Guidance document on the impact of water treatment processes on residues of active substances or their metabolites in water abstracted for the production of drinking water.

This guidance document provides a tiered framework for risk assessors and facilitates risk managers in making decisions concerning the approval of active substances (AS) that are chemicals in plant protection products (PPPs) and biocidal products, and authorisation of the products. Based on the approaches presented in this document, a conclusion can be drawn on the impact of water treatment processes on residues of the AS or its metabolites in surface water and/or groundwater abstracted for the production of drinking water, i.e. the formation of transformation products (TPs). This guidance enables the identification of actual public health concerns from exposure to harmful compounds generated during the processing of water for the production of drinking water, and it focuses on water treatment methods commonly used in the European Union (EU). The tiered framework determines whether residues from PPP use or residues from biocidal product use can be present in water at water abstraction locations. Approaches, including experimental methods, are described that can be used to assess whether harmful TPs may form during water treatment and, if so, how to assess the impact of exposure to these water treatment TPs (tTPs) and other residues including environmental TPs (eTPs) on human and domesticated animal health through the consumption of TPs via drinking water. The types of studies or information that would be required are described while avoiding vertebrate testing as much as possible. The framework integrates the use of weight-of-evidence and, when possible alternative (new approach) methods to avoid as far as possible the need for additional testing.

Implementation of initial emission mitigation measures for 1,4-dioxane in Germany: Are they taking effect?

Since our comprehensive investigation of finished drinking water in Germany obtained from managed aquifer recharge systems in the period 2015-2016, which revealed widespread contamination with 1,4-dioxane, mitigation measures (integration of AOP units, shutdown or alteration of production processes) have been implemented at some sites. In this study, we conducted follow-up tests on surface water concentrations and associated finished drinking water concentrations in 2017/2018, to evaluate the effectiveness of these measures. Our findings demonstrate that the emission mitigation measures had considerably reducing effects on the average 1,4-dioxane drinking water concentrations for some of the previously severely affected areas (Lower Franconia: -54%, Passau: -88%). Conversely, at notoriously contaminated sites where neither monitoring nor mitigation measures were introduced, the drinking water concentrations stagnated or even increased. Drinking water concentrations determined via a modified US EPA method 522 ranged from below LOQ (0.034 µg/L) up to 1.68 µg/L in all drinking water samples investigated. In river water samples, the maximum concentration exceeded 10 µg/L. Effluents of wastewater treatments plants containing 1,4-dioxane (5 µg/L-1.75 mg/L) were also analyzed for other similar cyclic ethers by suspected target screening. Thus, 1,3-dioxolane and three other derivatives were tentatively identified in effluents from the polyester processing or manufacturing industry. 1,3-Dioxolane was present in concentrations >1.2 mg/L at one site, exceeding up to sevenfold the 1,4-dioxane concentration found there. At another site 2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane was still found 13 km downstream of the discharge point, indicating that ethers analogous to 1,4-dioxane should be further considered regarding their occurrence and fate in wastewater treatment and the aquatic environment.

1,4-Dioxane contamination of German drinking water obtained by managed aquifer recharge systems: Distribution and main influencing factors.

1,4-Dioxane, a cyclic ether that has been classified as a class 2B carcinogen by the US-EPA, is a substance of growing environmental concern because of its abundant occurrence in surface waters worldwide. Its high polarity and low biodegradability hamper its retardation in aquifer systems. Previous investigations in Germany have shown that 1,4-dioxane is already widely distributed in rivers and can be found in groundwater at contamination sites. Therefore, the present study shall provide an overview of the Germany-wide distribution of 1,4-dioxane in finished drinking water (FDW) obtained by managed aquifer recharge (MAR) systems. Thus, we investigated the 1,4-Dioxane levels in FDW obtained by MAR, such as river bank filtration (RBF) or artificial groundwater recharge (AGR), in regions that are supplied by surface water bodies (mainly rivers) with already known 1,4-dioxane contaminations. In total, 125 FDW samples and 33 samples of corresponding surface waters were analyzed for 1,4-dioxane content using solid phase extraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SIM-mode) using a slight modification to US-EPA method 522. About 80% of the investigated FDW samples contained 1,4-dioxane at levels exceeding the limit of quantification (0.034 µg/L); the maximum value was 2.05 µg/L. However, a maximum concentration of 3 µg/L was obtained in the surface water samples. Three main factors were associated with elevated levels of 1,4-dioxane in the FDW: A significant 1,4-dioxane contamination of the associated surface water, the application of RBF instead of AGR, and the proportion of available unpolluted groundwater and/or reservoir water blended in the individual waterworks. The results show that 1,4-dioxane should be critically monitored during FDW production by means of MAR not only in Germany. The findings are also of relevance to neighboring countries depending on the same river systems and for research in the field of small mobile substances in drinking water production in general.

1,4-Dioxane pollution at contaminated groundwater sites in western Germany and its distribution within a TCE plume.

An effective and sensitive method for the analysis of 1,4-dioxane in water has been available since 2008 (EPA 522). This method is increasingly being applied to investigate the distribution of 1,4-dioxane in the aquatic environment. However, there is a need for more information about the possible occurrence of 1,4-dioxane in groundwater in Europe in general, and in Germany in particular, where virtually no data have been collected so far. The possible contamination of groundwater with 1,4-dioxane is of relevance to Germany because up to 70% of Germany's drinking water is obtained from groundwater and about 17% from river bank filtrate, which contains variable proportions of groundwater. The aim of the present study is to investigate selected and representative groundwater sites in Germany that have suspected occurrences of 1,4-dioxane. Five of the sites are well known for their volatile chlorinated hydrocarbon contamination, two sites have representative landfill leachate characteristics, and one site is negatively impacted by a detergent manufacturing plant. The presence of 1,4-dioxane was observed at each of these sites. Measured maximum concentration values ranged from 0.15µg/L to 152µg/L. An aquifer containing a trichloroethylene (TCE) plume with 1,4-dioxane as a co-contaminant was investigated in more detail. A perfect match was found between the concentrations of 1,4-dioxane and TCE in the vertical and horizontal distribution profiles. The results indicate the necessity for investigating groundwater contamination by 1,4-dioxane at sites with known 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA) and TCE contaminations, in landfill leachates, and at sites of detergent production.