Evaluation of the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP). METHODS: Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0-2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m(-2) on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m(-2) on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25-74) years; PS: 1 (0-2); histologies - squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3-76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7-39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5-49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7-50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7-92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2-34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3-36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3-4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer.

Cisplatin plus etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation therapy for patients with limited stage small cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a cisplatin plus etoposide regimen followed by thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin consolidation chemotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with limited SCLC were enrolled onto this study. Patients received three courses of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 i.v., days 1-3 (EP regimen), followed by TRT (45-56 Gy administered in 15 fractions), and three courses of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 i.v., day 1 and cisplatin, as previously, on day 2 (PP regimen); cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 34 for response. The overall response rate was 67% (CR: 26%; PR: 41%; intention-to-treat analysis) (95% CI: 53.0-84.2%). After a median follow-up period of 15 months, the median survival time was 15 months, the median time to tumor progression 8.3 months and the 1-year survival rate 53.8%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 39% and 36% of patients receiving EP and PP regimens, respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 5% and 3% for EP and PP regimens, respectively. Other hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were mild, with the exception of esophagitis occurring in 36% of patients during and/or immediately after radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Consolidation therapy with PP after sequential EP and thoracic radiotherapy is feasible and well-tolerated; however, the efficacy results are comparable with those previously obtained in the same patients' population using a combination of EP and TRT.

The RACOX phase I study: radiation (RA), capecitabine (C) and oxaliplatin (OX) as adjuvant treatment of stage II and III rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this phase I trial was to deter- mine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of adjuvant che- motherapy (CT) with oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine during concomitant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had pathological stage II (T3-4N0M0) or III (any T N1-2M0) rectal adenocarcinoma, and no prior treatment other than curative resection. Fixed capecitabine dose (825 mg/m(2) bid on days 1-14 and 22-35) was given and external beam RT was delivered to the pelvis (50.4 Gy in 27 fractions in 5.5 weeks, with field reduction after 45 Gy in linear accelerator, 18Mev). Oxaliplatin was tested at 4 dose levels: 100, 110, 120 and 130 mg/m(2). The dose of oxaliplatin was escalated when all 3 entered patients at each level had been monitored for at least 8 weeks after the CT/RT course without dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). In the presence of a DLT at any dose level, a further 3 patients were enrolled. If only 1 of the 6 patients experienced a DLT, escalation could proceed. The MTD was defined as the level at which >/= 2 of 3 to 6 patients experienced DLTs. Fifteen patients (10 males and 5 females, median age 62 years) were enrolled at oxaliplatin dose levels of 100 (n=3), 110 (n=3), 120 (n=3) and 130 mg/m(2) (n=6). RESULTS: All patients completed the planned CT/RT course. Dose reduction or delay of the 2nd CT cycle was not required. No DLTs were observed at all dose levels. Overall, gastrointestinal and neurological toxicities were mild and transient. Toxicities included non-dose-limiting nausea / vomiting, diarrhea, dysesthesias in 2 level III and in 1 level IV patients. Grade II myelotoxicity, mainly neutropenia, was seen in 6 patients. With a median follow-up of 4 months (range 2-12) after the completion of CT/RT, late toxicities were restricted to grade II radiation colitis and dermatitis in 2 and 2 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of pelvic RT, capecitabine and 3-weekly oxaliplatin is feasible and well tolerated. The MTD was not reached up to the dose of 130 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin, which is the recommended dose.

Weekly chemotherapy with carboplatin, docetaxel and irinotecan in advanced non-small-cell-lung cancer: a phase II study.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin, docetaxel plus irinotecan given weekly to patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 50 patients with previously untreated NSCLC (stage IIIB 10; stage IV 40; 44% squamous cell carcinoma; median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status 1) received intravenous (i.v.) carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 5 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 150 ug/m(2) was given from days 3 to 6 and 10 to 13. Response was evaluated every two cycles. Four complete responses (8%) and 24 (48%) partial responses were observed, giving an overall intent-to-treat response rate of 56%. 8 patients (16%) achieved stable disease and 14 (28%) progressed. The median time to progression (TTP) was 9.6 months (range 2.5-21.8 months), median survival was 14.8 months (range 0.3-27+ months) and actuarial 1-year survival time was 55%. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 and 22% of patients, respectively; 13 patients (26%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia and 7 (14%) had neutropenic fever that required hospitalisation, but was successfully treated with antibiotics and G-CSF support. One patient developed a severe allergy during docetaxel administration and was withdrawn. Other grade 3/4 adverse events included diarrhoea (n=14; 3 required hospitalisation), nausea/vomiting (n=9), neurotoxicity (n=5) and fatigue (n=5). 6 patients required a dose reduction. This combination of i.v. carboplatin AUC 2, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) given weekly is highly effective in the treatment of chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC. Toxicity was moderate, but manageable.

Weekly chemotherapy with docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell urothelial cancer: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five chemotherapy-naïve (adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy was allowed) patients with advanced TCC received intravenous docetaxel 35 mg/m2, gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given from days 3 to 6 and days 10 to 15, anti-emetics were used routinely. RESULTS: Most (27) patients (77.1%) had a performance status of 0 to 1 and eight (22.9%) had received prior adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 65.6% [23/35 patients, 95% confidence interval (CI) 47.8% to 80.9%]. Ten patients (28.5%) achieved a complete response (95% CI 14.6% to 46.3%) and 13 (37.1%) a partial response (95% CI 21.5% to 55.0%). Median survival time was 15.5 months, median duration of response was 10.2 months and median time to progression was 8.9 months. Ten patients (28.5%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia, including five (14.3%) who experienced febrile neutropenia, which was successfully treated. Grade 3/4 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 20% and 25.7% of patients, respectively; four patients required platelet transfusions. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel, gemcitabine plus cisplatin is a highly effective treatment for chemotherapy-naïve advanced TCC, and causes only moderate toxicity. This regimen should be considered as a suitable option that deserves further prospective evaluation through randomised phase III trials.

Methotrexate, etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MVIP): an effective first-line therapy for IGCCC intermediate / poor prognosis patients with germ-cell tumors. Single institution experience.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of methotrexate (M), etoposide (V), ifosfamide (I) and cisplatin (P) combination chemotherapy (MVIP) administered to chemotherapy-naive patients with intermediate / poor prognosis germ-cell tumors (GCT) according to the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) consensus classification system (IGCCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 2001 24 consecutive intermediate (n=14)/poor prognosis (n=10) GCT male patients entered prospectively this phase II trial. Patients received methotrexate 250 mg/m(2), day 1, with folinic acid rescue; cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) with appropriate hydration, day 3; ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) with mesna uroprotection, day 3; and etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/day, days 3-5. MVIP was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: After 120 cycles of MVIP (median 5, range 2- 7) 18 (75%) patients achieved complete remission (CR). CR was attained by 12 out of 14 (86%) intermediate prognosis and 6 out of 10 (60%) poor prognosis patients. Three CR patients (2 intermediate, 1 poor prognosis) of out 18 (16.7%) relapsed after a median of 6 months and 1 of them (poor prognosis) achieved a durable CR with second-line chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 37 months (range 5-115 months) 16 patients (10, 71% intermediate and 6, 60% poor prognosis) are long-term survivors with no evidence of disease (NED), and 2 (one of each group) are alive with disease. Actuarial overall survival at 3 and more years is 75% and NED survival is 67%. Hematologic toxicity was most common and easily manageable (grade 3-4 neutropenia 46% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia 25% of the cycles). There were no deaths, withdrawals or delays in chemotherapy administration because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: MVIP conventional chemotherapy proved very effective in terms of CR rate, overall survival and longterm NED survival in these unfavorable groups of GCT patients. The results obtained are encouraging and compare favorably with those taken by more intensive regimens including high-dose chemotherapy. We believe that MVIP justifies further studies.

Methotrexate, etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MVIP): An effective salvage therapy for patients with refractory or relapsed germ-cell tumors.

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of methotrexate, etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MVIP) in patients with germ-cell tumors (GCTs) refractory to or relapsed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1989 and 2001 22 male patients with GCTs refractory (n=7) or relapsed (n=15) after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy entered prospectively the study. Their median age was 29 years. Methotrexate 250 mg/m(2) as 4-hour infusion plus folinic acid were administered on day 1. On day 3 cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) with pre and posthydration was given as 30-min infusion; and ifosfamide 5 g/m(2) with mesna as 24-hour infusion. Etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/day as 1-hour infusion was administered on days 3-5. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) was administered either therapeutically (grade 3-4 neutropenia-/+antibiotics) or prophylactically (nadir grade 3-4 neutropenia in the previous chemotherapy cycle). RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response, toxicity and survival. A total of 95 cycles (median 4 cycles per patient) of MVIP were administered. Fourteen (63.6%) patient achieved complete response (CR), and 8 (36.4%) were treatment failures. Long-term disease-free survival (DFS) with MVIP was achieved in 11 out of 14 (78.6%) CR patients or 50% of all patients. After a median follow-up period of 55.04(+) months (range 4-147(+) months) overall survival is 59.09%. Good performance status (PS) was the only significant predictor for survival. Toxicity was easily manageable with no deaths or therapy delays. CONCLUSION: MVIP conventional chemotherapy proved particularly effective in terms of CR rate, overall survival and long-term DFS in this very poor prognosis patient population. Toxicity was tolerable. The results obtained are equal or even superior compared with those taken by more intensive regimens, including high-dose chemotherapy. MVIP justifies further studies in patients with refractory/ relapsed GCTs.

Fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without interferon alfa-2a as adjuvant treatment, in patients with high-risk colon cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown in randomized studies that adjuvant treatment with the combination of fluorouracil (FU) and levamisole reduced the risk of recurrence and deaths of patients with stage III colon cancer. Pharmacological studies of FU led to its use in combination with a number of modulating agents including interferon-alpha and leucovorin (LV) that appear to enhance its activity in vitro. Furthermore, a meta-analysis suggested that the combination of FU with LV increased the response rate as compared to FU monotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of adjuvant treatment with the combination of FU and LV with or without interferon alfa-2a (IFN) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with stage II or III colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 1989 to July 1997, 280 patients with stage II and III colon cancer entered the study and were randomly assigned to receive either the combination of FU (600 mg/m(2)/week x 6, followed by a 2-week rest) and LV (500 mg/m(2)/week x 6 as a 2-hour infusion, followed by a 2-week rest) for 4 cycles (group A, 139 patients), or the same chemotherapy plus recombinant IFN (3 MU subcutaneously 3 times a week) for 1 year (group B, 141 patients). RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (78.9%) of group A and 119 (84.4%) of group B completed four cycles of chemotherapy. Also, 51.4% of patients of group A and 53.9% of group B received > or =80% of the planned dose of FU. One patient (group A) was found to be ineligible and was not included in the analysis. The median relative dose intensity of FU in the two groups was 0.90 and 0.85, respectively. As of August 1998, after a median follow up of 4 years, there was no significant difference in either 3-year DFS (group A, 83.1%; group B, 75.9%, p = 0.14) or OS (group A, 84.5%; group B, 80.0%, p = 0.27). In the Cox model, stage of disease, number of infiltrated nodes, tumor grade and presence of regional implants were identified as significant prognostic factors for OS. Grade 3-4 toxicities, mainly diarrhea, were observed in 26.1% of patients of group A and in 24.8% of group B. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of IFN to the combination of FU with LV postoperatively does not improve DFS and OS of patients with stage II or III colon cancer.

Chemotherapy with cisplatin, epirubicin and docetaxel in transitional cell urothelial cancer. Phase II trial.

Cisplatin (CDDP), epirubicin (EPI) and docetaxel have single agent activity against urothelial transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of this combination in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial TCC. Patients with urothelial TCC who had no prior chemotherapy (prior adjuvant chemotherapy > 6 months allowed) were eligible for entry the study. Eligibility criteria were performance status 0-3, granulocyte count (AGC) > or = 1.5 (10(9)/l), platelet count > or = 100 (10(9)/l), clearance creatine > or = 60 ml/min and total bilirubin level < or = 1.5 mg/dl. Treatment consisted of EPI 40 mg/m2 intravenous push, docetaxel 75 mg/m2 in 1 h infusion with premedication and CDDP 75 mg/m2 with pre- and posthydration. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. Antiemetics with dexamethasone and 5-HT3 antagonists were used routinely. Prophylactic haematopoietic growth factors were not used. Patients were evaluated for toxicity weekly and assessed for response every two cycles of treatment. 32 patients were entered into the study and 30 patients (7 with locally advanced and 23 with metastatic disease) were assessable for response. There were 9 (30.0%) complete responses (2, 28.6% in locally advanced and 7, 30.4% in metastatic disease) and 11 (36.7%) partial responses (3, 42.9% in locally advanced and 8, 34.8% in metastatic disease) with an overall response rate (RR) of 66.7% (71.5% in locally advanced, 65.2% in metastatic disease). Overall median survival was 14.5 months (15 months for locally advanced, 12.5 months for metastatic disease). The median duration of response in patients with metastatic disease was 8.5 months. 16 (53.3%) patients required one dose reduction and 5 (16.7%) patients required two dose reductions for a nadir AGC < or = 500/mm3. Four episodes of febrile neutropenia and sepsis occurred. No patient had a dose reduction or treatment delay for any other grade 3/4 toxicity. There were no treatment delays due to myelotoxicity. Alopecia was universal. Non-haematological toxicity including mucositis, fluid retention, allergy, cutaneous toxicity, diarrhoea and neurotoxicity were mild and infrequent. The combination of EPI, docetaxel and CDDP is an active regimen for urothelial TCC. The response rate and toxicity were comparable with the M-VAC (methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplastin) regimen. Phase III trials comparing this regimen with M-VAC are warranted.

Combination chemotherapy with carboplatin, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of carboplatin, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC were treated on an out-patient basis with carboplatin area under the curve 5 intravenous (IV) and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) IV and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) IV on day 8. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (150 ug/m(2) subcutaneously) was given prophylactically from day 3 to day 6 and day 10 to day 16. Chemotherapy was repeated every 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles of treatment. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 24 to 75 years). The performance status was 0 for 16 patients, 1 for 17 patients, and 2 for 12 patients. Nine patients (20%) had stage IIIB disease, and 36 (80%) had stage IV; histology was mainly squamous cell carcinoma (51.2% of patients) that was poorly differentiated (37.8%). All 45 patients were assessable for toxicity, and 41 were assessable for response. On an intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 46. 5% (21 out of 45 patients; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31.7% to 62. 5%). Of the 45 patients, four (8.8%) achieved a complete response (95% CI, 2.5% to 21.2%); 17 (37.7%) achieved a partial response (95% CI, 23.8% to 53.5%); seven (15.5%) had stable disease; and 14 (31. 1%) had progressive disease. The median survival time was 13.5 months, and the actuarial 1-year survival rate was 51.11%. The median duration of response was 7.6 months, and the time to tumor progression was 8.1 months. Grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 17.7% and 28.8% of patients, respectively. Twenty-one patients (46.6%) developed grade 3/4 neutropenia, and six patients (13.3%) were complicated with fever. Alopecia was universal. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in four patients (8.8%); grade 3/4 neurotoxicity occurred in 10 patients (22.2%); and grade 2/3 allergic reaction occurred in three patients (16.6%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Six patients (13.3%) required a dose reduction, two of which required two reductions. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of carboplatin, docetaxel, and gemcitabine is an effective regimen for the treatment of chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced NSCLC, causing only moderate toxicity.

Subcutaneous low doses of interleukin-2 and recombinant interferon alpha with carboplatin and vinblastine in patients with advanced melanoma.

Twenty-three patients with advanced melanoma were treated with a combination of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2), and recombinant interferon alpha-2a (IFN-alpha) with chemotherapy consisting of four cycles of carboplatin (300 mg/m2, day 1) and vinblastine (6 mg/m2, day 1), every 28 days (CV-IL-IF). IL-2 was given at a dose of 4.5 x 10(6) U twice daily on days 3-6 and days 21-24 of each cycle; IFN-alpha dose was 4.5 x 10(6) U, starting on day 2, thrice weekly. Immunotherapy was intended to continue for 6 months. Of the 23 analyzed patients, 4 (17%) achieved an objective response, including 1 complete and 3 partial responses, in nonvisceral metastatic disease. The median time to progression was 5 months and the median survival from onset of the treatment 6 months (range 1-14 months). Four patients discontinued the treatment, due to nonhaematologic toxicity; 3 for severe weakness and the 4th patient for long-lasting CNS side-effects. Other grade 3-4 toxicities included weight loss (22%), nausea and vomiting (17%) and alopecia (13%). The haematologic toxicity was acceptable. No toxic death was noted. It is concluded that the CV-IL-IF regimen has limited activity and moderate toxicity.

First-line chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer with a combination of mitoxantrone, methotrexate, and vincristine (MIMO).

Fifty-one patients with advanced breast cancer entered a prospective study of combination chemotherapy, consisting of mitoxantrone (10 mg/m2), methotrexate (30 mg/m2), and vincristine (1 mg/m2, MIMO) given intravenously every 21 days. None of the patients had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, although 24 had been previously given adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-seven patients were analyzed for response and toxicity. Objective response was observed in 20 of them (42%) with 3 complete responses (6%) stable disease in 7 (15%), and progression in 19 (40%). Best responses were achieved in lung metastases. Liver metastases did not respond. The median duration of response was 9 months and the median time to disease progression 11 months. Toxicity was mild. Nausea and myelotoxicity were the main side effects. MIMO was found to be an effective and well tolerated first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer. The regimen was compared historically with MIMO plus carboplatin. The two types of treatment were found equipotent, with MIMO being less toxic.

Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-gamma in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Study.

Preclinical data have shown a synergism between 5-fluorouracil and interferon-gamma against human colon carcinoma cell lines. We conducted a phase II trial of this combination in 34 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. 5-Fluorouracil was administered as an intravenous bolus of 500 mg/m2 weekly and interferon-gamma subcutaneous injection at a dose of 200 micrograms (6 x 10(6) IU) 3 times a week. Thirty-two patients were evaluable for response. There was one complete and two partial responses (response rate 9.0%, 95% CI 1.98-25.02%). Eleven patients (34%) had stable disease. Common toxicities included fever 81%, nausea/vomiting 19%, diarrhea 16%, flu-like syndrome 16%, malaise 12.5% and leukopenia 12.5%. These results indicate that the above combination of 5-fluorouracil and interferon-gamma has an unimpressive activity in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Toxicity was very tolerable.

Efficacy of ondansetron treatment with different timing schedules: a randomized double-blind study.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether preloading administration of ondansetron given 12.5 h before cisplatin therapy, every 6 h, is better in controlling acute cisplatin-induced emesis than a standard dose every 8 h. All patients had previously received three cycles of CDDP-based chemotherapy in a dose of 100 mg/m2. Ondansetron was given according to two schedules: in group A (40 patients) at a dose of 8 mg in 100 ml normal saline over 10 min by intravenous infusion before the infusion of CDDP continued with 1 tablet of 8 mg after 8 and 16 h; in group B (40 patients) it was administered in six intravenous doses (every 6 h) starting 12.5 h before cisplatin administration. During the following 3 days, patients from both groups continued with tablets of 8 mg orally, every 8 h in group A and every 6 h in group B. The only difference in terms of the antiemetic response noticed between the two groups was in the number of patients that presented with nausea, which was increased in group A (32) in comparison to group B (25; p < 0.022). No difference was found in the number of vomiting episodes, retches or control of emesis, during the 3-day evaluation period after cisplatin infusion, and in secondary side effects. In conclusion the total dose of 24 mg ondansetron during the acute phase of emesis is as effective as preloading and increasing the total dose to 32 mg.

A comparative study with two administration schedules of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer.

One hundred and seven previously untreated patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer who were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) in two different maximum doses and schedules were retrospectively analyzed. Group A, 52 pts, was treated with LV 200 mg/m2/D i.v. push, followed by 5FU 700 mg/m2/D i.v. 1 h infusion for 5 D. Cycle was repeated every 21 D. Group B, 55 pts, was treated with LV 500 mg/m2/D in a 2 h infusion and 5FU 600 mg/m2/D i.v. bolus at mid-time of LV infusion, repeated every week for 6 wk followed by 2-wk rest period. There was no difference in response (A 8%, B 11%). Median survival for A was 37 (2-131) wk, B was 59 (1-112) wk (P = 0.021), time to progression for A was 20 (0-131) wk, B 30 (0-102) wk (P = 0.021). Administered mean dose intensity of LV was 350.8 mg/m2/wk in group A and 405.0 mg/m2/wk in group B without any significant difference; that of 5FU was significantly higher in group A as compared to group B (1205.3 vs 468.9 mg/m2/wk, respectively) (p < 0.0001). This difference was a consequence of the planned dose intensity for this drug in the two treatment regimens. Toxicity was more frequent and intense in group A for mucositis (P < 0.001), fatigue (P < 0.01), and neurotoxicity (P < 0.05), and in group B for neutropenia (P < 0.001) and nausea-vomiting (P < 0.001). There were one and four iatrogenic deaths in group A and B patients, respectively (NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of different schedules of ondansetron (GR 38032F) administration during cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a randomized trial.

The purpose of our study was to evaluate different schedules of ondansetron administration in cisplatin-induced emesis. All patients had previously received 2 cycles of CDDP-based chemotherapy in a dose of 100 mg/m2. Ondansetron was given by two schedules. Group A (45 patients) received a dose of 1 ampoule of 8 mg in 100 ml normal saline in a 10-min intravenous infusion before the infusion of CDDP; this was continued by 1 tablet of 8 mg in the afternoon and 1 before sleeping on the first day. For the next 3 days, the patients received 3 tablets of 8 mg daily. In group B (45 patients) the same doses were used at the same time and by the same route as in group A, except on the first day when all the dosages were intravenous. Nausea persisted for a longer time (A = 177 +/- 271 min, B = 78 +/- 83 min, p < 0.022), and it was intenser in group A (grade 0, p < 0.036, grade 1, p < 0.050) in comparison with group B. More patients of group B achieved complete (p < 0.015) and minor (p < 0.050) control of emesis, on the other hand group A presented an increased number with major (p < 0.015) and failure (p < 0.069) of control of emesis. There was no difference in nausea and vomiting for the next 3 days nor any difference in secondary side effects. We conclude that the intravenous administration schedule has shown superior antiemetic efficacy in patients who received cisplatin during the first 24 h.

Combination chemotherapy with cisplatin-vinblastine in malignant mesothelioma.

From June 1985 to March 1993, 20 consecutive patients with histologically proven malignant mesothelioma were treated with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 i.v. infusion on day 1 and vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and 8. Treatment was repeated every 4 weeks until progression. All patients were evaluated clinically and by CT-scan and were staged (Stage IV), according to Butchard's criteria, on entry to the study. None had prior surgical excision. Eighty-one chemotherapy cycles were administered to 20 patients. One complete response, four partial responses, nine stable diseases and six progressions were noted. One partial responder entered complete response following an operation. Toxicity was acceptable and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The median survival for responders was 19.3 months; for patients with stable disease 15.7 months and for non-responders, 5.2 months. The mean duration of response was 13 months. We conclude that for this small group of patients, the combination cisplatin-vinblastine is effective, with acceptable toxicity in malignant mesothelioma. Further study with a larger number of patients is necessary.

First-line combination chemotherapy with mitoxantrone, methotrexate, vincristine and carboplatin (MIMOC) in advanced breast cancer.

51 patients with stage IIIB and IV breast cancer entered a prospective phase II study of combination chemotherapy that consisted of mitoxantrone (8 mg/m2) day 1, methotrexate (25 mg/m2) day 1, vincristine (1 mg/m2) day 2 and carboplatin (250 mg/m2) day 2 (MIMOC) given in a 3-weekly schedule. None had received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, although 16 patients were given adjuvant chemotherapy. Objective response to treatment was seen in 29 of 48 patients analysed for response (60%) with 8 complete responses (CR). 7 out of 8 patients with stage IIIB disease responded, 2 of them completely. Responses were seen in all sites but the best results were achieved in lung metastases with 50% CR. The median duration of response was 8 months and the median time to disease progression was 12 months. The main toxicity was nausea and vomiting which was severe in 20% of the patients. Other toxicities were mild. MIMOC was administered on an out-patient basis and appears to be effective as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer.

The prognostic significance of immune changes in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with interferon alfa-2b.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the response rate and the immunorestorative properties of subcutaneously administered interferon alfa-2b (IFN-A2b) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to correlate the immune status with the clinical responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with advanced RCC were treated with recombinant IFN-A2b. The dose was increased progressively from 5 x 10(6) IU the first week to 10 x 10(6) IU the second week, and thereafter to 15 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously. RESULTS: Four patients (15%) achieved partial responses (PRs), and five patients (19%) had stable disease (S), whereas 17 patients (65%) progressed. In all patients, blood was withdrawn before IFN treatment and monthly thereafter. T lymphocytes after isolation from peripheral blood were tested for proliferation in the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction (autoMLR) and allogeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction (alloMLR), interleukin-2 (IL-2) production, expression of IL-2 receptors during the alloMLR, and the production of interleukin-1 (IL-1) by peripheral-blood monocytes. Twelve patients were assessable, four patients had a PR, one patient had S, and seven patients had progressive disease. Striking increases were demonstrated in all parameters 1 month after treatment with IFN-A2b in the four patients who responded and the patient with S. Namely, the autoMLR responses showed a mean increase of 250%, the IL-2 production 247%, the expression of IL-2-specific receptors 446%, the alloMLR responses 160%, and the production of IL-1 262%. On the contrary, the nonresponders did not show any change in their overall immune status, and in some, deterioration of the already depressed immunologic functions was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of IFN-A2b results in a marked potentiation of deficient cellular immune response in vitro in those patients with RCC who respond to the treatment. This may have prognostic significance, and certainly more patients are required to be studied for definite conclusions.

A randomized prospective study of cisplatin and vinblastine versus cisplatin, vinblastine and mitomycin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

From June 1986 to February 1989, 103 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, with no previous chemotherapy, were randomized to receive either a combination of cisplatin and vinblastine (group A) or the same combination with the addition of mitomycin (group B). In group A, 15/48 evaluable patients had objective responses, as did 8/45 in group B. The median survivals were 35 and 32 weeks, respectively. The median survival of patients with response or stable disease was 43 weeks. Response and survival did not differ significantly between treatment groups. The addition of mitomycin to the two-drug combination showed no major therapeutic benefit, while bone marrow toxicity was increased. Three patients in group B died of sepsis. Among the different patient characteristics, disease stage, performance status and response had influence on survival.