RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Pelvic organ prolapse can significantly reduce quality of life of affected women, with many cases requiring corrective surgery. The rate of recurrence is relatively high after conventional prolapse surgery. In recent years, alloplastic meshes have increasingly been implanted to stabilize the pelvic floor, which has led to considerable improvement of anatomical results. But the potential for mesh-induced risks has led to a controversial discussion on the use of surgical meshes in urogynecology. The impact of cystocele correction and implantation of an alloplastic mesh on patients' quality of life/sexuality and the long-term stability of this approach were investigated. METHOD: In a large prospective multicenter study, 289 patients with symptomatic cystocele underwent surgery with implantation of a titanized polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP ® Total 6, pfm medical ag) and followed up for 36 months. Both primary procedures and procedures for recurrence were included in the study. Anatomical outcomes were quantified using the POP-Q system. Quality of life including sexuality were assessed using the German version of the validated P-QoL questionnaire. All adverse events were assessed by an independent clinical event committee. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 67 ± 8 years. Quality of life improved significantly over the course of the study in all investigated areas, including sexuality and personal relationships (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test). The number of adverse events which occurred in the period between 12 and 36 months after surgery was low, with just 22 events reported. The recurrence rate for the anterior compartment was 4.5%. Previous or concomitant hysterectomy increased the risk of recurrence in the posterior compartment 2.8-fold and increased the risk of erosion 2.25-fold. CONCLUSION: Cystocele correction using a 2nd generation alloplastic mesh achieved good anatomical and functional results in cases requiring stabilization of the pelvic floor and in patients with recurrence. The rate of recurrence was low, the patients' quality of life improved significantly, and the risks were acceptable.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) impairs quality of life (QoL) due to vaginal bulge symptoms and changes in bladder/bowel and sexual function. The effect of alloplastic meshes on QoL is still being discussed. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the effect of mesh implantation on QoL and sexual function over 1 year. METHODS: 289 women with cystocele > stage I were included in this prospective multicenter study, with nine hospitals participating (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01084889). Mesh exposures rates and pelvic floor-related QoL using the validated German version of the p-QoL questionnaire were evaluated as the primary endpoints. Based on a single-sided binominal test with α = 0.05 and a power of 0.80, a sample size of 225 for the mesh exposures was calculated. The mesh used was a 6-arm mesh with titanium coating (TILOOP(®) Total 6, sponsor pfm medical ag, Germany). Preoperative data were compared to 6 and 12 months postoperative data, using Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 67 years (min 43, max 87). All domains of QoL improved significantly compared after surgery: mean prolapse score dropped from 73.7 to 19.4 after 6 and 16.2 after 12 months (p < 0.001). Sexual function also improved significantly. The rate of dyspareunia was lower at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective trial, a significant positive effect of mesh implantation on pelvic floor-related QoL was observed. These findings remained stable 1 year after surgery with further improvement. This trial adds further data to the ongoing discussion on the role and risk of meshes in POP surgery.
