Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 115(1): 119-23, 2007 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17126441

RESUMO

Isolates of Enterococcus spp. were collected from January 2001 to December 2004 from caecal samples of slaughtered poultry, swine and cattle in Hungary. The isolates were identified by their growth and biochemical properties and with PCR. The antibiotic susceptibility of a total number of 1272 isolates was tested with disk diffusion test to ampicillin, gentamicin, streptomycin, tetracycline, erythromycin and vancomycin. It was established that although ampicillin and amoxicillin are often used in veterinary practice its resistance rate was relatively low. In the case of tetracyclines and macrolides, a high incidence of resistance was found. Susceptibility of strains to tetracyclines and/or macrolides reduced in both 2003 and 2004 in all animal species, which may be due to the more frequent usage of these drugs in the veterinary practice following the ban of growth promoters. The annual data of vancomycin resistance point to an association between the recovery of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolates and the use of avoparcin. This study indicates that reducing antimicrobial resistance in food animals could be possible with lower usage of antibiotics, although variations can occur with different strains.


Assuntos
Matadouros , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Enterococcus/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Bovinos/microbiologia , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Enterococcus/genética , Enterococcus/isolamento & purificação , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/prevenção & controle , Microbiologia de Alimentos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Suínos/microbiologia
2.
Acta Vet Hung ; 48(4): 375-85, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11402655

RESUMO

At abattoirs and farms, 1248 sera were collected from animals representing 121 farms, and examined by complement fixation test using Mycoplasma mycoides subspecies mycoides small colony type (MmmSC) antigen. All sera were negative except seven from four farms, giving ++ reactions in the serum dilution of 1:10. On retesting, these sera and additional 30 sera collected repeatedly in both farms gave negative results. In isolation attempts, 953 lung samples collected from slaughtered cattle at the same abattoirs, and 326 nasal swabs collected from 11 herds proved to be negative for the presence of MmmSC, but M. bovis was isolated frequently. In the small farms 23.95% of the animals had pleurisy and/or pneumonia while in the large herds 34.69% had lesions. DNA extracted from 50 nasal swabs and 430 lung samples was examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using M. mycoides cluster-specific primers. DNA from further 325 lung samples was tested by the more specific M. mycoides subspecies mycoides small colony/large colony/capri specific primers and 196 samples by nested PCR specific for MmmSC. All gave negative results. The detection level of cluster-specific primers and the more specific primers was 33.4 pg of DNA, whereas that of nested PCR was 0.33 pg.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Bovinos/diagnóstico , Mycoplasma mycoides/isolamento & purificação , Pleuropneumonia Contagiosa/diagnóstico , Animais , Bovinos , Doenças dos Bovinos/epidemiologia , Testes de Fixação de Complemento , Hungria/epidemiologia , Pulmão/microbiologia , Pleuropneumonia Contagiosa/epidemiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase
3.
Vet Microbiol ; 58(1): 23-30, 1997 Oct 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9451458

RESUMO

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers complementary to the 16S rRNA genes was used to detect avian mycoplasmas. A primer pair designed for the detection of human and rodent mycoplasmal species was examined for its ability to detect the most important avian mycoplasmas. After testing the respective reference strains, we found that Mycoplasma iowae, Mycoplasma meleagridis and Mycoplasma synoviae could be detected by PCR with this primer pair, and distinction could be made among them by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay with two restriction enzymes (BamHI and RsaI). For the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by PCR, we needed species-specific primers. The results of the PCR- and RFLP, based identification procedures of 17 different field isolates agreed with those obtained by conventional methods.


Assuntos
Galinhas/microbiologia , Infecções por Mycoplasma/veterinária , Mycoplasma/isolamento & purificação , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/microbiologia , Perus/microbiologia , Animais , Primers do DNA , Eletroforese em Gel de Ágar/veterinária , Mycoplasma/classificação , Mycoplasma/genética , Infecções por Mycoplasma/diagnóstico , Infecções por Mycoplasma/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/veterinária , Polimorfismo de Fragmento de Restrição , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/diagnóstico , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/economia , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Especificidade da Espécie
4.
Acta Vet Hung ; 42(1): 69-78, 1994.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7810403

RESUMO

Comparative examination of a total of 1,030 blood samples from six turkey flocks of three Eastern Hungarian turkey farms was performed by the conventional haemagglutination inhibition (HI) and slide agglutination (SA) tests and by a competitive ELISA visualizing the inhibition by a positive test serum of the reaction between a monoclonal antibody and the specific epitope of Mycoplasma gallisepticum recognized by it. All the three tests detected the flocks which were certainly infected. The highest rate of positivity (93% of the samples tested) was revealed by the ELISA. By SA and HI the positivity rate was 56% and 55%, respectively. Thirty-five per cent of the positive blood samples reacted in all three tests, 17% of them only by ELISA and HI, another 17% only by ELISA and SA, while 3% only by SA and HI. In the case of positive flocks first the SA test and ELISA, then the HI test and ELISA give parallel results.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Infecções por Mycoplasma/imunologia , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/imunologia , Perus/imunologia , Testes de Aglutinação/veterinária , Animais , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/veterinária , Testes de Inibição da Hemaglutinação/veterinária , Infecções por Mycoplasma/sangue , Doenças das Aves Domésticas/sangue , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Perus/sangue , Perus/microbiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...