Physiological Assessment with iFR prior to FFR Measurement in Left Main Disease.

Despite guideline-based recommendation of the interchangeable use of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decision-making, iFR/FFR could demonstrate different physiological or clinical outcomes in some specific patient or lesion subsets. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of difference between iFR and FFR-guided revascularization decision-making on clinical outcomes in patients with left main disease (LMD). In this international multicenter registry of LMD with physiological interrogation, we identified 275 patients in whom physiological assessment was performed with both iFR/FFR. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as a composite of death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The receiver-operating characteristic analysis was performed for both iFR/FFR to predict MACE in respective patients in whom revascularization was deferred and performed. In 153 patients of revascularization deferral, MACE occurred in 17.0% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR to predict MACE were 0.88 (specificity:0.74; sensitivity:0.65) and 0.76 (specificity:0.81; sensitivity:0.46), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was significantly higher for iFR than FFR (0.74; 95%CI 0.62-0.85 vs. 0.62; 95%CI 0.48-0.75; p = 0.012). In 122 patients of coronary revascularization, MACE occurred in 13.1% patients. The optimal cut-off values of iFR and FFR were 0.92 (specificity:0.93; sensitivity:0.25) and 0.81 (specificity:0.047; sensitivity:1.00), respectively. The AUCs were not significantly different between iFR and FFR (0.57; 95%CI 0.40-0.73 vs. 0.46; 95%CI 0.31-0.61; p = 0.43). While neither baseline iFR nor FFR was predictive of MACE in patients in whom revascularization was performed, iFR-guided deferral seemed to be safer than FFR-guided deferral.

Comparative Evaluation of Alcohol Septal Ablation: Left Anterior Descending Versus Non-left Anterior Descending Artery Approaches.

Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is performed for symptomatic drug-refractory hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy to reduce the left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient (LVOTPG) by injecting ethanol into a septal branch that perforates the septal bulge. The target septal branches usually arise directly from the left anterior descending (LAD) artery; however, vessels from a non-LAD artery can be selected in some cases. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety between ASA performed using a septal branch arising from a non-LAD artery and a branch arising from the LAD artery. This single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study comprised patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy who underwent ASA at the Gifu Heart Centre between 2011 and 2022. The effectiveness and safety of ASA using the 2 artery types were compared. The primary end points were LVOTPG and procedure success, determined as LVOTPG <30 mm Hg after 1 year. Of 33 patients (mean age 66.4 ± 13.0 years, 13 men), 18 patients who underwent ASA using only LAD branches and 15 patients who underwent ASA using only non-LAD branches demonstrated no significant difference in the decrease in LVOTPG during the follow-up period (-99.1 ± 47.4 mm Hg/year vs -75.7 ± 39.2 mm Hg/year, respectively, p = 0.19). The procedure success at 1 year was not significantly different between the 2 groups (93.3% and 84.6%, respectively, p = 0.58). ASA performed using septal branches from non-LAD arteries could be an alternative treatment approach when appropriate septal branches are missing or desirable effects cannot be obtained from ASA using LAD branches.

The ability of contemporary cardiologists to judge the ischemic impact of a coronary lesion visually

BACKGROUND: Landmark trials showed that invasive pressure measurement (Fractional Flow Reserve, FFR) was a better guide to coronary stenting than visual assessment. However, present-day interventionists have benefited from extensive research and personal experience of mapping anatomy to hemodynamics. AIMS: To determine if visual assessment of the angiogram performs as well as invasive measurement of coronary physiology. METHODS: 25 interventional cardiologists independently visually assessed the single vessel coronary disease of 200 randomized participants in The Objective Randomized Blinded Investigation with optimal medical Therapy of Angioplasty in stable angina trial (ORBITA). They gave a visual prediction of the FFR and Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio (iFR), denoted vFFR and viFR respectively. Each judged each lesion on 2 occasions, so that every lesion had 50 vFFR, and 50 viFR assessments. The group consensus visual estimates (vFFR-group and viFR-group) and individual cardiologists' visual estimates (vFFR-individual and viFR-individual) were tested alongside invasively measured FFR and iFR for their ability to predict the placebo-controlled reduction in stress echo ischemia with stenting. RESULTS: Placebo-controlled ischemia improvement with stenting was predicted by vFFR-group (p < 0.0001) and viFR-group (p < 0.0001), vFFR-individual (p < 0.0001) and viFR-individual (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the predictive performance of the group visual estimates and their invasive counterparts: p = 0.53 for vFFR vs FFR and p = 0.56 for viFR vs iFR. CONCLUSION: Visual assessment of the angiogram by contemporary experts, provides significant additional information on the amount of ischaemia which can be relieved by placebo-controlled stenting in single vessel coronary artery disease.

Consensus document on the clinical application of invasive functional coronary angiography from the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

Invasive functional coronary angiography (FCA), an angiography-derived physiological index of the functional significance of coronary obstruction, is a novel physiological assessment tool for coronary obstruction that does not require the utilization of a pressure wire. This technology enables operators to rapidly evaluate the functional relevance of coronary stenoses during and even after angiography while reducing the burden of cost and complication risks related to the pressure wire. FCA can be used for treatment decision-making for revascularization, strategy planning for percutaneous coronary intervention, and procedure optimization. Currently, various software-computing FCAs are available worldwide, with unique features in their computation algorithms and functions. With the emerging application of this novel technology in various clinical scenarios, the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics task force was created to outline expert consensus on the clinical use of FCA. This consensus document advocates optimal clinical applications of FCA according to currently available evidence while summarizing the concept, history, limitations, and future perspectives of FCA along with globally available software.

Exercise-induced vasospastic angina diagnosed with a hand grip test in the catheterization laboratory: a case report.

Background: Exercise-induced vasospastic angina (VSA) is a relatively uncommon clinical scenario and is difficult to diagnose in the catheterization laboratory. Case summary: A 61-year-old Japanese man presented to our hospital with complaints of angina upon exertion in the morning. Neither a 12-lead electrocardiogram nor an echocardiogram showed any abnormal findings. Invasive coronary angiogram revealed moderate stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery. A hand grip test was performed, during which the patient experienced chest pain, and coronary angiogram showed coronary spasm at the site of organic stenosis with delayed coronary flow. Intracoronary nitrates (300 ug) were administered, resulting in the release of coronary spasm. Conclusion: The hand grip test may serve as a useful method for diagnosing exercise-induced VSA in the catheterization laboratory.

The ability of contemporary cardiologists to judge the ischemic impact of a coronary lesion visually.

BACKGROUND: Landmark trials showed that invasive pressure measurement (Fractional Flow Reserve, FFR) was a better guide to coronary stenting than visual assessment. However, present-day interventionists have benefited from extensive research and personal experience of mapping anatomy to hemodynamics. AIMS: To determine if visual assessment of the angiogram performs as well as invasive measurement of coronary physiology. METHODS: 25 interventional cardiologists independently visually assessed the single vessel coronary disease of 200 randomized participants in The Objective Randomized Blinded Investigation with optimal medical Therapy of Angioplasty in stable angina trial (ORBITA). They gave a visual prediction of the FFR and Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio (iFR), denoted vFFR and viFR respectively. Each judged each lesion on 2 occasions, so that every lesion had 50 vFFR, and 50 viFR assessments. The group consensus visual estimates (vFFR-group and viFR-group) and individual cardiologists' visual estimates (vFFR-individual and viFR-individual) were tested alongside invasively measured FFR and iFR for their ability to predict the placebo-controlled reduction in stress echo ischemia with stenting. RESULTS: Placebo-controlled ischemia improvement with stenting was predicted by vFFR-group (p < 0.0001) and viFR-group (p < 0.0001), vFFR-individual (p < 0.0001) and viFR-individual (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the predictive performance of the group visual estimates and their invasive counterparts: p = 0.53 for vFFR vs FFR and p = 0.56 for viFR vs iFR. CONCLUSION: Visual assessment of the angiogram by contemporary experts, provides significant additional information on the amount of ischaemia which can be relieved by placebo-controlled stenting in single vessel coronary artery disease.

Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.

Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of evidence that has led to major recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region based on updated information in the field that including both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 1 of the whole consensus document, which describes the general concept of coronary physiology, as well as practical information on the clinical application of physiologic indices and novel image-based physiologic assessment.

Prognostic Impact of Renal Function on 5-Year Outcomes After Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Deferral of Revascularization.

Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) might influence fractional flow reserve (FFR) value, potentially attenuating its prognostic utility. However, few large-scale data are available regarding clinical outcomes after FFR-guided deferral of revascularization in patients with CKD. Methods and Results From the J-CONFIRM registry (Long-Term Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Deferral of Coronary Intervention Based on Fractional Flow Reserve in Multicenter Registry), 1218 patients were divided into 3 groups according to renal function: (1) non-CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min per 1.73 m2), n=385; (2) CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate 15-59 mL/min per 1.73 m2, n=763); and (3) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (eGFR <15 mL/min per 1.73 m2, n=70). The primary study end point was the cumulative 5-year incidence of target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinical driven target vessel revascularization. Cumulative 5-year incidence of TVF was significantly higher in the ESRD group than in the CKD and non-CKD group, whereas it did not differ between the CKD and non-CKD groups (26.3% versus 11.9% versus 9.5%, P<0.001). Although the 5-year TVF risk increased as the FFR value decreased regardless of renal function, patients with ESRD had a remarkably higher risk of TVF at every FFR value than those with CKD and non-CKD. Conclusions At 5 years, patients with ESRD showed a higher incidence of TVF than patients with CKD and non-CKD, although with similar outcomes between patients with CKD and non-CKD. Patients with ESRD had an excess risk of 5-year TVF at every FFR value compared with those with CKD and non-CKD. Registration URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp; Unique identifier: UMIN000014473.

Prognostic Values of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Clinical Outcomes in Patients on Chronic Hemodialysis.

The fractional flow reserve (FFR) cut-off values of 0.75 or 0.8 have been widely used; however, whether they apply to patients on hemodialysis remains unknown. We aimed to investigate the cut-off value of FFR associated with clinical outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. Using the Japanese multicenter registry, we analyzed data of patients on hemodialysis with measured FFR between January 2010 and December 2016. Survival classification and regression tree analysis for the composite primary outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization revealed a threshold FFR of 0.83. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed for the clinical outcomes. Additionally, the primary outcome was analyzed using propensity score matching by dividing the patients into complete and incomplete revascularization groups according to the presence of residual lesions with an FFR of ≤0.83 after the intervention. Of the 212 included patients, 112 (52.8%) had lesions with an FFR of ≤0.83. After adjusting for confounders, an FFR of ≤0.83 was associated with a higher risk for the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.66, p = 0.021). Propensity score matching showed that complete revascularization for lesions with an FFR of ≤0.83 was associated with a reduced risk for the primary outcome compared with incomplete revascularization (hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.71, log-rank p = 0.0016). In conclusion, an FFR of ≤0.83 was an independent predictor of clinical events in patients on hemodialysis. Furthermore, complete revascularization was associated with better clinical outcomes. Thus, this population may require a distinct FFR cut-off value.

Deferred Versus Performed Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease With Hemodynamic Significance.

BACKGROUND: The majority of randomized controlled trials of revascularization decision-making excludes left main coronary artery disease (LMD). Therefore, contemporary clinical outcomes of patients with stable coronary artery disease and LMD with proven ischemia remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of physiologically significant LMD according to the treatment strategies of revascularization versus revascularization deferral. METHODS: In this international multicenter registry of stable LMD interrogated with the instantaneous wave-free ratio, patients with physiologically significant ischemia (instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89) were analyzed according to the coronary revascularization (n=151) versus revascularization deferral (n=74). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary end point was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem. The secondary end points were as follows: cardiac death or spontaneous LMD-related myocardial infarction; and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem. RESULTS: At a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (14.9%) in the revascularized group and 21 patients (28.4%) in the deferred group (hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.20-0.89]; P=0.023). For the secondary end points, cardiac death or LMD-related myocardial infarction occurred significantly less frequently in the revascularized group (0.0% versus 8.1%; P=0.004). The rate of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization of left main stem was also significantly lower in the revascularized group (5.4% versus 17.6%; hazard ratio, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.056-0.70]; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent revascularization for stable coronary artery disease and physiologically significant LMD determined by instantaneous wave-free ratio, the long-term clinical outcomes were significantly improved as compared with those in whom revascularization was deferred.

Multimodality imaging to identify lipid-rich coronary plaques and predict periprocedural myocardial injury: Association between near-infrared spectroscopy and coronary computed tomography angiography.

Background: This study compares the efficacy of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) in patients with significant coronary stenosis for predicting periprocedural myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We prospectively enrolled 107 patients who underwent CCTA before PCI and performed NIRS-IVUS during PCI. Based on the maximal lipid core burden index for any 4-mm longitudinal segments (maxLCBI4mm) in the culprit lesion, we divided the patients into two groups: lipid-rich plaque (LRP) group (maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400; n = 48) and no-LRP group (maxLCBI4mm < 400; n = 59). Periprocedural myocardial injury was a postprocedural cardiac troponin T (cTnT) elevation of ≥5 times the upper limit of normal. Results: The LRP group had a significantly higher cTnT (p = 0.026), lower CT density (p < 0.001), larger percentage atheroma volume (PAV) by NIRS-IVUS (p = 0.036), and larger remodeling index measured by both CCTA (p = 0.020) and NIRS-IVUS (p < 0.001). A significant negative linear correlation was found between maxLCBI4mm and CT density (rho = -0.552, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified maxLCBI4mm [odds ratio (OR): 1.006, p = 0.003] and PAV (OR: 1.125, p = 0.014) as independent predictors of periprocedural myocardial injury, while CT density was not an independent predictor (OR: 0.991, p = 0.22). Conclusion: CCTA and NIRS-IVUS correlated well to identify LRP in culprit lesions. However, NIRS-IVUS was more competent in predicting the risk of periprocedural myocardial injury.

Physiology-guided PCI versus CABG for left main coronary artery disease: insights from the DEFINE-LM registry.

There have been no studies comparing clinical outcomes of physiology-guided revascularization in patients with unprotected left main coronary disease (ULMD) between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes between PCI and CABG of patients with physiologically significant ULMD. From an international multicenter registry of ULMD patients interrogated with instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), we analyzed data from 151 patients (85 PCI vs. 66 CABG) who underwent revascularization according to the cutoff value of iFR ≤ 0.89. Propensity score matching was employed to adjust for baseline clinical characteristics. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization. The secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint. Mean age was 66.6 (± 9.2) years, 79.2% male. Mean SYNTAX score was 22.6 (± 8.4) and median iFR was 0.83 (IQR 0.74-0.87). After performing propensity score matching analysis, 48 patients treated with CABG were matched to those who underwent PCI. At a median follow-up period of 2.8 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 8.3% in PCI group and 20.8% in CABG group, respectively (HR 3.80; 95% CI 1.04-13.9; p = 0.043). There was no difference in each component of the primary event (p > 0.05 for all). Within the present study, iFR-guided PCI was associated with lower cardiovascular events rate in patients with ULMD and intermediate SYNTAX score, as compared to CABG. State-of-the-art PCI vs. CABG for ULMD. Study design and primary endpoint in patients with physiologically significant ULMD. MACE was defined as the composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. The blue line denotes the PCI arm, and the red line denotes the CABG arm. PCI was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE than CABG. CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; iFR: instantaneous wave-free ratio; MACE: major adverse cardiovascular events; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; ULMD: unprotected left main coronary artery disease.

Impact of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction on Coronary Physiological Assessment.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which is known to occasionally have coronary artery disease as concomitant disease may require coronary physiological assessment (Okayama et al., 2015; Shin et al., 2019 [1,2]). However, no study clarified the impact of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction on coronary physiological assessment. Herein, a case of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy concomitant with moderate coronary lesion was reported, in which dynamic change of physiological values was observed during pharmacological intervention. Specifically, fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) changed in an opposite fashion when the left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient was decreased by intravenous propranolol and cibenzoline: in FFR from 0.83 to 0.79 and in RFR from 0.73 to 0.91. Cardiologists should pay attention to the presence of concomitant cardiovascular disorders in interpreting coronary physiological data.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve Using Pressure Wire-Based Fractional Flow Reserve as a Reference.

BACKGROUND: Angiographic fractional flow reserve (angioFFR) is a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) application. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of angioFFR to detect hemodynamically relevant coronary artery disease.Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with 30-90% angiographic stenoses and invasive FFR measurements were included in this prospective, single-center study conducted between November 2018 and February 2020. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using invasive FFR as the reference standard. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, gradients of invasive FFR and angioFFR in the pre-senting segments were compared. We assessed 253 vessels (200 patients). The accuracy of angioFFR was 87.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.1-91.5%), with a sensitivity of 76.8% (95% CI 67.1-84.9%), specificity of 94.3% (95% CI 89.5-97.4%), and area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.86-0.93%). AngioFFR was well correlated with invasive FFR (r=0.76; 95% CI 0.71-0.81; P<0.001). The agreement was 0.003 (limits of agreement: -0.13, 0.14). The FFR gradients of angioFFR and invasive FFR were comparable (n=51; mean [±SD] 0.22±0.10 vs. 0.22±0.11, respectively; P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based angioFFR showed good diagnostic accuracy for detecting hemodynamically relevant stenosis using invasive FFR as the reference standard. The gradients of invasive FFR and angioFFR in the pre-stenting segments were comparable.

Unmasking the severity of aortic stenosis by pharmacological elimination of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction: a case report.

Background: Left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction may occur with aortic stenosis (AS). However, the severity of AS is difficult to determine in this condition because the dynamic pressure gradient in LVOT obstruction influences the blood flow across the aortic valve. Case summary: A 74-year-old woman was referred to our hospital having complaints of exertional dyspnoea and chest pain. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated LVOT obstruction with peak pressure gradient of 93 mmHg and 'moderate' AS with 3.9 m/s peak velocity and mean pressure gradient of 26 mmHg. Coronary angiography did not indicate any significant coronary artery disease. The pressure gradients at LVOT and aortic valve were measured as 34 mmHg and 76 mmHg via a pressure wire-pullback analysis, respectively. Intravenous 2 mg propranolol and 70 mg cibenzoline were administered to minimize the LVOT obstruction. Subsequently, these pressure gradients changed to 2 mmHg and 96 mmHg, respectively. The patient was finally diagnosed with 'severe' AS concomitant with LVOT obstruction. Therefore, surgical aortic valve replacement and myectomy were performed to remove the double obstruction. Discussion: Herein, we present a case of 'double' LVOT obstruction due to dynamic myocardial component and fixed aortic component. Although the severity of AS is known to be influenced by LVOT obstruction, the present case is novel to demonstrate the phenomenon by using a pressure wire during pharmacological intervention. An accurate evaluation of the AS severity is important to provide adequate treatment. Therefore, the severity of AS should be evaluated while minimizing the LVOT obstruction.

Dynamic improvement of an acute exacerbated subaortic pressure gradient after intravenous propranolol and cibenzoline, recorded using a pressure wire: a case report.

Background: Beta-blockers and Class 1A antiarrhythmics decrease the subaortic pressure gradient in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. However, real-time monitoring of the pressure gradient transition during intravenous therapy, based on cardiac catheterization, has never been reported. Case summary: A 52-year-old man, with an history of hypertension, was transferred to our hospital, complaining of angina. A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed diffuse ST-segment depression, and transthoracic echocardiography revealed a thickened left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) septum, resulting in LVOT obstruction which had never been diagnosed. Besides, severe mitral regurgitation (MR) due to systolic anterior motion was detected. Emergent cardiac catheterization revealed normal coronary arteries and severe MR. Simultaneous pressure measurements were taken at the ascending aorta (using a coronary catheter) and left ventricle (using a pressure wire). The subaortic systolic pressure gradient was 147 mmHg: 251 mmHg in the left ventricle and 104 mmHg in the aorta. Intravenous cibenzoline, following propranolol, was administered to ameliorate the pressure gradient, following which his chest pain disappeared immediately; the pressure gradient decreased to 13 mmHg. Further, severe MR was diminished. Oral bisoprolol and cibenzoline administration effectively stabilized his condition after catheterization. Discussion: Monitoring the simultaneous pressure between the left ventricle and aorta with a pressure wire revealed drastic improvement in the subaortic systolic pressure gradient. Owing to the soft, fine structure, the pressure wire allowed recording of the subaortic pressure gradient stably with less frequent premature ventricular contractions. Furthermore, this method could decrease the burden of catheter-related complications by eliminating the need for multiple atrial punctures.

Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio are widely accepted and recommended in Western and Japanese guidelines for appropriate percutaneous coronary intervention. There are, however, many differences in clinical situations between Japan and Western countries. Therefore, the Task Force on coronary physiology of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) has proposed an expert consensus document to summarize current evidence and suggest the practical use of physiological lesion assessment in Japan.