Unidirectional diploid-tetraploid introgression among British birch trees with shifting ranges shown by restriction site-associated markers.

Hybridization may lead to introgression of genes among species. Introgression may be bidirectional or unidirectional, depending on factors such as the demography of the hybridizing species, or the nature of reproductive barriers between them. Previous microsatellite studies suggested bidirectional introgression between diploid Betula nana (dwarf birch) and tetraploid B. pubescens (downy birch) and also between B. pubescens and diploid B. pendula (silver birch) in Britain. Here, we analyse introgression among these species using 51 237 variants in restriction site-associated (RAD) markers in 194 individuals, called with allele dosages in the tetraploids. In contrast to the microsatellite study, we found unidirectional introgression into B. pubescens from both of the diploid species. This pattern fits better with the expected nature of the reproductive barrier between diploids and tetraploids. As in the microsatellite study, introgression into B. pubescens showed clear clines with increasing introgression from B. nana in the north and from B. pendula in the south. Unlike B. pendula alleles, introgression of B. nana alleles was found far from the current area of sympatry or allopatry between B. nana and B. pubescens. This pattern fits a shifting zone of hybridization due to Holocene reduction in the range of B. nana and expansion in the range of B. pubescens.

Regulation of flowering in the long-day grass Lolium temulentum by gibberellins and the FLOWERING LOCUS T gene.

Seasonal control of flowering often involves leaf sensing of daylength coupled to time measurement and generation and transport of florigenic signals to the shoot apex. We show that transmitted signals in the grass Lolium temulentum may include gibberellins (GAs) and the FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) gene. Within 2 h of starting a florally inductive long day (LD), expression of a 20-oxidase GA biosynthetic gene increases in the leaf; its product, GA(20), then increases 5.7-fold versus short day; its substrate, GA(19), decreases equivalently; and a bioactive product, GA(5), increases 4-fold. A link between flowering, LD, GAs, and GA biosynthesis is shown in three ways: (1) applied GA(19) became florigenic on exposure to LD; (2) expression of LtGA20ox1, an important GA biosynthetic gene, increased in a florally effective LD involving incandescent lamps, but not with noninductive fluorescent lamps; and (3) paclobutrazol, an inhibitor of an early step of GA biosynthesis, blocked flowering, but only if applied before the LD. Expression studies of a 2-oxidase catabolic gene showed no changes favoring a GA increase. Thus, the early LD increase in leaf GA(5) biosynthesis, coupled with subsequent doubling in GA(5) content at the shoot apex, provides a substantial trail of evidence for GA(5) as a LD florigen. LD signaling may also involve transport of FT mRNA or protein because expression of LtFT and LtCONSTANS increased rapidly, substantially (>80-fold for FT), and independently of GA. However, because a LD from fluorescent lamps induced LtFT expression but not flowering, the nature of the light response of FT requires clarification.

Acceleration of flowering by overexpression of MFT (MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1).

MFT (MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1) is a member of a gene family that includes two important regulators, FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T) and TFL1 (TERMINAL FLOWER 1), in determination of flowering time in Arabidopsis. Although the functions of FT and TFL1 are assigned in the family, the roles of other members are largely unknown. Especially the sequence of MFT is homologous to both FT and TFL1, which act as a floral promoter and an inhibitor, respectively, making it difficult to predict the role of MFT. We performed genetic analyses of MFT to understand its role in floral development. Constitutive expression of MFT led to slightly early flowering under long days. However, a T-DNA insertion allele of MFT did not show obvious phenotype. Further genetic analyses with the loss-of-function alleles of FT, TFL1, and ATC (Arabidopsis Thaliana CENTRORADIALIS homologue) showed that a decrease of MFT activity did not enhance the phenotypes of the single mutants. Taken together, we suggest that MFT functions as a floral inducer and that it may act redundantly in determination of flowering time in Arabidopsis.