CAR T-cell therapy: A collaboration between authorized treatment centers and community oncologists.

With the approval of the first CAR T-cell products for hematological malignancies in 2017, these autologous cell therapies have changed the treatment paradigm for patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), who have a poor prognosis and few effective treatment options. Despite the demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with r/r diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, and follicular lymphoma, many patients who are eligible for CAR T-cell therapies do not receive them or are treated with CAR T cells as a later line of therapy at advanced stages of disease. Several barriers exist for referring patients to an authorized treatment center (ATC) for CAR T-cell therapy. Although most patients with NHL are treated by community-based oncologists, educational gaps may exist for some community oncologists about the availability of CAR T-cell therapies in certain indications, the overall treatment process, and how they can access these therapies for their patients. In addition to navigation of the referral process from the community setting to the ATC, other barriers include timely identification of candidates eligible for CAR T-cell therapy and logistical and reimbursement concerns. Here, we examine the patient CAR T-cell experience, which begins and ends in the community setting, and identify and discuss opportunities for improved collaboration between community oncologists and ATC physicians to help address barriers to treatment and enhance patient outcomes. Treatment decisions for a patient's second or third line of therapy for NHL are critically important, owing to declining probabilities for favorable outcomes with each successive line of therapy. For patients who are eligible, CAR T-cell therapies should be considered as early as possible in their treatment course. A better understanding of the CAR T-cell process, the patient's experience, and the collaboration necessary for timely patient identification, better access, and successful outcomes will enable more patients to benefit from CAR T-cell therapies.

A randomized, multicenter trial assessing the effects of rapastinel compared to ketamine, alprazolam, and placebo on simulated driving performance.

N-methyl-D-aspartate ionotropic glutamatergic receptor (NMDAR) modulators, including rapastinel and ketamine, elicit rapid and sustained antidepressant responses in patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. This phase I, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, five-period, crossover, single-dose study evaluated simulated driving performance of healthy participants (N = 107) after single doses of rapastinel slow intravenous (i.v.) bolus 900 and 1800 mg, alprazolam oral 0.75 mg (positive control), ketamine i.v. infusion 0.5 mg/kg (clinical comparator), and placebo ~ 45 min before driving. The primary end point was SD of lateral position (SDLP) during the 60-min 100-km simulated driving scenario. Additional measures of driving performance, sleepiness, and cognition were also evaluated. To assess effects over time, mean SDLP was calculated for each 10-min interval of driving. Sensitivity of the assays was confirmed with alprazolam (all placebo comparisons p < 0.02). Rapastinel 900 and 1800 mg did not significantly affect simulated driving performance compared to placebo (both p > 0.5). Both rapastinel doses resulted in significantly less impaired driving compared to alprazolam or ketamine (all p < 0.002); ketamine significantly impaired driving compared to placebo (p = 0.0001). Results for the additional measures were similar to the primary end point. No new safety signals were observed for any study interventions. This first study of rapastinel effects on simulated driving found that rapastinel 900 and 1800 mg did not impair driving performance, but ketamine 0.5 mg/kg resulted in significantly impaired driving performance. Ketamine's effects on driving were maintained for at least 105 min, indicating that clinicians should be vigilant to prevent or postpone driving in patients after ketamine treatment.

Simulated driving performance in healthy adults after night-time administration of 20 mg tasimelteon.

An impairment in next day driving performance has been reported for almost every drug currently United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for improvement of sleep in chronic and transient insomnia. Tasimelteon, a melatonin receptor agonist, demonstrated significant improvements in night-time sleep, daytime naps, and sleep timing in non-24-hr sleep-wake disorder (Non-24) by entraining these patients to a 24-hr day as measured by melatonin and cortisol rhythms. Given this new mechanism of action of entraining the biological clock, we conducted a study to evaluate the potential effect tasimelteon may have on the ability to operate a motor vehicle. The study was conducted in 48 healthy adult subjects using a randomised, double-blind, placebo and active (zopiclone 7.5 mg) controlled study with a 3-period cross-over design. Driving performance was assessed by measuring standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP) using the validated Cognitive Research Corporation Driving Simulator-MiniSim. The difference in least square mean SDLP for tasimelteon was 1.22 cm reflecting a non-significant increase in SDLP change from placebo (p = .1119). In contrast, treatment with the active control, zopiclone 7.5 mg, was associated with a meaningful and significant increase in SDLP, change from placebo for zopiclone was 4.14 cm (p < .0001). The lack of clinically meaningful and statistically significant finding with tasimelteon was further supported by the symmetry analysis, which showed the distribution of within-subject differences between tasimelteon and placebo was symmetric about zero. At the FDA-approved 20 mg dose to treat Non-24, tasimelteon did not impair next-day driving performance compared to placebo in adult healthy volunteers.

Safety and Tolerability of GRF6019 Infusions in Severe Alzheimer's Disease: A Phase II Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The plasma fraction GRF6019 shows multiple benefits on brain aging in mice, including enhanced cognition, neurogenesis, and synaptic density, as well as reduced neuroinflammation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of GRF6019 in patients with severe Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: A phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with severe AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score 0-10). Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to GRF6019 (N = 18) or placebo (N = 8) and received daily 250 mL intravenous infusions over 5 days. The primary endpoints were the rates of adverse events (AEs) and the tolerability of GRF6019 as assessed by the number of patients completing the study. Change from baseline in cognitive and functional assessments was also evaluated. RESULTS: All patients completed 100%of study visits and infusions. The rate of AEs was similar in the GRF6019 (8/18 patients [44.4%]) and placebo (3/8 patients [37.5%]) groups, and there were no deaths or serious AEs. The most common AEs considered related to treatment were mild, transient changes in blood pressure in the GRF6019 group (hypotension: 2 patients [11.1%]; hypertension: 1 patient [5.6%]); there were no related AEs in the placebo group. The trial was not powered to detect statistically significant differences between treatment groups. At the end of the study, patients in both treatment groups remained stable or improved on all cognitive and functional endpoints. CONCLUSION: GRF6019 demonstrated excellent safety, feasibility, and tolerability. Future trials designed to characterize the potential functional benefits of GRF6019 and related plasma fractions in severe AD are warranted.

Safety and tolerability of GRF6019 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease dementia.

INTRODUCTION: This phase 2 trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of repeated infusions of the plasma fraction GRF6019 in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, dose-comparison trial, 47 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive daily infusions of 100 mL (n = 24) or 250 mL (n = 23) of GRF6019 for 5 consecutive days over two dosing periods separated by a treatment-free interval of 3 months. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the enrolled patients was 74.3 (6.9), and 62% were women. Most adverse events (55%) were mild, with no clinically significant differences in safety or tolerability between the two dose levels. The mean (SD) baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score was 20.6 (3.7) in the 100 mL group and 19.6 (3.7) in the 250 mL group; at 24 weeks, the within-patient mean change from baseline was -1.0 points (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.1 to 1.1) in the 100 mL group and +1.5 points (95% CI, -0.4 to 3.3) in the 250 mL group. The within-patient mean change from baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale was -0.4 points (95% CI, -2.9 to 2.2) in the 100 mL group, while in the 250 mL group it was -0.9 points (95% CI, -3.0 to 1.2). The within-patient mean change from baseline on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living was -0.7 points in the 100 mL group (95% CI, -4.3 to 3.0) and -1.3 points (95% CI, -3.4 to 0.7) in the 250 mL group. The mean change from baseline on the Category Fluency Test, Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes, Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire was similar for both treatment groups and did not show any worsening. DISCUSSION: GRF6019 was safe and well tolerated, and patients experienced no cognitive decline and minimal functional decline. These results support further development of GRF6019.

NSI-189 phosphate, a novel neurogenic compound, selectively benefits moderately depressed patients: A post-hoc analysis of a phase 2 study of major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: NSI-189 phosphate (NSI-189) is a novel neurogenic molecule with pleiotropic properties, including antidepressant, procognitive, synaptoplastic, and neurotrophic activities demonstrated in preclinical studies. Its antidepressant activity is monoamine-independent. NSI-189 was previously tested in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder in an inpatient setting. METHODS: This study involved 220 patients randomized to an NSI-189 40-mg dose, NSI-189 80-mg dose, or placebo daily for 12 weeks. The study utilized the sequential parallel comparison design, in which the drug effect was tested in 2 separate stages of 6 weeks each. Herein, post-hoc analyses of the data are presented. RESULTS: NSI-189's antidepressant effect increased when the participants' initial baseline depression severity was dichotomized along a Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 30. The NSI-189 80-mg dose showed significant benefit over placebo when utilizing the MADRS-6 (P = .046) in the subgroup of patients who were moderately depressed (MADRS < 30) but was not significant in patients who were severely depressed (MADRS ≥30). More pronounced procognitive effects were also observed in the moderate subgroup relative to the severe subgroup or the whole study group, in which 11/36 (31%), 5/36 (14%), or 7/36 (19%) of CogScreen variables significantly improved, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that NSI-189 is effective as a safe adjunctive therapy, with most compelling antidepressant and procognitive benefits noted in patients with moderate depression.

An assessment of the centrally acting muscle relaxant tolperisone on driving ability and cognitive effects compared to placebo and cyclobenzaprine.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Tolperisone is a centrally acting muscle relaxant under development in the United States as a treatment for acute and painful symptoms of muscle spasms. The objective of this three-way, randomized, blinded, three-period crossover study was to assess the safety and cognitive effects of tolperisone compared to placebo and the widely used muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms to receive tolperisone (150 mg), cyclobenzaprine (10 mg) or placebo 3 times per day (TID) in 3 separate study periods. Subjects completed a driving test on the Cognitive Research Corporation's Driving Simulator (CRCDS Mini-Sim), a validated driving simulator, on day 1 at time to maximum plasma concentration, on day 2 before the morning dose of study drug and on day 3 at steady state following the morning dose. Subjects were assessed on various driving parameters and on a computer-administered digit-symbol substitution test (CogScreen symbol digit coding test). The driving scenario is a monotonous 100 km highway route on which subjects are instructed to maintain speed and lane position. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The performance of subjects who had received tolperisone was not significantly different from those who had received placebo in terms of the primary end point: standard deviation of lateral position, a measure of weaving. Subjects who had received tolperisone also performed comparably to those who had received placebo on a range of secondary measures assessing driving ability, cognition and psychomotor performance. In contrast, subjects who had received cyclobenzaprine showed significant impairment compared to placebo (P < .01) on the primary end point of standard deviation of lateral position and on the majority of the secondary end points of driving ability. Despite their markedly poorer driving performance after receiving cyclobenzaprine, few subjects reported feeling unsafe to drive on day 1 (10.3%) and day 2 (3.4%). The incidence of adverse events was similar for tolperisone (36.4%) and placebo (29.0%) and was greater for cyclobenzaprine (45.4%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Subjects who received tolperisone (150 mg TID) experienced no impact on various measures of driving, self-reported sleepiness and cognition measures compared to placebo, in contrast to those who received the widely used muscle relaxant cyclobenzaprine (10 mg TID).

Effects of lasmiditan on simulated driving performance: Results of two randomized, blinded, crossover studies with placebo and active controls.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of lasmiditan, an oral, centrally-penetrant, selective serotonin 1F (5-HT1F ) receptor agonist developed for the acute treatment of migraine, on simulated driving. METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers enrolled in two randomized, placebo and active comparator-controlled, crossover studies. Study 1 (N = 90) tested lasmiditan (50-, 100-, 200-mg), alprazolam (1-mg), and placebo at 1.5 hr post-dose. Study 2 (N = 68) tested lasmiditan (100-, 200-mg), diphenhydramine (50-mg, administered 2 hr pre-assessments), and placebo at 8, 12 and 24 hr post-dose. Driving performance was assessed using a validated driving simulator employing a 100 km driving scenario. Standard deviation of lateral position (SDLP), a measure of lane position control, was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: Assay sensitivity was confirmed by increased SDLP for active comparators at 1.5- and 8-hr time points. Lasmiditan doses showed significant driving impairment versus placebo at 1.5 hr post-dose. Lasmiditan doses were non-inferior to placebo at 8 hr. Driving impairment was concentration-dependent at 1.5 hr but not at 8 hr. Common adverse events were central nervous system-related and mild-to-moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Lasmiditan was associated with impaired simulated driving performance at 1.5 hr post-dose, but showed no clinically meaningful impairment at 8 hr post-dose.

Next-day residual effects of flibanserin on simulated driving performance in premenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the next-day residual effects of acute and steady-state nighttime dosing of flibanserin on simulated driving performance and cognitive function in healthy premenopausal women. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study, 72 subjects were treated with either acute oral doses of placebo, zopiclone 7.5 mg (positive control) or flibanserin 100 mg at bedtime (indicated therapeutic dose), or after chronic nightly oral doses of flibanserin 100 mg for 1 week followed by a single bedtime dose of flibanserin 200 mg (supratherapeutic dose). Simulated driving assessments were conducted 9 hr after dosing and cognitive function tests were administered immediately before or during the driving assessment. RESULTS: Zopiclone increased standard deviation of lateral position (≥3.1 cm; p < .0001) relative to placebo and impaired other parameters previously shown to be sensitive to sedation. No impairment was detected for flibanserin at either dose relative to placebo. Flibanserin 200 mg was similar to the 100-mg dose on cognitive testing and driving performance even though commonly reported adverse events for flibanserin were predictably increased at the higher dose. CONCLUSIONS: At both therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, flibanserin did not impair next-day driving performance and cognitive function compared to placebo.

Next-day residual effects of gabapentin, diphenhydramine, and triazolam on simulated driving performance in healthy volunteers: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

OBJECTIVE: Next-day residual effects of a nighttime dose of gabapentin 250 mg were evaluated on simulated driving performance in healthy participants in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, four-period crossover study that included diphenhydramine citrate 76 mg and triazolam 0.5 mg. METHODS: At treatment visits, participants (n = 59) were dosed at ~23:30, went to bed immediately, and awakened 6.5 h postdose for evaluation. The primary endpoint was the standard deviation of lateral position for the 100-km driving scenario. Additional measures of driving, sleepiness, and cognition were included. RESULTS: Study sensitivity was established with triazolam, which demonstrated significant next-day impairment on all driving endpoints, relative to placebo (p < 0.001). Gabapentin demonstrated noninferiority to placebo on standard deviation of lateral position and speed deviation but not for lane excursions. Diphenhydramine citrate demonstrated significant impairment relative to gabapentin and placebo on speed deviation (p < 0.05). Other comparisons were either nonsignificant or statistically ineligible per planned, sequential comparisons. Secondary endpoints for sleepiness and cognitive performance were supportive of these conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: Together, these data suggest that low-dose gabapentin had no appreciable next-day effects on simulated driving performance or cognitive functioning. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

A randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the sensitivity of the CRCDS Mini-Sim to the next-day residual effects of zopiclone.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to validate Cognitive Research Corporation's Driving Simulator (CRCDS Mini-Sim) for studies of drug safety with respect to driving ability. METHODS: A total of 30 healthy subjects were randomized to receive placebo or 7.5 mg zopiclone, a hypnotic known to impair driving, in random order during the 2 treatment periods of a 2 period crossover design. RESULTS: Evening administration of 7.5 mg zopiclone increased next-day standard deviation of lateral lane position (SDLP) by 2.62 cm on average compared with evening administration of placebo, and caused significant effects on symmetry analysis. The magnitude of the change in SDLP is highly similar to changes previously observed using on-the-road driving methods. CONCLUSIONS: Further validation of the CRCDS Mini-Sim is warranted to develop this platform for drug safety studies.

Relationship Between Obesity and Driving.

Obesity, which has become epidemic throughout many parts of the world, is known to be a risk factor for a range of diseases including hypertension, diabetes, and vascular disease. Based on this review, it also appears that obesity is associated with increased crash risk and increased risk of serious or fatal injury in a crash. The problem is particularly an issue for commercial truck drivers. Data are presented showing the high prevalence of obesity in truck drivers. Inadequate sleep, poor nutrition, lack of exercise, and the sedentary nature of driving all contribute to the risk of obesity. The obesity related condition of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is known to increase crash risk. Treatment of this condition has been demonstrated to improve driving performance and to reduce crash risk. Screening truck drivers for obesity related health conditions, such as OSA, would be expected to result in public safety benefits.

Early-stage comparative effectiveness: randomized controlled trial with histamine inverse agonist MK-7288 in excessive daytime sleepiness patients.

Histaminergic neurons are regulators of the sleep-wake cycle. We evaluated the alerting effects of MK-7288 (10, 20 mg), a novel histamine-3 receptor inverse agonist (H3RIA), along with modafinil (200 mg), a standard treatment, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of 56 patients with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Efficacy was assessed using maintenance of wakefulness tests (MWT) and car driving simulation tests. MK-7288 and modafinil significantly prolonged MWT sleep latency (improvements vs. placebo of 8.1 to 8.2 min for MK-7288 and 10.2 min for modafinil), and improved car driving simulation standard deviation of lane position (reduction vs. placebo of -0.1 m for each treatment). MK-7288 was associated with more insomnia (29%) than modafinil (9%) and placebo (6%). The study demonstrated the potential of the H3RIA mechanism for treating EDS, but did not show efficacy differentiation from modafinil. Early-stage comparative effectiveness can help prevent late-stage failure and increase the cost-effectiveness of drug development.

Effects of armodafinil on simulated driving and self-report measures in obstructive sleep apnea patients prior to treatment with continuous positive airway pressure.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been associated with an increased risk of motor vehicle crashes. This driving risk can be reduced (≥ 50%) by treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However residual excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) can persist for some patients who regularly use CPAP. The current study was designed to assess the effect of armodafinil on simulated driving performance and subsequent CPAP treatment compliance in newly diagnosed OSA patients with EDS during a 2-week "waiting period" prior to initiation of CPAP. METHODS: Sixty-nine newly diagnosed OSA patients, awaiting CPAP therapy, were randomized (1:1) to placebo or armodafinil (150 mg/day) treatment. Simulated driving tests and self-report measures were completed at baseline, after 2 weeks of drug treatment, and following 6 weeks of CPAP treatment. CPAP compliance was evaluated at the end of 6 weeks of CPAP. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, armodafinil improved simulated driving safety performance in OSA patients awaiting CPAP therapy (p = 0.03). Improvement was seen in lane position deviation (p = 0.002) and number of lane excursions (p = 0.02). Improvement was also observed on measures of sleepiness using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and sleep related quality of life. Following 6 weeks of CPAP, there was also significant improvement observed on multiple measures of simulated driving performance. CPAP compliance did not differ between armodafinil-treated and placebo-treated patients (p = 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: Armodafinil was found to improve simulated driving performance in OSA patients with EDS prior to initiation of CPAP. Treatment with armodafinil showed no effect on subsequent CPAP compliance.

Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea patients: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the neurocognitive effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES) was a 6-month, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, sham-controlled, multicenter trial conducted at 5 U.S. university, hospital, or private practices. Of 1,516 participants enrolled, 1,105 were randomized, and 1,098 participants diagnosed with OSA contributed to the analysis of the primary outcome measures. INTERVENTION: Active or sham CPAP MEASUREMENTS: THREE NEUROCOGNITIVE VARIABLES, EACH REPRESENTING A NEUROCOGNITIVE DOMAIN: Pathfinder Number Test-Total Time (attention and psychomotor function [A/P]), Buschke Selective Reminding Test-Sum Recall (learning and memory [L/M]), and Sustained Working Memory Test-Overall Mid-Day Score (executive and frontal-lobe function [E/F]) RESULTS: The primary neurocognitive analyses showed a difference between groups for only the E/F variable at the 2 month CPAP visit, but no difference at the 6 month CPAP visit or for the A/P or L/M variables at either the 2 or 6 month visits. When stratified by measures of OSA severity (AHI or oxygen saturation parameters), the primary E/F variable and one secondary E/F neurocognitive variable revealed transient differences between study arms for those with the most severe OSA. Participants in the active CPAP group had a significantly greater ability to remain awake whether measured subjectively by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale or objectively by the maintenance of wakefulness test. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP treatment improved both subjectively and objectively measured sleepiness, especially in individuals with severe OSA (AHI > 30). CPAP use resulted in mild, transient improvement in the most sensitive measures of executive and frontal-lobe function for those with severe disease, which suggests the existence of a complex OSA-neurocognitive relationship. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: Registered at clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00051363. CITATION: Kushida CA; Nichols DA; Holmes TH; Quan SF; Walsh JK; Gottlieb DJ; Simon RD; Guilleminault C; White DP; Goodwin JL; Schweitzer PK; Leary EB; Hyde PR; Hirshkowitz M; Green S; McEvoy LK; Chan C; Gevins A; Kay GG; Bloch DA; Crabtree T; Demen WC. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on neurocognitive function in obstructive sleep apnea patients: the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). SLEEP 2012;35(12):1593-1602.

Cognitive effects of oxybutynin chloride topical gel in older healthy subjects: a 1-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Oxybutynin is a common antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder. Transdermally administered oxybutynin chloride topical gel 10% (OTG) has a low propensity for anticholinergic adverse effects and possibly also a low risk of cognitive impairment. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled study evaluated the effects of OTG on cognitive and psychomotor functions in older healthy adults. METHODS: Healthy adults aged 60-79 years were assigned randomly (1:1:1) to 1-week's treatment with OTG (1 g [100 mg oxybutynin] applied once daily on rotating sites of upper arms/shoulders, abdomen or thighs) plus oral placebo, immediate-release oxybutynin (OXB-IR; 5 mg capsule three times/day) plus placebo gel, or double placebo. Delayed recall Name-Face Association Test (NFAT) score was the primary end point. Treatments were compared by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Of 152 participants (mean age, 68 years), 49 received OTG, 52 OXB-IR and 51 placebo. NFAT Delayed Recall tests revealed no significant treatment differences (overall, p = 0.2733; OTG vs placebo, p = 0.1551; OXB-IR vs placebo, p = 0.1767). However, a significant effect (p = 0.0294) was noted for the Misplaced Objects Test, with scores declining only for OXB-IR. Approximately twice as many participants receiving OXB-IR (n = 10) as those receiving OTG (n = 5) or placebo (n = 6) showed a significant decline (≥6 points) in Total Recall score for the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised. No significant effects on psychomotor reaction time were observed. The most common adverse event, dry mouth, occurred in 6.1%, 73.1% and 7.8% of participants receiving OTG, OXB-IR and placebo, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: OTG applied for 1 week had no clinically meaningful effect on recent memory or other cognitive functions in healthy, older adults. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered as NCT00752141 at www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Changes in body weight and psychotropic drugs: a systematic synthesis of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Psychotropic medication use is associated with weight gain. While there are studies and reviews comparing weight gain for psychotropics within some classes, clinicians frequently use drugs from different classes to treat psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: To undertake a systematic review of all classes of psychotropics to provide an all encompassing evidence-based tool that would allow clinicians to determine the risks of weight gain in making both intra-class and interclass choices of psychotropics. METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS: We developed a novel hierarchical search strategy that made use of systematic reviews that were already available. When such evidence was not available we went on to evaluate randomly controlled trials, followed by cohort and other clinical trials, narrative reviews, and, where necessary, clinical opinion and anecdotal evidence. The data from the publication with the highest level of evidence based on our hierarchical classification was presented. Recommendations from an expert panel supplemented the evidence used to rank these drugs within their respective classes. Approximately 9500 articles were identified in our literature search of which 666 citations were retrieved. We were able to rank most of the psychotropics based on the available evidence and recommendations from subject matter experts. There were few discrepancies between published evidence and the expert panel in ranking these drugs. CONCLUSION: Potential for weight gain is an important consideration in choice of any psychotropic. This tool will help clinicians select psychotropics on a case-by-case basis in order to minimize the impact of weight gain when making both intra-class and interclass choices.

Evaluation of cognitive function in healthy older subjects treated with fesoterodine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cognitive effects of fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg versus placebo in healthy older adults. METHODS: This was an active- and placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy crossover study conducted using healthy volunteers (aged 65-85 years) with baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥ 26. The study comprised 4 treatment periods: fesoterodine 4 mg for 6 days; fesoterodine 4 mg for 3 days followed by fesoterodine 8 mg for 3 days; placebo for 6 days; and placebo for 6 days with alprazolam 1 mg on day 6. The treatment sequence was randomized, with a 3- to 6-day washout between periods. Subjects completed computer-based cognitive assessments and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test on day 1 (before dosing) and day 6 (after dosing) of each period. The primary endpoint was the Detection task; secondary endpoints were the Identification task, 1-card learning task, Continuous Paired Associate Learning task, Groton Maze Learning Task, and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. RESULTS: Among 18 subjects in the per protocol set, changes from baseline to day 6 with fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg were not significantly different from placebo for any endpoint (P > 0.05); alprazolam produced significant impairment in all endpoints versus placebo (P < 0.05). No serious adverse events were reported; the most common adverse events were dry mouth for fesoterodine and sedation for alprazolam. No sedation was reported with fesoterodine. CONCLUSION: In healthy older adults, fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg once daily had no statistically significant effects versus placebo on any cognitive function assessed, including memory; alprazolam 1 mg produced statistically significant deterioration.

Blood-brain barrier permeation and efflux exclusion of anticholinergics used in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a common condition, particularly in the elderly. Anticholinergic agents are the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of OAB; however, many anticholinergics can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and may cause central nervous system (CNS) effects, including cognitive deficits, which can be especially detrimental in older patients. Many anticholinergics have the potential to cause adverse CNS effects due to muscarinic (M(1)) receptor binding in the brain. Of note, permeability of the BBB increases with age and can also be affected by trauma, stress, and some diseases and medications. Passive crossing of a molecule across the BBB into the brain is dependent upon its physicochemical properties. Molecular characteristics that hinder passive BBB penetration include a large molecular size, positive or negative ionic charge at physiological pH, and a hydrophilic structure. Active transport across the BBB is dependent upon protein-mediated transporter systems, such as that of permeability-glycoprotein (P-gp), which occurs only for P-gp substrates, such as trospium chloride, darifenacin and fesoterodine. Reliance on active transport can be problematic since genetic polymorphisms of P-gp exist, and many commonly used drugs and even some foods are P-gp inhibitors or are substrates themselves and, due to competition, can reduce the amount of the drug that is actively transported out of the CNS. Therefore, for drugs that are preferred not to cross into the CNS, such as potent anticholinergics intended for the bladder, it is optimal to have minimal passive crossing of the BBB, although it may also be beneficial for the drug to be a substrate for an active efflux transport system. Anticholinergics demonstrate different propensities to cross the BBB. Darifenacin, fesoterodine and trospium chloride are substrates for P-gp and, therefore, are actively transported away from the brain. In addition, trospium chloride has not been detected in cerebrospinal fluid assays and does not appear to have significant CNS penetration. This article reviews the properties of anticholinergics that affect BBB penetration and active transport out of the CNS, discusses issues of increased BBB permeability in patients with OAB, and examines the clinical implications of BBB penetration on adverse events associated with anticholinergics.

The association between obstructive sleep apnea and neurocognitive performance--the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES).

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and neurocognitive performance in a large cohort of adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analyses of polysomnographic and neurocognitive data from 1204 adult participants with a clinical diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES), assessed at baseline before randomization to either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or sham CPAP. MEASUREMENTS: Sleep and respiratory indices obtained by laboratory polysomnography and several measures of neurocognitive performance. RESULTS: Weak correlations were found for both the apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and several indices of oxygen desaturation and neurocognitive performance in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for level of education, ethnicity, and gender, there was no association between the AHI and neurocognitive performance. However, severity of oxygen desaturation was weakly associated with worse neurocognitive performance on some measures of intelligence, attention, and processing speed. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of OSA on neurocognitive performance is small for many individuals with this condition and is most related to the severity of hypoxemia.