Laparoscopic Dissection of Lymph Node Station 16-Why and How?

BACKGROUND: Dissection of para-aortic lymph nodes (Station 16) provides an important prognosticator for patients with gastrointestinal, colorectal, and hepatobiliary cancers.1-4 For example, a positive Station 16 lymph node has been shown to lead to 2-year survival of 3% in patients with pancreas adenocarcinoma, akin to stage IV disease.5,6 Thereby, Station 16 involvement can help with the risk/benefit stratification of the decision to move forward with radical surgery.7-9 Furthermore, it has been shown for gallbladder cancer that involvement of Station 16 cannot necessarily be predicted from the dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament lymph nodes only.10,11 TECHNIQUE: With the patient in the French position, a complete Kocherization and a Cattel-Braasch maneuver is performed, allowing for visualization of LN station 16b. Station 16b is the inferior border of the station 16 compartment. The left renal vein (LRV) serves as an important landmark to identify the superior border of the dissection comprised by Stations 16a2 and 16b1. Station 16a2 dissection may be associated with a traction injury of the left renal vein or damage of right renal or suprarenal arteries and is dissected if there are specific concerns regarding involvement. CONCLUSIONS: While station 16 provides important prognostic information for risk stratification, a strategic and stepwise approach is needed for a safe sampling. This is accomplished by wide mobilization of the duodenum, implementation of thermal fusion to minimize chyle leak, and careful dissection below the left renal vein.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been increasingly utilized to evaluate submucosal lesions of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract. Our study aims to determine the efficacy of UGI EUS-FNA/core needle biopsy (CNB), including the frequency and cytomorphologic features of encountered submucosal lesions, and to investigate contributing factors including the role of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). METHODS: We analyzed all UGI submucosal lesions diagnosed at our institution by EUS-FNA/CNB from September 2008 through August 2015. RESULTS: During this 8-year study period, 94 patients underwent 110 UGI EUS-FNA/CNB, including 89 (81%) gastric, 11 (10%) duodenal, and 10 (9%) esophageal lesions. Twenty-seven (25%) were gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), followed by 13 (12%) leiomyomas, 5 (5%) schwannomas, 4 (4%) gastric adenocarcinomas, 3 (3%) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and 3 (3%) pancreatic heterotopias. All GISTs, leiomyomas, and NETs were ultimately diagnosed by EUS biopsies, as well as 75% of adenocarcinomas, 60% of schwannomas, and 33% of pancreatic heterotopias. The specificity of EUS-FNA/CNB for these 6 most commonly encountered lesions was 100%, with sensitivity of 82%. Sensitivity was 100% for esophageal and duodenal biopsies, and 80% and 75% for gastric and gastroesophageal procedures, respectively. Factors that contributed to poor yield included the lack of ROSE, small lesional size, lesion location and histology, and needle type. Neither number of needle passes nor operator experience appeared to influence specimen adequacy. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNA/CNB is an effective modality for diagnosing UGI submucosal lesions. Awareness of potential errors due to sampling of the bowel wall, lesional cystic degeneration, as well as pancreatic heterotopia and Brunner gland hamartoma is essential in order to avoid false diagnoses.