Beyond Diameter: Enhancing Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surveillance with Volumetric Assessments after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR).

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between maximum transverse diameter (MTD) and volume measurements in patients who underwent reoperations after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and their association with the occurrence of endoleaks. The study included 51 patients who underwent EVAR and subsequent re-operations caused by endoleaks type I-III. In some number of events, multiple re-operations were needed. MTD was measured using the Horos software, and segmentations of the AAA were performed using 3D Slicer. This study first evaluated post-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) to measure MTD and volume. Then, similar measurements were made in the control scan for re-operation qualification. Negative remodeling (increase in MTD and/or volume) was observed in 40 cases using MTD, and 48 cases using volume measurements. The volume measurement showed lower missed negatives than MTD, indicating its effectiveness in screening for negative remodeling (p < 0.001). Combining both methods identified 51 negative remodeling cases and 8 positive changes, with a higher sensitivity compared to MTD alone. The volume of the sac did not predict specific endoleak types. Decreases in MTD were observed in smaller sacs, with smaller volume changes. Volume measurement is a valuable screening tool, and combining MTD and volume enhances sensitivity. However, sac volume does not predict endoleak type.

The Influence of Individualized Three-Dimensional Holographic Models on Patients' Knowledge Qualified for Intervention in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD).

We sought to determine the role of the patient-specific, three-dimensional (3D) holographic vascular model in patient medical knowledge and its influence on obtaining a more conscious informed consent process for percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PTA). Patients with peripheral arterial disease who had been scheduled for PTA were enrolled in the study. Information regarding the primary disease, planned procedure, and informed consent was recorded in typical fashion. Subsequently, the disease and procedure details were presented to the patient, showing the patients their individual model. A patient and medical supervisor equipped with mixed reality headsets could both simultaneously manipulate the hologram using gestures. The holographic 3D model had been created on a scale of 1:1 based on computed tomography scans. The patient's knowledge was tested by the completion of a questionnaire before and after the interaction in a mixed reality environment. Seventy-nine patients manipulated arterial holograms in mixed reality head-mounted devices. Before the 3D holographic artery model interaction, the mean ± standard deviation score of the knowledge test was 2.95 ± 1.21 points. After the presentation, the score had increased to 4.39 ± 0.82, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0000) between the two scores. Using a Likert scale from 1 to 5, the patients had scored the use of the 3D holographic model at 3.90 points regarding its usefulness in comprehending their medical condition; at 4.04 points regarding the evaluation of the holograms as helpful in understanding the course of surgery; and rated the model at 1.99 points in reducing procedure-related stress. Using a nominal scale (know or don't know), the patients had self-assessed their knowledge of the procedure before and after the 3D model presentation, with a score of 6.29 ± 2.01 and 8.39 ± 1.54, respectively. The study group tolerated the use of head-mounted devices. Only one patient had nausea and dizziness, while four patients experienced transient eye pain. The 3D holographic arterial model aided in the understanding of patients' knowledge regarding the disease and procedure, making the informed consent process more conscious. The holograms improved the patient's self-consciousness. Mixed reality headset-related complications were rare and within acceptable rates.

Immunosuppressant Adherence Factors Differentiating Compliant and Non-Compliant Kidney Transplant Recipients.

The purpose of this study is to find out the psychological factor characteristic of non-adherence patients. The study population comprised kidney transplant recipients aged between 18 and 82 years at least 3 months post-transplant who voluntarily agreed to answer a couple of fully anonymous questionnaires that questions pertaining to basic data, type of immunosuppressive drugs taken, and standardized questionnaires. Participants were recruited using direct routine, free-of-charge visits to specialist doctors in transplant clinics. There was no significant difference in the percentage of men and women in both adherence and non-adherence groups. Non-adherence patients were significantly younger compared to adherence patients. There was also a significant difference in the patient's level of education. Adherence patients were better educated. No significant differences in criteria such as place of residence, having children or a partner, or way of living were observed. However, the emotion scale correlated negatively with the level of life orientation in both groups, but the level of the emotions scale and distractions subscale was negatively correlated with the level of self-esteem only for the adherence group. In future research, it would be worthwhile to focus on lifestyle and health-promoting behaviors in juxtaposition with the propensity for adherence.