Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
1.
JAAPA ; 37(7): 50, 2024 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38916371
2.
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy ; 19(1): 33, 2024 Jun 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38915106

RESUMO

The COTAT (Collaborative Opioid Taper After Trauma) Study was a randomized trial of an opioid taper support program using a physician assistant (PA) to provide pain and opioid treatment guidance to primary care providers assuming care for adult patients with moderate to severe trauma discharged from a Level I trauma center on opioid therapy. Patients were recruited, assessed, and randomized individually by a surgery research recruitment team one to two days prior to discharge to home. Participants randomized to the opioid taper support program were contacted by phone within a few days of discharge by the PA interventionist to confirm enrollment and their primary care provider (PCP). The intervention consisted of PA support as needed to the PCP concerning pain and opioid care at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 after discharge or until the PCP office indicated they no longer needed support or the patient had tapered off opioids. The PA was supervised by a pain physician-psychiatrist, a family physician, and a trauma surgeon. Patients randomized to usual care received standard hospital discharge instructions and written information on managing opioid medications after discharge. Trial results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis. 37 participants were randomized to the intervention and 36 were randomized to usual care. The primary outcomes of the trial were pain, enjoyment, general activity (PEG score) and mean daily opioid dose at 3 and 6 months after hospital discharge. Treatment was unblinded but assessment was blinded. No significant differences in PEG or opioid outcomes were noted at either time point. Physical function at 3 and 6 months and pain interference at 6 months were significantly better in the usual care group. No significant harms of the intervention were noted. COVID-19 (corona virus 2019) limited recruitment of high-risk opioid tolerant subjects, and limited contact between the PA interventionist and the participants and the PCPs. Our opioid taper support program failed to improve opioid and pain outcomes, since both control and intervention groups tapered opioids and improved PEG scores after discharge. Future trials of post-trauma opioid taper support with populations at higher risk of persistent opioid use are needed. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT04275258 19/02/2020. This trial was funded by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the University of Washington Harborview Injury Prevention & Research Center (R49 CE003087, PI: Monica S. Vavilala, MD). The funder had no role in the analysis or interpretation of the data.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Masculino , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Adulto , Ferimentos e Lesões/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Centros de Traumatologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico
3.
JAAPA ; 37(1): 50, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128139
4.
JAAPA ; 36(7): 50, 2023 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37368855
5.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 8(1): e001038, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36844370

RESUMO

Background: Decreasing exposure to prescription opioids is critical to lowering risk of opioid misuse, overdose and opioid use disorder. This study reports a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial implementing an opioid taper support program directed to primary care providers (PCPs) of patients discharged from a level I trauma center to their homes distant from the center, and shares lessons for trauma centers in supporting these patients. Methods: This longitudinal descriptive mixed-methods study uses quantitative/qualitative data from trial intervention arm patients to examine implementation challenges and outcomes: adoption, acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity. In the intervention, a physician assistant (PA) contacted patients after discharge to review their discharge instructions and pain management plan, confirm their PCP's identity and encourage PCP follow-up. The PA reached out to the PCP to review the discharge instructions and offer ongoing opioid taper and pain management support. Results: The PA reached 32 of 37 patients randomized to the program. Of these 32, 81% discussed topics not targeted by the intervention (eg, social/financial). The PA identified and reached a PCP's office for only 51% of patients. Of these, all PCP offices (100% adoption) received one to four consults (mean 1.9) per patient (fidelity). Few consults were with PCPs (22%); most were with medical assistants (56%) or nurses (22%). The PA reported that it was not routinely clear to patients or PCPs who was responsible for post-trauma care and opioid taper, and what the taper instructions were. Conclusions: This level I trauma center successfully implemented a telephonic opioid taper support program during COVID-19 but adapted the program to allow nurses and medical assistants to receive it. This study demonstrates a critical need to improve care transition from hospitalization to home for patients discharged after trauma. Level of evidence: Level IV.

6.
JAAPA ; 36(1): 50, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36573818

Assuntos
Flores , Humanos
7.
JAAPA ; 35(7): 66, 2022 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762961
8.
JAAPA ; 34(7): 58, 2021 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34162811
9.
JAAPA ; 34(1): 58, 2021 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33332838
11.
JAAPA ; 33(1): 58, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31880654
12.
JAAPA ; 32(9): 58, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31460977
13.
JAAPA ; 32(1): 58, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30589741
14.
JAAPA ; 31(9): 58, 2018 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30153208
15.
JAAPA ; 30(7): 58, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28644227
16.
JAAPA ; 28(9): 1-2, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26302319
17.
JAAPA ; 28(3): 60, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25710407
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA