Radiographers' insights on the impact of their potential role in image interpretation within a low resource setting.

INTRODUCTION: The global shortage of radiologists has led to a growing concern in medical imaging, prompting the exploration of strategies, such as including radiographers in image interpretation, to mitigate this challenge. However, in low-resource settings, progress in adopting similar approaches has been limited. This study aimed to explore radiographers' perceptions regarding the impact of their potential role in image interpretation within a low-resource setting. METHODS: The study used a qualitative descriptive design and was conducted at two public referral hospitals. Radiographers with at least one year of experience were purposively sampled and interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide after consenting. Data saturation determined the sample size, and content analysis was applied for data analysis. RESULTS: Two themes emerged from fourteen interviews conducted with two male and twelve female radiographers. Theme one revealed the potential for enhanced healthcare delivery through improved diagnostic support, bridging radiologist shortages, career development and fulfilment as positive outcomes of role extension. Theme two revealed possible implementation hurdles including radiographer resistance and reluctance, limited training, lack of professional trust, and legal and ethical challenges. CONCLUSION: Radiographers perceived their potential participation positively, envisioning enhanced healthcare delivery, however, possible challenges like resistance and reluctance of radiographers, limited training, and legal/ethical issues pose hurdles. Addressing these challenges through tailored interventions, including formal education could facilitate successful implementation. Further studies are recommended to explore radiographers' competencies, providing empirical evidence for sustaining and expanding this role extension. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: The study further supports the integration of radiographers into image interpretation with the potential to enhance healthcare delivery, however, implementation challenges in low-resource settings require careful consideration.

Radiology image interpretation services in a low-resource setting: Medical doctors' experiences and the potential role of radiographers.

INTRODUCTION: Medical doctors can encounter significant challenges in both the radiology image interpretation service and their ability to interpret images to promote effective patient management. This study aimed to explore the experiences of medical doctors in a low-resource setting regarding the image interpretation service received in state-funded hospitals and the potential role of radiographers. METHODS: A qualitative approach with a descriptive phenomenology design was employed. Thirteen medical officers and medical interns, with a maximum of three years of experience, were purposively selected from three state-funded hospitals. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in English, and data analysis followed the conventional content analysis method using Atlas.ti for Windows (version 9). RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data. The first theme was a poor image interpretation service which highlighted issues such as long turnaround times for image reporting and compromised patient management. The second theme was training and support deficiency which revealed the inadequacy of image interpretation training and the need for additional on-the-job support. The third theme was the inconspicuous radiographer role which showcased the potential opportunities for radiographers to aid in filling the gaps in the image interpretation system. CONCLUSION: Medical doctors in this low-resource setting experience significant delays in radiology image interpretation, leading to compromised patient management. Their training in image interpretation is inadequate, and they often lack on-the-job support. Radiographers potentially play a role in image interpretation which may provide solutions to these contextual challenges. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: There is a need to review and develop a comprehensive image interpretation system that effectively supports medical doctors in image interpretation, possibly involving the collaboration of radiographers.

Exploring the implementation of role extension for Namibian radiographers: Perspectives on intravenous injection of contrast media.

INTRODUCTION: Role extension to include intravenous (IV) injection of contrast media has been formally embraced by radiographers and their regulatory bodies in developed countries. The revised scope of practice, in our Namibian context, has formalised IV injection as an extended role for radiographers. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of radiographers regarding this new role of IV injection of contrast media. METHODS: A qualitative design with a descriptive phenomenological approach was employed to collect data from 15 radiographers working in both public and private radiology facilities. Participants were purposively selected to participate in focus group discussions and individual interviews. An interview guide was used to facilitate the discussions and interviews, and a voice recorder was used for recording. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using Tesch's 8-step method. RESULTS: From the 15 participants, three themes were developed: enhanced service delivery with two subthemes (improved departmental workflow and patient care), training needs with two subthemes (inadequate contrast media reaction training and standardised training requirement), and medical-legal issues with two subthemes (regulatory blurriness and role conflict distress). CONCLUSION: The participants expressed mixed perceptions towards the IV injection role of radiographers, emphasising the benefits for the department and patients while raising concerns regarding standardisation of training and associated medico-legal issues. Furthermore, a large-scale evaluation is necessary to uncover the challenges and barriers to the successful adoption of this new role. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The role extension for radiographers to include IV injections is a long-awaited development, but it should be accompanied by the necessary training and guidelines to fully realise its benefits.

Writing for reflection: Radiography students' experiences with reflective journaling.

INTRODUCTION: Reflective journaling is a widely recognised method of engaging in reflective practice, whereby individuals document their critical analysis of past experiences or actions, focusing on the implications and lessons learned for future application. In radiography and other healthcare professions, reflective practice is considered essential for professional development and should be cultivated during training. This study aimed to explore the experiences of senior radiography students in utilising the reflective journal as a clinical learning tool. METHODS: This study employed a phenomenological research design, with the study participants being third and fourth-year radiography students. Data collection took place after the introduction of reflective journaling, with nineteen participants having utilised the reflective journal daily, for a minimum of eight months. Individual interviews were conducted after obtaining the participants' consent. The collected data were analysed using Atlas. ti (version 9.3), guided by the content analysis framework. RESULTS: The study revealed that participants experienced adaptation, characterised by reflective adaptation and process adaptation when utilising the reflective journal. Participants also encountered reflective barriers, including personal expression bias, inconsistent feedback, rumination overload, and impulsive practice dominance. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate the benefits of reflective journaling in promoting critical thinking and reflective practice among radiography students. It is therefore recommended that this practice be fully embraced as a standard clinical component. Additionally, the frequency of reflections should be reviewed to ensure effectiveness and consistent feedback should be provided to enhance skills development. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings contribute further evidence to support the incorporation of reflective journaling in clinical training to promote critical thinking and reflective practice.

Radiographers' experiences of image interpretation training in a low-resource setting.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographers extend their roles through formal and on-the-job training to keep up with clinical practice changes. One area of role extension that is now incorporated into undergraduate programmes is image interpretation, although the training provided may vary between institutions. This study explored the experiences of graduates from one higher education institution in a low-resource context with regard to their image interpretation training. METHODS: A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed to investigate the experiences of ten radiography graduates who were purposively selected from one higher education institution. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with each participant after obtaining their informed consent. The interview recordings were transcribed and analysed using Atlas.ti Windows (Version 9.0) software, following Colaizzi's seven-steps of data analysis. RESULTS: From the ten interviews conducted, teaching approach, clinical education, and assessment strategy emerged as areas of experience within the teaching and learning theme, while practitioner role modelling, skill utilisation, and industry impact were sub-themes under the paradoxical reality theme. The participants' experiences indicated a theory-practice gap in image interpretation among radiographers. CONCLUSION: The participants' experiences reflected a misalignment in the educational process due to inadequacies in the teaching approach, clinical education, and assessment strategies. Participants encountered significant differences between their expectations and clinical realities during and after training. Image interpretation by radiographers was recognised as a relevant area for role extension in this low-resource setting. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: While these findings are specific to the experiences of the participants, conducting similar research in comparable contexts and implementing competency-based image interpretation assessments could help identify gaps and guide interventions to address shortcomings.

Radiation risk-benefit communication during paediatric CT imaging: Experiences of radiographers at two public hospitals.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation dose knowledge and effective communication skills are essential for both radiographers and radiologists to be able to appropriately fulfil their legal responsibilities to justify each medical exposure. Furthermore, they enable the optimisation of imaging protocols and techniques according to the child's characteristics and underlying clinical conditions. Previous studies have shown that radiographers do not provide paediatric patients and their parents/guardians with adequate information about doses and risks before a procedure. However, they have a legal responsibility to explain the radiation risk associated with performing the procedure as well as the associated risk of not performing the same procedure. There are several obstacles to describing ionizing radiation risk, including the ionizing radiation language that is not readily understood by non-imaging personnel. This study aimed to explore and describe the radiographers' experiences of radiation risk-benefit communication during paediatric CT imaging at two public hospitals. This is important to understand the effectiveness of the communication process and institute corrective action where shortcomings are evident. METHODS: A qualitative, exploratory, descriptive research design was applied. The sample consisted of 12 purposively selected radiographers who were trained and working in the CT imaging department. Data were collected using face-to-face individual interviews. Tesch's 8 steps were used to analyse the data collected and generate themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Two themes emerged from the data collected: (1)Positive experiences with two sub-themes (job satisfaction and mutual benefit) and (2) negative experiences with three sub-themes (.professional deprecation, ineffectual outcomes and communication impediments). CONCLUSION: Positive experiences boosted radiographers' confidence and enhanced their participation in radiation risk-benefit communication with paediatric patients' parents and guardians while negative experiences hindered patient-centred care in the process of risk-benefit communication. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Continuous education of radiographers and doctors on radiation risk-benefit communication before paediatric CT procedures is recommended, in line with their scope of practice, to improve patient-centred care.