Phase I study of dose-escalated paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (PIC) combination chemotherapy in advanced solid tumours.

Based on the already known in vitro synergy between paclitaxel (taxol), cisplatin and oxazophosphorine cytostatics and the broad spectrum of activity of the above drugs we sought to evaluate the paclitaxel (taxol)-ifosfamide-cisplatin (PIC) combination in the outpatient setting in individuals with a variety of advanced solid tumours. Cohorts of patients were entered into six successive dose levels (DLs) with drug doses ranging as follows: paclitaxel 135-215 mg m(-2) day 1 - (1 h infusion), ifosfamide 4.5-6.0 g m(-2) (total dose) - divided over days 1 and 2, and cisplatin 80-100 mg m(-2) (total) - divided over days 1 and 2. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given from day 5 to 14. Forty-two patients were entered. Eighteen patients had 2-8 cycles of prior chemotherapy with no taxanes or ifosfamide (cisplatin was allowed). The regimen was tolerated with outpatient administration in 36/42 patients. Toxicities included: grade 4 neutropenia for < or = 5 days in 27% of cycles; 5 episodes of febrile neutropenia in three patients at DL-III, -V and -VI. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and cumulative grade 3 anaemia were seen in 7% and 13% of cycles respectively. Three cases of severe grade 3 neuromotor/sensory neuropathy were recorded at DL-II, -III, and -V, all after cycle 3. The maximum tolerated dose was not formally reached at DL-V, but because of progressive anaemia and asthenia/fatigue, it was decided to test a new DL-VI with doses of paclitaxel 200 mg m(-2), ifosfamide 5.0 g m(-2) and cisplatin 100 mg m(-2); this appeared to be tolerable and is recommended for further phase II testing. The response rate was 47.5% (complete response + partial response: 20/42). The PIC regimen appears to be feasible and safe in the outpatient setting. Care should be paid to neurotoxicity. Phase II studies are starting in non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and head and neck cancer at DL-VI.

Antiemetic prophylaxis with ondansetron and methylprednisolone vs metoclopramide and methylprednisolone in mild and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

The purpose of the present study was to examine whether its is possible to successfully replace ondansetron (OND) with metoclopramide (MCP) in patients exposed to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who did not experience severe nausea and vomiting while undergoing OND treatment during their first chemotherapy cycle. After switching to MCP, patients continued with this drug for three cycles, provided that they had adequate control of nausea and vomiting. Otherwise, they were switched back to OND. There were 76 patients, 60 women and 16 men, whose median age was 56 (mean 58) years. Karnofsky performance status score was 100 in 18 patients, 90 in 23, and 80 in 11 patients. No patient had previous chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients had breast cancer and received fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 500 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2. Twelve patients had small cell lung cancer and received carboplatin 400 mg/m2 + etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3 days. Twenty patients with ovarian cancer received carboplatin 350 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2. Ten patients had cancer of unknown primary and received carboplatin 400 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and etoposide 120 mg/m2 x 3 days. The OND schedule consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg intravenous bolus followed by OND 8 mg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by OND 4 mg orally x 3 on the same and the next 2 days. Patients who did not experience nausea and vomiting with OND continued with an MCP schedule consisting of methylprednisolone 40 mg bolus followed by MCP 2 mg/kg in a 15-min infusion before chemotherapy, followed by MCP (20 mg x 4 on the day of therapy and the next 2 days after). Patients who failed with MCP or OND continued with OND. Considering our results as a whole, the intensity of nausea does not appear to influence the results of Gralla's scale. The results of Gralla's scale do not appear to be affected by the analysis of the antiemetic results and nausea on the next 2 days following chemotherapy administration. Overall, patients received 145 cycles with OND and 159 cycles with MCP. Of the 76 patients receiving OND-based antiemetic regimen during the first cycle, 13 (21%) experienced severe vomiting (Grade 2, 3) and the remaining 63 (79%) had mild or no vomiting (Grade 0, 1). Patients with Grade 0, 1 vomiting (63, 83%) continued with MCP in the second cycle. The final number of patients who failed on MCP, after 4 cycles of chemotherapy increased to 33 (43%); 43 (57%) were able to complete chemotherapy with MCP. Headache occurred in 15 (10%) cycles with OND and 8 (5%) with MCP. Flushing was noted in 12 (8%), and constipation occurred in 43 (30%) of OND cycles, and extrapyramidal manifestations occurred in 3 (5%) of patients receiving MCP. Diarrhea was noted in 3 (2%) of cycles with OND and in 28 (18%) with MCP. The cost ratio between MCP and OND was 1:14. If we administered OND only in patients who needed it, the overall cost decreased to 44%. Following the strategy applied in the present study, the cost decreased to 47%.

A comparative study of intraperitoneal carboplatin versus intravenous carboplatin with intravenous cyclophosphamide in both arms as initial chemotherapy for stage III ovarian cancer.

Cisplatin (C) or carboplatin (CBP) plus cyclophosphamide (CTX) was until recently considered standard chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer (OC). Attempts to maximize platinum and its analog activity against OC include its administration directly into the peritoneal cavity. In the past we have shown that intraperitoneal (IP) CBP administration is a safe and effective treatment for OC [Polyzos et al: Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 1990;31: 1120]. In the present study we aimed to compare the effectiveness and toxicity of CBP administration either intravenously (IV) or IP plus CTX IV. Since 1990, 90 evaluable patients with stage III OC were prospectively randomized to receive CBP 350 mg/m2 IV or IP plus CTX 600 mg/m2 IV (in both groups) every 3-4 weeks for six courses. The randomization incorporated stratification according to performance status and the amount of residual tumor (maximum diameter 2 cm). Clinical assessment was performed with abdominal CT and serum CA-125. Responses were observed in 33/46 = 72% (95/CI 56.5-84.0) of the IV group and in 33/44 = 75% (95/CI 59.7-86.8) of the IP group with 48 and 45% clinical complete responses, respectively. Times to progression were 19 months (8-62+) for the IV group and 18 (6-72+) for the IP group. Median survivals were: 25 months (6-80+) and 26 months (6-72+), respectively. Significantly more patients in the IV group than in the IP group had grade 3 or higher leukopenia (p < 0. 01) and grade 3 thrombocytopenia (p < 0.09). Morbidity due to infectious complications in the IP group was minimal. It seems that IP CBP is equally effective to IV administration in terms of response and survival with less myelotoxicity. The favorable results on survival demonstrated in studies with IP C administration in patients with small volume disease [Alberts et al: N Engl J Med 1996;335:1950-1965] could not be repeated in the present study applying CBP in patients with variable tumor size and a relatively small number of patients. The likelihood that patients with large volume disease would benefit from a regional approach compared to systemic administration is small and this explains the inability to detect a difference between the two arms.

Combined epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid vs no treatment for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective comparative study.

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) has demonstrated activity in most gastrointestinal tumors. The addition of epirubicin (EPI) may increase the efficacy of the combination for cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as advanced pancreatic cancer. We examined two groups of patients, explaining the potential benefits and limitations of therapy, and those patients who agreed to undergo chemotherapy formed Group A and the remaining formed Group B. Therefore, the study was a non-randomized prospective comparison between patients receiving chemotherapy and those offered the best supportive care. Group A consisted of 42 patients; 19 underwent Roux-en-Y operation, and 23 were inoperable. Group B consisted of 48 patients who refused chemotherapy; 18 underwent Roux-en-Y operation, and 30 were considered inoperable. Chemotherapy consisted of FA 200 mg/m2/day, 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day both for 5 days, and EPI 35 mg/m2/day before FA-5-FU administration on days 1 and 2, every 28 days. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Objective tumor responses (partial responses) in Group A were seen in 8 patients (19%) (6 women and 2 men), and 6 (14%) had stable disease. The estimated median survival was 27.6 weeks (mean 27.5) for Group A and 22.5 weeks (mean 24) (p=0.01) for Group B. From the onset of therapy, median duration of response was 16.6 weeks and median time to progression 11.8 weeks in Group A. Toxicity consisted primarily of myelosuppression, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia, and mucositis. In Group A 12/42 patients became free from pain for a median duration of 10 months, 14/42 had improved appetite, and 15/42 had improved performance status in comparison to Group B, where no patients had improved performance status or symptoms. We conclude that the combination of EPI+FA+5-FU has moderate activity and increased toxicity in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

5-Fluorouracil, folinic acid and cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer: a pilot study.

The combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) has demonstrated activity in colorectal cancer (CC). Cisplatin is reported to have synergistic activity with 5-FU. We examined the combination FA + 5-FU + cisplatin in patients who had previously received chemotherapy with FA + 5-FU and relapsed. Two months after the last dose of FA + 5-FU and documentation of relapse, patients continued with the regimen consisting of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 in 15 min i.v. infusion followed by FA 500 mg/m2 in 1 h i.v. infusion, in the middle of which 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. bolus was administered, with adequate post-hydration. This was repeated weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2 week rest, for a maximum of six cycles. A total of 30 patients with CC that had relapsed to the combination of FA + 5-FU were treated; 23 had previous surgery and none had radiotherapy. Local recurrence was found in eight patients, metastases in the liver in 21, in lymph nodes in six, lung six and peritoneal metastases in seven. Seven patients responded partially. Toxicity requiring dose reduction or discontinuation of treatment included neutropenia 42% (grade 3:7%), mucositis 28% (grade 1:2), diarrhea 63% (Grade 3:10%), nausea-vomiting 55% (Grade 3:10%), increased creatinine value in three patients and peripheral neuropathy in two patients. We conclude that evaluation of this regimen shows substantial toxicity, with satisfactory response as a second line chemotherapy in these heavily pretreated patients.

Comparison of ondansentron versus ondansentron plus methylprednisolone as antiemetic prophylaxis during cisplatin-containing chemotherapy.

We compared the antiemetic efficacy of ondansentron versus ondansentron and corticosteroids in cisplatin-induced emesis. None of our patients had received prior chemotherapy. All patients received chemotherapy including cisplatin 100 mg/m2. Forty patients received ondansentron alone (Group A) and 40 the combination of ondansentron and methylprednisolone (Group B). Ondansentron was given at a dose of 8 mg in 100 mL N/S over 10 min by intravenous infusion. The initial dose was administered before the cisplatin and was followed by 8 mg orally in the afternoon and before sleeping the first day of chemotherapy. During the next 2 days, the patients received 8 mg orally 3 times daily. Methylprednisolone was given as an intravenous bolus of 40 mg before chemotherapy and then together with each dose of ondansentron at a dose of 16 mg orally. Group A had significantly longer duration of nausea after chemotherapy than group B (117 +/- 111 min, 62 +/- 71 min, P < 0.013). The response on emesis was also improved in group B, especially the day of chemotherapy [treatment failure: group A: 13 patients (30%) versus group B: 5 patients (11.6%), P < 0.03] and the next day [complete response: group A: 17 patients (39.5%) versus group B: 30 patients (69.7%), P < 0.005]. Patients in group B presented more sedative effects (P < 0.001) and better appetite (P < 0.02) than patients in group A. There were no other significant differences in side effects (activity, headache, constipation, etc). We conclude that corticosteroids improve the antiemetic efficacy of ondansentron in cisplatin-induced chemotherapy, and should be included in antiemetic regimens.

The Ser-Arg-Tyr-Asp region of the major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania mimics the Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser cell attachment region of fibronectin.

The major surface glycoprotein of Leishmania, gp63, a fibronectin-like molecule, plays a key role in parasite-macrophage interaction. Binding of gp63 to macrophage receptors is inhibited by Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser (RGDS)-containing synthetic peptides of fibronectin and by antibodies to these peptides. However, gp63 lacks an RGDS tetrapeptide. We sought to identify the region of gp63 that antigenically and functionally mimics the RGDS-containing region of fibronectin. We thus synthesized on polyethylene rods overlapping tetracosapeptides covering the whole sequence of Leishmania major gp63. gp63 affinity-purified antibodies raised against fibronectin and against the RGDS-containing fibronectin decapeptide RGDSPASSKP bound specifically to gp63 residues 241-264. Subsequently, by the use of smaller peptides, the gp63 tetrapeptide 252-255 (SRYD) was identified as the minimum antibody binding segment. Single residue substitution peptide analogues showed that indeed Tyr and Gly can be alternatively substituted in the SRYD- and RGDS-containing peptides of gp63 and fibronectin, respectively, without major effects on their antibody binding capacity. Subsequently, we investigated the effect of an SRYD peptide on promastigote-macrophage interaction in vitro; treatment of macrophages with an SRYD-containing gp63 octapeptide efficiently inhibited parasite attachment to macrophage receptors. Thus, the conserved among species sequence SRYD of gp63, with significant hydrophilicity, flexibility, and beta-turn propensity features, mimics antigenically and functionally the RGDS sequence of fibronectin. We suggest that this segment constitutes the putative gp63 adhesion site.