Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Environ Monit Assess ; 196(9): 849, 2024 Aug 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190210

RESUMO

Climate change has a significant impact on the Ganga-Brahmaputra (GB) basin, the major food belt of India, which frequently experiences flooding and varied incidences of drought. The current study examines the changing trend of rainfall and temperature in the GB basin over a period of 30 years to identify areas at risk with an emphasis on the Paris Agreement's mandate to keep increasing temperatures below 2 °C. The maximum temperature anomaly in the middle Ganga plains recorded an increase of more than 1.5 °C year-1 in 1999, 2005, and 2009. Some extreme events were observed in the Brahmaputra basin during 1999, 2009, and 2010, where a prominent temperature increase of 1.5 °C year-1 was observed. The minimum temperature revealed an increasing trend for the G-B basin with an anomalous increase of 0.04 to 0.06 °C year-1. The rainfall variability across the Ganga basin shows a rising tendency over the lower Ganga region while the Brahmaputra basin showed a downward trend. To identify the statistical relation between the Global climatic oscillations and regional climate, Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Niño 3.4 were used. The wet and dry period estimation shows a rise in flood conditions in the Ganga basin whereas, in the Brahmaputra basin, an increase in drought frequency was observed. The correlation based on Niño 3.4 and SPI3 presents a negative relation for the monsoon season in the G-B basin revealing a situation of drought occurrence (SPI3 below 0) with increased Nino 3.4 values (El Niño above + 0.4C).


Assuntos
Mudança Climática , Secas , Monitoramento Ambiental , Chuva , Temperatura , Índia , Inundações
2.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil ; 70(1): 105-114, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549828

RESUMO

Objectives: The study aimed to compare the effect of cranial electrical stimulation (CES) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in improving cognition among individuals with mild traumatic brain injury. Patients and methods: The pretest-posttest randomized controlled study was conducted between November 2020 and March 2022. Seventy-two patients (64 males, 8 females; mean age: 40.5±9.5 years; range, 18 to 45 years) experiencing cognitive impairment within three months of traumatic brain injury were recruited. Participants were randomly assigned into two groups: Group 1 (CES with cognitive training, n=36) and Group 2 (tDCS with cognitive training, n=36). Participants were blinded in the study. Both groups received 30-min sessions of neuromodulation along with 30 min of cognitive training five days a week for four weeks. The patients were assessed at baseline and at the end of two and four weeks of intervention. The primary outcome measure was the Montreal Cognition Assessment (MoCA), and the secondary outcome measure was the Galveston Orientation Amnesia Test (GOAT). Results: Demographic and baseline characteristics depicted normal distribution for both groups (p>0.05). Within group analyses of both groups demonstrated significant differences for both outcome measures (MoCA: p=0.001; GOAT: p=0.001). Between group analyses of MoCA showed significant improvement with p-value of 0.001 while GOAT exhibited p-value of 0.002 showing significant difference between the two groups. Time group interaction effect and covariance analyses depicted significant improvement with p-value of 0.001 for both outcome measures with excellent effect size >0.80. Conclusion: Cranial electrical stimulation was a more effective noninvasive neuromodulatory device than tDCS in improving cognition among individuals with traumatic brain injury.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA