure, and are likely in patients with a physiologically difficult airway. Bedside point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can help identify patients with high risk of cardiovascular collapse, provide opportunity for hemodynamic and respiratory optimization, and help tailor airway management plans to meet individual patient needs. This review discusses the role of POCUS in emergency airway management, provides an algorithm to facilitate its incorporation into existing practice, and provides a framework for future studies.

Failure to Rescue After Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Non-Cardiac Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Many deaths after surgery can be attributed to "failure to rescue," which may be a better surgical quality indicator than the occurrence of a postoperative complication. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one such postoperative complication associated with high mortality. The purpose of this study is to identify perioperative risk factors associated with failure to rescue among patients who develop postoperative AKI. METHODS: We identified adult patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery between 2012 and 2018 and experienced postoperative severe AKI (an increase in blood creatinine concentration of >2 mg/dL above baseline or requiring hemodialysis) from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for failure to rescue among patients who developed severe AKI. RESULTS: Among 5,765,904 patients who met inclusion criteria, 26,705 (0.46%) patients developed postoperative severe AKI, of which 6834 (25.6%) experienced failure to rescue. Risk factors with the strongest association (adjusted odds ratio >1.5) with failure to rescue in patients with AKI included advanced age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, presence of preoperative ascites, disseminated cancer, septic shock, and blood transfusion within 72 h of surgery start time. CONCLUSIONS: About one-fourth of patients who develop severe AKI after non-cardiac surgery die within 30 d of surgery. Both patient- and surgery-related risk factors are associated with this failure to rescue. Further studies are needed to identify early and effective interventions in high-risk patients who develop postoperative severe AKI to prevent the antecedent mortality.

Sedation-analgesia techniques for nonoperating room anesthesia: an update.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There has been a substantial increase in nonoperating room anesthesia procedures over the years along with an increase in the complexity and severity of cases. These procedures pose unique challenges for anesthesia providers requiring meticulous planning and attention to detail. Advancements in the delivery of sedation and analgesia in this setting will help anesthesia providers navigate these challenges and improve patient safety and outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: There has been a renewed interest in the development of newer sedative and analgesic drugs and delivery systems that can safely provide anesthesia care in challenging situations and circumstances. SUMMARY: Delivery of anesthesia care in nonoperating room locations is associated with significant challenges. The advent of sedative and analgesic drugs that can be safely used in situations where monitoring capabilities are limited in conjunction with delivery systems, that can incorporate unique patient characteristics and ensure the safe delivery of these drugs, has the potential to improve patient safety and outcomes. Further research is needed in these areas to develop newer drugs and delivery systems.