A Steadier Hand: The First Human Clinical Trial of a Single-Use Robotic-Assisted Surgical Device for Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and utility of an investigational robotic-assisted cochlear implant insertion system. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm, open-label study under abbreviated Investigational Device Exemption requirements. SETTING: All procedures were performed, and all data were collected, at a single tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-one postlingually deafened adult subjects that met Food and Drug Administration indication criteria for cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent standard-of-care surgery for unilateral cochlear implantation with the addition of a single-use robotic-assisted insertion device during cochlear electrode insertion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Successful insertion of cochlear implant electrode array, electrode array insertion time, postoperative implant function. RESULTS: Successful robotic-assisted insertion of lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays was achieved in 20 (95.2%) of 21 patients. One insertion was unable to be achieved by either robotic-assisted or manual insertion methods, and the patient was retrospectively found to have a preexisting cochlear fracture. Mean intracochlear electrode array insertion time was 3 minutes 15 seconds. All implants with successful robotic-assisted electrode array insertion (n = 20) had normal impedance and neural response telemetry measures for up to 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Here we report the first human trial of a single-use robotic-assisted surgical device for cochlear implant electrode array insertion. This device successfully and safely inserted lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays from the three device manufacturers with devices approved but he Food and Drug Administration.

Comparative Analysis of Robotics-Assisted and Manual Insertions of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.

HYPOTHESIS: Robotics-assisted cochlear implant (CI) insertions will result in reduced intracochlear trauma when compared with manual, across multiple users. BACKGROUND: Whether intracochlear trauma and translocations are two factors that may contribute to significant variability in CI outcomes remains to be seen. To address this issue, we have developed a robotics-assisted insertion system designed to aid the surgeon in inserting electrode arrays with consistent speeds and reduced variability. This study evaluated the effect of robotics-assisted insertions on the intracochlear trauma as compared with manual insertions in cadaveric cochleae in a simulated operative environment. METHODS: Twelve neurotologists performed bilateral electrode insertions into cochleae of full cadaveric heads using both the robotics-assisted system and manual hand insertion. Lateral wall electrodes from three different manufacturers (n = 24) were used and randomized between surgeons. Insertion angle of the electrode and trauma scoring were evaluated using high-resolution three-dimensional x-ray microscopy and compared between robotics-assisted and manual insertions. RESULTS: Three-dimensional x-ray microscopy provided excellent resolution to characterize the in situ trauma and insertion angle. Robotics-assisted insertions significantly decreased insertional intracochlear trauma as measured by reduced trauma scores compared with manual insertions (average: 1.3 versus 2.2, device versus manual, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between insertion angles observed for manual and robotics-assisted techniques (311 ± 131° versus 307 ± 96°, device versus manual, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Robotics-assisted insertion systems enable standardized electrode insertions across individual surgeons and experience levels. Clinical trials are necessary to investigate whether insertion techniques that reduce insertional variability and the likelihood of intracochlear trauma also improve CI auditory outcomes.

Development and Characterization of an Electrocochleography-Guided Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Array Insertion System.

OBJECTIVE: Electrocochleography (ECochG) is increasingly being used during cochlear implant (CI) surgery to detect and mitigate insertion-related intracochlear trauma, where a drop in ECochG signal has been shown to correlate with a decline in hearing outcomes. In this study, an ECochG-guided robotics-assisted CI insertion system was developed and characterized that provides controlled and consistent electrode array insertions while monitoring and adapting to real-time ECochG signals. STUDY DESIGN: Experimental research. SETTING: A research laboratory and animal testing facility. METHODS: A proof-of-concept benchtop study evaluated the ability of the system to detect simulated ECochG signal changes and robotically adapt the insertion. Additionally, the ECochG-guided insertion system was evaluated in a pilot in vivo sheep study to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio and amplitude of ECochG recordings during robotics-assisted insertions. The system comprises an electrode array insertion drive unit, an extracochlear recording electrode module, and a control console that interfaces with both components and the surgeon. RESULTS: The system exhibited a microvolt signal resolution and a response time <100 milliseconds after signal change detection, indicating that the system can detect changes and respond faster than a human. Additionally, animal results demonstrated that the system was capable of recording ECochG signals with a high signal-to-noise ratio and sufficient amplitude. CONCLUSION: An ECochG-guided robotics-assisted CI insertion system can detect real-time drops in ECochG signals during electrode array insertions and immediately alter the insertion motion. The system may provide a surgeon the means to monitor and reduce CI insertion-related trauma beyond manual insertion techniques for improved CI hearing outcomes.

Evaluation of Insertion Forces and Cochlea Trauma Following Robotics-Assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion.

HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to evaluate the effect of cochlear implant (CI) insertion technique on electrode insertion forces and intracochlear trauma. We hypothesize that robotics-assisted insertions will reduce insertion forces and intracochlear trauma compared with manual insertions. BACKGROUND: Variability in CI outcomes exists across patients, implant centers, surgeons, and electrode types. While surgical techniques that reduce electrode insertion trauma are well established, insertion trauma remains one contributing factor to variability in CI outcomes. Previous work demonstrates that micromechanically controlled insertion tools reduce both maximum insertion forces and insertion variability compared with manual insertions. METHODS: CI electrode insertions were performed either by hand (n = 12) or utilizing a robotics-assisted tool (n = 12) in fresh frozen, human cadaveric cochleae using electrodes from four different CI manufacturers. Electrodes array insertion forces were additionally evaluated in benchtop cochlea models. Following cadaveric insertions, samples were imaged via high resolution x-ray microscopy to evaluate electrode position and intracochlear trauma events based on a modified Eshraghi scale. RESULTS: Electrode array insertions performed by robotics-assisted system showed significantly lower insertion forces and variability. Manual electrode array insertions had a significantly higher overall trauma score of 3.1 ±â€Š2.0 compared with 0.9 ±â€Š1.0 for robotics-assisted insertions. Robotics-assisted insertions had higher rate of basilar membrane elevations while manual insertions showed higher rates of severe trauma events. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic-assisted insertion system reduced trauma events associated with CI electrode insertions in cadaveric cochleae compared with manual insertions. Surgical devices which help to precisely and more consistently insert electrodes may improve CI outcomes and hearing preservation.

Pilot Evaluation of Sheep as In Vivo Model for Cochlear Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The rise in the use of cochlear implants (CIs) has continued to fuel research aimed at improving surgical approaches and the preservation of residual hearing. Current in vivo models involve small animals not suitable for evaluating full-sized CIs nor are prohibitively expensive nonhuman primates. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an in vivo model of cochlear implantation in sheep. METHODS: Eight adult, female sheep were implanted with full-sized CIs from three manufacturers using a retrofacial approach to the round window. Partial electrode insertions were performed to a depth of 10 to 12 mm before closure. Round window electrocochleography (ECoG) and auditory brainstem responses (ABR) were conducted during and after surgery. Following a 30-day implantation, cochleae were explanted and imaged using both x-ray microscopy and histology. RESULTS: The surgery was well tolerated although limited complications were observed in three of eight sheep. Electrode insertions were up to 12 mm before insertion resistance noted. ECoG and ABR responses were reduced postimplantation, reflecting changes in cochlear mechanics due to the presence of the implant, and/or insertion trauma. Histological and radiological image analysis showed the presence of intracochlear fibrosis as well as one instance of tip fold-over. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sheep presents a feasible live-animal model to study cochlear implantations. Full-sized implants as well as surgical techniques can be evaluated on functional outcomes such as ABR and ECoG as well as histological markers for residual hearing including intracochlear fibrosis. Use of this model and surgical approach has potential to evaluate CIs and surgical techniques in both the acute and chronic setting.

Review of accessory parotid gland tumors: pathologic incidence and surgical management.

OBJECTIVE: The current study presents our experience with accessory parotid gland masses and reviews the literature on accessory parotid tumor incidence and surgical management. Based on our results, we advocate a standard parotidectomy approach with routine facial nerve dissection at the time of excision. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective chart review and comprehensive literature review on incidence of accessory parotid gland neoplasms. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients with mid-cheek masses treated by the senior author was conducted from January 2003 to January 2009. The tumor size at presentation, FNA biopsy, pathologic diagnosis, and surgical treatment were recorded for 13 patients. RESULTS: In the case series, 54% of lesions were benign (n=7) and 46% were malignant (n=6) including benign pathologies of 4 pleomorphic adenomas, 2 lymphadenitis, 1 monomorphic adenoma and malignant pathologies of 2 mucoepidermoid carcinoma, 2 B-cell lymphomas, 1 adenocarcinoma, and 1 myofibrosarcoma. Surgical intervention was performed on all patients with standard parotidectomy incision for accessory parotid mass excision after identification and tracing of facial nerve and its branches. CONCLUSION: The present study provides support for a standard parotid incision with identification of the facial nerve at the time of surgical incision as this resulted in successful excision of accessory parotid tumors with favorable cosmetic results and without facial paralysis or tumor recurrence. Literature review of 152 cases of accessory parotid gland lesions, revealed a pooled incidence of 70% benign and 30% malignant.