Structure of a 10-23 deoxyribozyme exhibiting a homodimer conformation.

Deoxyribozymes (DNAzymes) are in vitro evolved DNA sequences capable of catalyzing chemical reactions. The RNA-cleaving 10-23 DNAzyme was the first DNAzyme to be evolved and possesses clinical and biotechnical applications as a biosensor and a knockdown agent. DNAzymes do not require the recruitment of other components to cleave RNA and can turnover, thus they have a distinct advantage over other knockdown methods (siRNA, CRISPR, morpholinos). Despite this, a lack of structural and mechanistic information has hindered the optimization and application of the 10-23 DNAzyme. Here, we report a 2.7 Å crystal structure of the RNA-cleaving 10-23 DNAzyme in a homodimer conformation. Although proper coordination of the DNAzyme to substrate is observed along with intriguing patterns of bound magnesium ions, the dimer conformation likely does not capture the true catalytic form of the 10-23 DNAzyme.

The Two Non-Visual Arrestins Engage ERK2 Differently.

Arrestin binding to active phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors terminates G protein coupling and initiates another wave of signaling. Among the effectors that bind directly to receptor-associated arrestins are extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), which promote cellular proliferation and survival. Arrestins may also engage ERK1/2 in isolation in a pre- or post-signaling complex that is likely in equilibrium with the full signal initiation complex. Molecular details of these binary complexes remain unknown. Here, we investigate the molecular mechanisms whereby arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 (a.k.a. ß-arrestin1 and ß-arrestin2, respectively) engage ERK1/2 in pairwise interactions. We find that purified arrestin-3 binds ERK2 more avidly than arrestin-2. A combination of biophysical techniques and peptide array analysis demonstrates that the molecular basis in this difference of binding strength is that the two non-visual arrestins bind ERK2 via different parts of the molecule. We propose a structural model of the ERK2-arrestin-3 complex in solution using size-exclusion chromatography coupled to small angle X-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS). This binary complex exhibits conformational heterogeneity. We speculate that this drives the equilibrium either toward the full signaling complex with receptor-bound arrestin at the membrane or toward full dissociation in the cytoplasm. As ERK1/2 regulates cell migration, proliferation, and survival, understanding complexes that relate to its activation could be exploited to control cell fate.

Phosphorylation barcode-dependent signal bias of the dopamine D1 receptor.

Agonist-activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) must correctly select from hundreds of potential downstream signaling cascades and effectors. To accomplish this, GPCRs first bind to an intermediary signaling protein, such as G protein or arrestin. These intermediaries initiate signaling cascades that promote the activity of different effectors, including several protein kinases. The relative roles of G proteins versus arrestins in initiating and directing signaling is hotly debated, and it remains unclear how the correct final signaling pathway is chosen given the ready availability of protein partners. Here, we begin to deconvolute the process of signal bias from the dopamine D1 receptor (D1R) by exploring factors that promote the activation of ERK1/2 or Src, the kinases that lead to cell growth and proliferation. We found that ERK1/2 activation involves both arrestin and Gαs, while Src activation depends solely on arrestin. Interestingly, we found that the phosphorylation pattern influences both arrestin and Gαs coupling, suggesting an additional way the cells regulate G protein signaling. The phosphorylation sites in the D1R intracellular loop 3 are particularly important for directing the binding of G protein versus arrestin and for selecting between the activation of ERK1/2 and Src. Collectively, these studies correlate functional outcomes with a physical basis for signaling bias and provide fundamental information on how GPCR signaling is directed.

Arrestin-3 interaction with maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase.

Maternal embryonic leucine-zipper kinase (MELK) overexpression impacts survival and proliferation of multiple cancer types, most notably glioblastomas and breast cancer. This makes MELK an attractive molecular target for cancer therapy. Yet the molecular mechanisms underlying the involvement of MELK in tumorigenic processes are unknown. MELK participates in numerous protein-protein interactions that affect cell cycle, proliferation, apoptosis, and embryonic development. Here we used both in vitro and in-cell assays to identify a direct interaction between MELK and arrestin-3. A part of this interaction involves the MELK kinase domain, and we further show that the interaction between the MELK kinase domain and arrestin-3 decreases the number of cells in S-phase, as compared to cells expressing the MELK kinase domain alone. Thus, we describe a new mechanism of regulation of MELK function, which may contribute to the control of cell fate.

Arrestin-3 scaffolding of the JNK3 cascade suggests a mechanism for signal amplification.

Scaffold proteins tether and orient components of a signaling cascade to facilitate signaling. Although much is known about how scaffolds colocalize signaling proteins, it is unclear whether scaffolds promote signal amplification. Here, we used arrestin-3, a scaffold of the ASK1-MKK4/7-JNK3 cascade, as a model to understand signal amplification by a scaffold protein. We found that arrestin-3 exhibited >15-fold higher affinity for inactive JNK3 than for active JNK3, and this change involved a shift in the binding site following JNK3 activation. We used systems biochemistry modeling and Bayesian inference to evaluate how the activation of upstream kinases contributed to JNK3 phosphorylation. Our combined experimental and computational approach suggested that the catalytic phosphorylation rate of JNK3 at Thr-221 by MKK7 is two orders of magnitude faster than the corresponding phosphorylation of Tyr-223 by MKK4 with or without arrestin-3. Finally, we showed that the release of activated JNK3 was critical for signal amplification. Collectively, our data suggest a "conveyor belt" mechanism for signal amplification by scaffold proteins. This mechanism informs on a long-standing mystery for how few upstream kinase molecules activate numerous downstream kinases to amplify signaling.

GHSR-D2R heteromerization modulates dopamine signaling through an effect on G protein conformation.

The growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) and dopamine receptor (D2R) have been shown to oligomerize in hypothalamic neurons with a significant effect on dopamine signaling, but the molecular processes underlying this effect are still obscure. We used here the purified GHSR and D2R to establish that these two receptors assemble in a lipid environment as a tetrameric complex composed of two each of the receptors. This complex further recruits G proteins to give rise to an assembly with only two G protein trimers bound to a receptor tetramer. We further demonstrate that receptor heteromerization directly impacts on dopamine-mediated Gi protein activation by modulating the conformation of its α-subunit. Indeed, association to the purified GHSR:D2R heteromer triggers a different active conformation of Gαi that is linked to a higher rate of GTP binding and a faster dissociation from the heteromeric receptor. This is an additional mechanism to expand the repertoire of GPCR signaling modulation that could have implications for the control of dopamine signaling in normal and physiopathological conditions.

A Conserved Hydrophobic Core in Gαi1 Regulates G Protein Activation and Release from Activated Receptor.

G protein-coupled receptor-mediated heterotrimeric G protein activation is a major mode of signal transduction in the cell. Previously, we and other groups reported that the α5 helix of Gαi1, especially the hydrophobic interactions in this region, plays a key role during nucleotide release and G protein activation. To further investigate the effect of this hydrophobic core, we disrupted it in Gαi1 by inserting 4 alanine amino acids into the α5 helix between residues Gln(333) and Phe(334) (Ins4A). This extends the length of the α5 helix without disturbing the ß6-α5 loop interactions. This mutant has high basal nucleotide exchange activity yet no receptor-mediated activation of nucleotide exchange. By using structural approaches, we show that this mutant loses critical hydrophobic interactions, leading to significant rearrangements of side chain residues His(57), Phe(189), Phe(191), and Phe(336); it also disturbs the rotation of the α5 helix and the π-π interaction between His(57) and Phe(189) In addition, the insertion mutant abolishes G protein release from the activated receptor after nucleotide binding. Our biochemical and computational data indicate that the interactions between α5, α1, and ß2-ß3 are not only vital for GDP release during G protein activation, but they are also necessary for proper GTP binding (or GDP rebinding). Thus, our studies suggest that this hydrophobic interface is critical for accurate rearrangement of the α5 helix for G protein release from the receptor after GTP binding.

Functional stability of rhodopsin in a bicelle system: evaluating G protein activation by rhodopsin in bicelles.

Rhodopsin is a prototypical member of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This photoreceptor is responsible for initiating the visual signaling transduction cascade upon interaction with its heterotrimeric G protein, transducin (Gt), after light activation. Like all transmembrane proteins, rhodopsin is embedded within a phospholipid bilayer. Many studies have proposed that the membrane composition of this bilayer is an important factor for receptor function during the activation process. Here we describe the methods and assays used to evaluate the function of purified and reconstituted rhodopsin in bicelles.

A conserved phenylalanine as a relay between the α5 helix and the GDP binding region of heterotrimeric Gi protein α subunit.

G protein activation by G protein-coupled receptors is one of the critical steps for many cellular signal transduction pathways. Previously, we and other groups reported that the α5 helix in the G protein α subunit plays a major role during this activation process. However, the precise signaling pathway between the α5 helix and the guanosine diphosphate (GDP) binding pocket remains elusive. Here, using structural, biochemical, and computational techniques, we probed different residues around the α5 helix for their role in signaling. Our data showed that perturbing the Phe-336 residue disturbs hydrophobic interactions with the ß2-ß3 strands and α1 helix, leading to high basal nucleotide exchange. However, mutations in ß strands ß5 and ß6 do not perturb G protein activation. We have highlighted critical residues that leverage Phe-336 as a relay. Conformational changes are transmitted starting from Phe-336 via ß2-ß3/α1 to Switch I and the phosphate binding loop, decreasing the stability of the GDP binding pocket and triggering nucleotide release. When the α1 and α5 helices were cross-linked, inhibiting the receptor-mediated displacement of the C-terminal α5 helix, mutation of Phe-336 still leads to high basal exchange rates. This suggests that unlike receptor-mediated activation, helix 5 rotation and translocation are not necessary for GDP release from the α subunit. Rather, destabilization of the backdoor region of the Gα subunit is sufficient for triggering the activation process.

Energetic analysis of the rhodopsin-G-protein complex links the α5 helix to GDP release.

We present a model of interaction of Gi protein with the activated receptor (R*) rhodopsin, which pinpoints energetic contributions to activation and reconciles the ß2 adrenergic receptor-Gs crystal structure with new and previously published experimental data. In silico analysis demonstrated energetic changes when the Gα C-terminal helix (α5) interacts with the R* cytoplasmic pocket, thus leading to displacement of the helical domain and GDP release. The model features a less dramatic domain opening compared with the crystal structure. The α5 helix undergoes a 63° rotation, accompanied by a 5.7-Å translation, that reorganizes interfaces between α5 and α1 helices and between α5 and ß6-α5. Changes in the ß6-α5 loop displace αG. All of these movements lead to opening of the GDP-binding pocket. The model creates a roadmap for experimental studies of receptor-mediated G-protein activation.

Linking receptor activation to changes in Sw I and II of Gα proteins.

G-protein coupled receptors catalyze nucleotide exchange on G proteins, which results in subunit dissociation and effector activation. In the recent ß2AR-Gs structure, portions of Switch I and II of Gα are not fully elucidated. We paired fluorescence studies of receptor-Gαi interactions with the ß2AR-Gs and other Gi structures to investigate changes in Switch I and II during receptor activation and GTP binding. The ß2/ß3 loop containing Leu194 of Gαi is located between Switches I and II, in close proximity to IC2 of the receptor and the C-terminus of Gα, thus providing an allosteric connection between these Switches and receptor activation. We compared the environment of residues in myristoylated Gαi proteins in the heterotrimer to that upon receptor activation and subsequent GTP binding. Upon receptor activation, residues in both Switch regions are less solvent-exposed, as compared to the heterotrimer. Upon GTPγS binding, the environment of several residues in Switch I resemble the receptor-bound state, while Switch II residues display effects on their environment which are consistent with their role in GTP binding and Gßγ dissociation. The ability to merge available crystal structures with solution studies is a powerful tool to gain insight into conformational changes associated with receptor-mediated Gi protein activation.

Myristoylation exerts direct and allosteric effects on Gα conformation and dynamics in solution.

Coupling of heterotrimeric G proteins to activated G protein-coupled receptors results in nucleotide exchange on the Gα subunit, which in turn decreases its affinity for both Gßγ and activated receptors. N-Terminal myristoylation of Gα subunits aids in membrane localization of inactive G proteins. Despite the presence of the covalently attached myristoyl group, Gα proteins are highly soluble after GTP binding. This study investigated factors facilitating the solubility of the activated, myristoylated protein. In doing so, we also identified myristoylation-dependent differences in regions of Gα known to play important roles in interactions with receptors, effectors, and nucleotide binding. Amide hydrogen-deuterium exchange and site-directed fluorescence of activated proteins revealed a solvent-protected amino terminus that was enhanced by myristoylation. Furthermore, fluorescence quenching confirmed that the myristoylated amino terminus is in proximity to the Switch II region in the activated protein. Myristoylation also stabilized the interaction between the guanine ring and the base of the α5 helix that contacts the bound nucleotide. The allosteric effects of myristoylation on protein structure, function, and localization indicate that the myristoylated amino terminus of Gα(i) functions as a myristoyl switch, with implications for myristoylation in the stabilization of nucleotide binding and in the spatial regulation of G protein signaling.

Cell contact-dependent functional selectivity of ß2-adrenergic receptor ligands in stimulating cAMP accumulation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation.

Activation of ß(2)-adrenegic receptor (ß(2)-AR) leads to an increase in intracellular cAMP and activation of ERK. These two signals are activated by the interaction of the receptor with different transducer partners. We showed that the intrinsic activities of ß(2)-AR ligands for stimulating cAMP production and ERK phosphorylation responses in HEK-293 cells were not correlated. The lack of correlation resulted mainly from the discrepancy between the intrinsic activities of two groups of ligands for these two responses: The first group consisted of clenbuterol, cimaterol, procaterol, and terbutaline which acted as full agonists for cAMP production but displayed very weak effect on ERK phosphorylation. The second group comprised adrenaline and noradrenaline which displayed higher intrinsic activity for the ERK phosphorylation than for the cAMP response. Thus, both groups behaved as functionally selective ligands. The functional selectivity of the first group was observable only in adherent cells when confluence was approximately 100%. When cell-cell contact was minimized either by decreasing the density of the adherent cells or by bringing the cells into suspension, the first group of ligands gained the ability to stimulate ERK phosphorylation without a change in their effect on cAMP production. In contrast, selectivity of the second group was independent of the adherence state of the cells. Our results show that the inherent "bias" of ligands in coupling a G protein-coupled receptor to different transducers may not always be revealed as functional selectivity when there is a "cross-talk" between the signaling pathways activated by the same receptor.

Allosteric mechanisms of G protein-Coupled Receptor signaling: a structural perspective.

G protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) use a complex series of intramolecular conformational changes to couple agonist binding to the binding and activation of cognate heterotrimeric G protein (Gαßγ). The mechanisms underlying this long-range activation have been identified using a variety of biochemical and structural approaches and have primarily used visual signal transduction via the GPCR rhodopsin and cognate heterotrimeric G protein transducin (G(t)) as a model system. In this chapter, we review the methods that have revealed allosteric signaling through rhodopsin and transducin. These methods can be applied to a variety of GPCR-mediated signaling pathways.

Long and short distance movements of ß(2)-adrenoceptor in cell membrane assessed by photoconvertible fluorescent protein dendra2-ß(2)-adrenoceptor fusion.

Local movements of receptors in the plasma membrane have been extensively studied, as it is generally believed that the dynamics of membrane distribution of receptors regulate their functions. However, the properties of large-scale (>5µm) receptor movements in the membrane are relatively obscure. In the present study, we addressed the question as to whether the large-scale movement of receptor in the plasma membrane at the whole cell level can be explained quantitatively by its local diffusive properties. We used HEK 293 cells transfected with human ß2-adrenoceptor fused to photoconvertible fluorescent protein dendra2 as a model system; and found that 1) functional integrity of the dendra2-tagged receptor remains apparently intact; 2) in a mesoscopic scale (~4µm), ~90% of the receptors are mobile on average, and receptor influx to, and out-flux from a membrane area can be symmetrically explained by a diffusion-like process with an effective diffusion coefficient of ~0.1µm(2)/s; 3) these mobility parameters are not affected by the activity state of the receptor (assessed by using constitutively active receptor mutants); 4) in the macroscopic scale (4-40µm), although a slowly diffusing fraction of receptors (with D<0.01µm(2)/s) is identifiable in some cases, the movement of the predominant fraction is perfectly explained by the same effective diffusion process observed in the mesoscopic scale, suggesting that the large scale structure of the cell membrane as felt by the receptor is apparently homogeneous in terms of its mesoscopic properties. We also showed that intracellular compartments and plasma membrane are kinetically connected even at steady-state.

Interaction of a G protein with an activated receptor opens the interdomain interface in the alpha subunit.

In G-protein signaling, an activated receptor catalyzes GDP/GTP exchange on the G(α) subunit of a heterotrimeric G protein. In an initial step, receptor interaction with G(α) acts to allosterically trigger GDP release from a binding site located between the nucleotide binding domain and a helical domain, but the molecular mechanism is unknown. In this study, site-directed spin labeling and double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy are employed to reveal a large-scale separation of the domains that provides a direct pathway for nucleotide escape. Cross-linking studies show that the domain separation is required for receptor enhancement of nucleotide exchange rates. The interdomain opening is coupled to receptor binding via the C-terminal helix of G(α), the extension of which is a high-affinity receptor binding element.

Coupling efficiency of rhodopsin and transducin in bicelles.

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) can be activated by various extracellular stimuli, including hormones, peptides, odorants, neurotransmitters, nucleotides, or light. After activation, receptors interact with heterotrimeric G proteins and catalyze GDP release from the Gα subunit, the rate limiting step in G protein activation, to form a high affinity nucleotide-free GPCR-G protein complex. In vivo, subsequent GTP binding reduces affinity of the Gα protein for the activated receptor. In this study, we investigated the biochemical and structural characteristics of the prototypical GPCR, rhodopsin, and its signaling partner, transducin (G(t)), in bicelles to better understand the effects of membrane composition on high affinity complex formation, stability, and receptor mediated nucleotide release. Our results demonstrate that the high-affinity complex (rhodopsin-G(t)(empty)) forms more readily and has dramatically increased stability when rhodopsin is integrated into bicelles of a defined composition. We increased the half-life of functional complex to 1 week in the presence of negatively charged phospholipids. These data suggest that a membrane-like structure is an important contributor to the formation and stability of functional receptor-G protein complexes and can extend the range of studies that investigate properties of these complexes.

beta2-Adrenoceptor, Gs and adenylate cyclase coupling in purified detergent-resistant, low density membrane fractions.

Membrane rafts and caveolae are specialized microdomains of the cell membrane that form physical platforms for compartmentalization of signalling molecules. Here, we intended to gain insight into the consequences of caveolar localization in G protein-coupled receptor function. We analysed beta(2)-adrenoceptor signalling in purified CRLDF (caveolin-rich low density fractions) of beta(2)-adrenoceptor-overexpressing HEK-293 cells. beta(2)-adrenoceptor and Gs immunoreactivities and forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity were all detected in CRLDF obtained by the conventional raft purification method that uses Triton X-100 solubilization. However, Triton X-100 caused a complete loss of the functional coupling between beta(2)-adrenoceptor, Gs and adenylate cyclase. Therefore, we developed an optimized purification method based on n-octyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside solubilization, where the functional properties of beta(2)-adrenoceptor, Gs and adenylate cyclase were preserved in the CRLDF. Using this method, we showed that isoproterenol-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity was similar in CRLDF and bulk membrane preparations of HEK-293 cells that overexpress beta(2)-adrenoceptor or beta(2)-adrenoceptor-Gs fusion. Accordingly, treatment of cells with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, a caveola-disrupting agent, did not affect beta(2)-adrenoceptor-induced cAMP response. Likewise, these responses were insensitive to caveolin 1 and 2 overexpression. On the other hand, methyl-beta-cyclodextrin treatment did decrease beta(2)-adrenoceptor-induced ERK phosphorylation. However, the latter effect of methyl-beta-cyclodextrin could be attributed to a non-specific effect rather than its ability to disrupt membrane microdomains. We showed that localization in the raft microdomains did not affect the signalling efficiency of beta(2)-adrenoceptor-Gs-adenylate cyclase pathway, and that methyl-beta-cyclodextrin may inhibit signalling by directly affecting the signalling system independently of its caveola-disrupting property.