RESUMO
Background: The canine plays a vital role in dentofacial aesthetics and function. It supports the base of the alar and upper lip, which are crucial for smile aesthetics. When impacted, these functions are lost, leading to low self-esteem and overall poor health-related quality of life. The present study was conducted to find the prevalence of impacted and transmigrated canines in orthodontic patients and also to find the most prevalent type of canine impaction. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a hospital setting at Dental College. A total of 3050 OPGs (Orthopantomagram) of patients who visited dental hospitals for orthodontic treatment constituted the final sample. Demographic details regarding age, gender, and place of residence were collected from the patients. Evaluation of sample radiographs on the standard light box was performed to collect data regarding impacted and transmigrated canines. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Results: Prevalence of impacted canine was found to be 2.46%. Impacted canine prevalence of 1.53% and 2.85% was reported in males and females, respectively. Only two female patients had transmigrated mandibular impacted canines. Comparison of arch showed a statistically significant (P value 0.02) higher prevalence in the maxillary arch, which was 1.54%, and in the mandibular arch, it was 0.92%. The present study reported significantly more unilateral impactions (P value 0.00) than bilateral impactions. Conclusion: The overall prevalence for impacted canine was 2.46%. Prevalence was higher in female patients. Early diagnosis of impacted canines is vital for planning orthodontic treatment in such patients.
RESUMO
Objectives: In developing nations such as India, a disparity exists between the available resources for stroke rehabilitation and the substantial burden of stroke cases. Consequently, the provision of cost-effective and multidisciplinary post-stroke rehabilitation care to stroke survivors becomes of paramount importance. The utilization of mobile applications (apps) for stroke care has been on the rise, offering a personalized and pragmatic solution with the potential for wider reach in settings constrained by limited resources. To address the unmet needs in the prevention and management of post-stroke complications, we conceptualized a strategy known as a mobile application-based post-stroke care strategy for both survivors and their caregivers. Materials and Methods: The scope of the app's focus was determined based on the incidence of post-stroke complications within a prospective cohort of stroke patients, in conjunction with existing literature. An initial "web-based mobile app" prototype was crafted to align with the identified focus area. Before the development of the final app version, a feasibility study was conducted involving 30 participant dyads (comprising a patient and a caregiver). Content validity was evaluated by a panel of 20 stroke experts encompassing neurologists, nurses, physiotherapists, and psychologists. Results: The "Stroke Home Care" (SHC) mobile app was conceived as a web-based educational tool aimed at preventing and managing post-stroke complications. It seeks to train caregivers of immobile stroke patients in the administration of preventive and therapeutic care procedures, thereby potentially enhancing survivors' quality of life and alleviating caregivers' burden. The feasibility and validity studies indicated "high satisfaction" levels among most caregivers and experts (>75%), with the remainder expressing "satisfaction" and no "dissatisfaction" regarding app utilities. Stroke experts unanimously deemed the app "appropriate", with consensus on contents, video quality, video length, and voice clarity. Caregivers reported "satisfactory" user experiences, encountering no issues during app installation or operation. Suggestions from both caregivers and experts were integrated into the final app version. Conclusion: The "SHC" app represents a feasible and well-received innovation tailored for the use by caregivers of stroke survivors. Consequently, the initial feasibility of the developed app serves as a precursor to a randomized controlled clinical trial aimed at substantiating its effectiveness within the post-stroke survivor and caregiver population. Notably, within resource-constrained contexts, this app has the potential to be a pivotal tool for post-stroke care.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Literature states a higher self-contamination rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) while doffing personal protective equipment (PPE). During the Covid-19 pandemic, onsite trained observers were not always available to monitor PPE compliance. The remote audio-visual doffing surveillance (RADS) system has the potential to overcome this limitation. We aimed to compare the efficacy of this real-time RADS system against the onsite buddy system for monitoring the doffing of PPE. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was carried out at our tertiary care centre in northern India. 200 HCWs who cared for Covid-19 patients in the intensive care units/operation theatres were included. Group A included HCWs who performed doffing with the help of an onsite trained observer and group B included HCWs who performed doffing with the RADS system. An independent observer noted the error at any step using the CDC doffing checklist, in both groups. An online questionnaire to analyse the level of satisfaction post-doffing was also surveyed. RESULTS: The proportion of errors committed during doffing was significantly lower in group B compared to group A with a low relative risk of 0.34 (95% CI 0.22-0.51) (p < 0.001) (Figure 1A,B). In both groups, there was no difference in HCWs feedback regarding the ease of the system and fear of committing an error. Though the perceived quality of monitoring was felt better with onsite buddy, the overall confidence rating of being safe after doffing was better with the RADS system. CONCLUSION: Real-time RADS system may be more effective than the onsite buddy system for ensuring the safety of HCWs during doffing PPE. HCWs level of satisfaction related to the ease and anxiety with the monitoring systems were comparable. RADS system can reduce reliance on HCW resources and can integrate well into existing healthcare systems.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Ansiedade , Lista de ChecagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) problems among women with disabilities (WWD) in Chandigarh, India, and to ascertain the difficulties experienced by WWD in accessing hospital services. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted during 2014 to 2017 in Chandigarh, India. The study participants were women 15 years and older with at least 40% disability. A pretested questionnaire and in-depth interview were used to determine sociodemographic profile, medical history, sexual and reproductive morbidity, treatment-seeking behavior, and the type, extent, and course of the disability. Verbatim responses of the participants were noted. Data were manually coded and collated into possible themes. RESULTS: Postpolio residual paralysis (80; 30.7%) was the main reported disability, followed by severe sight impairment (52; 19.9%). A majority (170; 65%) of participants were unmarried. Of them, 66 (39%) were not willing to get married. The prevalence of SRH problems was high (151; 57.9%) among WWD, and only 82 (54%) took treatment. Dysmenorrhea (47; 31.1%), irregular periods (36; 23.8%), and vaginal discharge (17; 11.3%) were the main problems reported. The WWD in this study were likely to hide their SRH problems from others out of shame or fear. CONCLUSION: Among WWD, the prevalence of SRH problems is high and obtaining relief is difficult.
Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Saúde Reprodutiva , Estudos Transversais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Comportamento Sexual , Índia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Access to optimum health care services is vital for every woman. Women with disabilities (WWD), in particular, face multiple discrimination and social exclusion on this issue. The objective of the study was to evaluate the user-friendliness of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in terms of the physical access to health facilities in various hospitals in a city in north India. METHODS: This cross-sectional evaluation study was conducted during 2013-2017 in five purposively selected major government hospitals in a city in north India. A disabled friendliness evaluation tool was used to analyze the barriers to physical access in terms of approach to SRH care facilities. Data analysis was done through Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and content analysis. Results: Overall, 270 respondents aged 15 years and above with at least 40% disability were interviewed for the study. Lack of access to SRH care in hospitals (infrastructure/equipment/communication/transport) was the main barrier (46.36%) reported by WWD. Most of the hospitals lacked any special provisions for people with disability (PWD). Proper ramps, stairs, toilets, etc. were not present in hospitals as denoted by their verbatim responses. CONCLUSIONS: All the hospitals scored low on access to sexual and reproductive health services for WWD.
RESUMO
This study aims to assess the perception and attitude of health care personnel regarding integration of nursing education and nursing services. Using purposive and stratified random sampling technique, 92 medical faculty, 32 nursing faculty and 346 nursing officers were enrolled. A three-point Likert scale consisting of 15 items and six open ended questions was used to collect the data. Overall, the concept of integration of nursing education and nursing services at their institute was welcomed by 74.4% of health care personnel. Medical faculty (47.8%), nursing faculty (37.5%) and nursing officers (57.5%) scored the concept of integration as very good.
Assuntos
Educação em Enfermagem , Serviços de Enfermagem , Humanos , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Assistência ao Paciente , Percepção , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Owing to the highly contagious nature of SARS-CoV-2, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) among the healthcare workers (HCWs) is mandatory. However, PPE associated adverse effects are also there. OBJECTIVE: To study the adverse effects associated with PPE and their preventive measures amongst the HCWs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted among 200 HCWs working in a Covid center of a tertiary care center. The participants were sent the questionnaires online. Some of them not having smart phones were interviewed telephonically. Their information profile, the various adverse effects associated with PPE, and the preventive measures being practiced by them were noted. Data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Total 97% HCWs reported adverse effects with hazmat suit; 96% with N 95 mask; 92% with goggle and 78% with gloves. The adverse effects associated with the prolonged use of the mask were erythema; erosions and scar at the nasal bridge; ear pain; difficulty in breathing; and headache. Sixty-seven percent of the participants had sweating with the use of gloves, which led to cutaneous exfoliation such as dry hands (55%) and skin itching (43%). Moisturizers and natural oils were used to prevent the dryness of hands. For the pressure related injury over the nasal bridge due to N95 mask, participants used to apply Band-Aid (adhesive bandage) and cotton dressing. CONCLUSION: Adverse skin reactions related to PPE are common among HCWs. Comprehensive assessment of the skin condition and awareness on adverse skin reactions should be advocated.
RESUMO
Current study was conducted to assess the perception and barriers regarding proning among nurses. 385 nurses were conveniently surveyed using pre-tested tools. 3.9% of nurses "felt like running away" while providing care to the patients in prone position. 93.5% believed that prone position for COVID-19 patients is beneficial in reducing morbidity and that teamwork is required to be effective (96.6%). 93% nurses believed that inadequate staff-patient ratio is a significant barrier for prone positioning. Other barriers were fear of dislodgement of tubings (91.5%), difficulty in providing routine care (87.3%) and inadequate institutional protocol (83.9%). 12.5% were trained regarding proning.
RESUMO
Background & objectives: The safety of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine is a cause of concern for many who have been vaccinated. The people have multiple concerns and fear regarding the adverse events of the vaccine. Thus, this study was undertaken to establish the safety profile of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Corona Virus Vaccine (Recombinant) among the healthcare professionals. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional survey. After taking clearance from the institutional ethics committee 1500 healthcare professionals, who had their vaccination in the past two weeks were selected. They were provided with an online survey proforma regarding adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) of COVID-19 vaccine developed using google forms with an informed consent form affixed to it. Results: A total of 1036 individuals participated in the study. The mean and median (inter quartile range) age of the participants was 37.7 ±11.25 and 35 (29-46) yr, respectively. Of these, 52.1 per cent were female, 29.3 per cent were doctors, 33.4 per cent were nurses and 9.5 per cent were paramedical staff. Forty six per cent participants experienced one or more minor AEFIs such as pain, tenderness, redness, etc. at the injection site. Fatigue (31.75%), generalized feeling of unwell (28.57%), muscle pain (23.16%) and fever (21.71%) were the most commonly reported systemic AEFIs followed by headache (20.07%), dizziness (10.03%) and joint pains (15.25%). Most of them experienced these AEFIs within 24 h of the first dose of administration. About 42 per cent of the participants took oral antipyretics/analgesics for managing the AEFIs. Interpretation & conclusions: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Corona Virus Vaccine was found to be associated with mild local and systemic AEFIs that were more common after the first dose as compared to the second dose. There adverse events could be dealt with oral over-the-counter medications, with no requirement of hospitalization.
Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
AIM: Aim of this study is to gain insight into how frontline nurses accepted and prepared themselves before COVID posting. METHODS: It is a qualitative and phenomenological study design. Eighteen in-depth interviews were conducted with the nurses who provided care to confirmed COVID 19 patients in a tertiary hospital of North India from September to November 2020. The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) were followed in this study. RESULTS: In this study, the reported experiences were divided into five main themes: (I) Getting ready to be at the frontlines (II) Family and peer support (III) I Can Handle it! (IV) I have to be Strong! (V) Training is key to confidence. The risk of infection, fear of being a source of infection to the family, the worry of staying away from family, uncertainty, and nervousness related to personal protective equipment were the most common thoughts that disturbed the participants. However, taking a good diet, practicing yoga and meditation, having a sense of serving their country and community, faith in God, family support, faith in the organization, and good training helped the participants to prepare for the COVID posting. CONCLUSION: Despite facing various challenges, the nurses showed great strength and resilience. To promote a resilient health system, supportive supervision and adequate administrative support, training and workshops, peer group support, counseling cells, and spiritual support may be considered.
RESUMO
The study was carried out to explore the attitude and perception of observers involved in monitoring of doffing through Real Time Remote Audio-Visual aided (RT-RAVA), the first well-sophisticated surveillance system. A 21-item online-survey proforma was used to collect the data amongst 150 nursing personnel. 3/4th of the participants strongly agreed that they helped in reducing the doffing errors through RT-RAVA doffing. 97.3% perceived that the system is highly effective in reducing the infection during doffing. There was significant correlation between attitude and perception of the observers. The system was perceived as highly effective and was recommended for doffing.
RESUMO
Background Very little has been reported about health care workers' (HCWs) adherence to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines of doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Real-time remote audio-visual doffing surveillance (RADS) system for assisting doffing might reduce the risk of self-contamination. We used this system to determine the incidence of the breach in biosafety during doffing of PPE among HCWs involved in the care of Covid-19 patients. Methods A total of 100 HCWs were enrolled in this observational study who performed duties in the COVID intensive care unit (ICU) of our tertiary care centre. With a real-time RADS system, trained observers from remote locations assisted HCWs during doffing of PPE and noted breach at any step using the CDC doffing checklist. The breach was considered major if committed during removal of gloves/gown/N-95 or if ≥3 errors occurred in any other steps. Results Overall, 40% of the HCWs committed a breach during doffing at least one step. The majority of the errors were observed during hand hygiene (34%), followed by glove removal (12%) and N-95 removal (8%). Nineteen percent of HCWs committed the major breach, out of which 37.5% were done by house-keeping sanitation staff (p = 0.008 and RR 2.85; 95% CI of 1.313-6.19), followed by technicians (22.5%), nursing staff (16.7%) and resident doctors (6.5%). Conclusions Performing doffing using a real-time RADS system is associated with a relatively low incidence of a breach in biosafety compared with earlier studies using an onsite standard observer. Overall adherence of HCWs to the CDC guidelines of doffing PPE was satisfactory. This study highlights the importance of the RADS system during doffing of PPE in a health care setting amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The objectives of this umbrella review were to describe various aspects of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES)-related interventions and their effect on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes among children and young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and identify gaps in current DSMES-related research. METHODS: An umbrella review of systematic reviews on DSMES interventions was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 statement. Four international medical databases were searched for eligible review articles published in English in the last 10 years that dealt with children and youths with T1DM and were conducted in accordance with a priori protocol. RESULTS: Out of the 234 citations screened, only 8 systematic reviews representing 166 studies were considered eligible for further analysis. Glycemic management (A1C) is the most common outcome variable (108 studies). Common behavioral and psychosocial outcome variables examined are episodes of hypoglycemia (27 studies) and diabetic ketoacidosis (21 studies) and self-care behavior and generic quality of life (20 studies each). Several gaps in DSMES-related research studies are identified, including uneven geographical distribution of study population, methodological weaknesses in study designs, missing important outcome variables, use of nonstandardized assessment tools, and lack of assessment of the sustainability of effects. CONCLUSION: The effects of DSMES interventions on clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes are varied. The heterogeneity of implementation and evaluation makes it difficult to draw clear conclusions about elements of DSMES that are most effective. There is a need for long-term assessment of the psychosocial and behavioral outcomes using validated and generalizable instruments.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Hipoglicemia , Autogestão , Adolescente , Criança , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/terapia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer (PU) is one of the common, neglected and avoidable complications among bedridden patients. Despite the potential to reduce PU incidence, the evidence on the effect of patient/caregiver education is low. This pragmatic randomized controlled trial (CTRI/2011/07/001862) compared the impact of two structured educational interventions to patients and caregivers on prevention of PU in immobile orthopaedic patients. METHODOLOGY: Ninety-two orthopedically immobile patients (Braden score ≤12 or stage I PU) and their caregivers were (block) randomized into two equal groups. One group was offered Prevention Package 1 (PP1), i.e., self-instruction manual (SIM), one to one training and counselling on PU care practices. The second group (PP2) was given SIM only. Patients were followed equally at the hospital and home after discharge. Intention to treat analysis was conducted. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of PU was 8.7% in PP1 and 21.7% in PP2 for the entire study period. PU incidence rate in PP1 and PP2 was 0.9 and 2.41 per 1000 person-days, respectively. Incidence rate ratio was 2.67 (95% CI: 0.89, 8.02, p-0.04). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of PP1 and PP2 were statistically significantly different (p-0.043). PP1 also showed statistically significant improvement in knowledge on the prevention and management of PU compared to PP2 at post-intervention (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Individualized, structured education of patients and caregiver is effective in improving the knowledge and preventing the PU in immobile orthopaedic patients. A comprehensive approach involving hospital administrators, health care professionals, patients and caregivers may be further researched upon for a sustainable reduction in PU.
Assuntos
Recursos Audiovisuais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pessoal de Saúde/organização & administração , Máscaras , Roupa de Proteção , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , COVID-19/transmissão , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Índia , Masculino , Distanciamento Físico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravação em VídeoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have suboptimal quality of life (QOL). Various studies/researches have revealed that breathing exercises have a positive and favorable impact on different systems of the body. AIMS: This study aims to assess the effect of a breathing training program on QOL in patients with predialysis CKD. SETTINGS: The study was a single-center study conducted at PGIMER, Chandigarh. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty individuals were enrolled and randomized using lottery method. QOL was assessed or evaluated by Kidney Disease and QOL questionnaire (KDQOL™-36). Breathing exercises were taught to the intervention group. Patients included in control group continued with the routine care. Assessment of QOL was done after 4 weeks in both the groups. RESULTS: Change in KDQOL™-36 scores showed significant difference between control and the intervention group. The mean scores of control group in the subscale effects of kidney disease, SF-12 Physical functioning (Physical Health Composite) and SF-12 Mental functioning (Mental Health Composite) were 84.79, 39.16 and 37.40, respectively, whereas in intervention group, the respective mean scores were 91.88, 43.92, and 44.16. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.04, P = 0.01, and P = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Breathing training program improves QOL in patients with predialysis CKD.
RESUMO
Infection of the internal jugular vein (IJV) catheter continues to be a common cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD). The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of personal hygiene on the incidence of IJV catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). A randomized, controlled, parallel, and non-inferiority trial was conducted on patients initiated on maintenance HD via right IJV catheter. Patients were randomly allocated to control and intervention group via computer-generated random table. Intervention package for the intervention group included hand washing (2-4 hourly and whenever visibly dirty), feet washing (12 hourly), and axillary shave (at any point during the study, no hair growth in axilla). Patients were provided with a pamphlet and reinforced to continue package till IJV catheter was in situ. Patients were followed up twice a week for one month from the date of catheter insertion for the incidence of CRBSI. The primary outcome of the study was percentage of patients free from CRBSI. On intention-to-treat analysis, the percentage of patients without CRBSI was 53.7% and 29.3% in the intervention and control arm, respectively [P = 0.04; 25.12% (1.43-45.28%)]. Positive blood cultures were higher in control (73.3%) as compared to the intervention group (28.6%) (P = 0.19). Personal hygiene interventions are an effective method to reduce the incidence of CRBSIs among population undergoing maintenance HD via non-cuffed IJV catheter.