RESUMO
Computerized parenchymal analysis has shown potential to be utilized as an imaging biomarker to estimate the risk of breast cancer. Parenchymal analysis of digital mammograms is based on the extraction of computerized measures to build machine learning-based models for the prediction of breast cancer risk. However, the choice of the region of interest (ROI) for feature extraction within the breast remains an open problem. In this work we perform a comparison between five different methods suggested in the literature for automated ROI selection, including the whole breast (WB), the maximum squared (MS), the retro-areolar region (RA), the lattice-based (LB), and the polar-based (PB) selection methods. For the experiments, we built a retrospective dataset of 896 screening mammograms from 224 women (112 cases and 112 healthy controls). The performance of each ROI selection method was measured in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) values. The AUC values varied between 0.55 and 0.79 depending on the method and experimental settings. The best performance on an independent test set was achieved by the MS method (AUC of 0.59, 95% CI: 0.55-0.64). This method is fully-automated and does not require adjusting hyper-parameters. Based on our results, we prompt the use of the MS method for ROI selection in the computerized parenchymal analysis for breast cancer risk assessment.
