Clinical Characteristics, Developmental Trajectory, and Caregiver Burden of Patients With Creatine Transporter Deficiency (SLC6A8).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Creatine transporter deficiency (CTD) is a rare X-linked genetic disorder characterized by intellectual disability (ID). We evaluated the clinical characteristics and trajectory of patients with CTD and the impact of the disease on caregivers to identify relevant endpoints for future therapeutic trials. METHODS: As part of a French National Research Program, patients with CTD were included based on (1) a pathogenic SLC6A8 variant and (2) ID and/or autism spectrum disorder. Families and patients were referred by the physician who ordered the genetic analysis through Reference Centers of ID from rare causes and inherited metabolic diseases. After we informed the patients and their parents/guardians about the study, all of them gave written consent and were included. A control group of age-matched and sex-matched patients with Fragile X syndrome was also included. Physical examination, neuropsychological assessments, and caregiver impact were assessed. All data were analyzed using R software. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (27 male, 4 female) were included (25/31 aged 18 years or younger). Most of the patients (71%) had symptoms at <24 months of age. The mean age at diagnosis was 6.5 years. Epilepsy occurred in 45% (mean age at onset: 8 years). Early-onset behavioral disorder occurred in 82%. Developmental trajectory was consistently delayed (fine and gross motor skills, language, and communication/sociability). Half of the patients with CTD had axial hypotonia during the first year of life. All patients were able to walk without help, but 7/31 had ataxia and only 14/31 could walk tandem gait. Most of them had abnormal fine motor skills (27/31), and most of them had language impairment (30/31), but 12/23 male patients (52.2%) completed the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Approximately half (14/31) had slender build. Most of them needed nursing care (20/31), generally 1-4 h/d. Adaptive assessment (Vineland) confirmed that male patients with CTD had moderate-to-severe ID. Most caregivers (79%) were at risk of burnout, as shown by Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI) > 36 (significantly higher than for patients with Fragile X syndrome) with a high burden of time dependence. DISCUSSION: In addition to clinical endpoints, such as the assessment of epilepsy and the developmental trajectory of the patient, the Vineland scale, PPVT5, and CBI are of particular interest as outcome measures for future trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ANSM Registration Number 2010-A00327-32.

Preoperative 11 C-Methionine PET-MRI in Pediatric Infratentorial Tumors.

PURPOSE: MRI is the main imaging modality for pediatric brain tumors, but amino acid PET can provide additional information. Simultaneous PET-MRI acquisition allows to fully assess the tumor and lower the radiation exposure. Although symptomatic posterior fossa tumors are typically resected, the patient management is evolving and will benefit from an improved preoperative tumor characterization. We aimed to explore, in children with newly diagnosed posterior fossa tumor, the complementarity of the information provided by amino acid PET and MRI parameters and the correlation to histopathological results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children with a newly diagnosed posterior fossa tumor prospectively underwent a preoperative 11 C-methionine (MET) PET-MRI. Images were assessed visually and semiquantitatively. Using correlation, minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC min ) and contrast enhancement were compared with MET SUV max . The diameter of the enhancing lesions was compared with metabolic tumoral volume. Lesions were classified according to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. RESULTS: Ten children were included 4 pilocytic astrocytomas, 2 medulloblastomas, 1 ganglioglioma, 1 central nervous system embryonal tumor, and 1 schwannoma. All lesions showed visually increased MET uptake. A negative moderate correlation was found between ADC min and SUV max values ( r = -0.39). Mean SUV max was 3.8 (range, 3.3-4.2) in WHO grade 4 versus 2.5 (range, 1.7-3.0) in WHO grade 1 lesions. A positive moderate correlation was found between metabolic tumoral volume and diameter values ( r = 0.34). There was no correlation between SUV max and contrast enhancement intensity ( r = -0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative 11 C-MET PET and MRI could provide complementary information to characterize pediatric infratentorial tumors.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin versus albumin 4% in paediatric toxic shock syndrome: a randomised controlled feasibility study.

PURPOSE: Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is a rare disease responsible for significant morbidity and mortality. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IG) therapy in paediatric TSS could improve shock and organ failure, but more consistent efficacy and safety data are needed. Our objective was to determine whether a randomised clinical trial (RCT) assessing intravenous IG in TSS in children is feasible. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, feasibility, double-blind RCT assessing efficacy of high-dose intravenous IG versus albumin 4% (control group) within the first 12 hours of shock onset. Included patients were aged above 1 month and below 18 years with suspected TSS and septic shock. Feasibility was assessed by measuring inclusion rate, protocol compliance and missing data regarding death and the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 (PELOD-2) Score. Other secondary clinical outcomes were evaluated during hospital stay, at 60 day and 1 year. RESULTS: 28 patients, admitted in 6 paediatric intensive care units during 36 consecutive months and followed for 1 year, received the allocated treatment: 13 in intravenous IG group, 15 in control group. The median age was 10.6 years and the sex ratio was 1. Inclusion rate was above 50%, protocol deviations were below 30% and missing data regarding death and PELOD-2 Score below 10%. No difference concerning secondary clinical outcomes between groups was observed, and more adverse events were reported in the control group. CONCLUSION: It seems to be feasible to conduct an RCT assessing intravenous IG efficacy and safety in paediatric TSS but must be realised internationally, with choice of a clinically relevant endpoint and a specific design in order to be realistic. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02219165.

Phosphatidylserine enriched with polyunsaturated n-3 fatty acid supplementation for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with epilepsy: A randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a frequent comorbidity in children with epilepsy, which management mostly relies on the usual treatments of ADHD, especially methylphenidate. Supplementation with polyunsaturated n-3 Fatty Acid (PUFA) has been proposed as an alternative therapeutic approach in ADHD without epilepsy but has never been evaluated in epilepsy-associated ADHD. METHODS: A multicenter double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating supplementation with PUFA, in eicosapentaenoic- and docosahexaenoic-acid form, conjugated to a phospholipid vector (PS-Omega3) in children aged >6 and <16-years old, and suffering from any type of epilepsy and ADHD (inattentive or combined type) according to DSM-V. After a 4-week baseline period, patients were allocated (1:1) either to placebo group or to PS-Omega 3 group and entered a 12 week-double-blind treatment period which was followed by a 12 week-open-label treatment period. The primary outcome was the reduction of the ADHD-rating scale IV attention-deficit subscore after 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The study was stopped early because of lack of eligible participants and the expected sample size was not reached. Seventy-four patients were randomized, 44 in PS-Omega3, and 30 in the placebo group. The reduction after 12 weeks of treatment in the inattention subscore of the ADHD-IV scale was -1.57 in the PS-Omega3 group, and -2.90 in the placebo group (p = 0.33, α = 5%). Results were similar after 24 weeks of treatment and for all other ADHD-related secondary outcomes, with no difference between placebo and PS-Omega3. CONCLUSION: Our study remaining underpowered, no formal conclusion about the effect of Ps-Omega3 could be drawn. However, our data strongly suggested that the PS-Omega 3 formulation used in the current study did not improve ADHD symptoms in children with epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Supplementation with polyunsaturated n-3 Fatty Acid (PUFA) has been proposed in ADHD but has never been evaluated in patients with both epilepsy and ADHD. To address this issue, we conducted a multicenter double blind randomized placebo-controlled trial evaluating supplementation with PUFA in children with epilepsy and ADHD. The study was stopped early because of lack of eligible participants, hampering formal conclusion. However, the evolution of the ADHD symptoms at 12 and 24 weeks did not differ between placebo and PUFA supplementation, strongly suggesting that PUFA did not improve ADHD symptoms in children with epilepsy.

Unlicensed/Off-Label Drug Prescriptions at Hospital Discharge in Children: An Observational Study Using Routinely Collected Health Data.

BACKGROUND: Unlicensed and off-label (UL/OL) prescriptions have been associated with an increased risk of drug-related problems. Data of their prevalence at hospital discharge remain insufficient. We aimed to describe the prevalence of UL/OL drugs in outpatient prescriptions at discharge in children. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study using the routinely collected health data of children at discharge from 2014 to 2016. The primary reference source for determining licensed labelling was the summaries of product characteristics (SPCs) in a French industry-independent formulary named Thériaque. We described the characteristics of UL/OL prescriptions at discharge and looked for predictors of UL/OL prescriptions. RESULTS: We included 2536 prescriptions of 479 children. Licensed, OL, and UL prescriptions accounted for 58.6% (95% CI: 56.7-60.5), 39.2% (95% CI: 37.3-41.1), and 2.3% (95% CI: 1.7-2.9), respectively. A total of 323 (74%) children received at least one UL/OL drug. Among the licensed drugs, bronchodilators (8.8%) and analgesics (8.6%), and among the OL drugs, antibiotics (2.8%), were the most prescribed. The younger age of the children and higher number of drugs they received increased the probability of UL/OL prescriptions (unadjusted p-value of ≤0.05). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of UL/OL prescriptions is about 40% at discharge from a pediatric university hospital in France.

Data Monitoring Committees and clinical trials: From scientific justification to organisation.

Clinical trials often last several months or even several years. As the trial progresses, it can be tempting to find out whether the data obtained already answers the question posed at the start of the trial in order to stop inclusions or monitoring earlier. However, knowing and taking into account interim results can sometimes compromise the integrity of the results, which is counterproductive. To minimise this risk and ensure that the treatments are assessed reliably, safety and/or efficacy criteria are monitored during the study by a Data Monitoring Committee. After receiving the results confidentially, the Data Monitoring Committee assesses the benefit/risk ratio of the study treatment and recommends that the trial be continued, modified or terminated. Data Monitoring Committee members issuing these recommendations have an important responsibility: a hasty decision to end the trial may lead to inconclusive results unable to answer the initial question and, inversely, delaying the decision to end the trial may expose the subjects to potentially ineffective or even harmful interventions. The Data Monitoring Committee's task is therefore particularly complex. With this in mind, the round table discussion at the Giens workshops was a chance to review the scientific justification for creating Data Monitoring Committees and to recall the need for their members to receive comprehensive training on the complexities of multiple analyses, confidentiality requirements applying to the results and the need for them to be aware that recommendations to end a trial must be based on data that is robust enough to assess the benefit/risk ratio of the treatment studied.

[Does aspirin have a place in primary cardiovascular prevention by the polypill ? Simulation study on a realistic virtual population]. / L'aspirine a-t-elle une place dans la prévention cardiovasculaire primaire par la polypill ? Étude de simulation sur une population virtuelle réaliste.

BACKGROUND: The polypill strategy could become widely accepted in cardiovascular prevention due to reduced costs and its simplicity, which promote compliance. Aspirin is often included as a component of the polypill for primary prevention, but three powerful recent trials failed to show any favorable net benefit even in high-risk subgroups. Our objective is to estimate the net benefit associated with aspirin in primary cardiovascular prevention. METHODS: We simulated the impact of different polypill compositions combining pravastatin, ramipril, hydrochlorothiazide, with or without aspirin, on a realistic French virtual population between 35 and 65 years old. We assessed how this impact on myocardial infarction and stroke varied according to gender, diabetes, and arterial hypertension. We identified the subgroup of individuals whose specific benefit from aspirin was greater than twice the risk of serious bleeding it induced. RESULTS: The absolute benefit associated with aspirin was reduced by co-prescriptions. No subgroup of women benefited from aspirin, and the subgroup of women with a clear net benefit represented 128 women out of 529,421. Men at high risk of cardiovascular death, or with diabetes and hypertension, had a benefit from aspirin exceeding the risk of bleeding induced, but this risk represented more than half of the benefit. No subgroup analyzed did show a benefit greater than twice the risk of bleeding. The proportion of men whose expected benefit from aspirin was greater than twice the risk of bleeding represented 3% of all men. An optimal polypill strategy in primary prevention between the ages of 35 and 65, combining three drugs but not aspirin, can hope to save two out of three strokes and more than one out of two myocardial infarctions. It would prevent a major cardiovascular accident every 16 to 193 individuals treated according to the subgroups considered. CONCLUSION: Until proven otherwise, aspirin has only a limited place in individuals between 35 and 65 years without a cardiovascular history. We showed how simulating therapeutic strategies on a realistic virtual population could be used for best applying available evidence.

Project rebuild the evidence base (REB): A method to interpret randomised clinical trials and their meta-analysis to present solid benefit-risk assessments to patients.

Evidence-based medicine is the cornerstone of shared-decision making in healthcare today. The public deserves clear, transparent and trust-worthy information on drug efficacy. Yet today, many drugs are prescribed and used without solid evidence of efficacy. Clinical trials and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are the best method to evaluate drug efficacy and side effects. In a shared medical decision-making approach, general practitioners need drug assessment based on patient-important outcomes. The aim of project rebuild the evidence base (REB) is to bridge the gap between the data needed in clinical practice and the data available from clinical research. The drugs will be assessed on clinical patient important outcomes and for a population. Using the Cochrane tools, we propose to analyse for each population and outcome: 1) a meta-analysis based on RCTs with a low risk of bias overall; 2) an evaluation of results of confirmatory RCTs; 3) a statistical analysis of heterrogeneity between RCTs and 4) an analysis of publication bias. Depending on the results of these analyses, the evidence will be categorized in 4 different levels: firm evidence, evidence (to be confirmed), signal or absence of evidence. Project REB proposes a method for reading and interpreting RCTs and their meta-analysis to produce quality data for general practitioners to focus on risk-benefit assessment in the interest of patients. If this data does not exist, it could enable clinical research to better its aim.

Drug-related risk of hospital readmission in children with chronic diseases, a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are one of the leading causes of hospital readmissions. Children with chronic diseases are more likely to experience DRPs than adults. The burden and characteristics of drug-related readmissions at and after hospital discharge in children remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to summarize the impact of DRPs at and after hospital discharge on the risk of readmissions in children with chronic diseases. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed from inception until January 2022. Study selection criteria were studies assessing the impact of different factors at discharge and after discharge on the risk of hospital readmissions in children with chronic diseases, reporting an assessment of DRPs. DRP could be the only risk factor assessed or one among others. Included studies were assessed with the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Exposure (ROBINS-E) tool. We summarized the qualitative impact of the reported DRPs on hospital readmission as conclusive (significant association) or inconclusive. RESULTS: Of the 4734 studies initially identified, 13 met inclusion criteria. Eleven studies were retrospective, using electronic health records. The studies assessed the impact of DRPs at or after discharge according to the type of medication (in 6 studies), number of medication (in 5 studies) and medication nonadherence (in 2 studies). From the 44 reported associations between DRPs and the risk of readmission 26 (59% [95% CI, 43%-73%]) were conclusive, of which 81% increased the risk and 19% decreased the risk, and 17 (39% [95% CI, 24%-55%]) were inconclusive. CONCLUSION: The impact of DRPs on hospital readmissions in children with chronic diseases displayed conflicting results, estimated associations having potentially a serious risk of bias. We need more evidence with a lower risk of bias.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Maternal Mental Health during Pregnancy: A Comparison between Canada and China within the CONCEPTION Cohort.

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health has been described in Canada and China but no study has compared the two countries using the same standardized and validated instruments. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of COVID-19 public health policies on maternal mental health between Canada and China, as we hypothesize that geographical factors and different COVID-19 policies are likely to influence maternal mental health. Pregnant persons >18 years old were recruited in Canada and China using a web-based strategy. All participants recruited between 26 June 2020 and 16 February 2021 were analyzed. Self-reported data included sociodemographic variables, COVID-19 experience and maternal mental health assessments (Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorders (GAD-7) scale, stress and satisfaction with life). Analyses were stratified by recruitment cohort, namely: Canada 1 (26 June 2020-10 October 2020), Canada 2 and China (11 October 2020-16 February 2021). Overall, 2423 participants were recruited, with 1804 participants within Canada 1, 135 within Canada 2 and 484 in China. The mean EDPS scores were 8.1 (SD, 5.1) in Canada 1, 8.1 (SD, 5.2) in Canada 2 and 7.7 (SD, 4.9) in China (p-value Canada 2/China: p = 0.005). The mean GAD-7 scores were 2.6 (SD, 2.9) in China, 4.3 (SD, 3.8) in Canada 1 (p < 0.001) and 5.8 (SD, 5.2) in Canada 2 (p < 0.001). When adjusting for stress and anxiety, being part of the Chinese cohort significantly increased the chances of having maternal depression by over threefold (adjusted OR 3.20, 95%CI 1.77-5.78). Canadian and Chinese participants reported depressive scores nearly double those of other crises and non-pandemic periods. Lockdowns and reopening periods have an important impact on levels of depression and anxiety among pregnant persons.

The COVID-19 Pandemic Impacted Maternal Mental Health Differently Depending on Pregnancy Status and Trimester of Gestation.

Introduction: We aimed to measure the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal mental health, stratifying on pregnancy status, trimester of gestation, and pandemic period/wave. Methods: Pregnant persons and persons who delivered in Canada during the pandemic, >18 years, were recruited, and data were collected using a web-based strategy. The current analysis includes data on persons enrolled between 06/2020−08/2021. Maternal sociodemographic indicators, mental health measures (Edinburgh Perinatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorders (GAD-7), stress) were self-reported. Maternal mental health in pregnant women (stratified by trimester, and pandemic period/wave at recruitment) was compared with the mental health of women who had delivered; determinants of severe depression were identified with multivariate logistic regression models. Results: 2574 persons were pregnant and 626 had already delivered at recruitment. Participants who had delivered had significantly higher mean depressive symptom scores compared to those pregnant at recruitment (9.1 (SD, 5.7) vs. 8.4 (SD, 5.3), p = 0.009). Maternal anxiety (aOR 1.51; 95%CI 1.44−1.59) and stress (aOR 1.35; 95%CI 1.24−1.48) were the most significant predictors of severe maternal depression (EDPS ˃ 13) in pregnancy. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on maternal depression during pregnancy and in the post-partum period. Given that gestational depression/anxiety/stress has been associated with preterm birth and childhood cognitive problems, it is essential to continue following women/children, and develop strategies to reduce COVID-19's longer-term impact.

Trigger tools to identify adverse drug events in hospitalised children: A systematic review.

AIMS: To identify all available trigger tools applicable to the pediatric population in hospital settings to detect adverse drug events (ADEs) and to describe their performances by positive predictive value (PPV). METHODS: PubMed® was searched until December 2021. The reference sections were also consulted for new articles. Studies were selected when they used one or more triggers to identify AEs and used data on pediatric inpatient settings. Studies mentioning triggers related to AEs that were only caused by care procedures were excluded. Only triggers related to ADEs were included. PPVs of triggers were reported. Mean PPVs were calculated for multi-study triggers. The interest of each trigger in a real-time detection system was assessed. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included. A total of 271 unique triggers were identified, 179 of which were related to drug-induced harms. Among them, 68 could be used for prevention of ADEs, 80 for verification and 31 for reporting. Nineteen triggers (11%) had a mean PPV between 50% and 100%, including 5 that had a 100% PPV. CONCLUSION: The performances of individual triggers need to be more adequately studied. The detection of ADEs through computerized triggers and/or real-time detection systems remains an emerging field, very much needed in children especially, due to frequent off-label use.

Agreement between a regional pharmacovigilance centre and an adjudication committee regarding adverse drug reactions on a cohort of hospitalised children.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The EREMI project was set up to collect data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurring due to off-label and/or unlicensed drugs prescribed to hospitalised children in France. These events were evaluated by a regional pharmacovigilance centre (RPC) and an adjudication committee (AC). The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between these two different entities on their evaluation of ADRs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The RPC first validated the ADRs and assessed their causality using the Naranjo scale. The AC assessed then ADRs using all available information, including the RPC evaluation. The agreement on severity and nature of ADRs, role of treatment (suspect or concomitant) and drug causality was calculated using Cohen's nonparametric kappa coefficient (k). KEY RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-six events were reported in 219 children. The RPC excluded 65 events and validated 321 ADRs. Agreement was very good on nature of ADRs (k=0.85) and role of treatment (k=0.81), moderate on severity of ADRs (k=0.60) and very poor on drug causality (k=0.05). CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Agreement between the RPC and the AC was not constant throughout this evaluation. They troubled to agree on severe ADRs and on drug causality.

Replacing liquid with solid dosage forms in pediatric practice: Feasibility and economic impact from a hospital-based study.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To identify the 10 drugs most frequently administered to children in liquid dosage forms which are eligible for replacement with suitable authorized solid dosage forms and to assess the expected economic impact of this substitution. METHODS: The health record data from 312,152 oral drug administrations were analyzed. Ten drugs were selected according to their frequency of administration in liquid dosage forms, the availability of solid form alternatives, and the suitability of these alternatives for the children receiving the corresponding liquid forms. Potential hospital cost savings of the suggested substitutions were calculated. RESULTS: The 10 drugs identified as most frequently administered and for which suitable solid forms were available were: paracetamol, cyamemazine, valproic acid, clonazepam, furosemide, prazepam, hydroxyzine, alfacalcidol, amitriptyline, and levetiracetam. Thirty-four point six of the administrations of these drugs in liquid dosage forms could be delivered using suitable solid dosage forms without additional cost. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist for substituting liquid dosage forms with market-available solid dosage forms suitable in size and dosage for the pediatric population.

Prevalence and duration of prescribed opioid use during pregnancy: a cohort study from the Quebec Pregnancy Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show a rapid growth among pregnant women using high potency opioids for common pain management during their pregnancy. No study has examined the duration of treatment among strong opioid users and weak opioid users during pregnancy. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of prescribed opioid use during pregnancy, in Quebec; and to compare the duration of opioid treatment between strong opioid users and weak opioid users. METHODS: Using the Quebec Pregnancy Cohort (1998-2015), we included all pregnancies covered by the Quebec Public Prescription Drug Insurance Program. Opioid exposure was defined as filled at least one prescription for any opioid during pregnancy or before pregnancy but with a duration that overlapped the beginning of pregnancy. Prevalence of opioids use was calculated for all pregnancies, according to pregnancy outcome, trimester of exposure, and individual opioids. The duration of opioid use during pregnancy was analyzed according to 8 categories based on cumulative duration (< 90 days vs. ≥90 days), duration of action (short-acting vs. long-acting) and strength of the opioid (weak vs. strong). RESULTS: Of 442,079 eligible pregnancies, 20,921 (4.7%) were exposed to opioids. Among pregnancies ending with deliveries (n = 249,234), 5.4% were exposed to opioids; the prevalence increased by 40.3% from 3.9% in 1998 to 5.5% in 2015, more specifically a significant increase in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Weak opioid, codeine was the most commonly dispensed opioid (70% of all dispensed opioids), followed by strong opioid, hydromorphone (11%), morphine (10%), and oxycodone (5%). The prevalence of codeine use decreased by 47% from 4.3% in 2005 to 2.3% in 2015, accompanied by an increased use of strong opioid, morphine (0.029 to 1.41%), hydromorphone (0.115 to 1.08%) and oxycodone (0.022 to 0.44%), from 1998 to 2015. The average durations of opioid exposure were significantly longer among pregnancies exposed to strong opioid as compared to weak opioid regardless of the cumulative duration or duration of action (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Given the differences in the safety profile between strong opioids and the major weak opioid codeine, the increased use of strong opioids during pregnancy with longer treatment duration raises public health concerns.

Protocol of controlled odorant stimulation for reducing apnoeic episodes in premature newborns: a randomised open-label Latin-square study with independent evaluation of the main endpoint (PREMODEUR).

INTRODUCTION: Apnoea affects 85% of premature infants under 34 weeks of age and would be an important risk factor for subsequent neuropsychological disorders. Currently, premature children with life-threatening apnoeas receive stimulants such as methylxanthines (mainly, caffeine) or doxapram (an analeptic unlicensed in children under 15). However, these products have undesirable effects (hyperarousal, irritability, sleep disorders, tachycardia) and are not always effective because apnoea does persist in some premature newborns. Previous studies have indicated that odorant stimulation, a non-invasive intervention, may stimulate the respiratory rhythm. The objective of the present protocol is to reduce the occurrence of apnoeic episodes in premature newborns by controlled odorant stimulation added to current pharmacological treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The project is a randomised open-label Latin-square trial with independent evaluation of the main endpoint. It will include 60 preterm neonates from two university hospital neonatal intensive care units over 2 years (2021-2023). Each newborn will receive no (S0), sham (S1) or real olfactory stimulation (S2) in random order. During S2, three distinct odorants (mint, grapefruit and vanilla) will be delivered successively, in puffs, over 24 hours. Mint and grapefruit odours stimulate the main and the trigeminal olfactory pathways, whereas vanilla odour stimulates only the main olfactory pathway. A statistical analysis will compare the incidence of apnoeic episodes during S1 versus S2 using a mixed effects Poisson model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Comité de Protection des Personnes Île-de-France XI (# 2017-AO13-50-53). The results will be disseminated through various scientific meetings, specialised peer-reviewed journals and, whenever possible, posted on appropriate public websites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02851979; Pre-results.

Available medications used as potential therapeutics for COVID-19: What are the known safety profiles in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Medications already available to treat other conditions are presently being studied in clinical trials as potential treatments for COVID-19. Given that pregnant women are excluded from these trials, we aimed to investigate their safety when used during pregnancy within a unique population source. METHODS: Using the population-based Quebec Pregnancy Cohort, we identified women who delivered a singleton liveborn (1998-2015). Taking potential confounders into account including indications for use, the risk of prematurity, low birth weight (LBW), small for gestational age (SGA), and major congenital malformation (MCM) associated with COVID-19 repurposed drug use during pregnancy were quantified using generalized estimation equations. RESULTS: Of the 231,075 eligible pregnancies, 107 were exposed to dexamethasone (0.05%), 31 to interferons (0.01%), 1,398 to heparins (0.60%), 24 to angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) (0.01%), 182 to chloroquine (0.08%), 103 to hydroxychloroquine (0.05%), 6,206 to azithromycin (2.70%), 230 to oseltamivir (0.10%), and 114 to HIV medications (0.05%). Adjusting for potential confounders, we observed an increased risk of prematurity related to dexamethasone (aOR 1.92, 95%CI 1.11-3.33; 15 exposed cases), anti-thrombotics (aOR 1.58, 95%CI 1.31-1.91; 177 exposed cases), and HIV medications (aOR 2.04, 95%CI 1.01-4.11; 20 exposed cases) use. An increased risk for LBW associated with anti-thrombotics (aOR 1.72, 95%CI 1.41-2.11; 152 exposed cases), and HIV medications (aOR 2.48, 95%CI 1.25-4.90; 21 exposed cases) use were also found. Gestational exposure to anti-thrombotics (aOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.00-1.44; 176 exposed cases), and HIV medications (aOR 2.61, 95%CI 1.51-4.51; 30 exposed cases) were associated with SGA. First-trimester dexamethasone (aOR 1.66, 95%CI 1.02-2.69; 20 exposed cases) and azithromycin (aOR 1.10, 95%CI 1.02-1.19; 747 exposed cases) exposures were associated with MCM. CONCLUSIONS: Many available medications considered as treatments for COVID-19 are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Caution is warranted when considering these medications during the gestational period.

Polyclonal expansion of TCR Vbeta 21.3+ CD4+ and CD8+ T cells is a hallmark of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children.

Multiple Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) is a delayed and severe complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection that strikes previously healthy children. As MIS-C combines clinical features of Kawasaki disease and Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS), we aimed to compare the immunological profile of pediatric patients with these different conditions. We analyzed blood cytokine expression, and the T cell repertoire and phenotype in 36 MIS-C cases, which were compared to 16 KD, 58 TSS, and 42 COVID-19 cases. We observed an increase of serum inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, TNF-α, IFNγ, CD25s, MCP1, IL-1RA) in MIS-C, TSS and KD, contrasting with low expression of HLA-DR in monocytes. We detected a specific expansion of activated T cells expressing the Vß21.3 T cell receptor ß chain variable region in both CD4 and CD8 subsets in 75% of MIS-C patients and not in any patient with TSS, KD, or acute COVID-19; this correlated with the cytokine storm detected. The T cell repertoire returned to baseline within weeks after MIS-C resolution. Vß21.3+ T cells from MIS-C patients expressed high levels of HLA-DR, CD38 and CX3CR1 but had weak responses to SARS-CoV-2 peptides in vitro. Consistently, the T cell expansion was not associated with specific classical HLA alleles. Thus, our data suggested that MIS-C is characterized by a polyclonal Vß21.3 T cell expansion not directed against SARS-CoV-2 antigenic peptides, which is not seen in KD, TSS and acute COVID-19.

Relationship between adverse drug reactions and unlicensed/off-label drug use in hospitalized children (EREMI): A study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: To date, few studies have shown a significant association between off-label drug use and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The main aims of this study is to evaluate the relationship between adverse drug reactions and unlicensed or off-label drugs in hospitalized children and to provide more information on prescribing practice, the amplitude, consequences of unlicensed or off-label drug use in pediatric inpatients. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective study started from 2013, we use the French summaries of product characteristics in Theriaque (a prescription products guide) as a primary reference source for determining pediatric drug labeling. The detection of ADRs is carried out spontaneously by health professionals and actively by research groups using a trigger tool and patients' electronic health records. The causality between suspected ADRs and medication is evaluated using the Naranjo and the French methods of imputability independently by pharmacovigilance center. All suspected ADRs are submitted for a second evaluation by an independent pharmacovigilance experts. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: For our best knowledge, EREMI is the first large multicenter prospective and objective study in France with an active ADRs monitoring and independent ADRs validation. This study identifies the risk factors that could be used to adjust preventive actions in children's care, guides future research in the field and increases the awareness of physicians in off-label drug use and in detecting and declaring ADRs. As data are obtained through extraction of information from hospital database and medical records, there is likely to be some under-reporting of items or missing data. In this study the field specialists detect all adverse events, experts in pharmacovigilance centers assess them and finally only the ADRs assessed by the independent committee are confirmed. Although we recruit a high number of patients, this observational study is subject to different confounders.