RESUMO
Quadriparesis is a potentially catastrophic complication during operative procedures. It may result from a number of different types of central nervous system insults. A case of quadriparesis following an otherwise unremarkable percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery is reported. The quadriparesis resulted from multiple air micro emboli.
Assuntos
Embolia Aérea/complicações , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Quadriplegia/etiologia , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices are at additional risk for arrhythmias while undergoing surgical procedures. In this case report, we present a patient with a dual chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator who developed intraoperative pacemaker-mediated tachycardia causing significant hemodynamic instability. Management of this arrhythmia can be particularly challenging, because standard application of a magnet does not affect the pacing functions of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Awareness by the anesthesiologist and timely coordination with the cardiac electrophysiology team helped to optimize care for this patient.
Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial/efeitos adversos , Taquicardia/fisiopatologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral , Eletrocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Quadril/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Período Perioperatório , Fenilefrina/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Taquicardia/etiologia , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nearly 20 years ago it was shown that patients are exposed to unnecessary preoperative testing that is both costly and has associated morbidity. To determine whether such unnecessary testing persists, we performed internal and external surveys to quantify the incidence of unnecessary preoperative testing and to identify strategies for reduction. METHODS: The medical records of 1000 consecutive patients scheduled for surgery at our institution were examined for testing outside of our approved guidelines. Subsequently, 4 scenarios were constructed to solicit physician views of appropriate testing: a 45-year-old woman for a laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy, a 23-year-old woman for right inguinal herniorrhaphy, a 50-year-old man for a hemithyroidectomy, and a 50-year-old man for a total hip replacement. One or more of these scenarios were sent to directors of preoperative clinics (all), United States anesthesiologists (all), gynecologists (cystectomy), general surgeons (herniorrhaphy), otolaryngologists (thyroidectomy), and orthopedists (hip replacement). Potential predictors of ordering and demographic information were collected. RESULTS: More than half of our patients had at least 1 unnecessary test based on our testing guidelines (95% lower confidence limit = 52%). The 17 responding preoperative directors were unanimous for 36 of the 72 combinations of test or consult (henceforth "test") and scenario as being unnecessary. Among the 175 anesthesiologists responding to the survey, 46% ordered 1 or more of the tests unanimously considered unnecessary by the preoperative directors for the given scenario. Among 17 potential predictors of anesthesiologists' unnecessary ordering, only training completed before 1980 significantly increased the risk of ordering at least 1 unnecessary test (by 48%, 95% confidence limits >29%). Anesthesiologists were 53% less likely to order at least 1 unnecessary test relative to gynecologists for the cystectomy scenario, 64% less likely than general surgeons for the herniorrhaphy scenario, 66% less likely than otolaryngologists for the thyroidectomy scenario, and 67% less likely than orthopedists for the hip replacement scenario. The 95% lower confidence limits were all >40%. CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of patients with at least 1 unnecessary test is a suitable end point for monitoring providers' ordering. The incidence can be high despite efforts at improvement, but may be reduced if anesthesiologists rather than surgeons order presurgical tests and consults. However, anesthesia groups should be cognizant of potential heterogeneity among them based on time since training.
Assuntos
Anestesiologia/métodos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/normas , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Médicos/normas , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Anestesiologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Desnecessários/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the effect of preoperative medical consults on both perioperative management and surgical outcome. METHODS: The charts of 387 consecutive patients over the age of 50 undergoing non-cardiac, elective surgery during a six-week period were retrospectively examined. Patient factors including age, ASA status, gender, type of surgery, outcome (death, unexpected intensive care unit admission or uncomplicated discharge), presence of medical consult, and, in those cases where a medical consult was present, stated reason for the consult, the ordering physician, and recommendations of the consultant, were recorded. RESULTS: 138 patients receiving medical consults (35.7%) were identified (a total of 146 consults). The most common stated purpose of the consults examined was "preoperative evaluation." In only five consults (3.4%) did the consultant identify a new finding. Sixty-two consults (42.5%) contained no recommendations. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between those patients who received a medical consult and those who did not. CONCLUSION: A review of 146 medical consults suggests that the majority of such consults give little advice that truly impacts either perioperative management or outcome of surgery.
Assuntos
Assistência Perioperatória , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Causas de Morte , Cuidados Críticos , Tratamento Farmacológico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Intraoperatória , Monitorização Fisiológica , Alta do Paciente , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Congenital long QT syndrome is characterized by a corrected QT interval of at least 440 msec on the electrocardiogram and has been associated with recurrent syncope, documented ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death. There have been numerous articles over the past 20 years describing isolated instances of surgical and anesthesia related complications but the general anesthetic management of the condition remains unclear. CLINICAL FEATURES: An 11-yr-old female with documented long QT syndrome, with two episodes of syncope in the past, was admitted for emergency drainage of left periorbital cellulitis. Anesthesia was induced with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium, and initially maintained with nitrous oxide and halothane. After 20 min, the patient developed ventricular tachycardia (torsade de pointes). Lidocaine 1 mg.kg(-1) iv was given and the rhythm reverted to normal sinus. Halothane was discontinued and the surgery proceeded without further incident. CONCLUSIONS: Our review of the literature revealed that patients with long QT syndrome whose symptoms are well controlled prior to surgery tend to do well regardless of the anesthetic chosen. There are, however, theoretical reasons to avoid anesthetics which either sensitize the myocardium to catecholamines or which cause an increase in circulating levels of catecholamines.