Comparison of single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy and conventional photorefractive keratectomy in low to high myopic eyes.

Purpose: To compare the visual outcome, safety, safety index, efficacy, efficacy index and corneal transparency between single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (t-PRK) and conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with manual debridement of epithelium in eyes with low to high simple myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. Methods: In this retrospective ,case control study, we analysed and compared the postoperative uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) , safety, safety index,efficacy,efficacy index and the corneal transparency between t-PRK and PRK with 6th-generation Amaris excimer 500E laser (Schwind eye-tech-solutions) in 115 eyes of 59 patients. Results: Preoperative Mean Refractive Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) was - 3.88 + 0.23 Diopters(D) and -4.73 + 0.23D in PRK and t-PRK group respectively(p=0.09). In both the groups , none of the eyes lost postoperative BCVA at the end of mean follow-up period of 3.5 months . All the eyes achieved post operative UCVA of 20/40 or better in both the groups. Incidence of trace corneal haze was high in t-PRK group at the end of 3.5 months (P = 0.003). Conclusion: Single-step t-PRK and PRK provide similar results at the end of mean follow-up period of 3.5 months postoperatively with regards to post-operative UCVA, post operative BCVA, safety, safety index, efficacy and efficacy index. There was high incidence of trace haze in t- PRK eyes. Both the procedures are predictable, effective, and safe for correction of low to high myopia.

Management of Nocardia Interface Keratitis After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical course and management of graft-host interface Nocardia keratitis after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: A 70-year-old man presented with a corneal epithelial defect, stromal edema, graft infiltrate, and graft-host interface infection 5 months after an uneventful DMEK performed for bullous keratopathy in the left eye. Corneal scrapings from the margin of epithelial defect showed gram-positive bacillus, and the organism was identified as Nocardia asteroides. RESULTS: Intensive and appropriate topical and systemic antibiotic therapy resulted in complete resolution of infection. Three months later, the patient underwent a repeat DMEK, which resulted in clearing of corneal edema and improvement in visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Nocardia interface keratitis is a rare entity, which can occur after DMEK. Proper clinical evaluation and microbiological workup helped us in accurate diagnosis and management. Repeat DMEK after complete resolution of the infection resulted in good outcomes regarding corneal clarity and vision improvement.

Closure of microperforation during deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with a corneal tissue fragment.

We present a case of intraoperative microperforation during routine deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, managed with sealing the leak with the help of corneal tissue fragment and fibrin glue. Post operatively the graft was clear with complete closure of the perforation and without any further complications.