High-risk subgroups were not identified to benefit from thromboprophylaxis after hospitalization for COVID-19.

Background: The Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines-4c (ACTIV-4c) trial investigated prophylactic apixaban for 30 days following hospitalization for COVID-19. The overall incidence of early postdischarge death or thromboembolism was low, and the trial was closed early. Objectives: To identify a high-risk patient population who might benefit from postdischarge thromboprophylaxis through subgroup analyses stratified by age, race/ethnicity, obesity, D-dimer elevation, World Health Organization score, and modified International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism score on 30-day composite outcome of all-cause death, arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Methods: Cumulative incidences of all-cause death, ATE, and VTE within 30 days were described for each subgroup. Time to death, ATE, or VTE by 30 days was analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models with interaction testing for each subgroup. Results: Among 1217 patients randomized to apixaban or placebo group, 32% were >60 years old. Modified International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism score was ≥4 in 2% and 2 or 3 with an elevated D-dimer in an additional 9% of participants. The overall incidence of the primary endpoint was 2.13% in the apixaban group and 2.31% in the placebo group. At day 30, similar rates of the primary endpoint occurred within subgroups, except for participants aged >60 years. No benefit of thromboprophylaxis was seen in any subgroup. Conclusion: The combined incidence of 30-day death, ATE, and VTE was low in patients who survived COVID-19 hospitalization, except in patients over age 60 years. Due to the limited number of events, the findings remain inconclusive; nonetheless, the study did not identify a high-risk subgroup that would derive benefits from extended thromboprophylaxis.

A machine learning approach to predict mortality due to immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Background: Mortality due to immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) remains significant. Predicting mortality risk may potentially help individualize treatment. The French Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) Reference Score has not been externally validated in the United States. Recent advances in machine learning technology can help analyze large numbers of variables with complex interactions for the development of prediction models. Objectives: To validate the French TMA Reference Score in the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathy (USTMA) iTTP database and subsequently develop a novel mortality prediction tool, the USTMA TTP Mortality Index. Methods: We analyzed variables available at the time of initial presentation, including demographics, symptoms, and laboratory findings. We developed our model using gradient boosting machine, a machine learning ensemble method based on classification trees, implemented in the R package gbm. Results: In our cohort (n = 419), the French score predicted mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.77), sensitivity of 0.35, and specificity of 0.84. Our gradient boosting machine model selected 8 variables to predict acute mortality with a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.82). The 2 cutoffs corresponded to sensitivities of 0.64 and 0.50 and specificities of 0.76 and 0.87, respectively. Conclusion: The USTMA Mortality Index was acceptable for predicting mortality due to acute iTTP in the USTMA registry, but not sensitive enough to rule out death. Identifying patients at high risk of iTTP-related mortality may help individualize care and ultimately improve iTTP survival outcomes. Further studies are needed to provide external validation. Our model is one of many recent examples where machine learning models may show promise in clinical prediction tools in healthcare.

Advanced practice provider-led clinic for care transitions in newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism: establishment and utilization.

Background: Patients with suspected or newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE) are often referred to the emergency department (ED) for management, where anticoagulation is initiated. However, when the patient is judged to be suitable for outpatient management, counseling and follow-up specialty care are frequently suboptimal. Objectives: To establish an advanced practice provider (APP)-led rapid follow-up clinic to improve transitions of care for patients with newly diagnosed deep vein thrombosis or low-risk pulmonary embolism and to provide continued specialty care and support, including management of complications and medication access issues. Methods: In order to address this gap in transition of care, we developed an APP-led clinic with a mandate to improve quality and safety in the outpatient setting for patients with acute VTE. Results: In the first 2 years, a total of 234 patients were evaluated, of whom data were standardized and reviewed for 229. Utilization steadily increased over time, with at least 10% of patients requiring financial medication assistance over both years. Seventy-two percent of patients were referred from the ED in the first year and 59% in the second year, and referrals from non-ED outpatient specialties increased. Data on deviations from standard care identified in referred patients were collected in the second year and found in 19 (12.7%) of cases. These included unnecessarily prescribed or changed anticoagulants, dosing errors, misclassification of thrombosis, and other deviations. Patient demographic data also demonstrated increasing diversity of the patient population over time, with increased utilization by Hispanic and African American patients in the second year. This highlighted the need for better patient education material translations into Spanish, which is a future aim. Conclusion: In summary, the APP-led VTE Transition Clinic was feasible and grew quickly in utilization, diversity of referrals, and diversity of patients served.

Effect of Thromboprophylaxis on Clinical Outcomes After COVID-19 Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 have an increased incidence of thromboembolism. The role of extended thromboprophylaxis after hospital discharge is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether anticoagulation is superior to placebo in reducing death and thromboembolic complications among patients discharged after COVID-19 hospitalization. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04650087). SETTING: Done during 2021 to 2022 among 127 U.S. hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 18 years or older hospitalized with COVID-19 for 48 hours or more and ready for discharge, excluding those with a requirement for, or contraindication to, anticoagulation. INTERVENTION: 2.5 mg of apixaban versus placebo twice daily for 30 days. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy end point was a 30-day composite of death, arterial thromboembolism, and venous thromboembolism. The primary safety end points were 30-day major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated early, after 1217 participants were randomly assigned, because of a lower than anticipated event rate and a declining rate of COVID-19 hospitalizations. Median age was 54 years, 50.4% were women, 26.5% were Black, and 16.7% were Hispanic; 30.7% had a World Health Organization severity score of 5 or greater, and 11.0% had an International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism risk prediction score of greater than 4. Incidence of the primary end point was 2.13% (95% CI, 1.14 to 3.62) in the apixaban group and 2.31% (CI, 1.27 to 3.84) in the placebo group. Major bleeding occurred in 2 (0.4%) and 1 (0.2%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 3 (0.6%) and 6 (1.1%) apixaban-treated and placebo-treated participants, respectively. By day 30, thirty-six (3.0%) participants were lost to follow-up, and 8.5% of apixaban and 11.9% of placebo participants permanently discontinued the study drug treatment. LIMITATIONS: The introduction of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines decreased the risk for hospitalization and death. Study enrollment spanned the peaks of the Delta and Omicron variants in the United States, which influenced illness severity. CONCLUSION: The incidence of death or thromboembolism was low in this cohort of patients discharged after hospitalization with COVID-19. Because of early enrollment termination, the results were imprecise and the study was inconclusive. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.

Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research priorities for mucocutaneous bleeding disorders.

BACKGROUND: Excessive or abnormal mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB) may impact all aspects of the physical and psychosocial wellbeing of those who live with it (PWMCB). The evidence base for the optimal diagnosis and management of disorders such as inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD), Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), and von Willebrand disease (VWD) remains thin with enormous potential for targeted research. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: National Hemophilia Foundation and American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network initiated the development of a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders with extensive all-stakeholder consultations to identify the priorities of people with inherited bleeding disorders and those who care for them. They recruited multidisciplinary expert working groups (WG) to distill community-identified priorities into concrete research questions and score their feasibility, impact, and risk. RESULTS: WG2 detailed 38 high priority research questions concerning the biology of MCB, VWD, inherited qualitative platelet function defects, HDS/EDS, HHT, bleeding disorder of unknown cause, novel therapeutics, and aging. CONCLUSIONS: Improving our understanding of the basic biology of MCB, large cohort longitudinal natural history studies, collaboration, and creative approaches to novel therapeutics will be important in maximizing the benefit of future research for the entire MCB community.

More people experience mucocutaneous bleeding (MCB), affecting tissues like skin and gums, than have hemophilia A or B. MCB is not understood as well as hemophilia. Common types of MCB include nosebleeds, bleeding gums, heavy menstrual bleeding, and digestive tract bleeding. Mucocutaneous inherited bleeding disorders include inherited platelet disorders, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD) and Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS), von Willebrand Disease (VWD), and others. Diagnosing and treating MCB is complicated and sometimes medical providers dismiss the bleeding that patients report when they cannot find a medical explanation for it. Many people with mucocutaneous bleeding (PWMCB) do not receive the care they need; for example, women with VWD live with symptoms for, on average, 16 years before they are diagnosed in the US. This struggle to obtain care has important negative impacts on patients' physical and psychological health and their quality-of-life. The National Hemophilia Foundation (NHF), a large US bleeding disorders patient advocacy organization, set out to develop a National Research Blueprint for Inherited Bleeding Disorders focused on community priorities. They brought together a group of patients, providers, and researchers with MCB expertise to identify the research that would most improve the lives of PWMCB through targeted and accessible diagnostics and therapies. We report in this paper that research is needed to better understand the biology of MCB and to define the mechanisms of disease in these disorders. We also describe high priority research questions for each of the main disorders, novel therapeutics, and aging.

Development and performance of a hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia-specific quality-of-life instrument.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is characterized by arteriovenous malformations and telangiectasia, with primary clinical manifestations of epistaxis and gastrointestinal bleeding and resultant anemia. HHT negatively affects health-related quality of life (HR-QoL); however, existing tools to measure HR-QoL are not HHT specific. Our objective was to develop an HHT-specific HR-QoL (HHT-QoL) instrument and evaluate its performance in a cross-sectional survey of individuals with HHT. Four HHT-specific questions were developed to evaluate the impact of HHT on productivity and social and personal interactions. An anonymous e-mail survey was conducted through Cure HHT. Participants also indicated their perceived HHT severity and completed 3 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires: Discretionary Social Activities, Social Roles, and Emotional Distress. Complete data were available for 290 participants who self-identified their HHT severity as mild (29%), moderate (46%), or severe (25%). The HHT-QoL scale was reliable (Cronbach's-α, 0.83). Principal components analysis indicated the instrument was unidimensional. Participants had low levels of QoL with their ability to participate in discretionary social activities (PROMIS mean 36.4 [standard deviation 14.3]) and perform in social roles (41.5 [17.2]), and the presence of a high level of emotional distress (64.8 [24.2]). The HHT-QoL score correlated negatively with PROMIS Discretionary Social Activities (r = -0.65) and Social Roles (r = -0.68) and positively correlated with PROMIS Emotional Distress (r = 0.51). In conclusion, the 4-item HHT-QoL instrument provides valuable insight and may be a useful addition to future clinical research in HHT.

Race, rituximab, and relapse in TTP.

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is characterized by recurring episodes of thrombotic microangiopathy, causing ischemic organ impairment. Black patients are overrepresented in iTTP cohorts in the United States, but racial disparities in iTTP outcome and response to therapy have not been studied. Using the United States Thrombotic Microangiopathies Consortium iTTP Registry, we evaluated the impact of race on mortality and relapse-free survival (RFS) in confirmed iTTP in the United States from 1995 to 2020. We separately examined the impact of rituximab therapy and presentation with newly diagnosed (de novo) or relapsed iTTP on RFS by race. A total of 645 participants with 1308 iTTP episodes were available for analysis. Acute iTTP mortality did not differ by race. When all episodes of iTTP were included, Black race was associated with shorter RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.21); the addition of rituximab to corticosteroids improved RFS in White (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.18-0.73) but not Black patients (HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.71-1.31). In de novo iTTP, rituximab delayed relapse, but Black patients had shorter RFS than White patients, regardless of treatment. In relapsed iTTP, rituximab significantly improved RFS in White but not Black patients. Race affects overall relapse risk and response to rituximab in iTTP. Black patients may require closer monitoring, earlier retreatment, and alternative immunosuppression after rituximab treatment. How race, racism, and social determinants of health contribute to the disparity in relapse risk in iTTP deserves further study.

Accuracy of a modified 4Ts score in predicting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: Thrombocytopenia is common among critically ill patients and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is often on the differential. Professional guidelines recommend calculating a pre-test probability score before performing HIT testing. The 4Ts score is widely utilized but accuracy has been questioned in critically ill patients. The HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score is available, but complexity limits use. Our objective was to compare a modified intensive care unit (ICU)-4Ts score to available scoring tools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective pilot study. Adult ICU patients that were tested for HIT and had a documented 4Ts score were included. A blinded investigator retrospectively calculated the HEP and ICU-4Ts score. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared. RESULTS: In 194 included patients, ROC AUC was significantly higher for the ICU-4Ts compared to the 4Ts score (0.80 versus 0.66, respectively; p = 0.044). The ICU-4Ts score had the highest specificity, PPV, and NPV. The sensitivity was similar between the HEP and ICU-4Ts score. CONCLUSIONS: The ICU-4Ts score better predicted the diagnosis of HIT compared to the 4Ts score. Prospective validation studies are needed to confirm these results.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT): a practical guide to management.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), the second most common inherited bleeding disorder, is associated with the development of malformed blood vessels. Abnormal blood vessels may be small and cutaneous or mucosal (telangiectasia), with frequent complications of bleeding, or large and visceral (arteriovenous malformations [AVMs]), with additional risks that can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality. HHT can present in many different ways and can be difficult to recognize, particularly in younger patients in the absence of a known family history of disease or epistaxis, its most common manifestation. HHT is commonly diagnosed using the established Curaçao clinical criteria, which include (1) family history, (2) recurrent epistaxis, (3) telangiectasia, and (4) visceral AVMs. Fulfillment of 3 or more criteria provides a definite diagnosis of HHT, whereas 2 criteria constitute a possible diagnosis of HHT. However, these criteria are insufficient in children to rule out disease due to the age-dependent development of some of these criteria. Genetic testing, when positive, can provide definitive diagnosis of HHT in all age groups. Clinical course is often complicated by significant epistaxis and/or gastrointestinal bleeding, leading to anemia in half of adult patients with HHT. The management paradigm has recently shifted from surgical approaches to medical treatments aimed at control of chronic bleeding, such as antifibrinolytic and antiangiogenic agents, combined with aggressive iron replacement with intravenous iron. Guidelines for management of HHT, including screening and treatment, were determined by expert consensus and originally published in 2009 with updates and new guidelines in 2020.

Systemic bevacizumab for refractory bleeding and transfusion-dependent anemia in Heyde syndrome.

Heyde syndrome, the co-occurrence of aortic stenosis and bleeding gastrointestinal (GI) angiodysplasia, is managed with aortic valve replacement. However, severe bleeding and anemia can preclude safe use of the antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy required for this intervention. We present a case of the novel and successful treatment of severe, refractory bleeding and transfusion dependence with antiangiogenic therapy in a patient with Heyde syndrome. After systemic bevacizumab was initiated, the patient achieved durable hemostasis with normalization of hemoglobin and liberation from red cell transfusion and dependence on iron infusion; aspirin therapy was successfully initiated where it had previously failed. This durable hemostasis facilitated her subsequent successful transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels, which were monitored during therapy, paradoxically rose after bevacizumab was initiated but normalized after it was discontinued. Given the angiogenic dysregulation of Heyde syndrome, systemic bevacizumab may be an effective and safe targeted therapy for managing refractory GI bleeding, which thereby facilitates antiplatelet therapy and aortic valve replacement in these challenging cases. Additional investigation into the therapeutic role of inhibiting angiogenesis as a hemostatic modality in Heyde syndrome is warranted.

Minimizing cost associated with management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A cost analysis of various laboratory testing models.

INTRODUCTION: Management of patients with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to significant costs. Reported cost-saving initiatives have focused on minimizing inappropriate testing in low-risk patients and optimizing alternative anticoagulant selection. We sought to further investigate how utilizing various HIT laboratory testing models would impact total cost of testing and alternative anticoagulant use. METHODS: Utilizing a retrospective cohort of adult patients tested for HIT over three years within our institution, we evaluated how utilization of four distinct laboratory models impacted total number of HIT test combinations completed, time to HIT testing finalization, percentage of patients discharged from the hospital prior to HIT testing finalization, total alternative anticoagulant days, and total anticipated major bleed events. Additionally, we calculated cost of laboratory testing and alternative anticoagulant associated with each model. RESULTS: A total of 482 patients were included in our cohort. A laboratory testing model that utilized an in-house platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) completed three days weekly, and reflex serotonin release assay (SRA) with a five-day turnaround resulted in the shortest mean time to HIT testing finalization, lowest percentage of patients discharged prior to HIT testing finalization, and lowest total alternative anticoagulant days. CONCLUSIONS: Institutions should evaluate current HIT laboratory testing practices and assess for opportunities for optimization. Testing models utilizing a PF4-heparin antibody ELISA with a reflex SRA for positive results may improve testing metrics and lead to lower utilization of alternative anticoagulants.

Evaluation of 4Ts score inter-rater agreement in patients undergoing evaluation for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

The American Society of Hematology and American College of Chest Physicians heparin-induced thrombocytopenia guidelines recommend calculation of a pretest probability score prior to performing laboratory testing, and the 4Ts score is commonly used. Inter-rater agreement of the 4Ts score has been evaluated, but limited data are available regarding the reliability of the 4Ts score when performed by nonexpert clinicians. The purpose of this study was to Compare 4Ts scores calculated by medical teams to an expert. A single-center observational study was conducted in patients evaluated for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia over 24 months. The primary outcome was difference in mean 4Ts score calculated by the medical team compared with an expert. Secondary outcomes included inter-rater agreement in risk category assignment and the negative predictive value (NPV) of the 4Ts score. The mean total 4Ts score was significantly higher when calculated by the medical team compared with expert (4.16 ±â€Š1.41 versus 3.42 ±â€Š1.53; P < 0.001). There was slight agreement in risk category assignment (Cohen κ coefficient = 0.164; P = 0.005). The NPV of the 4Ts score was 0.949 (95% confidence interval 0.891-1.000) when calculated by the medical team and 0.927 (95% confidence interval 0.869-0.984) when calculated by expert. Total 4Ts scores calculated by the medical team were significantly higher with only slight inter-rater agreement compared with expert. The NPV of the 4Ts score when calculated by nonexperts may be lower than previously reported. The recommendation to forgo laboratory testing for low 4Ts score patients may need to be revisited.

Cancer Therapy-Associated Thrombosis.

[Figure: see text].

Impact of a multidisciplinary workflow on safety and management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

PURPOSE: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin administration. Management strategies are complex and include discontinuing heparin products, initiating alternative anticoagulants, interpreting laboratory test results, documenting heparin allergies, and providing patient education. Medication error reports and a retrospective review conducted at an academic medical center revealed an opportunity for a quality improvement initiative and led to the creation of a multidisciplinary workflow for the management of HIT. In a pre-post study, the impact of the multidisciplinary workflow on the safety and management of HIT was evaluated. METHODS: The preimplementation group consisted of adult patients tested for suspected HIT from April 4, 2014, through May 31, 2016; the postimplementation group consisted of adult patients tested from November 1, 2016, through October 31, 2018. The primary outcome was the incidence of heparin product administration while HIT testing was ongoing. The secondary outcome was the rate of appropriate heparin allergy documentation. RESULTS: The incidence of heparin product administration while HIT testing results were pending was significantly reduced, from 54.2% to 20.0% (P < 0.001), after workflow implementation. The rate of appropriate heparin allergy documentation significantly increased, from 95.0% to 100% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multidisciplinary workflow for the management of HIT significantly reduced the incidence of heparin administration while testing was ongoing and improved the rate of appropriate heparin allergy documentation.

An international, multicenter study of intravenous bevacizumab for bleeding in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: the InHIBIT-Bleed study.

Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler-Weber-Rendu disease) is a rare multisystem vascular disorder causing chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, epistaxis, and severe anemia. Bevacizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, may be effective to treat bleeding in HHT. This international, multicenter, retrospective study evaluated the use of systemic bevacizumab to treat HHT-associated bleeding and anemia at 12 HHT treatment centers. Hemoglobin, epistaxis severity score, red cell units transfused, and intravenous iron infusions before and after treatment were evaluated using paired means testing and mixed-effects linear models. 238 HHT patients received bevacizumab for a median of 12 (range, 1-96) months. Compared with pretreatment, bevacizumab increased mean hemoglobin by 3.2 g/dL (95% CI, 2.9-3.5 g/dL) [mean hemoglobin 8.6 (8.5, 8.8) g/dL versus 11.8 (11.5, 12.1) g/dL, p<0.0001)] and decreased the epistaxis severity score (ESS) by 3.4 (3.2-3.7) points [mean ESS 6.8 (6.6-7.1) versus 3.4 (3.2-3.7), P<0.0001] during the first year of treatment. Compared with 6 months pretreatment, RBC units transfused decreased by 82% [median of 6.0 (IQR 0.0-13.0) units versus 0 (IQR, 0.0-1.0) units, P<0.0001] and iron infusions decreased by 70% [median of 6.0 (1.0-18.0) infusions versus 1.0 (0.0-4.0) infusions, P<0.0001] during the first 6 months of bevacizumab treatment. Outcomes were similar regardless of underlying pathogenic mutation. Following initial induction infusions, continuous/scheduled bevacizumab maintenance achieved higher hemoglobin and lower ESS than intermittent/as needed maintenance but with more drug exposure. Bevacizumab was well tolerated: hypertension, fatigue, and proteinuria were the most common adverse events. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 2% of patients. In conclusion, systemic bevacizumab was safe and effective to manage chronic bleeding and anemia in HHT.

Recombinant porcine FVIII for bleed treatment in acquired hemophilia A: findings from a single-center, 18-patient cohort.

Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder in which acquired autoantibodies to endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) decrease FVIII activity and lead to a bleeding phenotype. A substantial majority of individuals who develop AHA present with severe bleeding. Effective treatment requires both immunosuppressive therapy and prompt hemostatic treatment. Bleeding is commonly treated with bypassing agents (BPAs) such as recombinant activated FVII (rFVIIa) or activated prothrombin complex concentrates Disadvantages to BPAs include the inability to monitor response with standard laboratory assays, inconsistent hemostatic efficacy, and thrombosis. Recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII: Obizur, Baxter, Deerfield, IL) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for bleed treatment in AHA in 2014, and has the advantage of laboratory monitoring of FVIII activity levels and known hemostatic efficacy in the presence of anti-human FVIII inhibitors and after failure of BPAs. Using an algorithm-based approach, rpFVIII has been used to successfully treat 18 patients with AHA at our center with substantially lower doses than the current FDA-recommended dosing. Additionally, data from our cohort show that the preexposure anti-porcine Bethesda titer does not reliably predict the clinical response to rpFVIII treatment and is not correlated with the anti-human Bethesda titer. We also present data showing lower total rpFVIII use for initial bleed resolution when rpVIII is used upfront, as compared with use as rescue therapy. We validated our dosing algorithm, which uses much lower than FDA-recommended doses with 14 more patients than in our previously reported patient series.

Platelet transfusion for patients with platelet dysfunction: effectiveness, mechanisms, and unanswered questions.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we discuss current clinical guidelines and potential underlying mechanisms regarding platelet transfusion therapy in patients at risk of bleeding, comparing management of patients with thrombocytopenia versus those with qualitative platelet disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: Platelet transfusion therapy is highly effective in managing bleeding in patients with hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia. Clinical trials have demonstrated that platelet transfusion can be used at a lower trigger threshold and reduced platelet doses, and may be used therapeutically rather than prophylactically in some situations, although additional data are needed. In patients with inherited platelet disorders such as Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia or those with RASGRP2 mutations, platelet transfusion may be ineffective because of competition between transfused and endogenous platelets at the site of vascular injury. Successful management of these patients may require transfusion of additional platelet units, or mechanism-driven combination therapy with other pro-hemostatic agents. In patients on antiplatelet therapy, timing of transfusion and inhibitor mechanism-of-action are key in determining therapeutic success. SUMMARY: Expanding our understanding of the mechanisms by which transfused platelets exert their pro-hemostatic function in various bleeding disorders will improve the appropriate use of platelet transfusion.

Second International Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.

DESCRIPTION: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disease with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 5000 that is characterized by the presence of vascular malformations (VMs). These result in chronic bleeding, acute hemorrhage, and complications from shunting through VMs. The goal of the Second International HHT Guidelines process was to develop evidence-based consensus guidelines for the management and prevention of HHT-related symptoms and complications. METHODS: The guidelines were developed using the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) framework and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. The guidelines expert panel included expert physicians (clinical and genetic) in HHT from 15 countries, guidelines methodologists, health care workers, health care administrators, patient advocacy representatives, and persons with HHT. During the preconference process, the expert panel generated clinically relevant questions in 6 priority topic areas. A systematic literature search was done in June 2019, and articles meeting a priori criteria were included to generate evidence tables, which were used as the basis for recommendation development. The expert panel subsequently convened during a guidelines conference to conduct a structured consensus process, during which recommendations reaching at least 80% consensus were discussed and approved. RECOMMENDATIONS: The expert panel generated and approved 6 new recommendations for each of the following 6 priority topic areas: epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding, anemia and iron deficiency, liver VMs, pediatric care, and pregnancy and delivery (36 total). The recommendations highlight new evidence in existing topics from the first International HHT Guidelines and provide guidance in 3 new areas: anemia, pediatrics, and pregnancy and delivery. These recommendations should facilitate implementation of key components of HHT care into clinical practice.