The Role of Civil Society in the Implementation of the Global Breast Cancer Initiative (GBCI) Framework: Takeaways from Southeast Asia.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched the Global Breast Cancer Initiative (GBCI) with the aim of strategically guiding and coordinating efforts to reduce breast cancer mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). At the country level, GBCI requires adaptation to local contexts based on a systematic assessment of barriers faced by breast cancer patients and the health system's capacity. This requires engaging stakeholders with civil society organizations being key. METHOD: During the 7th Southeast Asia Breast Cancer Symposium (SEABCS) held in Hue, Vietnam, breast cancer clinicians, policy makers, patients, advocates, and caregivers were invited to participate in a workshop to discuss the role civil society organizations will play in the implementation of GBCI. The workshop objective was to identify the needs of CSOs to effectively support the domestic implementation of GBCI principles and strategies. RESULT: Twenty-two people registered for the workshop, with eight civil society organizations represented by one or more members. Participants were assigned to three groups and were asked to describe; (a) the ways in which civil society could use the GBCI framework document, advocate for its implementation at the country level, and support the implementation of recommended interventions; and (b) what would be needed for civil society to use, advocate for, or implement GBCI. CONCLUSION: This report outlines the main discussion points, the roles that civil society can play in countries' implementation efforts, and the resources needed so they can efficiently support their governments in their implementation strategy. By including civil society as a key element of breast cancer control, countries in the region and beyond can accelerate the domestic implementation of the GBCI principles and strategies, making significant progress in breast cancer control and improving the lives of those affected by the disease.

Early Detection of Breast Cancer in Indonesia: Barriers Identified in a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: The lack of early detection in breast cancer management has been identified as the primary factor contributing to the high mortality rate. The introduction of BPJS Kesehatan, Indonesia's national health insurance, was intended to ensure the provision of adequate health services for breast cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the current state of health services in Indonesia concerning the early detection of breast cancer, following the implementation of BPJS Kesehatan introduction. METHODS: The study was conducted in 2017 in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Subjects were recruited using a purposive sampling technique with maximum variation. The sample comprised breast cancer patients, health care professionals (HCPs), and healthy women from the general population with no history of breast cancer. The subjects' experiences and knowledge of health services regarding the early detection of breast cancer were investigated through in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the results from interviews with 25 participants. RESULT: This study identified several issues that hinder the timely detection of breast cancer. The lack of both screening and diagnostic procedures emerged as a prominent obstacle in breast cancer management. The study identified the following barriers: (1) limited community knowledge about early detection; (2). lack of urgency among patients to seek medical treatment; (3) limited access to health facilities; and (4) inconsistent adherence among health care professionals to guidelines for both screening and diagnostic procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed multiple factors contributing to the delay in breast cancer detection in Indonesia, leading to suboptimal management of the disease. It is crucial for the government to prioritize the improvement of enabling factors across all levels of care for early detection. These factors include initiatives to increase public awareness, improve access to health services, strengthen the referral system, and enhance health facilities.

International Interobserver Variability of Breast Density Assessment.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine variability in visually assessed mammographic breast density categorization among radiologists practicing in Indonesia, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the United States. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive 2-D full-field digital screening mammograms obtained from September to December 2017 were selected and retrospectively reviewed from four global locations, for a total of 800 mammograms. Three breast radiologists in each location (team) provided consensus density assessments of all 800 mammograms using BI-RADS® density categorization. Interreader agreement was compared using Gwet's AC2 with quadratic weighting across all four density categories and Gwet's AC1 for binary comparison of combined not dense versus dense categories. Variability of distribution among teams was calculated using the Stuart-Maxwell test of marginal homogeneity across all four categories and using the McNemar test for not dense versus dense categories. To compare readers from a particular country on their own 200 mammograms versus the other three teams, density distribution was calculated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: For all 800 mammograms, interreader weighted agreement for distribution among four density categories was 0.86 (Gwet's AC2 with quadratic weighting; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-0.88), and for not dense versus dense categories, it was 0.66 (Gwet's AC1; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.70). Density distribution across four density categories was significantly different when teams were compared with one another and one team versus the other three teams combined (P < .001). Overall, all readers placed the largest number of mammograms in the scattered and heterogeneous categories. CONCLUSIONS: Although reader teams from four different global locations had almost perfect interreader agreement in BI-RADS density categorization, variability in density distribution across four categories remained statistically significant.

An Asian Body to Tackle Cancers in Asia - The Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance.

The socioeconomic burden of cancer is growing rapidly in the Asian region, with a concentrated burden on low- and middle- income countries. The residents of this region, representing almost 60% of the global population, demonstrate an eclectic and complex nature, with huge disparities in ethnicity, sociocultural practices among others. The Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance (ANCCA) was established in 2005 by heads of several national cancer centers (NCCs) in the region to address common issues and concerns among Asian countries. During the first 13 years of ANCCA's existence, the participating NCCs' senior managers paved the way toward collaboration through transparent sharing of key facts and activities. Concrete achievements of the Alliance include the Asia Tobacco-Free Declaration, the establishment of the ANCCA Constitution in 2014 as well as the creation of an official website more recently. In November 2019, the most active ANCCA members (China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mongolia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) strengthened the bonds of the entity with the clear aim to halt the increase in cancer and mortality rates in Asian countries by 2030. New opportunities including accelerated cooperation between members as well as collaboration with external and multidisciplinary stakeholders at local, regional and international levels are an essential step to most effectively tackle cancers in Asia.