"Renters" or "owners"? Residents' perceptions and behaviors regarding error reduction in teaching hospitals: a literature review.

PURPOSE: Residents' attitudes, practices, and behaviors vary in response to medical error within the context of the culture of their institutions. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature focused on residents' attitudes and behaviors regarding medical errors in teaching hospitals, including a qualitative review of barriers and proposed countermeasures related to residents' engagement in patient safety. METHOD: The electronic literature databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for articles published between January 1988 and June 2008. The search strategy yielded 124 articles. A scoring system was developed to assess the quality of the overall literature. RESULTS: Nineteen studies met eligibility criteria, with 17 published since 2005. There were 12 cross-sectional, 5 qualitative, 1 cohort and 1 pre-post intervention study. Quality assessment scores ranged from 5.5 to 12.5 (possible range 1.0-16.0). Three studies obtained a score of < or = 8.0, 5 obtained scores of 8.5 to 10.5, and 11 studies had scores of 11.0 to 12.5. Personal, environmental, and system barriers, and environmental and system countermeasures, were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Although the published literature on this topic is limited, those articles that exist identify barriers that make residents reluctant to engage in institutional error identification and/or reduction. Key factors identified included a fear of retribution and the perception of residents as transient care providers. Whereas several countermeasures have been promulgated, the literature reveals scant evidence of their effectiveness. Institutions should recognize and capitalize on the unique experiences of residents and their potential to become owners in patient safety initiatives.

Residents' and attending physicians' handoffs: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Effective communication is central to patient safety. There is abundant evidence of negative consequences of poor communication and inadequate handoffs. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a systematic review of articles focused on physicians' handoffs, conduct a qualitative review of barriers and strategies, and identify features of structured handoffs that have been effective. METHOD: The authors conducted a thorough, systematic review of English-language articles, indexed in PubMed, published between 1987 and June 2008, and focused on physicians' handoffs in the United States. The search strategy yielded 2,590 articles. After title review, 401 were obtained for further review by trained abstractors. RESULTS: Forty-six articles met inclusion criteria, 33 (71.7%) of which were published between 2005 and 2008. Content analysis yielded 91 handoffs barriers in eight major categories and 140 handoffs strategies in seven major categories. Eighteen articles involved research on handoffs. Quality assessment scores for research studies ranged from 1 to 13 (possible range 1-16). One third of the reviewed research studies obtained quality scores at or below 8, and only one achieved a score of 13. Only six studies included any measure of handoff effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the negative consequences of inadequate physicians' handoffs, very little research has been done to identify best practices. Many of the existing peer-reviewed studies had design or reporting flaws. There is remarkable consistency in the anecdotally suggested strategies; however, there remains a paucity of evidence to support these strategies. Overall, there is a great need for high-quality handoff outcomes studies focused on systems factors, human performance, and the effectiveness of structured protocols and interventions.