Cholecystitis: association between ultrasound findings and surgical outcomes.

AIM: To identify sonographic signs of cholecystitis that correlate with surgical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent cholecystectomy between 22/06/2014 and 1/3/2016 and underwent abdominal ultrasound (US) within 7 days of surgery were included. Individual US signs, including gallstones, gallbladder distention, wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and abscess, were graded by two radiologists, 1 and 2. Outcomes included operative duration (OD), drain placement, partial cholecystectomy, conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy, surgical pathology, bile leak, infection, and 30-day readmission. US signs and outcomes were analysed using analysis of variance, chi-square test, or odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Radiologist 1 reported 141/333 and radiologist 2 reported 128/333 patients showed gallbladder distention. For the subset with OD, radiologist 1 reported 140/320 and radiologist 2 reported 126/320 patients showed gallbladder distention. Distention was predictive of increased OD (radiologist 1, +23.2 minutes, p<0.0001; radiologist 2, +19.4 minutes, p=0.0003). Cases with gallbladder distention were more likely to have surgical drain placement (OR= 2.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-6.08, p=0.027 radiologist 1; OR=2.59; 95% CI: 1.13-5.95, p=0.025 radiologist 2). Wall thickening was present in 126/333 patients reported by radiologist 1 and 120/333 by radiologist 2. Cases with wall thickening were more likely to have drain placement (OR=2.66; 95% CI: 1.16-6.13, p=0.021 radiologist 1; OR=3.49; 95% CI: 1.49-8.16, p=0.004 radiologist 2). For the subset with OD, wall thickening was present for 121/320 reported by radiologist 1 and 116/320 by radiologist 2 and predicted longer OD (radiologist 1, +15.9 minutes, p=0.0033; radiologist 2, +13.3 minutes, p=0.0143). CONCLUSION: Gallbladder distention and wall thickening on US correlate with prolonged OD and surgical drain placement in patients with cholecystitis.

Operative fixation of rib fractures after blunt trauma: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

"BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are identified in 10% of all injury victims and are associated with significant morbidity (33%) and mortality (12%). Significant progress has been made in the management of rib fractures over the past few decades, including operative reduction and internal fixation (rib ORIF); however, the subset of patients that would benefit most from this procedure remains ill-defined. The aim of this project was to develop evidence-based recommendations. METHODS: Population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO) questions were formulated for patients with and without flail chest. Outcomes of interest included mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), incidence of pneumonia, need for tracheostomy, and pain control. A systematic review and meta-analysis of currently available evidence was performed per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were identified and analyzed. These included 986 patients with flail chest, of whom 334 underwent rib ORIF. Rib ORIF afforded lower mortality; shorter DMV, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS; and lower incidence of pneumonia and need for tracheostomy. The data quality was deemed very low, with only three prospective randomized trials available. Analyses for pain in patients with flail chest and all outcomes in patients with nonflail chest were not feasible due to inadequate data. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with flail chest, we conditionally recommend rib ORIF to decrease mortality; shorten DMV, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS; and decrease incidence of pneumonia and need for tracheostomy. We cannot offer a recommendation for pain control, or any of the outcomes in patients with nonflail chest with currently available data"

Rectal foreign bodies: A case report and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Rectal foreign bodies (RFB) present the modern surgeon with a difficult management dilemma, as the type of object, host anatomy, time from insertion, associated injuries and amount of local contamination may vary widely. Reluctance to seek medical help and to provide details about the incident often makes diagnosis difficult. Management of these patients may be challenging, as presentation is usually delayed after multiple attempts at removal by the patients themselves have proven unsuccessful. PRESENTATION OF CASE: In this article we report the case of a male who presented with a large ovoid rectal object wedged into his pelvis. As we were unable to extract the object with routine transanal and laparotomy approach, we performed a pubic symphysiotomy that helped widen the pelvic inlet and allow transanal extraction. DISCUSSION: We review currently available literature on RFB and propose an evaluation and management algorithm of patients that present with RFB. CONCLUSION: Management of patients with rectal foreign bodies can be challenging and a systematic approach should be employed. The majority of cases can be successfully managed conservatively, but occasional surgical intervention is warranted. If large objects, tightly wedged in the pelvis cannot be removed with laparotomy, pubic symphysiotomy should be considered.

Management of blunt hepatic and splenic trauma in a Greek level I trauma centre.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: Non-operative management (NOM) has revolutionized the care of blunt hepatic and splenic trauma patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate treatment of such patients in a Greek level I trauma centre, to identify factors that are important for selecting them for NOM and to investigate for predictors of NOM failure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed the Trauma Registry data of 96 consecutive adult patients admitted with blunt liver and/or splenic injuries over a 4-year period. RESULTS: Immediately operated patients (32.3%) had lower diastolic arterial pressure (p = 0.02), lower International Classification of Diseases -9th revision Injury Severity Score (ICISS) (p = 0.01), and a higher grade of splenic injury (p = 0.002) than NOM patients. NOM success rate was 80%. No predictors of NOM failure were found ; however, isolated splenic trauma patients failed NOM more frequently than hepatic patients (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: NOM of adult blunt hepatic and splenic trauma patients is safe and efficient. Haemodynamic stability, ICISS and the grade of splenic injury are important for selecting these patients for NOM while splenic trauma patients need more intense observation.