Duplicate Prescription Rates of Long-Acting Bronchodilator Inhalers.

Background: Long-acting bronchodilator inhalers are widely used with or without inhaled corticosteroids (ICs) by patients with lung diseases. In Israel alone, there are 21 inhalers containing long-acting ß2 agonists (LABAs) and/or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs). Some patients are treated incorrectly with several inhalers of the same pharmacologic group. Methods: Electronic data of LABA and/or LAMA inhalers purchased during a period of 1 year were extracted in one district of Clalit Health Services in Israel. Patients who were treated with two or more inhalers from the same pharmacologic group were compared with patients without duplicate treatment. Inhaler purchases during the 12 months before and after the first duplicate purchase were compared with the purchases by patients without duplication of treatment. New diagnoses were compared to identify possible side effects. Results: Of the 13,528 patients who were treated with LABA and/or LAMA inhalers, 244 (1.8%) purchased at least two different inhalers from the same pharmacologic group. Inhaler purchases were 3.8 times higher in the duplication group during the 12 months before the first duplication. Inhaler purchase increased by 28% in the duplication group compared with a 4.5% increase in the nonduplication group (p < 0.001) during the following year. The risk for duplicated consumption was significantly higher in patients with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diagnosis, males, and persons aged between 61 and 80 years. Conclusions: Nearly 2% of the patients treated with long-acting bronchodilators consumed different medications of the same pharmacologic group even when adherence was satisfactory. COPD patients are at higher risk for inhaler duplication. Clinical Trial Registration Number: 0151-20-COM1.

Short-acting bronchodilators purchase as a marker for asthma control.

Background: Administrative data has been used to quantify the amount of medication use in order to identify at-risk asthma patients. In our previous study we used short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) inhalers as a marker for asthma control.Methods: We further analyzed patient data from the SABA inhalers study in which asthma control was classified by GINA guidelines, physician assessment and the patients overall estimation. We identified all short-acting bronchodilator purchases (SABA and anticholinergic inhalers and solutions) in the year prior to administering the questionnaire relating to asthma control, and compared inhaled and systemic steroid use.Results: Of 241 asthma patients, 83 completed questionnaires. Using the GINA guidelines criteria, 26 were symptom controlled, 46 were partially controlled and 11 were uncontrolled. Using patients' overall impression of their asthma control, mean annual short-acting bronchodilator purchases were significantly higher in the partially controlled and uncontrolled patients (10 and 8.9 respectively) than in the controlled patients (2, p = 0.005). Most asthma patients purchase less than half of the controller medications prescribed to them.Conclusion: When using administrative data, 3 or more -of all types of short-acting bronchodilator purchases in one year should alert the physician to evaluate asthma control and purchase alerts should notify both physicians and patients when controller consumption is low.

Determination of asthma control using administrative data regarding short-acting beta-agonist inhaler purchase.

BACKGROUND: Symptom control is a primary goal in asthma. We hypothesized that administrative data regarding rescue inhaler purchases may correlate with asthma symptom control. METHODS: We identified all patients who purchased short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) inhalers during the course of one year in the database of a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO). Primary physicians identified asthma patients and classified their asthma symptom control into three groups according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Asthma patients were asked to answer symptom questionnaires and grade their asthma control. SABA inhaler purchases were compared between asthma control groups as classified by the guidelines, the physicians and the patients. We also compared the agreement on asthma control between the three methods of classification. RESULTS: Of 241 asthma patients, 83 completed the questionnaires. Using the GINA guidelines criteria, 26 were symptom controlled, 46 were partially controlled and 11 were uncontrolled. SABA inhaler purchases were not significantly lower in the controlled group. Using patients' overall impression of their asthma control, the mean numbers of SABA inhalers purchased were 1.5, 4.4 and 6.4 per year in the controlled, partially controlled and uncontrolled groups, respectively (p = 0.03). Patients' classification of asthma control had better agreement (kappa = 0.34) with GINA guidelines than physician's' agreement (kappa = 0.05). CONCLUSION: When using administrative data for asthma patients, 2 or more SABA inhaler purchases in one year should alert the physician for the need for asthma control evaluation. Purchase of at least 4 SABA inhalers a year may be regarded as a marker for asthma that is not controlled.