Low rate of local recurrence detection by rectoscopy in follow-up of rectal cancer.

AIM: The main aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of rectoscopy for detecting local recurrence of rectal cancer in patients following low anterior resection. METHOD: This was a retrospective study of 201 patients, who underwent low anterior resection for rectal or rectosigmoid cancer between 2007 and 2009 and who were followed up with rigid rectoscopy and imaging. A total of 91 patients were excluded from the analysis for various reasons, leaving 110 patients eligible for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 613 rectoscopies were performed, and 48 biopsies taken. Six local recurrences were detected in the 110 patients, three of which were first detected by rectoscopy and three by CT. Two of the local recurrences were detected outside the follow-up programme because of symptoms: one by rectoscopy and one by CT. Three of 613 (0.5%) rectoscopies led to detection of local recurrence. The sensitivity and specificity of rectoscopy to detect local recurrence was 0.50 and 0.93, respectively. Nineteen distant metastases were detected, and two patients had both local recurrence and distant metastasis. All local recurrences and distant metastases were detected within 48 months of surgery. CONCLUSION: Rigid rectoscopy is poor at detecting local recurrence. Only 3 out of 613 rectoscopies (0.5%) detected local recurrence. Due to extramural growth of some recurrences, the sensitivity is also very low. Based on our results, routine rectoscopy in the surveillance of asymptomatic patients cannot be recommended.

Risk Factors for Complications following Introduction of Radical Surgery for Colon Cancer: A Consecutive Patient Series.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer surgery is standardized, resulting in improved survival. Colon cancer has fallen behind and therefore more radical surgical techniques have been introduced. One technique is complete mesocolic excision. The aim of this article was to study the complications after the introduction of standardized complete mesocolic excision in a single center. METHODS: Complete mesocolic excision was introduced in 2007, and data were collected from 286 patients prior to surgery (2007-2010). The surgeon decided on open or laparoscopic surgery. Follow-up information was recorded until 31 December 2015. Complications were classified according to a modified Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 47%, severe complications (grade III and IV) in 15%. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. A total of 142 patients (49.7%) were operated by open surgery. Logistic regression revealed anemia (p = 0.001), open surgery (p < 0.001), and long operating time (p < 0.001) as significant factors for complications in general. Multinomial logistic regression revealed that severe complications occurred more often in males (odds ratio: 2.56; 95% confidence interval: 0.98-6.68), patients with anemia (odds ratio: 3.49; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-9.60), elevated body mass index (odds ratio: 1.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.28), and in open surgery (odds ratio: 9.95; 95% confidence interval: 2.58-38.35). Age was not associated with severe complications. Survival was not significantly influenced by complications. Overall survival (5 years) was 90% among patients with complications and 92% among those without complications. CONCLUSION: Severe complications following the introduction of complete mesocolic excision are patient dependent and related to open surgery. Patients selected for laparoscopy had less number of complications; therefore, introducing complete mesocolic excision by laparoscopy is justified. Identification of these factors can improve selection of appropriate surgical approach and postoperative patient safety.

Rate of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Anastomosis Depends on the Definition: Pelvic Abscesses are Significant.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer has proposed that a pelvic abscess in the proximity of the anastomosis is considered an anastomotic leak, whether or not its point of origin is detectable. This study describes how the inclusion of pelvic abscesses alters the leakage rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Risk factors and postoperative complications in patients with visible anastomotic leakage ("direct leakage"), pelvic abscesses alone in the vicinity of a visibly intact anastomosis ("abscess leakage"), and no leakage were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 341 patients operated with anterior resections and who received an anastomosis within 15 cm as measured from the anal verge were included. A total of 37 patients (10.9%) had direct leakage, 13 (3.8%) had abscess leakage, and 291 (85.3%) had no leakage. The overall anastomotic leakage rate was 14.7% (50 patients). In accordance with the grading system outlined by International Study Group of Rectal Cancer, 7 patients (2.1%) experienced Grade A leakage, 19 (5.6%) Grade B, and 24 (7.0%) Grade C. Direct leak patients had more often a reoperation due to anastomotic complications (odds ratio = 19.7, p = 0.001), a permanent stoma (odds ratio = 28.5, p = 0.001), and a longer hospital stay than abscess leak patients (29.0 vs 15.5 days, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Abscess leakage accounted for over one-fourth of the overall leakage rate, raising the leakage rate. Direct leak patients were at a higher risk of requiring a reoperation, permanent stoma, and longer hospital stay than abscess leak patients. Abscess leak patients were at a greater risk for a urinary tract infection, wound infection, and postoperative intestinal obstruction than non-leak patients.

Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy for prediction of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomoses.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, there is no accurate tool to predict its occurrence. We evaluated the predictive value of visible light spectroscopy (VLS), a novel method to measure tissue oxygenation [saturated O(2) (StO(2) )], for anastomotic leakage of the colon and the rectum. METHOD: Oxygen saturation in the bowel was measured in 77 colorectal resections. The anastomosis was between 2 and 30 cm (mean 13 cm) from the anal verge. The oxygen saturation was measured in the colon and rectum before and after anastomosis construction. This was compared with a reference measurement in the caecum. Data on postoperative complications were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 14 (18%) patients. When compared with a leaking anastomosis, normal anastomoses showed rising O(2) values during the operation (mean StO(2) 72.1 ± 9.0-76.7 ± 8.0 vs 73.9 ± 7.9-73.1 ± 7.4) (P ≤ 0.05). There were also higher StO(2) values in the caecum compared with those which ultimately leaked (73.6 ± 5.7 normal anastomoses, 69.6 ± 5.6 anastomotic leaks) (P ≤ 0.05). Both StO(2) values were predictive of anastomotic leakage. CONCLUSION: Tissue oxygenation O(2) appears to be a potentially useful means of predicting anastomotic leakage after colorectal anastomosis.

Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The dramatic clinical consequences of anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery can be reduced by a diverting stoma or drainage of the peri-anastomotic area. Currently, the surgeons' clinical judgement is of major importance in decision making, but reliable data of the diagnostic accuracy are lacking. In this prospective clinical study, the surgeons' predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 191 patients undergoing colorectal resection with anastomosis, the risk for anastomotic leakage was determined by the surgeon on the basis of a visual analogue scale (VAS). This risk assessment was compared to the actual occurrence of anastomotic leakage post-operatively. RESULTS: A total of 26 (13.6%) patients showed anastomotic leakage. The surgeons' median predicted leakage rate was 7.1% in anastomoses >15 cm from the anal verge and 9.5%

Intraoperative assessment of microperfusion with visible light spectroscopy in esophageal and colorectal anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the technical feasibility and stability of measurements using visible light spectroscopy to measure microvascular oxygen saturation (StO(2)) in gastrointestinal anastomoses. METHODS: In consecutive esophageal (n = 14) or colorectal (n = 30) resections, during which an uncomplicated anastomosis was performed, measurements of serosal StO(2) were performed during the procedure. RESULTS: In esophageal resections, median (+/- standard error) StO(2) was stable before and after anastomosis in the proximal esophagus (before: 66.0 +/- 4.6, after: 68.3 +/- 6.0%) and the gastric conduit (before: 70.6 +/- 8.6, after: 69.8 +/- 8.0%). Mean colorectal StO(2) before and after anastomosis increased in the proximal part (71.3 +/- 8.4 to 76.6 +/- 8.2%; p < 0.005). Mean StO(2) in the distal part remained stable (72.4 +/- 6.6 to 74.8 +/- 6.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Visible light spectroscopy is a feasible and fast method for intraoperative assessment of microperfusion of the serosa in esophageal and colorectal anastomosis. Future clinical studies will define its role in the prediction of anastomotic leakage.

Preoperative irradiation with 5 x 5 Gy in a murine isolated colon loop model does not cause anastomotic weakening after colon resection.

INTRODUCTION: There are conflicting studies on the influence of fractionated preoperative 5 days of 5 Gy irradiation on tissue oxygenation and subsequent colonic anastomotic strength. To elucidate the effect of preoperative irradiation on anastomotic strength, an isolated colon loop model was developed. METHODS: Male Wistar rats (n = 164) were randomly divided into three groups. One group remained untreated (control). In the other two groups, a loop of descending colon was exteriorized to create a hernia of the abdominal wall. After 4 weeks' recovery, this loop was locally irradiated with 5 x 5 Gy of gamma-rays or sham irradiated. One week after (sham-) irradiation, an anastomosis was performed in all groups. Tissue oxygenation (StO2) was determined with visible light spectroscopy. The animals were sacrificed 3 or 7 days after the operation and the anastomosis was tested for bursting pressure and breaking strength. RESULTS: Irradiated rats showed significantly more weight loss (90% SD 4.3 of initial body weight vs. 96% SD 2.8, p < or = 0.05) and enteritis (18% vs. 5%, p = 0.013) compared to sham and control animals. StO2 was not influenced by irradiation and was not predictive for anastomotic strength. The control group showed significantly lower bursting pressure and breaking strength compared to (sham-) irradiated animals. CONCLUSION: We developed a new isolated loop model for intermittent irradiation of the colon. Preoperative irradiation of the distal part of a colon anastomosis was successfully administered with acceptable side effects and did not cause reduced tissue oxygenation nor clinical signs of anastomotic weakening, nor objective reduction in bursting pressure and breaking strength.

Results of streamlined regional ambulance transport and subsequent treatment of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the triage of patients operated for non-ruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) before the endovascular era. DESIGN: Retrospective single-centre cohort study. METHODS: All patients treated for an acute AAA between 1998 and 2001 and admitted to our hospital were evaluated in the emergency department for urgent AAA surgery. All time intervals, from the telephone call from the patient to the ambulance department, to the arrival of the patient in the operating theatre, were analysed. Intraoperative, hospital and 1-year survival were determined. RESULTS: 160 patients with an acute AAA were transported to our hospital. Mean (SD) age was 71 (8) years, and 138 (86%) were men. 34 (21%) of these patients had symptomatic, non-ruptured AAA (sAAA) and 126 patients had ruptured AAA (rAAA). All patients with sAAA and 98% of patients with rAAA were operated upon. For the patients with rAAA, median time from telephone call to arrival at the hospital was 43 min (interquartile range 33-53 min) and median time from arrival at the hospital to arrival at the operating room was 25 min (interquartile range 11-50 min). Intraoperative mortality was 0% for sAAA and 11% for rAAA (p = 0.042), and hospital mortality was 12% and 33%, respectively (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary unified strategy resulted in a rapid throughput of patients with acute AAA. Rapid transport, diagnosis and surgery resulted in favourable hospital mortality. Despite the fact that nearly all the patients were operated upon, survival was favourable compared with published data.

Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is little agreement on prophylactic use of drains in anastomoses in elective colorectal surgery despite many randomized clinical trials. Once anastomotic leakage occurs it is generally agreed that drains should be used for therapeutic purposes. However, on prophylactic use no such agreement exists. AIM: To compare the safety and effectiveness of routine drainage and nondrainage regimes after elective colorectal surgery. The primary outcome was clinical anastomotic leakage. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken to identify randomized clinical trials. Of the 1140 patients who were enrolled (six randomized controlled trials), 573 were allocated for drainage and 567 for no drainage. Outcome measures were: (i) mortality: 3% (18 of 573 patients) compared with 4% (25 of 567 patients); (ii) clinical anastomotic dehiscence: 2% (11 of 522 patients) compared with 1% (7 of 519 patients); (iii) radiological anastomotic dehiscence: 3% (16 of 522 patients) compared with 4% (19 of 519 patients); (iv) wound infection: 5% (29 of 573 patients) compared with 5% (28 of 567 patients); (v) reintervention: 6% (34 of 542 patients) compared with 5% (28 of 539 patients); (vi) extra-abdominal complications: 7% (34 of 522 patients) compared with 6% (32 of 519 patients). None of these differences in outcome was significant. CONCLUSION: There is insufficient evidence showing that routine drainage after colorectal anastomoses prevents anastomotic and other complications.

Prophylactic anastomotic drainage for colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: There is little agreement on prophylactic use of drains in anastomoses in elective colorectal surgery despite many randomized clinical trials. Results of these trials are contradictory, quality and statistical power of these individual studies have been questioned. Once anastomotic leakage has occurred it is generally agreed that drains should be used for therapeutic purposes. However, on prophylactic use no such agreement exists. OBJECTIVES: Comparison of safety and effectiveness of routine drainage and non-drainage regimes after colorectal surgery. The following hypothesis was tested: The use of prophylactic anastomotic drainage after elective colorectal surgery does not prevent development of complications. SEARCH STRATEGY: The studies were identified from CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS, MEDLINE, Controlled Clinical Trials Database, Trials Register of the Cochrane Colorectal Cancer Group, reference lists. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing drainage with non-drainage regimes after anastomoses in elective colorectal surgery were reviewed. Outcome measures were: 1. mortality; 2. clinical anastomotic dehiscence; 3. radiological anastomotic dehiscence; 4. wound infection; 5. reoperation; 6. extra-abdominal complications. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were independently extracted and cross-checked by the two reviewers. The methodological quality of each trial was assessed. Details of the randomization (generation and concealment), blinding, and the number of patients lost to follow-up were recorded. The RCTs were stratified based on experimental group, according to clinical homogeneity (external validity). MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1140 patients enrolled (6 RCTs), 573 were allocated for drainage and 567 for no drainage. The patients assigned to the drainage group compared with the ones assigned to non-drainage group showed: a) Mortality: 3% (18 of 573 patients) compared with 4% (25 of 567 patients); b) Clinical anastomotic dehiscence: 2% (11 of 522 patients) compared with 1% (7 of 519 patients); c) Radiological anastomotic dehiscence: 3% (16 of 522 patients) compared with 4% (19 of 519 patients); d) Wound infection: 5% (29 of 573 patients) compared with 5% (28 of 567 patients); e) Reintervention: 6% (34 of 542 patients) compared with 5% (28 of 539 patients); f) Extra abdominal complications: 7% (34 of 522 patients) compared with 6% (32 of 519 patients). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence showing that routine drainage after colorectal anastomoses prevents anastomotic and other complications.