Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Of Primary Versus Revision Arthroscopic Anatomic Glenoid Reconstruction with Distal Tibial Allograft For Anterior Shoulder Instability With Bone Loss.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction (AAGR) used for primary versus revision surgery for addressing anterior shoulder instability with bone loss. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review on consecutive patients who underwent AAGR from 2012 to 2020. Patients who received AAGR for anterior shoulder instability with bone loss and had a minimum follow-up of two-years were included. Exclusion criteria included patients with incomplete primary patient reported outcome scores (PROs), multi-directional instability, glenoid fracture, non-rigid fixation and concomitant HAGL, or rotator cuff repair. Our primary outcome was measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) scores. Secondary outcomes included postoperative Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, Hand (DASH) scores, complications, recurrence of instability and CT evaluation of graft position, resorption, and healing. RESULTS: There were 73 patients (52 primary and 21 revision) finally included. Both groups had comparable demographics and preoperative WOSI and DASH scores. The primary group had significantly better postoperative WOSI and DASH scores at final follow-up when compared to the revision group (WOSI: 21.0 vs 33.8, p=0.019; DASH: 7.3 vs 17.2, p=0.001). The primary group also showed significantly better WOSI scores than the revision group at 6-month, 1-year and 2-year time points (p=0.029, 0.022 and 0.003; respectively). The overall complication rate was 9.6% (5/52) in the primary group and 23.8% (5/21) in the revision group. Both groups showed good graft healing and placement in the A to P and ML orientation and had a similar rate of graft resorption/remodeling. There was no difference between the groups in the remainder of the CT measurements. CONCLUSION: Functional outcome scores and stiffness were significantly worse in patients undergoing an AAGR procedure after a failed instability surgery when compared with patients undergoing primary AAGR. There were no differences in postoperative recurrence of instability or radiographic outcomes. As a result, AAGR should be considered as a primary treatment option within current treatment algorithms for shoulder instability.

Primary Rotator Cuff Bridging Reconstruction Shows Better Clinical and Radiographic Results Than Revision Bridging Reconstruction.

Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of revision rotator cuff bridging reconstruction (BR) as compared to primary BR in a large cohort of patients. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients who underwent BR using dermal allograft for large/massive rotator cuff tears between 2010 and 2018. Patients who completed Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) and Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores both pre- and postoperatively were included. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans were compared to assess for differences in fatty infiltration, muscle atrophy, and graft status. Results: Eighty patients met the inclusion criteria, including 43 patients who underwent BR as a primary surgery and 37 patients who underwent revision BR. The mean follow-up duration was 5.7 ± 1.9 years in the primary group and 5.8 ± 2.0 years in the revision group. Both WORC and DASH scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperatively for both the primary and revision groups (P < .05). The primary group had significantly better postoperative WORC and DASH scores at 6 months, 1 year, and final follow-up (P < .05). Failure rate of the graft was higher in the revision group compared to primary group (14.3% vs 6.1%, respectively; P = .337), and the amount of fatty infiltration of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles significantly improved in patients who received primary BR compared to revision BR (P < .05). Conclusions: BR using dermal allograft for large/massive irreparable rotator cuff tears showed improvement of functional outcomes, with primary cases resulting in better improvement in patient-reported outcomes compared to revision cases. Primary BR was also associated with better postoperative fatty infiltration of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Arthroscopy Association of Canada Position Statement on Opioid Prescription After Arthroscopic Surgery.

Background: Despite the ongoing opioid epidemic, most patients are still prescribed a significant number of opioid medications for pain management after arthroscopic surgery. There is a need for consensus among orthopaedic surgeons and solutions to aid providers in analgesic strategies that reduce the use of opioid pain medications. Purpose: This position statement was developed with a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of exclusively randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to synthesize the best available evidence for managing acute postoperative pain after arthroscopic surgery. Study Design: Position statement. Methods: The Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until August 10, 2022. Keywords included arthroscopy, opioids, analgesia, and pain, and associated variations. We included exclusively RCTs on adult patients to gather the best available evidence for managing acute postoperative pain after arthroscopic surgery. Patient characteristics, pain, and opioid data were extracted, data were analyzed, and trial bias was evaluated. Results: A total of 21 RCTs were identified related to the prescription of opioid-sparing pain medication after arthroscopic surgery. The following recommendations regarding noninvasive, postoperative pain management strategies were made: (1) multimodal oral nonopioid analgesic regimens-including at least 1 of acetaminophen-a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-can significantly reduce opioid consumption with no change in pain scores; (2) cryotherapy is likely to help with pain management, although the evidence on the optimal method of application (continuous-flow vs ice pack application) is unclear; (3) and (4) limited RCT evidence supports the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and relaxation exercises in reducing opioid consumption after arthroscopy; and (5) limited RCT evidence exists against the efficacy of transdermal lidocaine patches in reducing opioid consumption. Conclusion: A range of nonopioid strategies exist that can reduce postarthroscopic procedural opioid consumption with equivalent vocal pain outcomes. Optimal strategies include multimodal analgesia with education and restricted/reduced opioid prescription.

3D Printed Patient-Specific Cutting Guides for Bone Grafting in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Novel Technique.

Glenoid bone loss remains a challenge in shoulder arthroplasty. Addressing substantial bone loss is essential to ensure proper function and stability of the shoulder prosthesis and to prevent baseplate loosening and subsequent revision surgery. Current options for creating and shaping glenoid bone grafts include free-hand techniques and simple reusable cutting guides that cut the graft at a standard angle. There is currently no patient-specific device available that enables surgeons to accurately prepare the bone graft and correct glenoid deformity. We present a novel surgical technique using three-dimensional (3D)-printed cutting guides to create a patient-specific bone graft to address glenoid deformity in the setting of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Biomechanical Strength of All-Inside ACL Reconstruction Grafts Using Side-to-Side and Backup Fixation.

BACKGROUND: The all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) procedure uses a single hamstring tendon folded twice and secured to itself to form a 4-stranded graft. There are several possible configurations for preparing the graft. PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical properties of a new graft preparation technique in comparison with 2 commonly used configurations. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Five porcine flexor tendons were prepared into the test graft configuration: side-to-side fixation with a backup fixation at the button loop (graft M). The test configuration was compared with the results of a previous study that included grafts with simple interrupted sutures (graft A; n = 5) and end-to-end fixation (graft C; n = 5). All grafts were subjected to the same mechanical testing protocol to determine the mean failure load, stiffness, rate of elongation, and total elongation during both cyclic loading and pull to failure. Differences between groups were evaluated. RESULTS: Graft A had a significantly lower failure load (637 ± 99 N) compared with graft M (883 ± 66 N; P = .002) and graft C (846 ± 26 N; P = .002). Graft A also had significantly lower stiffness (166 ± 12 N/mm) compared with graft M (215 ± 8 N/mm; P < .001) and graft C (212 ± 11 N/mm; P < .001). Graft C had a significantly lower elongation during cyclic loading (3.42 ± 0.24 mm) compared with graft M (4.37 ± 0.74 mm; P = .026) and graft A (4.90 ± 0.88 mm; P = .006). The unsecured fixation was the weakest graft, with the lowest failure load and stiffness. The new side-to-side configuration and end-to-end configuration were equally strong. CONCLUSION: The new side-to-side configuration was not biomechanically superior to the end-to-end configuration; however, they were both stronger than unsecured fixation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: As the all-inside ACLR is gaining popularity, this study provides surgeons with a new method of preparing grafts and evaluates the method with respect to currently used configurations.

Posterior Glenohumeral Capsular Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Allograft.

Posterior shoulder instability is an uncommon and challenging cause of shoulder pain and dysfunction. Surgical management has less reliable results and higher failure rates compared with techniques for anterior shoulder instability. The presence of generalized ligamentous laxity further complicates options for surgical management. If primary capsulolabral repair fails, controversy exists as to the optimal revision procedure. This technical description and video present an arthroscopic technique for reconstruction of the posterior glenohumeral capsule with an acellular dermal allograft to treat posterior instability in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and a previously failed posterior capsular plication.