Combined Comprehensive Risk Score of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress and C-Reactive Protein-to-Albumin Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Indicator of Long-term Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: In patients with colorectal cancer, both C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and comprehensive risk score of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress have demonstrated prognostic significance. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical value of the combined use of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and comprehensive risk score for predicting prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTINGS: The cohort was divided into 3 groups based on a combined score derived from the value of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and comprehensive risk score (low/mid /high). PATIENTS: Patients who underwent curative resection between 2010 and 2019 at multiple institutions were enrolled in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall and recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 2207 patients (801 in low cohort, 817 in mid cohort, and 589 in high cohort) were included in this study. Multivariate analysis revealed that combined score was an independent prognostic factor for both overall and recurrence-free survival, irrespective of disease stage (p < 0.05). Furthermore, Harrell's C-Index indicated that the predictive power of combined score was significantly superior to that of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio or comprehensive risk score (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study had a retrospective design, and data on genetic markers were not included. CONCLUSION: The synergistic combination of C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio and comprehensive risk score contributes to the robust definition of combined score, a potent prognostic factor, regardless of disease stage. This finding has the potential to provide novel insights into the management of patients with CRC who have undergone curative resection. See Video Abstract.

Stratification of Stage II Colon Cancer Using Recurrence Prediction Value: A Multi-institutional International Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To create a recurrence prediction value (RPV) of high-risk factor and identify the patients with high risk of cancer recurrence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: There are several high-risk factors known to lead to poor outcomes. Weighting each high-risk factor based on their association with increased risk of cancer recurrence can provide a more precise understanding of risk of recurrence. METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional international retrospective analysis of patients with Stage II colon cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2020. Patient data from a multi-institutional database were used as the Training data, and data from a completely separate international database from two countries were used as the Validation data. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: A total of 739 patients were included from Training data. To validate the feasibility of RPV, 467 patients were included from Validation data. Training data patients were divided into RPV low (n = 564) and RPV high (n = 175). Multivariate analysis revealed that risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the RPV high than the RPV low (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.628; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.887-3.660; P < 0.001). Validation data patients were divided into two groups (RPV low, n = 420) and RPV high (n = 47). Multivariate analysis revealed that risk of recurrence was significantly higher in the RPV high than the RPV low (HR 3.053; 95% CI 1.962-4.750; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RPV can identify Stage II colon cancer patients with high risk of cancer recurrence world-wide.

Delayed-Onset Organ/Space Surgical Site Infection Worsens Prognosis in High-Risk Stage II and III Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how early- and delayed-onset organ/space surgical site infections (SSIs) affect the long-term prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer, who are potential candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the association between the timing of SSI onset and clinical outcome. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study evaluated patients who were diagnosed with high-risk stage II or III colorectal cancer and underwent elective surgery between 2010 and 2020. Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary endpoint and was compared between early SSI, delayed SSI (divided based on the median date of SSI onset), and non-SSI groups. RESULTS: A total of 2,065 patients were included. Organ/space SSI was diagnosed in 91 patients (4.4%), with a median onset of 6 days after surgery. The early-onset SSI group had a higher proportion of patients with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥IIIb SSI than the delayed-onset SSI. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) had earlier organ/space SSI onset than those who did not. The adjusted hazard ratio of 5-year RFS in the delayed-onset SSI was 2.58 (95% confidence interval: 1.43-4.65; p = 0.002): higher than that in the early-onset SSI, with the non-SSI as the reference. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed-onset organ/space SSI worsened long-term prognosis compared to early-onset, and this may be due to delayed initiation of AC. Patients who are clinically suspected of having lymph node metastasis might need additional intervention to prevent delays in commencing AC due to the delayed SSI.

Prognostic Impact of Main Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although extended lymph node dissection during colon cancer surgery is recommended in both Western and Eastern countries, the perception and clinical significance of main lymph node metastasis (MLNM) remains controversial. METHODS: In total, 1557 patients with colon cancer who underwent curative resection with D3 dissection were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological factors associated with MLNM were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare the prognosis between the MLNM and non-MLNM groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio, 2.117 (0.939-4.774), p = 0.071] and recurrence-free survival (RFS) [hazard ratio, 2.183 (1.182-4.031), p = 0.013] were affected by the MLNM status independent of the TNM stage. Survival analysis demonstrated that among patients with stage III disease, the OS and RFS rates were significantly different between patients with and without MLNM (OS: p = 0.0147, RFS: p = 0.0001). However, the OS and RFS rates were not significantly different between patients who had stage III disease with MLNM and patients who had stage IV disease (OS: p = 0.5901, RFS: p = 0.9610). CONCLUSIONS: MLNM is an independent prognostic factor for patients with colon cancer. The addition of the MLNM status to the current TNM classification may enhance the prognostic value of the TNM staging system and the clinical efficacy of adjuvant therapy in patients with colon cancer.

Comprehensive risk score of the E-PASS as a prognostic indicator for patients after elective and emergency curative colorectal cancer surgery: A multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of the comprehensive risk score (CRS) of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who underwent elective and emergency colorectal cancer surgery with curative intent. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: CRS, which is calculated based on both clinical and surgical factors, is a good predictor of postoperative complications and mortality. However, the impact of CRS in CRC prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with CRC who underwent curative resection between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The cohort was divided into the low and high CRS groups. The prognostic value of CRS was evaluated via Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. The CRS cutoff value was obtained using the Youden index applied to OS curves and have not been validated by any validation cohorts. RESULTS: In total, 2407 patients, including 1359 and 1048 patients with low and high CRS, respectively, were enrolled in this study. Multivariate analysis revealed that a CRS was an independent prognostic factor of overall and recurrence-free survival regardless of disease stage. Furthermore, adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial for the survival of patients with stage III CRC in both high and low CRS groups; however, the survival benefit was limited in elderly high CRS patients. CONCLUSIONS: CRS was a strong prognostic factor for CRC regardless of disease stage and might be considered as a biomarker for selecting elderly patients who are eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Relationship Between the Onset of Ménière's Disease and Sympathetic Hyperactivity.

Objective: The pathogenesis of Ménière's disease is still largely unknown; however, it is known to be strongly associated with stress. Excessive stress can cause hyperactivity of the sympathetic autonomic nervous system. With the aim of understanding changes in sympathetic hyperactivity before and after Ménière's disease, we compared autonomic nervous function in patients in a stable phase of Ménière's disease and that in healthy adults. We also gathered data over about 10 years on autonomic nervous function immediately before a Ménière's attack. Study Design: Prospective study. Patients: Autonomic nervous function was analyzed in 129 patients in a stable phase of Ménière's disease 31 healthy adult volunteers. In nine patients, autonomic nervous function was also measured immediately before and after treatment of a vertigo attack. Main Outcome Measure: Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) of EEG/ECG and an infrared electronic pupillometer were used. Sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous function was measured. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in autonomic nervous function determined by HRV and electronic pupillometry between patients in a stable phase of Ménière's disease and healthy adults. Sympathetic function as measured by electronic pupillometry parameters VD and T5 showed no difference between the affected and unaffected sides in the baseline data measured in the stable phase (VD: affected side is 31.02 ± 6.16 mm/sec, unaffected side is 29.25 ± 5.73 mm/sec; T5: affected side is 3.37 ± 0.43 msec, unaffected side is 3.25 ± 0.39 msec). In contrast, all nine patients whose HRV data had been obtained just before an attack showed marked suppression of the parasympathetic nervous system and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Electronic pupillometry also revealed an overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system on the affected side, just before the attacks. Analysis of sequential changes after the onset of an attack revealed that overactivation on the affected side was reduced after treatment, and no difference between affected and unaffected sides was observed 3 days after treatment. Conclusion: Detailed analysis of autonomic nervous function showed that immediately before an attack of Ménière's disease, the sympathetic nervous system on the affected side was strongly overactivated.

Lymph node metastasis is strongly associated with lung metastasis as the first recurrence site in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The lymphatic system is known to be the primary pathway of metastasis for colorectal cancer. However, beyond regional lymph node metastases, little is known about the pathway of lymphatic metastases and the differences in the recurrence site risk. The aim of this study was to clarify the relationship between lymph node metastasis and the first recurrence site in colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative resection in our institution between January 2003 and December 2016 were included in this analysis. The relationship between the first recurrence site and clinicopathological factors was analyzed by the Cox regression model and competing risk regression model. RESULTS: In total, 1,249 patients with colorectal cancer were included in this analysis. We found that the stages of lymph node metastases (N0 vs N1: P = .008, N0 vs N2a: P < .001, N0 vs N2b: P < .001) were significantly associated with lung metastasis in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in the competing risk analysis, the stages of lymph node metastases were significantly correlated with lung metastasis (N0 vs N1: P = .002, N0 vs N2a: P < .001, N0 vs N2b: P < .001) but were not correlated with other recurrence sites. CONCLUSION: The severity of lymph node involvement had a strong correlation with lung metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.

Management of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients: The Japanese experience.

OBJECTIVE: Involvement in the tracheostomy procedure for COVID-19 patients can lead to a feeling of fear in medical staff. To address concerns over infection, we gathered and analyzed experiences with tracheostomy in the COVID-19 patient population from all over Japan. METHODS: The data for health-care workers involved in tracheostomies for COVID-19-infected patients were gathered from academic medical centers or their affiliated hospitals from all over Japan. RESULTS: Tracheostomies have been performed in 35 COVID-19 patients with a total of 91 surgeons, 49 anesthesiologists, and 49 surgical staff members involved. Twenty-eight (80%) patients underwent surgery more than 22 days after the development of COVID-19-related symptoms (11: 22-28 days and 17: ≥29 days). Thirty (85.7%) patients underwent surgery ≥ 15 days after intubation (14: 15-21 days, 6: 22-28 days, and 10: ≥29 days). Among the total of 189 health-care workers involved in the tracheostomy procedures, 25 used a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) and 164 used a N95 mask and eye protection. As a result, no transmission to staff occurred during the 2 weeks of follow-up after surgery. CONCLUSION: No one involved in tracheostomy procedures were found to have been infected with COVID-19 in this Japanese study. The reason is thought to be that the timing of the surgery was quite late after the infections, and the surgery was performed using appropriate PPE and surgical procedure. The indications for and timing of tracheostomy for severe COVID-19 patients should be decided through multidisciplinary discussion.